2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary supporters don't go to rallies, don't vote in internet polls, what DO they do???
I mean seriously, where the hell ARE they? There are some here at DU, I'll admit, but they are clearly outnumbered by Bernie supporters. Even Hillary supporters will admit to that.
So, where are all the Hillary supporters?? Is there some secret place on the internet I can find them all hanging out together, like some game of sardines?? Or do they wait by their land-line phones all day, waiting for Gallup to call them? Inquiring minds would like to know.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Polls seem to indicate that there will be plenty this time around.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)what else ya got?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)AND vote in polls at the same time.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Hardly the demographic to put their life on hold and rush to the internet to vote in an online poll.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Where is this internet you are talking about that I have to put my life on hold to reach?
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I'm a Bernie fan.
I also work in public relations for the tech industry.
I know how to send an email, vote in a poll, read and write on social media sites and talk to my family at the same time. It's really not that hard anymore. I mean, it's not like I'm having to put my life on hold while waiting for the AOL dial buzz or something.
Geesch.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Invalidates them then there really is no discussion.
Sanders supporters purposely overwhelming online polls indicates nothing more than Bernie supporters decided to overwhelm the polls.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)And yes the effect of a debate will be measured in the polling that happens between now and the next debate.
I'm not sure what make outfit is first up with a poll taken after the debate, but I have no doubt that one side or the other will be quoting the Reuters silliness at the end of this week while we wait.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)trueblue2007
(19,251 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Don't get too caught up in the craziness.
Stay cool my friend.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)I'm not putting down rallies but I was with Howard Dean in 2003-2004 and he had big rallies & he had lots of "meet-ups" and support on the internet. But in the end it didn't get him any primary wins beyond his home state. Now, Bernie is doing better than that, I agree, but big crowds at rallies don't necessarily elect a president.
Obama got crowds and had support on the internet.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)believe that without the online activism, he might not have won that election.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)and getting out the vote that got him elected.
artislife
(9,497 posts)If you got to Feelthe bern you would see there is an area for your state and what is going on. A lot of what is going on in my state is how to register events in libraries along with how to caucus workshops. The ground crew for Obama didn't all turn to H this election cycle. There are a lot of pretrained organizers.
At the events, there are people walking up and down the lines with information on how to register to vote, sign up sheets etc.
Don't worry, we are mobilized.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I was responding to the ridiculous assertion that the on line presence of Obama supporters is what won him the election.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)wilsonbooks
(972 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I am not rich and have given a few dollars.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)we've had plent of links here on DU indicating 90+% of Hillary's money comes from small (Under $100 I believe was said) donations.
you sound petualnt and snide with that comment.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)They can be counted on to go to the polls and cast their votes. That's where they go.
artislife
(9,497 posts)that Bernie supporters won't.
Because since he hasn't run for president before, there is no hard data on whether his national supporters will get out the vote.
But you could look at his past elections to see if people have, indeed, shown up and pulled the lever, so to speak.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)If you want a look into how they will vote, just keep following the polls. Wishing doesn't make anything so. And I've been looking at past elections since 1960. Who wins depends on a lot more factors than policy positions. While they're important to some, for many, other factors influence the decision.
Watch out for confirmation bias on discussion forums like this one. DU doesn't reflect the general voting population in any way. It doesn't even reflect Democratic voting behavior very well.
artislife
(9,497 posts)From where I take the pulse of the nation.
Not by a long shot.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)Good luck with that.
Don't worry, nothing is brewing...not one damn thing...heh
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and yes, I know that's not a strictly accurate quote but it captures the spirit of the OP.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Complete with infographs from many multiple sources
http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/1955149/sanders-cashes-clintons-emails-tune-1-3-million/
The OP has a good question. What's up with this? Why is it that every single internet source shows Bernie absolutely crushing Hillary? Where are her supporters?
It's a very valid question.
Look at this.

leftynyc
(26,060 posts)But I haven't ever missed an election since my 18th birthday. I would imagine there are plenty of us.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)because most American's these days do just that, many on both.
Check it;
"As of January 2014, 74% of online adults use social networking sites."
http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/
I'm leary of having a big social network footprint. That's as a result of the Bush administration. I don't trust republicans.
artislife
(9,497 posts)that those who do, don't vote.
hmm.
You have no basis in fact because we have not seen Bernie in a national election, therefore we haven't seen whether the Bernie supporters actually show up to vote.
We have seen his supporters show up and vote on a city and state level, though.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)so comfortable shoving words into my mouth? The ACTUAL implication that was made was that because Bernie won on twitter and facebook that it was the Hillary voters that weren't excited or planning to vote. I was simply pointing out that simply was not true and you somehow decided to say I implied something that simply was not there. I'm done with this stupid conversation.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to do with facebook and twitter? Those were the topics of conversation.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)To Hillary supporters regions of the internet that are unfavorable to her are cast as a bunch of click happy kids but magically somehow there are other regions of the internet that are aok and worthy of soending time on.
Or theres the sentimwnt that Hillary supporters are too adroit and do not have enough time to be on Facebook or whatever but yet they post here nonstop everyday the same crap over and over.
To me its a big bunch of hypocrisy writ large.
Peronally, in my opinion, it is highly offensive.
In other words don't be on an internet forum board posting non stop then act like being another part of the internet is meaningless.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I post "non-stop"? And I never called facebook or twitter meaningless (where do you get this stuff?). Just look at the heading of this OP - the implication being that since Hillary supporters are not on social media, we don't exist in the online universe. There is nothing hypocritical about it - I think social media is fine for those who like it but it says nothing about those who don't. Your persecution complex is leading you to make charges that 1. don't make sense and 2. are complete bullshit.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to show where I post "non-stop" the same things over and over again. It should be a magnificent waste of your time but will prove your post was nothing but bullshit. So go ahead and prove me wrong.
artislife
(9,497 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)And second, that's since 2002 when I joined DU - so let's see -15,000 posts over 13 years averages to 3 per day. That's what you call non-stop? And let's not forget the charge that I post the same thing over and over again. Go ahead and prove it.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Next time don't make charges you can't back up and I wont have to embarrass you.
artislife
(9,497 posts)You are tightly wound this morning! I suggest some lavendar and a massage. It will help release all that tension.
http://www.massagetherapy.com/learnmore/benefits.php
Feel Better!!
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)I do have Facebook, but I have it filtered so I don't have to see most of the crap that's on there that I don't want to see. I use it exclusively to be in touch with friends and family. Twitter I don't do. Seems like just another version of Facebook to me and everyone I know is on Facebook, so that is good enough. I don't have an iPhone or iPad. I have a simple work cell phone. I'm probably a rarity for someone born at the tail end of Gen X. It is true that most the people my age have iPhones and are on them constantly. I think a lot of people don't think about how much time that technology is consuming in their lives. Since I work in tech, I can't stay away from computers and the internet altogether, but I try my best to moderate myself. I try to make sure I spend most of my free time off the internet instead of on it. Plus, I have kids and I want to teach them to not be internet junkies. Not sure how good of a job I am doing with that, but I keep trying.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)but am an adroid gal for a smartphone. The ipad was a gift. My niece keeps nagging me to get on facebook but honestly, I'm just not interested. Twitter seems like an excellent device for breaking news but for anything else it seems redundant so not interested in that either (I get late breaking news alerts on my smartphone so it's not like I'm missing anything). I think I'll take what this younger generation has to say more seriously when more of them get off their lazy asses and vote.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)don't you? It's a joke. She was a very clever writer and one of the best film critics ever.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)She actually said: "I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don't know. They're outside my ken. But sometimes when I'm in a theater I can feel them."
Which I think also kind of captures the feeling of some Sanders supporters.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)TBH, I don't feel the need to go to rallies OR vote in meaningless online "polls."
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)apparently twitter is just a discovery with some campaigns. She has 4.47 million followers.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Response to Historic NY (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandySF
(84,319 posts)Work. Take my kid to school and/or pick him up. Help with homework. Take him to his games or recitals. Read. Watch TV/movie. Donate. Vote.
RandySF
(84,319 posts)Autumn
(48,962 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Working for a living. Donating our time to phone banks. I personally don't like crowds so never show at a rally but haven't missed a vote since I'm 18 (I'm 54). I also don't answer calls from numbers I don't know so I can't be waiting for a polling company to be calling. Why do all of you sound like Romney and the unskewed polls dude from 2012?
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)tritsofme
(19,900 posts)If crowds elect people...or ballots.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Just because people buy and drink RC cola, it doesn't mean it is as big and far reaching as Coke.
Those two examples fade when details are scrutinized.
global1
(26,507 posts)It's a new world out there and many political consultants don't know how to function in it and use it to their advantage. They are old school. They will be looking back at the 2016 race for the WH and will have to alter their strategies going forward or lose their jobs as political consultants going forward to those that understand the impact and importance of the internet and social media.
reddread
(6,896 posts)or whatever it is.
thinking of ways to use all those Billionaire Bucks
Zorra
(27,670 posts)MSM, twitter followers, internet trolls, endorsements, all campaign needs, etc, ad nauseum.
I don't even see Hillary bumper stickers anywhere.
It's not like they have to choose between either donating $20 to finance her campaign, or not paying the electric bill this month.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)These are thoughts that become real to individuals when they hang out in echo chambers.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Now I have felt pain for a second time. That knock on your door thirty minutes ago was a live Hillary supporter wanting to talk to you. I know you got a little nervous and were trying to figure out where the knock was coming from your computer. There is a whole world out there. Knock Knock. Check your front door. It wasn't your computer fan going bad. lol. Have a wonderful day.
quickesst
(6,309 posts).... believe that pissing, moaning, groaning, and crying loudly is showing more support for their candidate as opposed to the quiet confidence Hillary's supporters have. That confidence has been twisted into the false memes created by some of Bernie's supporters such as "The Anointed One, it's her turn, or the chosen one" etc. It's all you have to remember. They created them, not us.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)quickesst
(6,309 posts)... it should make sense appropriate to my statement. Thanks
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I'd STILL like an answer.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I would imagine Hillary supporters have roughly the same internet access as Bernie supporters. And especially since she has millions of social media followers, why aren't they burning up the internet like Sanders supporters are?
artislife
(9,497 posts)This site and the monster site they just created.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)eom
Cosmocat
(15,424 posts)and apparently vote in polls?
If they are such despicable people why concern yourself with them?
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)They aren't welcome on DU at the moment and that's unfortunate. It's easier to get shit done in an environment that isn't full of hate and teeth gnashing. So they are probably getting shit done elsewhere.
But don't worry, they will be here in full force after Hillary wins the nomination and the terms of service kick in.
Until then, enjoy your echo chamber.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)so they outnumber bernie supporters but leave because they can't handle those who support bernie? your the ones living in echo
chamber.
keep dreaming bernie is going to win and no amount of spin from MSM will change that.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)But I'm the dreamer...
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)FSogol
(47,623 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)FSogol
(47,623 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)They know corporate America will take care of them.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)The 1% are her sponsors; they know she'll do what they want her to do.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)In voting for her or attend any of her events
Sanders supporters are everywhere!
Maybe once every other day I will see a car with a Hillary sticker but every day I see multiple cars with Sanders stickers!
Perhaps she thinks she can buy the votes like Facebook likes she appears to have bought the pundits so it is not out of the realm of probability
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)If you don't know anyone who supports Clinton, you have a very limited group of acquaintances.
YabaDabaNoDinoNo
(460 posts)Conservatives some would support her
Alas, life is to short to hang out with conservatives so it looks like I will not be meeting any HRC supporters anytime soon
That is if they exist IRL
Heck I don't even think I would want to hang out with anyone who thinks she should be POTUS.
Pointless to be friends too nothing in common and no shared values.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)But then again, I interact with a lot of people IRL.
I'm sociable that way I guess.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)trueblue2007
(19,251 posts)trueblue2007
(19,251 posts)Slamming a legitimate Candidate and millions of supporters. SHAME SHAME ON YOU.
Lancero
(3,276 posts)It's a site by and for Hillary Clinton supporters, so they tend to congregate their.
She has many supporters, though the site is getting off to a slow start. Right now they have just over 10k registered members, but more will come once they start spreading the word.
...Wait, they don't have 10k members? Not even 5k? Nor 1k? But... Supporters, site by and for them, why don't they join it?
Ok, a really slow start then with a few hundred members - What? Only 94? Thats... wow. Do they even care enough to spread the word to her supporters?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Bernie has all the momentum right now.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)JI7
(93,617 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)See ya March 1st Super Tuesday
taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)I don't have time for shit like twitter and facebook.
My wife, a big Hillary supporter, also runs her own business. She didn't even watch one second of the debate.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)I really don't get all this "the internets is for kids" samctimony literally posted on an internet forum board with no hint of irony whatsoever.
artislife
(9,497 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)riversedge
(80,812 posts)not to demean yourself and other Democrats next time you post.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)That's not enough motivation to do anything other than wave hands around moaning about Republicans, flinching at Sarah Palin and cuddling in the dark whenever Coulter opens her mouth.
They don't care about Clinton beyond the extent to which they can present her as something that ISN'T something else.
She's not a Republican. She's not a man. She's not a silly ideologue. BTW, she's still not a Republican.
DU has an extremely wide range of contributions from a huge number of people. There is a small minority whose primary goal is to get diagonal.
You'll have noticed that the vast majority of the Clinton supporters that escaped to the Other Site That Shall Not Be Named are people who have spent their entire time here coming up with contributions that oppose something that someone else has said. They have high post counts and a history of long exchanges of the "ner ner ner that's your opinion" variety, ideas that are information-lite, opinion-heavy, emotive, largely disinterested in whatever anyone else says. They also have a propensity to pretend that their correspondents on DU have all sorts of personality flaws and are out to get them, they use this as an excuse for foul behaviour. Politics, for them, is a lightning conductor.
They view politics as a giant argument. And so they're obviously far more interested in the Opponent than any genuinely useful activity acheivable by their own side. There's a deep need for the acheivement to NOT be what the Opponent wants, they have very little in the way of any external validation for the positions they repeatedly leap to at the drop of a hat.
If other people disagree with them, they must have been in the right to start with.
I don't think that's a terribly useful way of thinking about politics. It's structureless and vulnerable to all sorts of messy, self-generated internal contradictions.
artislife
(9,497 posts)sorry my reply isn't nearly as gifted.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)"Or do they wait by their land-line phones all day waiting for Gallup to call them?"
I could be wrong but, I would imagine Hillary supporters already know her and they don't have that same excitement about her as the Bernie supporters have about him, he is the unknown entity in this election. So, I'm not surprised that Bernies supporters/fans are very excited about this election, and they should be.
Fearless
(18,458 posts)BooScout
(10,410 posts)...that HRCers don't spend enough time voting on internet polls that at the end of the day are meaningless and prove nothing.
Why am I even bothering to take the time to respond to this?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Bernie Sanders followers are really losing touch with reality it seems.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)about how their candidate IS the next president.
You know, just like they did in 2008.
SharonClark
(10,497 posts)I work, have a house and garden to maintain and dogs to walk. I'm on the board of several all volunteer non-profits, I'm on the democratic county central committee, I door knock for candidates, I organize events, I go to the theatre and concerts several times a week, I drink wine and Single Malt Scotch. I usually run my presidential precinct caucus and register voters. Guess I don't have time to worry about internet polls.