2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPlease explain how to sell Ayn Rand to low-information voters in 30 seconds...
...and make them care about her and what she represents.
Conservative Activists know who she was and what she advocated and love her.
Liberal Activists know who she was and what she advocated and hate her.
The remaining 4-5% of the electorate haven't read her, don't know who she was, and aren't going to sit around for a literature/Poli Sci class explaining her theories, and how they link to the Romney/Ryan campaign.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)elleng
(131,053 posts)Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected all forms of faith and religion. She supported rational and ethical egoism, and rejected ethical altruism. In politics, she condemned the initiation of force as immoral and opposed all forms of collectivism and statism, instead supporting laissez-faire capitalism, which she believed was the only social system that protected individual rights.
brooklynite
(94,679 posts)Is professional wrestling on TNT or the SYFY channel?
Butterbean
(1,014 posts)somebody who read Atlas Shrugged cover to cover and knows exactly what her philosophies are, but also knows the average joe's eyes will glaze over in about 2 seconds with an explanation that complicated. Sort of like mine do when my husband starts talking about computers.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)brooklynite
(94,679 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)rejected all forms of faith and religion. rejected ethical altruism, which means a moral obligation to help, serve, or benefit others, if necessary, at the sacrifice of self interest.
In other words, athiest who rejected any thought that people should help others, completly UN-Christian, as noted by the Nuns on the Bus and Friars.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)With my memory I'd have to hand out cards with that written on it lol
Good work !
I can use that short explanation when phone banking.
elleng
(131,053 posts)so can I!
ronwelldobbs
(28 posts)Lucy Goosey
(2,940 posts)...and that her atheism is an integral part of her philosophy. Then tell them she viewed altruism as evil and selfishness as good. That covers a lot of it, really.
LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)Short as I could get it.
budkin
(6,713 posts)From what I can remember, there were the creators who worked hard and made innovation possible and then everyone else was a bunch of lazy slugs who didn't deserve any kind of handouts or help.
Herlong
(649 posts)Trains good. Poor bad. via 1957. We are talking Ann Rand right
edit for "poor bad" in any Ann Randian generation
Trains is short but "poor bad" is what you need to know without reading the books.
longship
(40,416 posts)Especially the former.
Response to longship (Reply #13)
Herlong This message was self-deleted by its author.
Care to clarify?
Herlong
(649 posts)Poor personal hygiene; poor mental acuity.
Especially the former.
longship
(40,416 posts)I heard that years ago, and again recently, after the Ryan nom.
I mentioned her mental acuity because of her idiotic political positions. I meant it as a pure ad hominem attack. Deservably so. She was a dispicible person.
Springslips
(533 posts)That she is from Russia and loved selfishness, a very unamerican idea.
RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)According to Anton Szandor LaVey, founder and first high priest of the Church of Satan.
http://www.theprovocation.net/2011/09/tea-party-owes-more-to-church-of-satan.html
MADem
(135,425 posts)30 minutes of batshit crazy....
steve2470
(37,457 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)There are other instances of it being posted, in three separate parts, but that's the only version (and it's a good quality one, too) that I could find that was the whole kit-n-kaboodle together. Not sure about the political enthusiasms of the person who slapped it up on the net, but in any event, it's a fascinating--if creepy--portrait!
patrice
(47,992 posts)I should listen to it again and take notes.
Just a couple of sketchy things now:
Reality is an objective absolute.
Logic is the only meaning there is.
No political choices (That struck me as being quite similar to "No difference between Democrats and Republicans" .
Altruism is the hateful master of all in all.
.....................
It's very clear that most if not all of the opposition's rhetoric is deliberately designed out of Ayn Rand's specific words. I knew there was a relationship, but this is more than that.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That's the riff we've been hearing from those monsters for years, and they learned it at Cruella's...er...Ayn's bony knee!
patrice
(47,992 posts)generations, some of them anyway, are already inclined to take the next step.
MADem
(135,425 posts)My needs are simple at this stage in my life. I have enough money to be comfortable now and take care of those near and dear to me. I could work and make serious scratch, but it would probably shorten my life and leave me NOT free to help people out here and there.
patrice
(47,992 posts)someone, anyone, not just those that their ministers tell them deserve certain approved "help", but what the people themselves actually identify about their own needs.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Shopping, the doctor, rides to the polls, stuff like that. The public support for that kind of stuff is there to some extent, but it's not always convenient for people with health issues. I'll change the odd light bulb and be the "hovering presence" when a handyman is needed, too, so folks don't get ripped off.
Hell, I figure someday I'll be relying on a little help myself--what goes around, comes around!
It's not like it's a big sacrifice, either--a lot of these more experienced citizens have a lot of wisdom. Some even have coffee and PIE!!!
patrice
(47,992 posts)the unconscious physiological sense of threat to one's existence acquired in a culture in which members do not help one another unless there's some kind of reward, financial, social, or religious, in it. Think of our species before civilization, and especially capitalism, happened to it, MOST of its existence, when helping was an instinct.
ronwelldobbs
(28 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,762 posts)bhikkhu
(10,720 posts)...who sits at the foundation of the character of the youthful and energetic GOP VP choice. What we need now is an experienced and steady hand on the wheel; a young and enthusiastic radical elitist social engineer is not what we need.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)Reluctantly admitted by another one.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)The lower you go the more religious.
patrice
(47,992 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)Response to brooklynite (Original post)
struggle4progress This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
struggle4progress This message was self-deleted by its author.
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)Jim__
(14,082 posts)Sick of the GOP
(65 posts).
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Sick of the GOP
(65 posts).
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)Raven
(13,899 posts)do not deserve to live and do not deserve to be loved. The very opposite of Christian teaching. She would be endorsing the R/R ticket if she were alive.
Poiuyt
(18,129 posts)That says it all to me. How can you be proud of that?
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)She was an author who advocated a philsophy of greed. For Ayn Rand, there was no such thing as a community and no such thing as charity. People should act in their own selfish self-interest and never mind the consequences to anybody else. One could consider her philosophy the exact opposite of what is taught in the Bible or in just about any other religious creed. And even most atheists reject her views as immoral.
Sick of the GOP
(65 posts)I've read both the Old & New Testaments and from my understanding, Jesus (not that I believe in him), would spit on Ayn Rand. Not just on her, but in her face. Yet "Christians" support her more than atheists. When you add in the research that shows more atheists than Christians have read the Bible...
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)Sick of the GOP
(65 posts)Low-info voters'll flock to her like flies on shit.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)But I think she was published at a time when we were steeped in the hate and fear of the Communist manifesto.
She seemed to be writing against the collective and having a share in everything vs the pride and drive an individual has in a personal struggle to succeed and thrive.
I remember seeing that book laying around our house and my parents were liberal. Seems like it was considered an intellectual undertaking back in the
60's mostly condeming Communism and championing Capitalism.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Ann Coulter.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)who borrowed a lot of her ideas from the founder of Marxism. Educated during the Russian Revolution and emigrated to the US when she was 21.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Monk06
(7,675 posts)She has all the intellectual depth of Robert Heinlein or Frank Herbert
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Monk06 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Monk06 This message was self-deleted by its author.
cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)AynR = Ryan interesting coincidence.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Get all the results of satanism, without having to worship satan!