Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:34 PM
monmouth4 (9,064 posts)
"I would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency." Goldman Sach's CEO
Lloyd Blankfein...That really bothers me and it should bother you too...
|
19 replies, 3548 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
monmouth4 | Oct 2015 | OP |
Rosa Luxemburg | Oct 2015 | #1 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Oct 2015 | #8 | |
Catherina | Oct 2015 | #15 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Oct 2015 | #19 | |
whatchamacallit | Oct 2015 | #2 | |
BootinUp | Oct 2015 | #3 | |
restorefreedom | Oct 2015 | #4 | |
global1 | Oct 2015 | #5 | |
Catherina | Oct 2015 | #6 | |
Cassiopeia | Oct 2015 | #7 | |
passiveporcupine | Oct 2015 | #9 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Oct 2015 | #10 | |
dsc | Oct 2015 | #11 | |
monmouth4 | Oct 2015 | #12 | |
dsc | Oct 2015 | #13 | |
TBF | Oct 2015 | #14 | |
cyberswede | Oct 2015 | #16 | |
KoKo | Oct 2015 | #17 | |
Robbins | Oct 2015 | #18 |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:38 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
1. I guess he will head for the hills when Bernie is president?
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:29 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,919 posts)
8. hahaha! Tru dat!
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:41 AM
Catherina (35,568 posts)
15. Call me crazy
![]() |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:42 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
2. Duh
Anyone with a functioning brain knows what's happening here. Hillary is status quo.
|
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:44 PM
BootinUp (44,384 posts)
3. When did he say it and why do you believe him?
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:47 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
4. wow he will be really bumming
when neither of them gets the nom
and i expect him to be catatonic when bernie wins the wh. |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 10:03 PM
global1 (24,569 posts)
5. Now You Know Why They Called Them The "Presumptive Nominees".....
and why they blacked out Bernie and why they are afraid of Bernie and why they are worried about Trump's success and the possibility of him becoming the Repug nominee.
They want a Clinton v Bush general election because they know they win either way. Anybody else spells trouble for them because they don't control Bernie or The Donald. Blankfein's comments should put us all on notice. The powers that be have spoken. This is why we need a revolution lest we totally lose control our our country. |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 10:20 PM
Catherina (35,568 posts)
6. Of course he would
![]() |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:20 AM
Cassiopeia (2,603 posts)
7. Exactly.
HRC isn't a tool of the 1%, she is the 1%.
|
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:37 AM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
9. Well, that is pretty clear isn't it?
Come on down Bernie!
![]() |
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:36 AM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
10. He wouldn't have hired them if he wasn't fond of them.
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:31 AM
dsc (51,780 posts)
11. and what bothers me is no link
no context, no nothing.
|
Response to dsc (Reply #11)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:37 AM
monmouth4 (9,064 posts)
12. Here is a portion of it..
An O’Malley spokesperson pointed us to an article published in March 2015 in Politico magazine. In it, economic reporter Ben White detailed Blankfein’s close relationship with the Clintons and wrote,"Blankfein has indicated he would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jun/02/martin-omalley/had-goldman-sachs-ceo-said-his-picks-are-hillary-c/ |
Response to monmouth4 (Reply #12)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:38 AM
dsc (51,780 posts)
13. where, when, and how
oh and btw you still have provided no link at all even to the politico piece.
|
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:33 AM
TBF (31,869 posts)
14. And that is yet another reason to vote for Bernie. nt
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:44 AM
cyberswede (26,117 posts)
16. Oy veh.
Yes, that is pretty illuminating.
|
Response to monmouth4 (Original post)
Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:52 PM
Robbins (5,066 posts)
18. except
many dems don't care.Goldman sach's ceo fine with Clinton In white house doesn't matter to them.
|