2016 Postmortem

monmouth4

(10,780 posts) Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:34 PM Oct 2015

"I would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency." Goldman Sach's CEO

Lloyd Blankfein...That really bothers me and it should bother you too...

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"I would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency." Goldman Sach's CEO (Original Post) monmouth4 Oct 2015 OP

I guess he will head for the hills when Bernie is president? Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2015 #1

hahaha! Tru dat! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #8

Call me crazy Catherina Oct 2015 #15

LOL! Rosa Luxemburg Oct 2015 #19

Duh whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #2

When did he say it and why do you believe him? BootinUp Oct 2015 #3

wow he will be really bumming restorefreedom Oct 2015 #4

Now You Know Why They Called Them The "Presumptive Nominees"..... global1 Oct 2015 #5

Of course he would Catherina Oct 2015 #6

Exactly. Cassiopeia Oct 2015 #7

Well, that is pretty clear isn't it? passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #9

He wouldn't have hired them if he wasn't fond of them. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #10

and what bothers me is no link dsc Oct 2015 #11

Here is a portion of it.. monmouth4 Oct 2015 #12

where, when, and how dsc Oct 2015 #13

And that is yet another reason to vote for Bernie. nt TBF Oct 2015 #14

Oy veh. cyberswede Oct 2015 #16

Yes--K&R! KoKo Oct 2015 #17

except Robbins Oct 2015 #18

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)

1. I guess he will head for the hills when Bernie is president?

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:38 PM

Oct 2015

InAbLuEsTaTe

(25,518 posts)

8. hahaha! Tru dat!

Reply to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:29 AM

Oct 2015

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

Catherina

(35,568 posts)

15. Call me crazy

Reply to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #1)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:41 AM

Oct 2015

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)

19. LOL!

Reply to Catherina (Reply #15)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 10:10 PM

Oct 2015

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)

2. Duh

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:42 PM

Oct 2015

Anyone with a functioning brain knows what's happening here. Hillary is status quo.

BootinUp

(51,645 posts)

3. When did he say it and why do you believe him?

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:44 PM

Oct 2015

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)

4. wow he will be really bumming

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 09:47 PM

Oct 2015

when neither of them gets the nom

and i expect him to be catatonic when bernie wins the wh.

global1

(26,507 posts)

5. Now You Know Why They Called Them The "Presumptive Nominees".....

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 10:03 PM

Oct 2015

and why they blacked out Bernie and why they are afraid of Bernie and why they are worried about Trump's success and the possibility of him becoming the Repug nominee.

They want a Clinton v Bush general election because they know they win either way.

Anybody else spells trouble for them because they don't control Bernie or The Donald.

Blankfein's comments should put us all on notice.

The powers that be have spoken.

This is why we need a revolution lest we totally lose control our our country.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)

6. Of course he would

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Mon Oct 19, 2015, 10:20 PM

Oct 2015

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)

7. Exactly.

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:20 AM

Oct 2015

HRC isn't a tool of the 1%, she is the 1%.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)

9. Well, that is pretty clear isn't it?

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:37 AM

Oct 2015

Come on down Bernie!

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)

10. He wouldn't have hired them if he wasn't fond of them.

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 01:36 AM

Oct 2015

dsc

(53,445 posts)

11. and what bothers me is no link

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:31 AM

Oct 2015

no context, no nothing.

monmouth4

(10,780 posts)

12. Here is a portion of it..

Reply to dsc (Reply #11)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:37 AM

Oct 2015

An O’Malley spokesperson pointed us to an article published in March 2015 in Politico magazine. In it, economic reporter Ben White detailed Blankfein’s close relationship with the Clintons and wrote,"Blankfein has indicated he would be fine with either a Bush or Clinton presidency."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jun/02/martin-omalley/had-goldman-sachs-ceo-said-his-picks-are-hillary-c/

dsc

(53,445 posts)

13. where, when, and how

Reply to monmouth4 (Reply #12)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 08:38 AM

Oct 2015

oh and btw you still have provided no link at all even to the politico piece.

TBF

(37,197 posts)

14. And that is yet another reason to vote for Bernie. nt

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:33 AM

Oct 2015

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)

16. Oy veh.

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 11:44 AM

Oct 2015

Yes, that is pretty illuminating.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)

17. Yes--K&R!

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:49 PM

Oct 2015

Robbins

(5,066 posts)

18. except

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Tue Oct 20, 2015, 12:52 PM

Oct 2015

many dems don't care.Goldman sach's ceo fine with Clinton In white house doesn't matter to them.

Reply to this discussion

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.