What Clinton GOT WRONG About Snowden

[Segami]

"..I get that Clinton doesn't like Snowden. I doubt he's too upset about that. But Clinton should get her facts straight if she's going to take a stand against those federal employees and contractors who take their oaths to uphold the Constitution seriously enough to report crimes against it.She should be celebrating whistleblowers, not vilifying them and suggesting they waltz into the nearest penitentiary..."

Hillary Clinton is wrong about Edward Snowden. Again. The presidential candidate and former secretary of state insisted during the recent Democratic debate that Snowden should have remained in the United States to voice his concerns about government spying on US citizens. Instead, she claimed, he "endangered US secrets by fleeing to Russia." After accusing Snowden of stealing "very important information that has fallen into the wrong hands," she added: "He should not be brought home without facing the music." Clinton should stop rooting for Snowden's incarceration and get her facts straight.


First, Snowden is a whistleblower, not a leaker. Whistleblowing is the act of bringing to light evidence of waste, fraud, abuse, law-breaking, or dangers to public health or safety. Snowden did exactly that when he divulged proof that the National Security Agency was illegally snooping on all of us. Second, Snowden knew it was impossible to report this wrongdoing through his chain of command at the NSA, where he was working as a contractor employed by the consulting giant Booz Allen Hamilton. I've written previously about whistleblower Tom Drake, who went through his own chain of command to report an earlier illegal wiretapping scheme by the NSA. Drake went to his bosses, his office's general counsel, the NSA's inspector general, the Pentagon's inspector general, and congressional oversight committees - only to be charged with 10 felonies, including five counts of espionage.


CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling, who reported wrongdoing in a CIA operation related to the Iranian nuclear program through his chain of command, was similarly charged with multiple counts of espionage. Now he's serving 42 months in prison. The sad fact is that many national security chains of command are overtly hostile to people who report wrongdoing. I learned this firsthand when I spent nearly two years behind bars for denouncing the CIA's use of torture years after I left the agency. And I didn't go to any country club. I went to a real prison. Indeed, one of my former supervisors at the CIA called whistleblowing "institutionalized insubordination." In other words, employees should just "follow orders," even if those orders are illegal. Didn't Nazi war criminals say that they were just following orders, too? To me, their compliance was criminal.


Third, Clinton claimed that Snowden would have enjoyed protection from the Whistleblower Protection Act if he'd remained in the United States to make his revelations. I'm disappointed, frankly, that somebody running for president of the United States doesn't know that the Whistleblower Protection Act exempts national security whistleblowers. There are no protections for you if you work for the CIA, NSA, or other federal intelligence agencies - or serve them as a contractor. You take a grave personal risk if you decide to report wrongdoing, and there's nobody who can protect you. Even the federal body that's supposed to protect whistleblowers, the Merit Systems Protection Board, got itself in trouble in October for suspending and retaliating against its own whistleblower, who revealed that the agency had a huge backlog of cases and was taking far too long to adjudicate them. That certainly doesn't inspire confidence.



cont'

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/33362-what-clinton-got-wrong-about-snowden

[randys1]

1. Hasnt this been posted at least once already?

Hillary had a good day yesterday, but at DU it is a new day

[emulatorloo]

2. Yes, either this one or a clone of it.

[Babel_17]

3. Sort of convincing, if only someone like Daniel Ellsberg would chime in on Snowden's side ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ellsberg#Later_activism_and_views

On June 10, 2013, Ellsberg published an editorial in The Guardian newspaper praising the actions of former Booz Allen worker Edward Snowden in revealing top-secret surveillance programs of the NSA.[40] Ellsberg believes that the United States has fallen into an "abyss" of total tyranny, but said that because of Snowden's revelations, "I see the unexpected possibility of a way up and out of the abyss."

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/07/daniel-ellsberg-snowden-honored-his-oath-better-than-anyone-in-the-nsa/375031/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/daniel-ellsberg-nsa-leaker-snowden-made-the-right-call/2013/07/07/0b46d96c-e5b7-11e2-aef3-339619eab080_story.html

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/01/edward-snowden-nsa-surveillance-patriot-act-whistleblowers-daniel-ellsberg

[Reter]

4. Oh I so wonder why she doesn't like him

Actually, I do know why. He's probably got dirt on her.