Wouldn't it be great if DWS decided CNBC would be a great moderator for one of our debates?

[monmouth4]

It would show the public how a real debate is conducted and let the moderators do their thing. How bad could it be?

[Erich Bloodaxe BSN]

1. It would be better if she let BLM and CampaignZero host one. nt

[think]

2. No thank you. Rachel Maddow will do a much better job and we'll actually hear about issues.

I know that it's a town hall rather than a debate but it will still be much better than the CNBC food fight debate.

[razorman]

8. I am not sure there has ever been a genuine national debate shown,

in the original meaning of the term, since the invention of television. What today is euphemistically called, a "debate", is just a glorified press conference. A real traditional debate would entail each candidate laying out their positions and allowing them to interact with and question each other. "Moderators" should be irrelevant to the process.

[stonecutter357]

3. We Don’t Need FOX REJECTS.

[Autumn]

4. What would really be great is if DWS

fucking went away. Far away.

[monmouth4]

5. Haha, yes, well that's a given....n/t

[valerief]

6. A REAL debate would be if the Dem candidates moderated the GOP debate

and vice versa. Get the fuckin' media off the panel.

[monmouth4]

7. I like that too!...n/t