2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen Democrats Vote Their Conscience, Bernie Sanders Will Defeat a 'Moderate' Hillary Clinton
Last edited Mon Nov 2, 2015, 05:35 PM - Edit history (1)
Ya ya I know, all the Hillary fans will be yelling "OMG the Goodmanz!!!111". Whatever.
Like it or not, he has a point.
This article is huge so I'm only posting a snippet.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/democrats-bernie-sanders-defeat-moderate-hillary-clinton_b_8449748.html
Assuming Democrats have a progressive conscience in 2016, only one candidate will be victorious in the primaries, and I explain my thought process in this
The AUMF, legislation allowing the president to unilaterally send Americans into battle for a limited time without Congressional approval, should deter any progressive from voting for Hillary Clinton. Also, a recent Black Lives Matter protest of Clinton's event highlights the fact non-white Democrats are essential to any lead in the polls. Ironically, Clinton waited almost three weeks to address Ferguson, once used a 3 AM ad in 2008 that had a "racist sub-message," and today accepts money from prison lobbyists. This speaks volumes.
No, it's not chicken or fish, unless one of the dishes was made in a prison; Hillary Clinton's campaign accepts donations from prison lobbyists. The truth is that both candidates are the antithesis of one another when it comes to the presidency. The powers directly tied to the Oval Office aren't Congressional votes. They consist of the ability to wage war, dictate U.S. foreign policy, decide upon whether or not to confront Wall Street or bailout banks, and if we're to embark upon unfair trade deals or colossal oil pipelines. Remember, you're voting for a president, not a Senator. Vetoes and a value system matter, especially when Clinton supported the TPP 45 times and once supported Keystone XL.
On foreign policy, Wall Street, war, and trade, Hillary Clinton leans towards the Republican Party. POLITICO once labeled Clinton Wall Street Republicans' dark secret and The New York Times once asked Are Neocons Getting Ready to Ally With Hillary Clinton?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Why?
The former Secretary of State waited almost three weeks to address Ferguson.
Why?
In 2008, the Clinton campaign ran a 3:00 a.m. ad against Obama that contained a "racist sub-message" according to Harvard's Orlando Patterson.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Hillary has a lot of baggage, you can better believe it will be exploited especially during election time.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...about that GOP success?
randys1
(16,286 posts)so you are right, if ALLEGED liberals and Democrats are this vicious towards her..........
riversedge
(80,744 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Sorry but last I heard, Bernie wasn't "The anointed one". You guys can't discuss policy and anytime someone brings something up, y'all freak about it and see it as an attack. It's sad really.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)When Hillary has nothing but the more than dubious support of big banks and corporations, as well as a less than glamorous voting record, all that's left is to attack.
Wotas
(26 posts)What are people so afraid of?
DianeK
(975 posts)obviously pro Bernie threads..I can only conclude that you intend to throw wrenches....I do not agree with you..I will never agree with you..you will not agree with me..so why..when the title of the post is so obviously pro Bernie would you even enter?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Correcting the record.
DianeK
(975 posts)ok..i understand so much now..
bravenak
(34,648 posts)DianeK
(975 posts)but i appreciate your passion
bravenak
(34,648 posts)mcar
(46,022 posts)Pro Bernie replies should be posted in the protected Sanders group. This is in GD
. Thus it is open to all.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)even notice it.
I just have to put in a bouncy. I should do it in every post for a week. I'd forget though.
You just bring it out. Bravenak Darangement Syndrome.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)get a kick out of it
bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)mcar
(46,022 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)R.I.P. dude
bravenak
(34,648 posts)People think I'm serious when I say this stuff. My God!
I'm almost done doing this. So boring. Too easy.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)
Your move, Bravenak.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's from being a dancer. You never lose certain, um, attributes. Like I twerk all the time yo. I see a dance and I own it, immediately.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)
...I'm just in a giffy mood, I guess
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I wish I knew why that exists.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The more I realize it's more like Smooth Criminal Cat, innit? He just needs to leeeeean.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I think I gave up. It looks like this dance my mom does she calls the creep.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)He wore special shoes that basically bolted to the floor to keep him from falling over. So don't feel bad, he was cheating
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)For example, the ones who cheered the destruction of Libya and slavered over the possibility of intervening in Syria?
This election will tell us if they outnumber the decent, humanitarian Democrats.
riversedge
(80,744 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Reality. Let's talk about the 89 Dems who voted to gut SNAP http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/01/29/1273428/-These-89-Democrats-Voted-to-Cut-8-7-Billion-from-Food-Stamps
I don't give a shit what side someone is on, wrong is wrong. PERIOD.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)You know, the 40 M who will be voting in the Primary season?
20 M of which say they support Hillary Clinton.
Conscience free?
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Decent Democrats vote for Bernie the rest of us are the opposite of decent I guess?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)but now I find out that I don't have a conscience and I'm not decent either?
Perfect way to treat fellow Dems.....of course unless the people doing the talking are not really Dems?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I hate these arrogant posts that slam other democrats.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)After all, he's talking about a specific group of Democrats, not all.
Isn't that the logic you guys use while shitting on Sanders supporters? "Divisive," huh?
riversedge
(80,744 posts)PPP poll Iowa Nov 2: Clinton 57% Sanders 25% O'M 7%
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/11/cruz-rising-in-iowa-clinton-back-out-to-dominant-lead.html#more
Broward
(1,976 posts)If not in name, at least in their ideology.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 2, 2015, 10:21 PM - Edit history (1)
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)On Mon Nov 2, 2015, 06:55 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
What about Democrats who have no conscience?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=757996
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is OTT talkinng to democrats on a democratic board that way
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Nov 2, 2015, 06:58 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Is the alerter one of those "Democrats who have no conscience"? If not, this post isn't about you. If so, please take a hike.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting. Hide this tripe.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Wotas
(26 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)See October figures XD

bravenak
(34,648 posts)We will not shift to Bernie. Obama also was getting delegates. Bernie is not getting delegates.
Hillary has campaigned for many who will return the favor. Bernie has not. Hillary went and listened to what DEMOCRATS want. Bernie did not. He is not a Democrat.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)though that many indy and republican RINOs will and are supporting Bernie and that's where Hillary is lacking.
Hillary has campaigned for who exactly? Bernie has been in the senate fighting for the middle class and poor for 30 years.
Bernie isn't a Dem? So what! Honestly, that doesn't matter at all and if anything it gives him a huge edge considering the American people are completely fed up with the both parties and Washington.
Policy is MORE important than party. Period. Full stop.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)get a chance to bring more SOCIALISM to America?
Please stop!! My sides!! Hurts!!
No, seriously, who are these people who are going to help Bernie overcome the sheer number of Democratic votes in the primary? You have to get past that step first.
And policy? Like what? The stuff he cannot say how he will pass other than, "I need a Revolution!"
A revolution? Who is going to take to the streets? Occupy? Didn't even work LAST TIME. Black social justice warriors? Yeaaah, no, probably not, they like hope and stuff and Bernie is super depressing. A Dour Dan. Millennials? Us older ones are raising kids and working and cannot attend his revolution at this time in many cases. The younger ones? In the streets all day? Umm hmm. I kick it with them all the time, some will attend, most will not.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)I know it. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Bernie+sanders+republican+supporters
See, there you go. Now what? That's called a "coalition" that reaches across the divide.
Yet you guys dismiss facts like how they actually helped Bernie get elected, despite all the articles out there, you defend the Flat Earth Society. Never mind that in a general, the stats are showing that Bernie does better against a Republican opponent than Hillary.
Oh and guess what Bravenak, I'm no Dem, I'm an Indy. And there's millions more like myself. We're the largest voting block in America.
Socialism you say? My response? Who the hell are Ike Republicans!?


bravenak
(34,648 posts)Once again
ability to only deflect and NOT understand what it is you're truly saying.
Meanwhile this is happening and you just got completely reked.
Have a nice day

bravenak
(34,648 posts)I wonder what a Facebook page proves? That republicans will switch parties to vote Bernie? No.
Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)where Bernie consistently gets 25% of the REPUBLICAN vote.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)I promise you he'll get a lot more crossover vote than Hillary would.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And stickers that say 'ECONOMIC FREEDOM OR DEATH!" As in NO SOCIALISM, like the sticker on their car windows.
Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)open carrying. We call ourselves 'The Last Frontier'. We do GUNS. We make girls get parents permission for abortions. We legalize weed. We drill oil. I don't think you know much about this place.
Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)just peeling off a few moderates is enough to tilt the scales in some surprising areas.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)until recently.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)zappaman
(20,627 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)he does not have the nature to be president and he really is not willing to do the work to be president. We need a strong person who does not shout all the time.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Obama had from many of his colleagues when he ran in 2007-08 for comparison. It's not that they fear the Clintons (as Bernie boosters have claimed on DU). It's that they fear Sanders as nominee.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)is so few outside the Democrat bubble support Hillary.
People matter, not endorsements. That's why Bernie is ahead of Hillary by almost 200,00 donors.
Wotas
(26 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)He doesn't have the nature and not willing to do the work? What on earth are you talking about?
So you'll support a candidate who is basically a hawk when it comes to foreign policy, is against a $15 minimum wage and whose plan for college students STILL leaves families paying for their schooling and would require them to work?
The whole shouting thing is just stupid. Who the hell cares about that? That doesn't matter. What does is policy.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Experience and living in a kibbutz is not gaining very much foreign experience to deal with world leaders.
You are right the shouting is stupid.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Where are you getting this from? Sorry but Sanders is quite the opposite.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Obama is calm and gets things done. Hillary sat through a full day of testimony very calm and poised. I cannot imagine Bernie in a situation like that.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You mean like this?
'Nuff said. Just saying.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)You guys are honestly considering the merits about whether a candidate is "shouting" while people in my fucking neighborhood can't even afford food for their kids? You go ahead, you support your candidate that way, have at it. There's a lot more important issues to discuss with things which ACTUALLY MATTER than bullshit like this.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Alright now that all the sharks have been said let's stay on the issues.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Here, better?
Not doctored.
Everybody yells but this whole "shouting thing" is just downright stupid. We face so much as a country. We need to fight that and not bullshit. I'll say that to anybody. I don't give a crap who they support.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)and wouldn't a $15/hr minimum wage help to lift people out of poverty than $12? That's a huge difference. Massive really.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I don't understand what you think Bernie will be able to accomplish if he were POTUS? He doesn't work well with other peers, he hasn't verbalized a workable plan to change your poor neighorhoods...you do realize he would not become a dictator with unfettered ability to enforce any policy he so pleases?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We win. Everyone likes Skittles and Gold. Since were just fantasizing anyway.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 2, 2015, 11:59 PM - Edit history (1)
You have trotted out every right wing or crackpot source possible to attack Hillary Clinton. If you had trotted out a bunch of right wing shit to attack Bernie you would have been tombstoned a long time ago.
Some other titles from the youtube channel you posted here: "The Young Turks DESTROYED - Planned Parenthood Videos are real", "Donald Trump's favorite jokes showing he speaks the truth", "The real reason Zayn Malik left One Direction. Demon, reptilian, shapeshifter, possessed?", "Donald Trump not scared by the Left. The billionaire clear Republican winner", etc...
I got news for you....
No one here gives a fuck what Ann Coulter, Rand Paul, Mika & Joe or any of the other assholes you trot out to bash a Democratic candidate says. Well, except those that hate hillary with the passion of a billion fires apparently.
For fuck's sake.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)riversedge
(80,744 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)eom
Nanjeanne
(6,579 posts)I've been affiliated with the Democratic Party since I was eligible to vote. I have always been attracted to what I thought were Democratic party platforms. What I have increasingly gotten over the many many years is dismayed at the inability of the Democratic Party to fight for the values I once believed were central to their core. Times I've given money to the DNC. Times I've written across their appeals "grow a spine and I'll donate again". Worked very hard for Obama in the first election and dropped out of Organizing for America when he wouldn't fight for the public option. I don't call myself an independent because truthfully I cannot imagine actually voting for a Republican and independent seems to infer that I could swing that way. But I have never been a slave to the big "D" party. I'm more interested in small "d" policies. So I have no problem supporting Sanders even if it appears to be a big deal that he wasn't a formal member of the party. He has caucused solely with the Democrats for his entire career and to me, he is more of a "democrat" than a vast majority of those who carry the D next to their name.
I know if Clinton becomes the nominee - I will check her name off in the election because the Supreme Court is too important to me to run a risk that she loses. But I truly don't believe the vast number of young and new voters will make that same call. And I do wonder, if Sanders is "not electable" - but Clinton has adopted almost every one of his policies over the last few months (some say better late than never and I suppose there's some truth to that) ---- how is Clinton electable? Her policies are now just about the same. So it's obviously not policies that make Sanders unelectable to some? I'm more concerned that in September Clinton said ""You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty," to the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. Then one month later she's claiming to be "a progressive". Hard to know which one to believe and therein lies the rub. My dilemma and a much bigger one than "Bernie isn't a REAL Democrat!".
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)She did a presentation on healthcare to Congress in the 90's, she has been a long time advocate on women's rights, against violence against women worldwide, worked for Children's Defense Fund, pushed for children to have health care and education.
It is true Democratic policies have not gone far in the last few years, I will continue to fight for Democratic ideas. Thanks for supporting Hillary in the GE, she will work for us.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)This is the differences between Bernie and Hillary on minimum wage
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/07/hillary_clinton_vs_bernie_sanders_democratic_frontrunners_disagree_on_wall_street_minimum_wage_and_trade/
More here http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/07/should-hillary-fear-the-15-minimum-wage-000180
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Was not. Clinton also tried to get the minimum wage increases tied to congressional raises. My question on the $15 is why limit the minimum wage to $15?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)First off, the whole "n the $15 is why limit the minimum wage to $15?" this is a very Republican and Libertarian talking point in order to justify that a raise in minimum wage isn't needed and would hurt businesses, you're aware of that, correct?
Secondly....Bernie introduced and co-sponsored the Minimum Wage Fairness Act in 2014. Provide me a link please to where Bernie didn't support minimum wage? Hillary wasn't a sponsor on this as she wasn't a Senator at the time.

Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Since Sanders decided to run for president it must have dawned on him he needed to sponsor some bills on something. He has been in Congress for twenty five years, he had sponsored less bills than Clinton has in eight years and a big pile of bills in 2014 and a big pile in 2015. He has had twenty five years to get wage increases, for twenty four of those years it did not entice him to sponsor wage increases. This says a lot.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)What they can learn from Sanders is that good ideas are not sufficient. Creating more livable cities requires nurturing a core of activist organizations that can build long-term support for progressive municipal policies.
https://www.thenation.com/article/bernies-burlington-city-sustainable-future/
and why you repeating right wing talking points on here?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)though about experience? A lot.
As I said, $15/hr helps to life people out of poverty much more than $12/hr. This will be an issue too and on the national stage, this is going to hurt Hillary drastically. The minimum wage is the one single issue which has a tendency to win elections. Bernie is out ahead on this.
That whole war hawk comment has me rather perplexed. You truly think Bernie is a war hawk?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)not have very much to show for it, my mayor only as 6 years.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Seriously?
You take the cake when it comes to right wing sources. Not only do you repeat the talking points, but you drag the most vile of the lot in here to atack a Democratic candidate. And you stomp your feet and scream at people to watch and listen to those fucking assholes because they all hate Hillary as much as you do.
You may want to back up and take that right turn you obviously missed. No one here is interested in your slimy right wing propaganda except your fellow haters.
riversedge
(80,744 posts)lst one is sanders platform says Medicare for all. That is laudable--I would want that and it is an issue would work for. Yet, I do not believe the US is ready for that. Sanders said how he would pay for it but really seems so much at this time. I see Colorado wants to put in on the ballot this fall. I hope they get it enacted--at the state level. Maybe the state level is the way to go for now. Hillary wants to expand it--like sanders, but it would be for those who need it most--such as the poor--the elderly==especially women. I forgot how paid for but it is on her website.
2nd one is College for all--as Sanders wants. Again laudable but how to pay for it is the problem. Again look at Hillary's website. She wants students to work 10 hrs weeks--a needs approach but grants expanded.
Anyway that is quick. Which brings me to your last comment. For me it is based on her experience in the wide world and SOS of working with people. sometimes one has to take smaller steps to anything done. the "....xxx for all" is entising but we have to deal Repug congress. Simple as that.
http://www.wdsu.com/politics/clinton-pleads-guilty-to-being-a-moderate/35201626
By Dan Merica
Clinton 'pleads guilty' to being a moderate
Published 12:52 PM CDT Sep 10, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio (CNN) Hillary Clinton confessed Thursday to something liberals have long suspected: being a moderate Democrat.
"You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center," Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. "I plead guilty."
The line is new for Clinton, who spent a large portion of her early campaign casting herself as a liberal fighter who has been progressive for her entire life. To many on the left, those lines never really rang true.
"I take a backseat to no one," Clinton told a New Hampshire audience in July, "When you look at my record in standing up and fighting for progressive values."
....................................
On Thursday, Clinton reiterated that willingness to compromise, telling the audience that while she would "meet anytime, anywhere with anyone to find common ground," she would also "stand my ground" on issues like abortion and women's rights, among others.
Clinton argued at the Columbus event that being in the "center" is a positive, not a negative.
......................
Before that Clinton told the audience that it was important for voters to demand specifics -- not just "broad stokes" -- from candidates.
"Some people want it to be about everything other than what they would do when they are president," Clinton said. "I think it really matters that people tell you what they will do and how they intend to do it, not just in broad stokes but in details. How are you the voters supposed to make up your minds?"
..........................
Before Clinton came on stage, Dana Ellis, a digital marketing strategist from the Columbus area, said that while Sanders has captured "the really progressive liberal arm of the party," Clinton's "more centrist Democrats understand that in order to win the White House you have to have a broader appeal."
your comment:
.......---- how is Clinton electable? Her policies are now just about the same. So it's obviously not policies that make Sanders unelectable to some? I'm more concerned that in September Clinton said ""You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty," to the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. Then one month later she's claiming to be "a progressive". Hard to know which one to believe and therein lies the rub.
Sorry, I can not help you with this one.
My dilemma and a much bigger one than "Bernie isn't a REAL Democrat!".
Qutzupalotl
(15,815 posts)Sanders wants public college paid for by a transaction tax on Wall Street, similar to DeFazio's bill. This will slow down high-frequency trading, which disadvantages small investors, most of whom cannot make thousands of trades per second.
So Sanders' plan does two things: it will help the average investor make money on Wall Street while helping more people get a college education.
riversedge
(80,744 posts)still leaves the problem of another "entitlement", which we know the Repug congress will go no where near it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Pathwalker
(6,603 posts)Which have a FOUR paragraph limit. After what happened last time, do yu really want to break this rule?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)What happened last time? I'll gladly condense it but it's literally a snippet. The article itself is about 40 paragraphs.
Pathwalker
(6,603 posts)They later won, but it was a long and expensive fight. DUers were put on notice to honor the four copyright rule. You can "Ask The Administrators" for guidance.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)still_one
(98,883 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)yeah, they are crapping their collective pants right now.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Historic NY
(40,010 posts)I'm voting tomorrow, its election day in NY.
riversedge
(80,744 posts)FloridaBlues
(4,664 posts)riversedge
(80,744 posts)Iowa Dems just voted their conscience
PPP poll Iowa Nov 2: Clinton 57% Sanders 25% O'M 7%
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2015/11/cruz-rising-in-iowa-clinton-back-out-to-dominant-lead.html#more
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)If you have a conscience, are well informed, or some other positive characteristic, you will vote for Bernie.
If not, you'll vote for Hillary.
The arrogance of this narrative is a real turn off. Reduces the mindset to something that sounds like a cult.
Push Bernie's record as mayor. Push the constructive amendments he has pushed thru Congress....anything but inferring people who vote for Hillary are "less than", in some ways, Bernie supporters.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)So far, it looks like the Democrats are going with Clinton.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)there is some truth to that statement.
In the beginning a lot of DUers said:"We like Bernie's ideas,
they are great, but he is a fringe candidate."
Next they said:" Bernie's ideas are great, but he is not
electable."
Next: "Yes, his ideas are good, buuuut what has he achieved?"
In spite of the fact that Bernie has won on a lot of amendments.
Then:" We like Bernie, but his supporters turn us off, therefore
we cannot vote for him."
By now we have reached the stage of implied sexism and
racism and other points.
So, yes, if people really agreed with his ideas and plans,
they would vote for him. Except for politics.
BootinUp
(51,281 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)And that sound is driving the establishment mad. MAD I say!
lol
Wotas
(26 posts)riversedge
(80,744 posts)Wotas
(26 posts)Just regular, everyday people who aren't overly political or emotionally/financially invested in a Hillary presidency.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)It's a matter of degree, but yeah, let's not rule out Sanders grabbing support from voters that others can't reach.
P.S. Welcome to DU!
Wotas
(26 posts)tritsofme
(19,887 posts)and LBJ's classic rejoinder: "In your gut, you know he's nuts!"
Koinos
(2,800 posts)It just feels right.
