2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo is Bernie or bust openly advocating not
voting for the nominee in the general?
Are 1,000,000 pledges to write in Sanders in the general supposed to intimidate us ?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Let's stop the division.
If that's their prerogative, go for it.
Most of these types usually want aTtention anyways
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and their useful, but principled, idiots.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)what?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)writing Bernie in at the G/E is stupid ... Maybe principled, but stupid, as it increases the gop's changes of winning the G/E.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)who only gives lip service to progressive causes, but hops in bed with the corporations that are the root of many of those problems, myself.
That said: I'm no idiot.
I live in a red state. I can safely vote my conscience in the general election should Sanders not win the nomination. I probably will vote Green and Dem down-ticket. All my state's ECs will go to the Republican anyway, so my plan is not idiotic in the least. I simply will no longer vote for the corporate-owned candidate, no matter to which party that person belongs.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I'm glad you plan to vote down ticket; but know, if enough vote Green or writing in Bernie (should he not be the Democratic nominee), we WILL end up with much worse than a corporate-owned President.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Well, the good news my friend is you and I wont be talking about it together because we will be separated soon.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to that way by Right Wingers, who have nothing else to offer.
Sickening really to see what is going on here. Advocate for your candidate, stop attacking other Democrats, disagree on the issues, but if the namecalling of Democratic voters doesn't stop, it is guaranteed that when their votes are needed, they just might not be there.
I wish SOMEONE in our party would realize that you 'win more flies with honey' and stop the divisive attacks on people who just might be needed not too long from now.
The Mid Terms ought to have caused people to understand that the attitude towards long time dems from within their own party is causing us to LOSE elections.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)One fellow has such as his signature, so I'm just curious if it goes both ways.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)should that person lose in the Democratic primary? ... Especially, when doing so runs counter to what that candidate stated he would not do ... for exactly the reason indicated above? I wasn't aware.
But ... I know of only one non-Bernie supporter that has made similar noises ... and, yes, I told them I thought they were making a mistake.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)all night for a year to stop them.
Do you have a link?
I really want to work on that.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)It is way past time that our "representative" goverment represent us and not those which desire to harm, enslave, and/or kill us.
#BernieOrBust
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Last edited Wed Nov 4, 2015, 09:49 AM - Edit history (1)
Maybe it is a repub plan to pull your string and you are being played for a sucker.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I was never going to cast a vote for HRC long before Sander's entered the race, I think your theory holds no water.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)brings with her and that she represents.
I'm sure she is a loving grandmother and mother as well as a patient, loving wife.
But I will not vote for another corporate and Wall Street candidate. Unfortunately, that is what Hillary is.
I owe it to my grandchildren to vote against the corruption.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Too hawkish on foreign policy.
Too tied to Wall Street.
If I wanted that, I'd vote for the Republicans.
brush
(53,759 posts)Dr. Doolittle
(43 posts)Not from me. I've had enough of the two evils bullshit.
brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
frylock
(34,825 posts)brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
artislife
(9,497 posts)They have decided to abandon both houses. Maybe 25% is going to join them.
Both parties should ask themselves if they make a good product anymore.
randys1
(16,286 posts)To prevent Women dying in back alleys, to prevent Women going to prison for receiving healthcare, to prevent doctors from going to prison, to prevent Black people from being told they will not vote unless they have the exact 7 forms of ID needed
To prevent this, you and I must work that much harder to cancel out those who will willingly bow out of the process regardless of the results.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)brooklynite
(94,461 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)All you Hillary people better figure out why she's not generating any enthusiasm with a very significant slice of the electorate and get a plan in place to deal with it. Sticking your fingers in your ears isn't going to cut it. Telling people how awful the Republicans are isn't going to cut it.
Obama lost a big chunk of voters between 2008 and 2012. 2008 was a campaign run (deceptively in my opinion) on hope and change. 2012 was a campaign run on how scary the Republicans are. Hillary can't run on hope and change.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)The Democratic Party's only role has become to prevent the awfulness of the GOP on certain issues. And to keep the sanctimonious GOP from setting the tone.
But beyond that? The Democratic Establishment is hardly much better on actually protecting us from the monopolization of the economy and the gutting of the middle/working/poor majority.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)If Clinton wins the primary, one million Sanders supporters are going to write Sanders in? I hadn't seen this. So we would elect one of these clowns on the right and everyone would know the election was given to them. That's assuming Clinton wouldn't win anyway. If that's what they feel is in their best interests, have at it. Unfortunately the country would lurch right.
Are you sure what you are saying is really being promoted by Sanders supporters. Most of them here say they will vote Clinton in the general.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)There's a facebook page and a website. Revolt against plutocracy and/or Citizen's against Plutocracy. I haven't read any of it yet but i have it bookmarked for later.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)and there are only 4000 or so likes which isn't that many and it seems like this idea has been around since last summer so it doesn't appear to have amounted to much so far.
MineralMan
(146,281 posts)a PPR was the reward for that post.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)I'm gonna spend it like a crazy fool.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Giving your strongest opposition more power. Does that need to be said out loud?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I don't think Bernie would advocate it.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)So no, I'm pretty sure Sanders would endorse Clinton and not support such a "splitter" movement, should he not be the nominee.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)in the White House.
Corporations can be great and have their rights and their place, but they should not be running the country as they have for decades now.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)But if it came down to it I'd prefer the devil I know if our compatriots (and they are) manage to crucify the only non-devil we've got.
brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
randys1
(16,286 posts)takes over everything.
Then and only then will people wake the fuck up.
Maybe.
MineralMan
(146,281 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)2008 threatened the same thing, and much closer to the general election than we are right now. Everyone needs to chill. Everyone.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We vote last. The winner is usually pretty obvious by the time we vote. I will vote for all Democratic candidates, especially my wonderful member of the House, but not for Hillary.
I do not want to have voting for Hillary on my conscience.
We have a wonderful time to clean up our government and institute social programs we need with Bernie's presidency.
It would be a violation of my moral standards to vote for anyone other than Bernie in this election. America needs Bernie. I cannot settle for second best. We need Bernie.
randys1
(16,286 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)all it means is that after the convention, if hillary is the nom, that posters actively campaigning for another ge candidate will probably be suspended.
we can still post about other issues and even the ge as long as we don't come on here and tell people not to vote for hillary (if she is the nom) or dems in other races.
kind of ironic..there is a post daily here telling people they must pledge loyalty to her yet after the primaries we won't be able to advocate for someone else....interesting....
randys1
(16,286 posts)Saying you will not vote for Hillary or write in Bernie's name, is the same as this and means anyone doing that should be permanently banned.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)mm hmmmmm..
besides, it is not the ge yet its primary season
and du can't require loyalty oaths as much as some here would like to see it
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)And that's why the TOS makes the no advocating or suppressing distinction. DU can't follow you into the voting booth or compel you to honestly state your intentions. I can see where you wanna go with this, but it's a waste of time.
randys1
(16,286 posts)regardless of who is the nominee, that has nothing to do with it
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)they are simply stating their personal feelings and affirming their right to vote how they please.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)We shall have to see what happens after the election.
Are you planning to vote for Bernie?
If not, why not?
brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I want Bernie appointing our next presidential cabinet.
I do not want another daughter or son of Wall Street making those appointments.
What do you have against voting for Bernie?
brush
(53,759 posts)Either of our big two are hundreds of times better than Carson or Trump.
Lyric
(12,675 posts)then logic and reason are wasted on them. Just ignore them. Nothing can dissuade a fanatic.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Outside of this website is the real world. They gather and congregate here in numbers and percentages that don't exist in the real world.
Imagine being in a shopping mall that appears to be overflowing with loud and obnoxious "slacker" teens. Based on these surroundings, it would be easy to assume that ALL teens are slackers, but that's not reality. The ones you can't see, the ones who don't congregate at the shopping mall are busy doing other things. They're not being loud and obnoxious. They're not shoplifting or blocking the corridors.
Keep things in perspective, and realize that what you're seeing here does not represent reality. (At least not in the numbers and percentages that would make any difference outside of this website.)
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Keep whistling past the graveyard. Hillary better find a way to enthuse disaffected voters.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)They've made their pledge and their promise, so I take them at their word.
Although, the frequency with which they announce their intentions suggests to me that they REALLY do want attention, and that they REALLY want others to try and convince them to vote anyway. People like that are feeling helpless and frustrated, so their actions and words are intended to create an illusion that they matter more than everyone else. They're fooling themselves, but they're not fooling me.
Hillary will be the nominee, and they won't vote for her. No amount of pleading or logic or rational explanations will dissuade them from their mission of spoiled-sport, sour-grapes, sore-loser revenge. Okay. I accept that and I'm fine with it.
They'll do what they need to do and they'll have no effect on the outcome of the general election.
I'll gladly take a moment to write about my take on what (and why) they behave this way, but to interact with them and try to convince them otherwise is pointless.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)How many lost elections will it take for you to get that message?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)brush
(53,759 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)to walk away from the polls.....these people know exactly what they are doing and who they effectively are helping. Rove is rubbing his hands with glee.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)eom
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)you are just making sure that even more people assert to not vote clinton in the unlikely event she becomes the nominee
i see you read the classic "how to win friends and influence people" might want to share a copy with the campaign,...she could use the help
brush
(53,759 posts)And I mean that to Hillary or bust voters also.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but i am not going to vote for an unacceptable candidate out of fear. that is how totalitarian regimes "get" votes.
if the dem party wants to win, they can stop rigging the process for a candidate that doesn't stand at all for democratic ideals but instead represents the plutocracy and the MIC. If they lose this and the Supreme Court goes down, you will need to speak to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the party elites and ask them why they threw it to the republicans.
a captive vote does not advance democracy imo
Lyric
(12,675 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Ya mean like threats of "we're gonna kick ya out of our club if ya don't take our Loyal to The Powers That Be Oath?"
How's the 1,000,000 attempts to force that on your fellow Democrats that aren't "intimidated" by your authoritarian bullshit working out for ya?
quickesst
(6,280 posts)Care to link me to a copy of that, or is this more made up shit? Your quotation marks, not mine. Thanks
99Forever
(14,524 posts)In fact, if I could possibly "care" less about what you think, I would.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)That's okay. I already knew you couldn't do it............Jack.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)As long as they are not advocating for that here on DU, though, they are certainly free to do so, just as all citizens are free to cast their vote the way they see fit.
Are you concerned?
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Then don't vote for her.
I don't get the need to make a big production of it.
I suppose if Skinner wants to use his bandwidth for this campaign, that's his prerogative.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)By announcing their intentions, they expect to be coddled and validated by other like-minded individuals.
Or, they're wanting to feel powerful by provoking a reaction. They want others to respond and try to convince them to do otherwise.
It's all a game that's not worth playing. They've made up their minds, and I'll happily take them at their word and move on to something that's infinitely more productive.
Just like dealing with a toddler. If they have a public tantrum, they hope to get attention (even if they don't get their way). The attention is, itself, the reward.
This "reward" only encourages the same type of behavior again and again.
Any attempts to "negotiate" or to explain and reason with them is also to acknowledge their vanity. It won't change their mind, but it WILL guarantee more of the same behavior.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)standing and watching your campaign follow the same losing trajectory it did in 08 sounds worse, hence the vicious attacks. its desperation, but not on our part.
#bernieorbust2016
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)brooklynite
(94,461 posts)This seems to come from the belief that Clinton will win unless some people threaten to hold their breath until they turn blue.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the b.o.b movement has stated that if/when bernie gets the nom, their mission is basically moot, and that would be a good thing.
brooklynite
(94,461 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and i will be happy to answer the question
brooklynite
(94,461 posts)...for a scenario threatening dire consequences if you don't get what you want in the Primary?
Let me think about that.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)that is clintonthought. we care about the country and getting it back from the corporate power mongers.
unlike clinton, sanders cares about more than getting himself into the wh
answer your question?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)"If you don't all vote for Bernie, you will suffer by having a Republican in the Whiltehouse."
Are we absolutely positive this movement wasn't started by Rove?
Autumn
(45,014 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)On the contrary.
I myself am an Indy voter. I support Bernie and I voted for Obama.
I don't support Hillary and I don't see her as representing me at all. The issues and where she stands sounds a great deal more like a conservative Dem than anything else. She's not Elizabeth Warren and I wish people would stop trying to cosplay her as such.
I'm personally sick of the whole "lesser of 2 evils" bullshit and many of us are. For many of us, we see Bernie as a big change from the current political landscape. I myself am backlogged almost $100k in student loan debt. So far nothing Hillary says has made me change my mind. I'm also a gun owner, I live in the mountains in Colorado. Yes, guns are needed here because "Bears don't care" and quite frankly, neither do Mountain Lions. I'll tell ya, when you see a Mountain Lion at 6am watching you, you'll change your opinion quickly on guns.
I benefited from Obamacare, in fact, I have a personal letter here from POTUS after I sat down and wrote him how it saved my life. I was one of the very first people in the country to be allowed into the high risk exchanges before the ACA was even available to the public due to a very rare and deadly non smoking related lung disease. I've also lived in Germany, as I married a German and I've seen single payer in action. Guess what? It's far superior.
No, it's not about having temper tantrums, sorry. People are downright pissed and they're sick and tired of corporate candidates with special interest corporate backed SuperPACs getting them elected. We're fed up while we work our asses off and can't barely get by. Hillary wants $12 minimum wage, Bernie wasnt $15. That's a huge difference to many of us. That's $480 a month!
Sorry, this is about life. It's about who survives. It's THAT simple.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)they will have two choices. They can unite behind Bernie and win it all, or they can stick with their untrustworthy nonelectable candidate and watch a Republican get into the White House. But it won't be the fault of the progressives it will be the fault of the Democratic establishment elite who tried to force a corporate owned hawk down our throats and didn't think we would fight back.
#bernieorbust2016
brooklynite
(94,461 posts)...it put the onus on the Clinton supporters to build a national broad-based alliance of liberals, centrists, men, women, whites, blacks, hispanics AND appeal to sane, moderate suburban Republicans and Independents, rather than kowtow to a handful (and that's all there are) of holier than thou chest-thumpers threatening to take their ball and go home.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)most repubs i know would crawl through a raging blizzard for the chance to vote against clinton. but hey, its always good to dream......
and its not about chest thumping.lts about reclaiming our democracy from the establishment elitists who don't give a shit about us ...just the 1% and the mic.
and if you think its just a handful of us.....well i guess you will be surprised come elections day
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)They're playing power dodge-ball, and we're playing chess. They're screaming, we're thinking. They want to win an argument, we want to win an election.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)"Not as bad" has lost it's thunder.
lame54
(35,277 posts)yet pretend not to be
MineralMan
(146,281 posts)I'd consider this to be pretty unconscionable for a DUer to advocate, and one DUer was PPRed for advocating signing that pledge already.
Such a pledge is likely to be a tipping point for DU posting privileges, I think.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I was told there is a vocal group here that doesn't do pledges. Now, I wonder who would be trying to implement and promote such an absurdity? Surely not someone on the Left?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)has been PPR'd for posting it by EarlG, FYI! That might answer some questions people have!
mkc87
(1 post)I feel that Bernie or Bust means just that, after 7 years of do nothing half measures, 5% change, and government run by and for multi-national corporations. All while hearing about all the things the president can't do, while he's giving the shop away to corporations and his golden sacks buddies. I'm so sick of it. I would rather vote for Bernie Sanders as a write in than to vote again Republican Light, the lesser of two evils is still plenty evil.