2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders is a small (d) Democrat. Hillary is not.
Small (d) democratA democrat, that is, a person who holds democratic views; not necessarily someone who is a member of a country's "Democratic Party".
Small d Democrats hold traditionally Democratic views. Corporate Democrats do not share these beliefs. Their core values got corrupted by corporate money/right wingism.
O'Malley is also a small d Democrat. Hillary isn't. She is corporate bank funded, fueled and favored 'Democrat'.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)do tell please
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts).
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Is there any position he holds on guns that she disagrees with?
Seriously.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)for issues which he knows he is wrong.
Sanders will not be the DNC nominee
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Not like she is asking to make gun owners carry insurance or taxing ammo at a large amount. Nope. Let alone taking on the 2nd amendment and banning guns.
It is tiring.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)After watching her performance in 2008 I don't believe she's changed that much.
artislife
(9,497 posts)We might get a post office renamed, though.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)
senz
(11,945 posts)To me, Hillary is complaining about gun manufacturers' protection from liability. As I recall, Bernie voted in favor of their "protection" from lawsuits-- I think (again, mere recollection) on the grounds that guns, like hammers or tire irons, or bows and arrows, can be used for good or ill and that the manufacturers cannot be held responsible for what people do with their products.
I don't particularly like guns, but Bernie's response seems logical.
I always admire your comments, but this one doesn't make much sense to me. Maybe I'm just tired tonight, I dunno -- but can you explain it?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)are what matter? How Randian of you.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Randian does not win any points for you.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)twice in 2 days now. Not here for the popularity contest.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251757985#post117

waldo.c
(43 posts)..responsible for the gun violence. I don't think so. Remember these guys who were reacting to rumours spread by their own party through a compliant media
https://fmonster.wordpress.com/2010/04/04/rundown-republicans/912-teaparty-dc-we-came-unarmed-this-time
What about this genius and his friends https:
//www.google.com.au/search?q=we+came+unarmed+this+time+picture&biw=1264&bih=736&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CB4QsARqFQoTCMvRo_Tw9cgCFQGQlAod198KoA#tbm=isch&q=NRA+memeberspicture&imgrc=JQoMCfPj6Bkz-M%3A
America is soaked in guns. The first step to dealing with that problem is to elect an honest President.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Seriously, it's 2015. You need to update your rants.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Can you name one?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sanders is a member of Congress, has he sponsored a bill to make background checks greater? No, if he did that NRA would be calling on him.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He voted in favour of expanded background checks and for assault weapons bans.
Which of those do you think the NRA approves of?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...after Sandy Hook.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The truth doesn't matter, lies, smears, accusations, whatever it takes to win, just like 2008.
Karma13612
(4,981 posts)Was that he felt it should be legislated at the state level.
You know, like a LOT of laws are done.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)This week's talking point has something to do with toxic dumping. That too has been thoroughly debunked.
These talking points cost a lot of money.
I'm almost sorry to see them waste so much corporate money only to see it go down the drain.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)In that case, hi David!
senz
(11,945 posts)You don't seem very honest when you say things like that. How tiresome it must be to always have to push the latest Hillary meme. How tiresome to support such a low character.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)are you talking about here in the US or in other countries that we have 'helped' thanks to our SOS Hillary.
Z
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)this would exclude Sanders of whom is noted in Congress as an Independent, against what some believe Sanders does not always caucus with Democrats.
On the corporate deals, Sanders needs to explain his close relationship with Lockheed Martin and also explain his Wall Street banker. Sanders needs to be honest with people, admit his connections.
Sanders will not be the DNC nominee.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)on EVERY issue. Hillary is not. She is a big D Democrat corporate funded.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)his opponent.
The gun issue will not endear Sanders to lots of voters, he will not be the DNC nominee.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He backed every proposal in Obama's gun control package after Sandy Hook. He has a D- rating from the NRA.
Face it, Sanders and O'Malley are the only democrats in this race.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)NRA congressional member. Since Sanders has always maintained the Independent status he is the only candidate in the DNC primary who is not a Democrat. You can say Clinton is not a Democrat forever but Sanders will not be the DNC nominee.
Karma13612
(4,981 posts)Details about that vote.
He voted against suing a gun manufacturer if a person uses a gun to murder someone.
Would you sue a hammer company if someone beat the life out of someone with a hammer????
Hum????
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He stated that gun store owners shouldn't be sued for legally selling guns, but those who sell guns illegally should be prosecuted.
Do you believe a gun store owner is legally responsible for what happens with that legally sold gun after it leaves the store? Does Hillary? If she does, why doesn't she say so?
Has Hillary even staked out a position on guns? All I have heard from her is vague rhetoric. How does she differ from him?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)One of the items brought up often is the hammer manufactures, why not give them immunity? Everyone want to talk about fairness and now some are fighting for biased laws to remain. Equality should apply here also.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Do you think anyone in the universe believes that?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Karma13612
(4,981 posts)What connections????
And unless you have a crystal ball, you do not know who is going to be the nominee.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)more which will come out.
Qutzupalotl
(15,824 posts)His opponents have had decades to come up with dirt, but haven't been able to.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)facts.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)two thirds of the Dem base, now only 32% of registered voters. Hilary doesn't have crossover appeal, as demonstrated by her inability to beat either Trump or Carson. Bernie does, and beats all Repubs in polls re the GE.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sanders will not win the nomination with 30%, it is simple.
senz
(11,945 posts)I've been a Democrat since I was old enough to vote, but that doesn't tell you who I am and what I believe. What counts is what I actually stand for, not the political party I signed up for half a century ago.
"Demos" means "people." "Cracy" means "rule." "Democracy" means the people rule.
Bernie is for the people. Bernie is for democracy. Bernie is a democrat.
Hillary has no concern for the people, for ordinary working Americans. Hillary is for the very rich and powerful. Hillary is for oligarchy and plutocracy. She does not support democracy. Doesn't matter what party she signed up for. She is not a democrat.
AND YOU KNOW THAT.
When I read your comments, I have to remind myself that you do not speak for Ann Richards. I think she would be embarrassed to read what you write.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)All the shouting in the world is going to change the fact Clinton is the best qualified candidate for president and change the will of the people to elect Clinton as the DNC nominee.
senz
(11,945 posts)nor do I consider her more qualified than anyone else running on the Democratic ticket. I do not think First Lady qualifies as experience, and her record in the Senate and as SoS is not particularly admirable or even remarkable. She may be well-known, but that's not a qualifier. I don't think she has shown any vision whatsoever, and neither has she demonstrated leadership qualities.
Seriously.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sanders can't be accepted as a hard core liberal. Sanders is too far left, I dont agree with the socialist side of Sanders, his positions runs too deep. The means he has presented on paying for his agenda so far does not meet the needs of he cost.
senz
(11,945 posts)Sanders' "socialist side" is in keeping with FDR's "socialist" programs that paved the way for a strong economy, a prosperous middle class, and a can-do, optimistic attitude in this country that paved the way for the social and environmental programs of the 60's and 70s -- all of which is GONE now, thanks to the corporate takeover of our government in the 80s, 90s, and 2000s.
FDR paid for these "socialist" programs with a progressive (ascending) tax structure. The chart below shows the top marginal tax rate from 1912 to 2008.

We can do it again, Thinkingabout, if we elect Bernie Sanders to the presidency. Hillary belongs and is beholden to the oligarchy (great wealth and big corporations); she would never do what we need to restore the country. Never.
Think about it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)the few, unless 34% continues to be the number which shows up to vote. This is a personal choice of the no voters. How many programs or foundations has been created by Sanders which does good for others like the Clintons? Just name the foundation which Sanders has created and backed which does anything close to the Clinton foundation?
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...hmmm, where have I heard that before?
Careful there, you may be treading in treacherous waters when using that phrase. Just ask Bernie!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...please use these special powers only for good.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)One need only listen to what they say, and who funds them.
I vote based on beliefs. Not slick packaging and marquee lights.
senz
(11,945 posts)Look up the definitions of democracy, oligarchy and oligarchy's little buddy, plutocracy. Start with dictionary definitions and then go deeper in your research until you feel that you have a fair sense of what the terms mean. Then take some time out of your busy day to think about how these terms would apply to a candidate's record, behavior, decisions, transactions, connections, associations, etc. Talk with others about it if that helps. Since these are politicians, their record and behavior should be given more weight than their words.
Then, if you're honest with yourself, it should become reasonably clear which candidates are essentially democratic and which are oligarchic/plutocratic in their outlook and political/financial behaviors.
Not that hard to do.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Accepting that you lost an election. Which she did.
But please do try to convince voters that she's not a "real" democrat. None of the other Sanders campaign strategies seem to be working.
senz
(11,945 posts)You constantly speak as though you are "in the know." Anyone who knows the bare minimum about democracy should know that the "hallmark of democracy" (it's spelled with a small "d," grow up) is centered in the relationship of the people to the government, i.e., the people rule. That's all the people, right down to the commoners, which is most of us (yes, probably even you). That is what our founders intended, within the social/conceptual limitations of their time.
Please do not overlook that. Do not dismiss it. It is central. We have all but lost it. It is time to regain it.
I am asking you to think.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Most "Democrats" these days wouldn't know a democrat if they tripped over one.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Hillary became a democrat in high school after taking President Johnson's side in a debate.
Karma13612
(4,981 posts)It wasn't until Yale law school.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)In High school Hillary was a Goldwater girl. Her teacher challenged her to take President Johnson's side in a debate. She studied up for the debate and has been a democrat ever since.
I can't find the link where I read that
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Note that I don't hold what a candidate believed when they were in college against them. They are formative years and should be used to explore one's political identity. As she clearly did.
This whole "Hillary Clinton was a young republican" meme is annoying and distracting from the real issues of the campaign
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)until this election is over, best we can do is just hold on as its going to be a wild ride.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Bernie Sanders has called himself a Democrat..big OR small d!
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I don't see this in Hillary but I do see this in Bernie and Martin.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)I am a small d progressive and support Bernie...the 1%er is a corporate shill intent on raking in more corporate cash from Goldman, WellsFargo, CIBC, TD, Insurance companies, etc...Those voters who don't see it, don't want to see it...
Long race ahead...real challenge...
BERNIE: true believer in the American people...
jalan48
(14,914 posts)If Hillary gets the nomination she may get the Progressive vote this time but after the general election we are going to see Progressives break away (along with Greens). We can no longer pretend we are all one big party, we are not. Climate change by itself is a far too serious issue to let Wall Street candidates dictate the future of our children and grandchildren.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)listen to your betters and the political class they represent, not introductory poli sci!
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Renew Deal
(85,151 posts)No amount of twisting it will make Sanders a Democrat.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)He is a small d democrat. Once upon a time the Democratic party believed certain things. Many of us still believe in those things.
senz
(11,945 posts)I know quite a bit about Hillary and Bernie, and on those two, every word of your OP is true.
I actually don't know that much about O'Malley, but so far he sounds pretty good, certainly better than Hillary.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And about big money, big power, the War Machine...and it goes on and on.
She would be no different than her husband or Obama.
We've enough of them.
senz
(11,945 posts)Always have. Am so glad to see you writing more OPs -- you have much to add to the discussion, and we need all the intelligence we can get around here.