2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA New MSNBC Poll Shows Hillary Clinton Isn’t So Popular- And This Is Why (Video)
November 7, 2015

An independent poll created on MSNBCs website, showed that Hillary Clinton may not have the support of voters that she will need to beat Bernie Sanders.
Dan Berger created a user poll that asked Do you plan on voting for Hillary Clinton for president in 2016?
So far 123,000 people have cast their votes, and its looking pretty grim for Hillary.
Of the 123,000, only 16,000 have said they do plan to vote for Hillary in 2016, and about 3,000 said they were still undecided.
An overwhelming amount of the people polled, 104,000 to be exact, said they were not voting for Hillary.
Can you really blame them though?
...
http://aattp.org/a-new-msnbc-poll-shows-hillary-clinton-isnt-so-popular-and-this-is-why-video/
Direct link to the poll: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-hillary-2016#56789
leveymg
(36,418 posts)why most voters find her to be untrustworthy. If she runs, she will probably be beaten in the GE. And, that is why she's the wrong candidate for the Democratic Nomination.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Besides all her ahem mistakes and pretending for a flipping moment that I agreed with her on the issues, I have no intention of voting in someone who's going to need constant defending. Been there, done that from 1993-2001, especially in 1998, and never doing it again.
onenote
(46,227 posts)when they appoint a couple more junior Scalias to the Supreme Court (and fill the lower courts with more clones of Alito and Thomas than you can count).
Who will tell you the truth when they roll back various Obama executive orders on minimum wage, same sex benefits, climate change, etc etc etc.
Who will tell you the truth when they decide to harass immigrants and Muslims and anyone else not meeting their definition of a good (meaning Christian) American.
I'm a Bernie supporter and I'm appalled that some of my fellow Bernie supporters have adopted a holier than thou approach that Bernie himself rejects. He gets it. You don't.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Since the same people who do GOTV also tend to do the canvass, the futility of defending the candidate's positions will also erode GOTV efforts at the end of the election period. If you don't have effective GOTV, you will likely lose. No amount of money will save the election. That is what I am afraid will happen with Candidate Hillary.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Time magazine nailed it
...
http://time.com/3928948/bernie-sanders-immigration/
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Unfortunately.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Maybe next we can conclude that she can't win based on number of DU OPs.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,096 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Look, I'm a Bernie supporter, but we shouldn't be referencing online polls to support our arguments.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)You help make this place fun instead of infuriating.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Your expertise on polling and statistics is much needed around here.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Hillary supporters can delude themselves if they like, but don't take down the whole party with you in the General.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)User generated poll where people can share the link; just like the OP did.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)which is the largest group within the electorate. That goes back to 2008, if not further. That can only spell disaster in the General.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)it's a stratum that's promised us the moon every 2 or 6 years but then make life harder for the 80% of us without plush investments day by day, who doesn't have positions, just talking points that'll be reversed the moment the polls or money shifts, just pretty-sounding promises that are tailored to win the most votes
the stereotype's been around since the 1775 election, and for reason
every 2 years they've said "we'll KICK! REPUBLICAN! ASS!"--in 2010, '12, '14 ...
she'll blow up a million Iraqis and thousands of Americans and then hire proto-ISIS so she can look tough and get the votes and connections to move a step forward on the American political ladder ending at that nice Resolute desk
Catherina
(35,568 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)but that they're a logrolling web of old and nouveaux riches that's blocked the commoners from making themselves heard and that have set things up so that what little that passes that helps us is stuff that's slipped through (or passed--once it's become inevitable--to cover up some other crap)
they scream at each other all election season (which LASTS 23 months anyway by now) and then pass each other's bills in sync, laws to keep their donors happy; and the election's just artificial wedge issues that get your asshole uncle yelling at the screen/radio
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Which means she's monumentally stupid or coldly calculating enough to cost human lives to fulfill her ambitions.
In either case, it makes her unfit to hold public office.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Paraphrasing.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)The phrase "you broke it, you fix it" means nothing to certain people.
It's unforgivable.
Baitball Blogger
(52,714 posts)If memory serves me, in the first two years of Clinton's presidency, he did come on strong and provided his full support for gay issues. And if I can recall correctly, he faced a backlash that was only second to the barrage from the Starr investigations.
I'm not sure what they were like politically before that moment in history, but they should at least get credit for taking a step in the right direction--before they got run over by the Mack truck of conservative public opinion.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)If that isn't calculating, I don't know what is.
Baitball Blogger
(52,714 posts)Just offering an explanation for the way they are. I agree that public opinion polls drive them. Which means, that people who are not reached by pollsters will be underrepresented and possibly disenfranchised when they opt for Republican coalitions.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]You have to play the game to find out why you're playing the game. -Existenz[/center][/font][hr]
DCBob
(24,689 posts)wyldwolf
(43,891 posts)... trumpet expected results.
Translation: Bernie people, like Romney people and Ron Paul people before them, are scientific poll deniers who will appear as deer in the headlights when their guy loses.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Teabagged again!
pinebox
(5,761 posts)for the Dem forum.
TexasBushwhacker
(21,283 posts)Yes, it could be Bernie supporters, it could be Republicans too.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)as you have been socialized or because you voted on a war measure the way the majority voted?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)First, it's a self selecting online poll.
Second, it's a poll on MSNBC.com, which is NOT a news site (nbcnews.com is); it's a political discussion site affiliated with MSNBC, which attracts people sufficiently engaged in politics to want to read and discuss the details. That eliminates probably 80-90% of the Democratic electorate.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)Just saying...
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)blue neen
(12,465 posts)you can't call up or e-mail your friends and say, "Hey, this poll is up on MSNBC. Go and vote for Hillary right now!", or "Go and vote for Bernie right now." "And, make sure that you vote more than once!"
I've seen it done right here on this forum, also. You know, like posting this OP?
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.