HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » So, about this meme that ...

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:34 AM

So, about this meme that you have to have bazillions of dollars

to compete in today's political environment. If that was the case, Jeb would be winning by a landslide, Meg Whitman would have been California's Governor and Carly Fiorina would have been one of it's Senators.

Keep fighting, Bernie supporters, it's been done before and we can do it again.

35 replies, 2050 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 35 replies Author Time Post
Reply So, about this meme that you have to have bazillions of dollars (Original post)
Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 OP
Kalidurga Nov 2015 #1
jwirr Nov 2015 #4
Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #17
BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #2
NurseJackie Nov 2015 #8
Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #9
reddread Nov 2015 #18
Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #20
reddread Nov 2015 #21
Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #22
reddread Nov 2015 #23
dsc Nov 2015 #3
Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #5
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #6
Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #7
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #10
eridani Nov 2015 #11
MohRokTah Nov 2015 #16
Name removed Nov 2015 #25
eridani Nov 2015 #33
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #30
eridani Nov 2015 #32
SunSeeker Nov 2015 #34
eridani Nov 2015 #35
AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #12
Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #13
brooklynite Nov 2015 #14
reddread Nov 2015 #19
Nay Nov 2015 #27
1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #28
MohRokTah Nov 2015 #15
Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #24
Name removed Nov 2015 #26
1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #29
Uncle Joe Nov 2015 #31

Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:37 AM

1. But we do have a bazillion dollars

Bernie has 700,000 people that send him money. And there is the hidden campaign money it can't be counted there is just no way to estimate the amount of money all the volunteers spend knocking on doors, going to canvassing meetings, and all the other volunteer campaign work.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kalidurga (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:00 PM

4. Buying our own signs, copying or own flyers, organizing our

own meetings and actions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Kalidurga (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:05 AM

17. Of course you're right.

Those are the "intangibles" the Bean Counters hate because there's no way to quantify it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:42 AM

2. Not in the Primary but most certainly in the General Election.

In the primary, it's basically Party candidates against one another and a few million should be enough.

However, once the primaries are over, Citizens United becomes all-important when Democrat campaigns against Republican for the White House. Big Money will begin to unite against their single adversary.

Since Sanders is principled and is bucking the Citizens United new rules, and has neither big donors in the primaries and definitely none (no Super PACs) for the G.E., he'll be an easy target to defeat by the GOP money machine and the Libertarian billionaires who want to destroy "Big Gubmint".

In this era of Citizens United, your preferred primary candidate has decided to handicap himself just before entering the ring. Not smart. Noble? Principled? Ethical? Morally sound? Absolutely. But not a winning strategy against an opponent who is willing to bring out the big guns while Sanders holds a water pistol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:34 PM

8. Thank you! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:35 PM

9. What can big money accomplish that grass root cannot?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #9)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:09 PM

18. buy off the media

 

now why would that be necessary, let alone legal?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reddread (Reply #18)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:11 PM

20. I get your point, but *the media* is already OWNED by the 1%

They are simply a propaganda arm
of the oligarchs.

The 4th Estate is long gone.

It seems the money buys ADVERTISING.
It keeps the flow of money flowing
from the top, to the enablers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #20)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:17 PM

21. more like a revolving merry go round in this case

 

contributions flowing one way, votes flowing the other.
big media budgets, no nasty (or for that matter, fair) coverage.
total abrogation of responsibilities in place and inherent from the
dawn of broadcasting, no matter how they shed them, crimes against democracy.
believing a word or apparent action from criminals like that
is a bad idea.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to reddread (Reply #21)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:18 PM

22. Yep, That's how we know the 4th Estate is dead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #22)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:24 PM

23. 1st Amendment obituary written by "acceptable sources"

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 10:45 AM

3. jerry brown was the best known, non incumbent politician in the state when he ran and beat whitman

Jeb is losing to people who also have money (he isn't losing to Kasich for example).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:07 PM

5. And use our DU link to donate to Bernie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:12 PM

6. The 2016 Presidential Election is expected to cost $5 Billion.

This is not a state office campaign in a blue state. The Fiorina and Whitman examples in California, where very popular and well known and well financed Dem Governor and Senate candidates were on the ballot (Jerry Brown and Barbara Boxer), are just not applicable.

Bernie cannot do this on $10 Act Blue internet donations and no super pac help. Ask Russ Feingold.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #6)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 01:19 PM

7. It won't *cost* 5 billion. That's what will be spent

At $5 billion, what does
that breakdown to per vote?

What other nation spends
that kind of money to elect leaders?
NONE.

It's a symptom of the cancer
that plagues of political system.

It's a sure sign of corruption.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #7)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:23 PM

10. That's all you've got? Playing with semantics?

How about addressing my point?

How is unilateral disarmament going to get us what we want?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #10)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:58 AM

11. How does money overcome grassroots organizing? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Reply #11)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:04 AM

16. Paying three people to GOTV to every grassroots volunteer your opponent has in GOTV = Landslide. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #16)


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #16)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:24 PM

33. Because paid GOTV people are really, really motivated?

The game has changed with traditional media seeing significant aging of viewership, and social media and podcasting taking on increasingly important roles.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Reply #11)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:11 PM

30. By overwhelming the airwaves with propaganda. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #30)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:21 PM

32. So who's listening to the airwaves anymore?

Mostly people who won't vote for Democrats anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Reply #32)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:46 AM

34. Right. Who needs TV ads. Only Republicans watch TV.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SunSeeker (Reply #34)

Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:24 AM

35. Most voters are more annoyed by them than convinced of anything.

TV viewing is way down, with the median age of broadcast TV reaching an all time high of 54.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 07:07 AM

12. Money can't buy you love

 

Ask Scott Walker and Jeb! Jeb! has about $200 million. Walker has the Koch Brothers. Money can't buy you love.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AgingAmerican (Reply #12)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 10:54 AM

13. And money can't buy enthusiasm

and money doesn't translate to votes. That's why all these, "But Brown and . . . state elections . . . and established candidates" reactions. Money changing hands between the .01%ers is all they know.

BUT, we have to keep him viable throughout the early primary states so the REST OF THE COUNTRY can have the option of voting for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:00 AM

14. Correction, you have to have money as a threshold; you can still be a hopeless candidate...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #14)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:10 PM

19. thats for sure

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #14)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:45 PM

27. Thank you. Enough money is the baseline -- you still have to be able to run a

campaign, display energy, etc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nay (Reply #27)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:05 PM

28. I want to include, as a huge etc., ...

 

"and connect with key constituencies, within your parties base."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:02 AM

15. Money is a key component to the game.

 

And Sanders just does not have the fund raising capability in order to win a GE.

End of story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MohRokTah (Reply #15)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:37 PM

24. Not true

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #24)


Response to Name removed (Reply #26)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:10 PM

29. Now, THAT, is a meme ...

 

a fantasy fueled meme at that.

At the end, it'll be the decisions influenced by CU that will doom Clinton.


Unless I'm misunderstanding your point, HRC has the money to compete in this CU age; however, Bernie and O'Malley, do not ... less so, O'Malley, because he has not foreclosed on fund raising streams.

That, and Bernie's base is still growing on a rapid basis. None of them will ever be polled, of course.


That was the fantasy part.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Le Taz Hot (Original post)

Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:15 PM

31. Kicked and recommended.

Thanks for the thread, Le Taz Hot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread