Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:03 PM Nov 2015

as President you do not get to ignore national emergencies just because you're not prepared for them

if you can't even handle talking about them in a debate, how can you handle them in an actual situation?

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
as President you do not get to ignore national emergencies just because you're not prepared for them (Original Post) hill2016 Nov 2015 OP
Don't worry 72DejaVu Nov 2015 #1
Neither do Senators. mmonk Nov 2015 #2
We have enough problems in this country for many debates. -none Nov 2015 #3
Ah, yes, of course. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #17
An act of international terrorism IS a one-off event. -none Nov 2015 #20
Yeah, Hillary did soooooooooooo well when given time to study... Hepburn Nov 2015 #21
The American people deserve an in-depth debate Eric J in MN Nov 2015 #4
foreign policy and national security hill2016 Nov 2015 #10
In other words ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #19
You do know there are already five threads on this? nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #5
one more hill2016 Nov 2015 #7
I suppose ....... polly7 Nov 2015 #9
We are not in a national emergency, for starters AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #6
right hill2016 Nov 2015 #8
Sorry, but performing for the cameras in a debate, Hortensis Nov 2015 #11
yup hill2016 Nov 2015 #12
Umhm. Experience matters. IF this shows that off, Hortensis Nov 2015 #13
Hillary has a ton of experience Bomb Iraq, Coop in Honduras ,Libya, Ukraine ... bahrbearian Nov 2015 #22
And the issues that will now get no airing in a debate at all? jeff47 Nov 2015 #14
Bernie didn't say that Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #15
his campaign did hill2016 Nov 2015 #16
Who said they're scared? Hissyspit Nov 2015 #23
Killing more Innocent people. bahrbearian Nov 2015 #25
My God, I had never thought of this. ithinkmyliverhurts Nov 2015 #18
How did we go from a DUer insisting that Bernie is a warhawk, to this? Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #24

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
1. Don't worry
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:07 PM
Nov 2015

If Bernie is elected, I am sure that Putin and Assad and the Chinese will never do anything he thinks is unfair.

-none

(1,884 posts)
3. We have enough problems in this country for many debates.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:13 PM
Nov 2015

Let's not get bogged down in current events that will be old news in a year. Many, if not most current domestic problems will still be with us with next November's elections

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
17. Ah, yes, of course.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:31 PM
Nov 2015

An act of international terrorism is a one-off event, and will never have to be addressed by a US president in future - what with it being "old news" and all.

I mean, look at 9-11 - old news! And nothing has happened since then that an American president would need to address.

Jesus Hussein Christ.

-none

(1,884 posts)
20. An act of international terrorism IS a one-off event.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:47 PM
Nov 2015

And Presidents have advisers. Presidents are not sovereign and expected to think of everything themselves. That is why they have staffs and department heads with their own staffs. So I wouldn't worry too much about when Bernie becomes President.
And BTY, that is Barack Hussein Obama. That other guy died a long time ago.

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)
21. Yeah, Hillary did soooooooooooo well when given time to study...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:49 PM
Nov 2015

...the IWR. Scares me shitless to think of the mistakes she would make if not given any time to study a problem.

Eric J in MN

(35,639 posts)
4. The American people deserve an in-depth debate
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:15 PM
Nov 2015

...on the candidates' domestic policies.

Bernie Sanders' has better domestic policies than the other candidates.

He's the only one who has promised that the US won't have the most prisoners when he's president.

The only one who wants to make marijuana federally legal.

The only one who wants public universities to be tuition-free.

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
19. In other words ...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:35 PM
Nov 2015

... the debates should be focused on BS's perceived strong points, and avoid any topics where he might falter or demonstrate his ill-preparedness to adequately respond.

Got it!

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
6. We are not in a national emergency, for starters
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:20 PM
Nov 2015

And we shall see who handles who during the debate. America is sick and tired of war.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
8. right
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:21 PM
Nov 2015

and if Sanders can't even handle talking about an emergency that happened overseas what makes you think he can handle an actual emergency?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
11. Sorry, but performing for the cameras in a debate,
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:22 PM
Nov 2015

where an entire election could hang on a single word, is NOT analogous to meeting in private with the security council. HRC, as former Secretary of State, has a real advantage in this switcheroo to foreign policy. Even if all candidates should have been studying foreign policy for a long time now, it's NOT "fair."

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
12. yup
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:23 PM
Nov 2015

as we see, real actual experience counts.

It's not something you can learn from a book.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. Umhm. Experience matters. IF this shows that off,
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:24 PM
Nov 2015

it may be "unfair," but it's likely to reveal a truth that a more controlled debate could obscure.

bahrbearian

(13,466 posts)
22. Hillary has a ton of experience Bomb Iraq, Coop in Honduras ,Libya, Ukraine ...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:58 PM
Nov 2015

Experience that people will die for.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. And the issues that will now get no airing in a debate at all?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:25 PM
Nov 2015

Limiting us to so few debates and then ripping out the content of one debate means those issues will never be covered.

It's one of the big downsides to DWS's plan.

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
23. Who said they're scared?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 10:00 PM
Nov 2015

Maybe they thought the change was biased or unfair or inappropriate. I don't know. All I've read so far is from ANOTHER CAMPAIGN'S STAFFER.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»as President you do not g...