2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumas President you do not get to ignore national emergencies just because you're not prepared for them
if you can't even handle talking about them in a debate, how can you handle them in an actual situation?
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)If Bernie is elected, I am sure that Putin and Assad and the Chinese will never do anything he thinks is unfair.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)-none
(1,884 posts)Let's not get bogged down in current events that will be old news in a year. Many, if not most current domestic problems will still be with us with next November's elections
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)An act of international terrorism is a one-off event, and will never have to be addressed by a US president in future - what with it being "old news" and all.
I mean, look at 9-11 - old news! And nothing has happened since then that an American president would need to address.
Jesus Hussein Christ.
-none
(1,884 posts)And Presidents have advisers. Presidents are not sovereign and expected to think of everything themselves. That is why they have staffs and department heads with their own staffs. So I wouldn't worry too much about when Bernie becomes President.
And BTY, that is Barack Hussein Obama. That other guy died a long time ago.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)...the IWR. Scares me shitless to think of the mistakes she would make if not given any time to study a problem.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...on the candidates' domestic policies.
Bernie Sanders' has better domestic policies than the other candidates.
He's the only one who has promised that the US won't have the most prisoners when he's president.
The only one who wants to make marijuana federally legal.
The only one who wants public universities to be tuition-free.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)are important too.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... the debates should be focused on BS's perceived strong points, and avoid any topics where he might falter or demonstrate his ill-preparedness to adequately respond.
Got it!
polly7
(20,582 posts)can't hurt
polly7
(20,582 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And we shall see who handles who during the debate. America is sick and tired of war.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)and if Sanders can't even handle talking about an emergency that happened overseas what makes you think he can handle an actual emergency?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)where an entire election could hang on a single word, is NOT analogous to meeting in private with the security council. HRC, as former Secretary of State, has a real advantage in this switcheroo to foreign policy. Even if all candidates should have been studying foreign policy for a long time now, it's NOT "fair."
as we see, real actual experience counts.
It's not something you can learn from a book.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)it may be "unfair," but it's likely to reveal a truth that a more controlled debate could obscure.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Experience that people will die for.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Limiting us to so few debates and then ripping out the content of one debate means those issues will never be covered.
It's one of the big downsides to DWS's plan.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)what are they scared off?
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)Maybe they thought the change was biased or unfair or inappropriate. I don't know. All I've read so far is from ANOTHER CAMPAIGN'S STAFFER.
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)ithinkmyliverhurts
(1,928 posts)Hillary 2016.