2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI don't think Sanders actually knows what Wall Street is.
I doubt many people here either.
Does he think that the only thing banks do are credit card and mortgages? Clinton tried to tell him that Glass-Steagall would not have covered AIG and Lehman Brothers.
Why is their business model "Fraud"?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)so what exactly does Wall Street do? Why is their business model fraud?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)That's all I need to know.
Do you think her son-in-law is pissed she's going to come down hard on hedge funds?
She said that Glass-Steagall wouldn't have helped on AIG and Lehman and she wants to take a holistic approach, broader than Glass-Steagall.
Did you miss that part?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Hillary's 'holistic approach' is nothing more than empty words. I'm sorry you're behind the curve.
so you don't have a substantive response do you?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)at that point.
What "holistic" approach does she want?
Did you miss that part?
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)and the government made them take back their fraudulent crap from Fannie/Freddie. Minus the bogus crap from Wall St., Freddie/Fannie are now in the black. They were lucky, many didn't get their money back.
who were the mortgages originated and serviced by?
Not Wall Street.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)which immediately sold them to Wall St. Crap mortgages were packaged as AAA and sold to investors.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)was originated by Countrywide (and other originators)? How was that Wall Street's fault?
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)a sure bet. They were not. They were based on subprime loans. They ran out of prime loans to package in 2005 so they took what they could get.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)the AAA derivatives were over-collaterialized. Should have been safe. None of the models took into account a -40% HPA.
LSK
(36,846 posts)putitinD
(1,551 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)DURHAM D
(32,606 posts)Kind of pathetic.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)it took several years before things got straightened up. One entire area over near Pearl Street was virtually w/o people, office buildings abandoned. I walked the streets many times shuffling through stuff that lined the curbs and cover the fronts of buildings. The first people to actually repopulate the are were young people from various colleges that bought up the office suites for dorms. I was blown away all of them in the area.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)many larger firms left NYC for good. It was devastating for many people. So ignorant to assume everyone working down there is a six figure banker.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)and even Fraunces Tavern. They were happy to see us. Spent a lot of time walking those desolate streets. We would go do shows for the museums so they could have a couple good days to attract people.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Outside of NYC it seems, many have no idea it effected the entire city in very significant ways. I got what she was saying about NYers supporting her. She worked hard for NYC.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Clinton stands foursquare with the Repugicans against reintroducing Glass-Steagall.
By the way, Sanders seems to be dominating this 'debate'.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Banks, wallstreet, and insurance industry are all just hucksters.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts).... our economy would be limited to banging rocks together an poking at the ground with sticks. America's financial industry is one off our great assets in the world economy and we would be an impoverished backwater without it
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)PosterChild
(1,307 posts)... just as cognizant and informed as your comment
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)Glass-Steagall would not have directly applied to Lehman or AIG. It would have prevented banks like Wachovia or WaMu from securitizing their own loan pools. Without those securitizations, AIG wouldn't have been in trouble for taking sucker bets on MBS CDS. Without those banks (and others) making a secondary market possible, Lehman would have had trouble failing because they wouldn't have had the chance to leverage themselves so hightly.
Glass-Steagall isn't meant to be a magic wand that fixes everything. It's meant to put a firewall between the Treasury and bad bets made by bankers.
As for fraud, I recommend William Black of UMKC. He's the foremost authority on financial fraud in America today. Sanders is likely familiar with him since he hired Black's colleague, Stephanie Kelton, to be the chief minority economist for the Senate Budget Committee.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)AIG wouldn't have been able to take those sucker bets. The CFMA gave them an exemption from New York's gambling laws.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Part in the financial crisis. He needs to be honest.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)have a substantive response?
Do you know what exactly is Wall Street?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Both "questions" you've just asked me can only be adequately responded to by your point of view. That's not a question, it's a direction, and I take no direction from you or Hillary Clinton.
basically you don't really have a reply?
Fearless
(18,421 posts)And go find the people who know what they're talking about.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)He has no idea what he's talking about as Clinton schooled him today.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)And you are horrifically biased. Citing your screen name and your icon. It's clear you have an agenda. I have no interest in talking to someone who clearly has no grasp on what actually happened tonight.
LSK
(36,846 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)AIG and Lehman wouldn't have been stopped by Glass-Steagall.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)LSK
(36,846 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)don't understand what happened back in 2008 much less what derivatives and collateralized debt obligations are nor about the fraudulent AAA ratings.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)to bet on that?
I have right in front of me two books called "Credit Derivatives CDOs & Structured Credit Products" and "Securitization The Financial Instrument of the Future".
Avalux
(35,015 posts)PosterChild
(1,307 posts)DianeK
(975 posts)of all people in our great country...Bernie Sanders understands more how Wall Street operates over anyone else..bar none! are you serious? if you are seriously asking this question then you just do not know!
hill2016
(1,772 posts)shows he clearly doesn't know what Wall Street does.
Clinton was trying to tell him (AIG and Lehman would not have been impacted by Glass-Steagal).
DianeK
(975 posts)so educate yourself before responding to what you do not understand, perhaps
hill2016
(1,772 posts)you don't know what Wall Street is either, so how can you tell that Sanders is the greatest expert on Wall Street ever?
840high
(17,196 posts)reading this op.
i have a much better idea than you