Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:13 PM Nov 2015

I don't think Sanders actually knows what Wall Street is.

I doubt many people here either.

Does he think that the only thing banks do are credit card and mortgages? Clinton tried to tell him that Glass-Steagall would not have covered AIG and Lehman Brothers.

Why is their business model "Fraud"?

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't think Sanders actually knows what Wall Street is. (Original Post) hill2016 Nov 2015 OP
Oh yes, we're all stupid and so is Bernie. n/t Avalux Nov 2015 #1
sure hill2016 Nov 2015 #2
What I heard is that Hillary DOES NOT support re-instating Glass-Steagall. Avalux Nov 2015 #4
huh? hill2016 Nov 2015 #6
Awww...you still haven't figured it out, have you? Avalux Nov 2015 #7
sorry hill2016 Nov 2015 #8
About what? I don't bite bait. n/t Avalux Nov 2015 #9
No, it wouldn't have - because it had been gone for so long Fawke Em Nov 2015 #31
Their mortgage based derivatives were wide scale fraud Mnpaul Nov 2015 #17
so hill2016 Nov 2015 #18
Countrywide Mnpaul Nov 2015 #20
so the bogus stuff hill2016 Nov 2015 #23
Wall St. sold them as AAA based derivatives Mnpaul Nov 2015 #24
yeah well hill2016 Nov 2015 #27
I paid my mortgage to CitiMortgage for quite a long time, that is WALL STREET LSK Nov 2015 #32
Hillary is probably getting her answers fed to her from wall street. putitinD Nov 2015 #3
Tonight she'll report back to them. 840high Nov 2015 #55
Serious. He sounds stuck in a loop. bravenak Nov 2015 #5
O'M and BS are both stuck in the 1990s. DURHAM D Nov 2015 #13
I'd say 60's for the one and 90's for the other. bravenak Nov 2015 #14
I'm surprised that people think ONLY the WTC was damaged that day. Ignorant. bettyellen Nov 2015 #10
The financial district of the World was effectively out of business.... Historic NY Nov 2015 #37
So many thousand businesses below Canal St- many of them small were decimated... bettyellen Nov 2015 #39
Exactly, we would drive down there from upstate to patronize the coffee shops, or sandwich places.. Historic NY Nov 2015 #53
Yep, for the first time in my life I missed the tourists. Took a long time to get them back. bettyellen Nov 2015 #54
Hillary was right too Gman Nov 2015 #11
She was certainly on the "right" Fearless Nov 2015 #26
Bottom line ... earthside Nov 2015 #12
Their business model is fraud. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #15
If it weren't for those hucksters.... PosterChild Nov 2015 #45
... PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #46
I like your reply . ... PosterChild Nov 2015 #52
She's right but wrong MFrohike Nov 2015 #16
without the CFMA Act(which passsed at the same time) Mnpaul Nov 2015 #19
Is Sanders going to say he voted for the Commodities Futures Modifications Act which played a big Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #21
obviously you are naive? Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #22
Best joke I've heard all night! Would you like a few more straws to grasp at?? Fearless Nov 2015 #25
do you actually hill2016 Nov 2015 #29
Do you know how to ask actual questions? Fearless Nov 2015 #33
so hill2016 Nov 2015 #47
A reply to nonsense? There is no reply to nonsense except to shake your head Fearless Nov 2015 #49
I would advise you to stay away from Sanders though hill2016 Nov 2015 #50
Like I said, you have no idea what you're talking about. Fearless Nov 2015 #51
Did you miss the whole derivatives housing crash thing??? LSK Nov 2015 #28
as Hillary explained hill2016 Nov 2015 #30
You really don't know how Wall St. works do you? Fearless Nov 2015 #35
seperating savings and loans from risky business aka derivatives would have prevented a lot LSK Nov 2015 #36
I'm pretty sure now Clinton supporters mmonk Nov 2015 #34
and how much are you willing hill2016 Nov 2015 #41
Now I understand your support of Hillary. n/t Avalux Nov 2015 #42
But do you understand wall street ? Nt PosterChild Nov 2015 #48
that is actually hilarious! DianeK Nov 2015 #38
the answer he gave on national tv hill2016 Nov 2015 #40
you are showing your age DianeK Nov 2015 #43
I'm guessing hill2016 Nov 2015 #44
Obviously you don't. What a waste 840high Nov 2015 #57
i think hill2016 Nov 2015 #58
go read your 2 books 840high Nov 2015 #56

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
4. What I heard is that Hillary DOES NOT support re-instating Glass-Steagall.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:17 PM
Nov 2015

That's all I need to know.

Do you think her son-in-law is pissed she's going to come down hard on hedge funds?

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
6. huh?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:19 PM
Nov 2015

She said that Glass-Steagall wouldn't have helped on AIG and Lehman and she wants to take a holistic approach, broader than Glass-Steagall.

Did you miss that part?

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
7. Awww...you still haven't figured it out, have you?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:20 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary's 'holistic approach' is nothing more than empty words. I'm sorry you're behind the curve.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
31. No, it wouldn't have - because it had been gone for so long
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:07 AM
Nov 2015

at that point.

What "holistic" approach does she want?

Did you miss that part?

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
17. Their mortgage based derivatives were wide scale fraud
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:48 PM
Nov 2015

and the government made them take back their fraudulent crap from Fannie/Freddie. Minus the bogus crap from Wall St., Freddie/Fannie are now in the black. They were lucky, many didn't get their money back.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
20. Countrywide
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:53 PM
Nov 2015

which immediately sold them to Wall St. Crap mortgages were packaged as AAA and sold to investors.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
23. so the bogus stuff
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:56 PM
Nov 2015

was originated by Countrywide (and other originators)? How was that Wall Street's fault?

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
24. Wall St. sold them as AAA based derivatives
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:01 AM
Nov 2015

a sure bet. They were not. They were based on subprime loans. They ran out of prime loans to package in 2005 so they took what they could get.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
27. yeah well
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:05 AM
Nov 2015

the AAA derivatives were over-collaterialized. Should have been safe. None of the models took into account a -40% HPA.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
37. The financial district of the World was effectively out of business....
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:10 AM
Nov 2015

it took several years before things got straightened up. One entire area over near Pearl Street was virtually w/o people, office buildings abandoned. I walked the streets many times shuffling through stuff that lined the curbs and cover the fronts of buildings. The first people to actually repopulate the are were young people from various colleges that bought up the office suites for dorms. I was blown away all of them in the area.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
39. So many thousand businesses below Canal St- many of them small were decimated...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:16 AM
Nov 2015

many larger firms left NYC for good. It was devastating for many people. So ignorant to assume everyone working down there is a six figure banker.

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
53. Exactly, we would drive down there from upstate to patronize the coffee shops, or sandwich places..
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:29 AM
Nov 2015

and even Fraunces Tavern. They were happy to see us. Spent a lot of time walking those desolate streets. We would go do shows for the museums so they could have a couple good days to attract people.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
54. Yep, for the first time in my life I missed the tourists. Took a long time to get them back.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:35 AM
Nov 2015

Outside of NYC it seems, many have no idea it effected the entire city in very significant ways. I got what she was saying about NYers supporting her. She worked hard for NYC.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
12. Bottom line ...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:25 PM
Nov 2015

Clinton stands foursquare with the Repugicans against reintroducing Glass-Steagall.

By the way, Sanders seems to be dominating this 'debate'.

PosterChild

(1,307 posts)
45. If it weren't for those hucksters....
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:22 AM
Nov 2015

.... our economy would be limited to banging rocks together an poking at the ground with sticks. America's financial industry is one off our great assets in the world economy and we would be an impoverished backwater without it

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
16. She's right but wrong
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:34 PM
Nov 2015

Glass-Steagall would not have directly applied to Lehman or AIG. It would have prevented banks like Wachovia or WaMu from securitizing their own loan pools. Without those securitizations, AIG wouldn't have been in trouble for taking sucker bets on MBS CDS. Without those banks (and others) making a secondary market possible, Lehman would have had trouble failing because they wouldn't have had the chance to leverage themselves so hightly.

Glass-Steagall isn't meant to be a magic wand that fixes everything. It's meant to put a firewall between the Treasury and bad bets made by bankers.

As for fraud, I recommend William Black of UMKC. He's the foremost authority on financial fraud in America today. Sanders is likely familiar with him since he hired Black's colleague, Stephanie Kelton, to be the chief minority economist for the Senate Budget Committee.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
19. without the CFMA Act(which passsed at the same time)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:51 PM
Nov 2015

AIG wouldn't have been able to take those sucker bets. The CFMA gave them an exemption from New York's gambling laws.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
21. Is Sanders going to say he voted for the Commodities Futures Modifications Act which played a big
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:54 PM
Nov 2015

Part in the financial crisis. He needs to be honest.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
33. Do you know how to ask actual questions?
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:08 AM
Nov 2015

Both "questions" you've just asked me can only be adequately responded to by your point of view. That's not a question, it's a direction, and I take no direction from you or Hillary Clinton.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
49. A reply to nonsense? There is no reply to nonsense except to shake your head
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:25 AM
Nov 2015

And go find the people who know what they're talking about.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
50. I would advise you to stay away from Sanders though
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:26 AM
Nov 2015

He has no idea what he's talking about as Clinton schooled him today.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
51. Like I said, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:28 AM
Nov 2015

And you are horrifically biased. Citing your screen name and your icon. It's clear you have an agenda. I have no interest in talking to someone who clearly has no grasp on what actually happened tonight.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
34. I'm pretty sure now Clinton supporters
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:09 AM
Nov 2015

don't understand what happened back in 2008 much less what derivatives and collateralized debt obligations are nor about the fraudulent AAA ratings.

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
41. and how much are you willing
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:18 AM
Nov 2015

to bet on that?

I have right in front of me two books called "Credit Derivatives CDOs & Structured Credit Products" and "Securitization The Financial Instrument of the Future".

 

DianeK

(975 posts)
38. that is actually hilarious!
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:10 AM
Nov 2015

of all people in our great country...Bernie Sanders understands more how Wall Street operates over anyone else..bar none! are you serious? if you are seriously asking this question then you just do not know!

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
40. the answer he gave on national tv
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:17 AM
Nov 2015

shows he clearly doesn't know what Wall Street does.

Clinton was trying to tell him (AIG and Lehman would not have been impacted by Glass-Steagal).

 

DianeK

(975 posts)
43. you are showing your age
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:20 AM
Nov 2015

so educate yourself before responding to what you do not understand, perhaps

 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
44. I'm guessing
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:22 AM
Nov 2015

you don't know what Wall Street is either, so how can you tell that Sanders is the greatest expert on Wall Street ever?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I don't think Sanders act...