Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:20 AM Nov 2015

It sounds as though Clinton "won" the debate for the following reason...

Sanders' goal wasn't in fact to "win" the debate; it was to slow Clinton's upward trajectory AND to peel away some of her supporters, because that's the only way he can win the Primary. To that end, he needed to expand support beyond his traditional base. From what I've read, he didn't add an issue to the discussion that hadn't already been debated, and Clinton didn't flub an issue that hasn't already been thrown at her ineffectively.

nb - someone will point out all the online polls that said Sanders won -- and that's part of the problem. The people who run out after a debate to search out online polls and vote on them are already enthusiastic Sanders supporters; they don't reflect any shifting of votes from Clinton.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It sounds as though Clinton "won" the debate for the following reason... (Original Post) brooklynite Nov 2015 OP
Yes, he spoke only to his base. A Dem in Iowa polled said this .. Cha Nov 2015 #1
I wasn't home, but really that is what he said? Iliyah Nov 2015 #2
Yes. I know.. Unbelieveable! Cha Nov 2015 #4
No, this quote is just another bullshit answer that never happened! dmosh42 Nov 2015 #6
He explained how he worked with the other side to push some of the most Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #41
HRC Did Not Win - HRC Doubled Down On Her IWR Vote - She Bears Responsibility For The Middle East cantbeserious Nov 2015 #3
Her IWR vote came up in 2008...she got as many votes as Obama brooklynite Nov 2015 #5
Misdirection - Does Not Change The Facts - And - Does Not Change Her Ownership Of Results cantbeserious Nov 2015 #7
I'm just addressing whether Sanders ended up getting any of her votes... brooklynite Nov 2015 #9
Your Opinion Only - Others See The World Differently cantbeserious Nov 2015 #10
My opinion, informed by the results of the 2008 Primary... brooklynite Nov 2015 #11
Your Opinion Only - Others See The World Differently - Your's Is Not The Only Perspective Of Events cantbeserious Nov 2015 #12
Still waiting for yours brooklynite Nov 2015 #14
Just Gave It - Matters Not What The Establishment Party Thinks - Matters Only What The People Think cantbeserious Nov 2015 #17
And what is your evidence that The People feel differently now than in 2008? brooklynite Nov 2015 #19
The Massive Turn Out For Bernie - HRC Not Even Close - The Despicable Manipulations By The DNC cantbeserious Nov 2015 #20
"Massive turn out..." brooklynite Nov 2015 #23
Misdirection - One Is Becoming Known For This Tactic cantbeserious Nov 2015 #24
Pointing to data from previous elections where the outsider DIDN'T win = "misdirection" brooklynite Nov 2015 #27
Misdirection - The Item Up For Discussion Is This Election - One Seems To Want To Live In The Past cantbeserious Nov 2015 #28
Ah, you are the People and speak for all of them. Good to know... Thor_MN Nov 2015 #25
Thank You - But Know - However - One Does Have Eyes - The Crowd Numbers Tell The Tale cantbeserious Nov 2015 #26
Delusions of grandeur... Seek help. Thor_MN Nov 2015 #29
Ad Hominem Attacks Are Against DU Rules - Clearly One Is Unable To Face Reality cantbeserious Nov 2015 #30
The "reality" that one speaks for anyone other than oneself? Delusional to think otherwise. Thor_MN Nov 2015 #32
Ad Hominem Attacks Are Against DU Rules - One Is Doubling Down cantbeserious Nov 2015 #34
One doesn't speak for anyone other than oneself, never trust one who claims otherwise. Thor_MN Nov 2015 #35
Tripling Down On The Ad Hominem Attack That Started This Sub-Thread cantbeserious Nov 2015 #37
Have a nice day. Thor_MN Nov 2015 #39
Today's stage is very different than 2008. Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #43
No she did not "double down" on the IWR vote. She said it was a mistake. Lil Missy Nov 2015 #13
Admitting The Mistake Does Not Make Up For The Deplorable Conflations She Made - The 9/11 Comparison cantbeserious Nov 2015 #16
Thank you. Now I know I can't ever take anything you say seriously. n/t Lil Missy Nov 2015 #21
Ad Hominem Attacks Are Against DU Rules - Clearly One Is Unable To Face Reality cantbeserious Nov 2015 #22
You 'logic' is flawed. Even IF she doubled down--that does not mean she did not win the debate. BTW. riversedge Nov 2015 #18
What additional legal authority did george bush gain from the 2002 iwr vote BlueStateLib Nov 2015 #40
The Senator from Wall Street lost berni_mccoy Nov 2015 #8
We will know in about 9 days who is going to benefit from the debate Kalidurga Nov 2015 #15
I agree that he spoke to his base and they likely will stand pat. I don't think he MADem Nov 2015 #31
saving up enid602 Nov 2015 #38
Spin, spin, spin. artislife Nov 2015 #33
the following reason...$$$$$$ bahrbearian Nov 2015 #36
It was a de facto win as opposed to a de jeur win. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #42
Having reviewed the PPP 'polling' done by a Hillary Superpac, the language about intenet polling is Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #44
How about the CBS overnight poll? brooklynite Nov 2015 #45
Among Democrats, Clinton is seen as winning by more than two to one, while independents are split... MADem Nov 2015 #46

Cha

(320,554 posts)
1. Yes, he spoke only to his base. A Dem in Iowa polled said this ..
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:23 AM
Nov 2015
“Focused entirely on his base which demands the pure," said an unaligned Iowa Democrat. "Worst answer: Asked directly how he would work with a GOP Congress, he argued that the Political Revolution would sweep aside all in its path.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/insiders-bad-night-for-bernie-215901#ixzz3rZPLIGb6

Baitball Blogger

(52,714 posts)
41. He explained how he worked with the other side to push some of the most
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:41 AM
Nov 2015

comprehensive legislation for veterans. It was a response to a question asking what crisis have you faced that shows you're ready for the presidency. (Very loose paraphrasing on my part.)

Really, a president doesn't know what kind of Congress he will face until after the election. But, Bernie is a smart man. He knows how the game is played.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
3. HRC Did Not Win - HRC Doubled Down On Her IWR Vote - She Bears Responsibility For The Middle East
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:30 AM
Nov 2015

eom

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
7. Misdirection - Does Not Change The Facts - And - Does Not Change Her Ownership Of Results
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:32 AM
Nov 2015

eom

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
9. I'm just addressing whether Sanders ended up getting any of her votes...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:35 AM
Nov 2015

...if IWR didn't stop people from voting for her in 2008, it won't stop them now.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
11. My opinion, informed by the results of the 2008 Primary...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:40 AM
Nov 2015

...and FWIW, I ended up supporting Obama then.

Your opinion is informed by....?

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
12. Your Opinion Only - Others See The World Differently - Your's Is Not The Only Perspective Of Events
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:43 AM
Nov 2015

eom

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
17. Just Gave It - Matters Not What The Establishment Party Thinks - Matters Only What The People Think
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:45 AM
Nov 2015

eom

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
20. The Massive Turn Out For Bernie - HRC Not Even Close - The Despicable Manipulations By The DNC
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:52 AM
Nov 2015

To protect HRC at all costs - By the DNC DWS DLC THird-Way Party Establishment.

 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
27. Pointing to data from previous elections where the outsider DIDN'T win = "misdirection"
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:02 AM
Nov 2015

Good to know

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
28. Misdirection - The Item Up For Discussion Is This Election - One Seems To Want To Live In The Past
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:04 AM
Nov 2015

eom

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
26. Thank You - But Know - However - One Does Have Eyes - The Crowd Numbers Tell The Tale
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:02 AM
Nov 2015

eom

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
32. The "reality" that one speaks for anyone other than oneself? Delusional to think otherwise.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:09 AM
Nov 2015
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
35. One doesn't speak for anyone other than oneself, never trust one who claims otherwise.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:16 AM
Nov 2015

Baitball Blogger

(52,714 posts)
43. Today's stage is very different than 2008.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:44 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:21 PM - Edit history (1)

When you have the CIA pointing out that the Bush Administration was faulty in their response to early warnings prior to 9/11, it makes you reexamine everything that occurred since that time that kept us on a road we shouldn't be on today.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
16. Admitting The Mistake Does Not Make Up For The Deplorable Conflations She Made - The 9/11 Comparison
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:44 AM
Nov 2015

She Doubled Down.

riversedge

(81,530 posts)
18. You 'logic' is flawed. Even IF she doubled down--that does not mean she did not win the debate. BTW.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:47 AM
Nov 2015

she did not double down--she said it was a mistake.

BlueStateLib

(937 posts)
40. What additional legal authority did george bush gain from the 2002 iwr vote
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:34 AM
Nov 2015

Bush already had
1- The terms of the 1991 Gulf War resolution were still binding, desert storm hostilities ended with a cease fire and all the u.n. resolutions were still in effect.
2- Terms of the Sept. 14, 2001 congressional resolution approving military action against terrorism (S.J. Res 23)·

Only one person voted against war and that was Rep Barbara Lee. If the 2002 iwr was a vote for war, why was Iraq invaded by hans blix and the u.n. weapons inspectors?

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
8. The Senator from Wall Street lost
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:33 AM
Nov 2015

Because she is against:
Ending SuperPACs
Free College
Reinstating Glass-Steagall

And because her foreign policy decisions resulted in ISIS and she tied her Wall Street donations to 911. DISGRACEFUL!

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
15. We will know in about 9 days who is going to benefit from the debate
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:44 AM
Nov 2015

when the new national polls come out. That won't even tell us who is winning state by state, but we will have some clues. Right now is anyone's guess how the general public feels about the debate.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
31. I agree that he spoke to his base and they likely will stand pat. I don't think he
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:06 AM
Nov 2015

grew his cadre of supporters at all, in fact, I think anyone on the fence would have turned away. He seemed irritated, distracted, and tired. He was leaning on that podium like he needed support.

These poor kids that run around cache-clearing and dummying up the online polls need to understand that there's no cache-clearing at the voting booth. That's asking for awareness, though, and they're more interested in the appearance of "winning" to the point that they're doing it like a North Korean dictator--it's just absurd.

O'Malley might have helped himself a bit, particularly with the Trump 'carnival barker' line. An undecided voter might just be tempted to respond with O'Malley's name to a pollster after that great quip. I just found his performance inartful--he did not seem comfortable in his own skin.

enid602

(9,754 posts)
38. saving up
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:19 AM
Nov 2015

Hillary had a few openings that she did not take. She could have asked him for a list of congressional candidates who are running on his 'revolution,' or a list of current congress people who endorse him. He said twice that the business model for Wall Street is fraud, which might make New Yorkers queasy given their city's dependence on the financial sector. Such a statement would not play out well in the GE.

She seems to be saving up for a future debate.

Bernie's explanation of his efforts on veterans' benefits in response to the question of how he would handle a crisis like Paris was a bit odd.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
42. It was a de facto win as opposed to a de jeur win.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 11:44 AM
Nov 2015

Nothing will really change, ergo it's a win for whomever holds the lead.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
44. Having reviewed the PPP 'polling' done by a Hillary Superpac, the language about intenet polling is
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:03 PM
Nov 2015

a tad specious. Sure, internet polls are what they are. But a stilted poll designed by the purchaser of the poll is also what it is, and the folks who spend money and time in advance to do some funky number work are clearly committed to that game completely. 'Do not read internet polls, read only the polls we had made for you to read, that's what's fair'.

To be very clear, internet polls are flawed, the PPP polling is intentionally skewed and only dinging one of those things makes your position look weak to me. Manipulative statistics are manipulative. Not just some of them. Contrived and meaningless results are contrived and meaningless results, not just some but all.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
46. Among Democrats, Clinton is seen as winning by more than two to one, while independents are split...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:43 PM
Nov 2015
Immediately after Saturday night's Democratic debate, CBS News interviewed a nationally representative sample of debate watchers assembled by GfK's Knowledge Panel who identified themselves as Democrats or independents. By a 23 point margin, these debate watchers say Hillary Clinton won the debate. Fifty-one percent say Clinton won, compared to 28 percent who favor Bernie Sanders. Just 7 percent pick Martin O'Malley as the winner. Fourteen percent called it a tie.

Among Democrats, Clinton is seen as winning by more than two to one, while independents are split between Clinton and Sanders.

Handling the Issues
In light of the terrorist attacks on Friday night in Paris, Saturday night's debate shifted much of its focus to foreign policy, terrorism, and addressing the threat posed by the Islamic militant group ISIS. On these topics, Clinton scores a commanding lead over her rivals. More than six in 10 Democrats and independents who watched the debate think Hillary Clinton would do the best job on each of these measures, compared to about a quarter who pick Sanders, and about one in 10 who pick O'Malley.

But on domestic issues, views are more mixed. While Clinton has a slight lead over Sanders on handling gun policy (43 - 36 percent), Sanders beats Clinton by almost two to one on handling income inequality. When it comes to the economy and jobs, Clinton and Sanders are about even. O'Malley trails both candidates on all of these by a wide margin.


Hillary Clinton 51
Bernie Sanders 28
Martin O’Malley 7
Tie 14





http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-second-democratic-debate-november-2015-cbs-news/

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It sounds as though Clint...