Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:26 AM Nov 2015

O'Malley Slams Clinton's 'SHAMEFUL' Comment on 9/11 and Wall Street Ties


“...I believe that we should not be on the hook as taxpayers for the bad bets that are made by banks that have grown too big to manage on Wall Street,” he said. “And in that shameful moment I think Secretary Clinton was trying to pump out a smokescreen to cover her tracks on this one....”





Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley on Monday slammed Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton for her “shameful” response linking 9/11 to her Wall Street donations. In Saturday’s second Democratic debate, the former senator reminded viewers that she represented New York during the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and said much of the support Wall Street has given her stems from that event. “We were attacked in downtown Manhattan, where Wall Street is,” Clinton said. “I did spend a whole lot of time and effort helping them rebuild. That was good for New York, it was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists who had attacked our country.”



Speaking on CNN’s “New Day,” O’Malley blasted Clinton for what he said was an inappropriate response. “I thought that moment, frankly, was pretty shameful. I don’t believe that the people watching were applauding the notion that Secretary Clinton was pumping out this smokescreen and wrapping herself in the tragedy of 9/11,” he said. “I don’t think they saw that as something appropriate to do, to mask her coziness and her closeness to Wall Street and all of the architects of the crash of 2008.” O’Malley cited their contrasting stances on Wall Street as a fundamental distinction between the two candidates. While Clinton “subscribes to a sort of crony capitalism” that benefits the big banks, he said, he believes in “traditional fair-market American capitalism.”


cont

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/hillary-clinton-9-11-wall-street-martin-omalley-215923
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
O'Malley Slams Clinton's 'SHAMEFUL' Comment on 9/11 and Wall Street Ties (Original Post) Segami Nov 2015 OP
good for O'Malley! He needs to keep hammering it. nt antigop Nov 2015 #1
A day late, a dollar short. MADem Nov 2015 #2
Truth is truth... Segami Nov 2015 #4
Of course; nothing wrong with him expressing his opinions. MADem Nov 2015 #5
Keep repeating it. Do you do it in your dreams???? elleng Nov 2015 #8
What a weird thing to say. Now it's a crime to discuss politics on a political discussion board? MADem Nov 2015 #9
'Crime?' THAT's a good one. elleng Nov 2015 #11
I was wrong about something. Admiral Loinpresser Nov 2015 #22
THANKS, Admiral; elleng Nov 2015 #23
I think that he and Bernie together might make a difference in caucus states though... cascadiance Nov 2015 #6
I'll Second That Duckfan Nov 2015 #19
He's my second choice and I think the only reason he isn't resonating, is because sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #15
OT Hepburn Nov 2015 #3
Bless him. Point out the eternal shame of those inappropriate words. eom Betty Karlson Nov 2015 #7
He's been watching Trump too long MaggieD Nov 2015 #10
You tell'em M'Om! and agree on the jeans comment above, lol! magical thyme Nov 2015 #12
Good for him. He's right that was shameful. askew Nov 2015 #13
Go O'Malley! SoapBox Nov 2015 #14
K&R hedgehog Nov 2015 #16
He'd make a great VP for Bernie Demeter Nov 2015 #17
I thought O'Malley zentrum Nov 2015 #18
Props to O'M for that! d_legendary1 Nov 2015 #20
Good for him. Those are bold comments Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #21

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. A day late, a dollar short.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:33 AM
Nov 2015

He's just not resonating.

I don't think he's a bad guy, but I'd be shocked if he sees much if any movement upward in the polls.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. Of course; nothing wrong with him expressing his opinions.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:52 AM
Nov 2015

I wouldn't expect too much to come from them, though.

His timing isn't helped by events in Paris, either.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
9. What a weird thing to say. Now it's a crime to discuss politics on a political discussion board?
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:36 PM
Nov 2015

elleng

(141,926 posts)
11. 'Crime?' THAT's a good one.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:39 PM
Nov 2015

You appear to take every opportunity to slam Governor O'Malley, and I'm saying that I've noticed it.

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
22. I was wrong about something.
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 04:09 AM
Nov 2015

I got mad at him at one point and leaped to conclude he was running for VP on Hillary's ticket. After the quoted statement that seems unlikely.

He has always been my definite and acceptable second choice. I am trying to redeem myself by taking a more nuanced view of his strategy and tactics. Bottom line: his excellent record as governor makes him an attractive progressive candidate. With his nomination, I could retain hope for transformative change. With Hillary as nominee, close to no hope at all.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
6. I think that he and Bernie together might make a difference in caucus states though...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:10 PM
Nov 2015

... like Iowa and Nevada early on, where in order to get delegates out of various precincts, in order to maximize delegate representation out of a precinct, voters will need to unite with supporters of other candidates to send a delegate representing a group of voters to the state level conventions. I see a bigger potential for Bernie and O'Malley supporters uniting (depending on the numbers and dynamics of the voters needing to join together) as supporting Bernie, O'Malley, or "uncommitted" with a delegate more willing to vote for either Bernie or O'Malley at the state level. I think there's a greater chance than in the last elections that the 2nd and 3rd place candidate delegates in precincts if Hillary is in the lead in those precincts to be joined together to build in effect potentially larger vote counts for one of them (more likely for Bernie with a larger voting segment than O'Malley at this point). In precincts where Bernie leads, probably O'Malley voters are more apt to join other Bernie voters to grow his delegation too in other districts where Bernie has the majority of voters.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
15. He's my second choice and I think the only reason he isn't resonating, is because
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:24 PM
Nov 2015

Bernie is in the race and has a long track record that people can look at. But had Bernie not entered the race, it would O'Malley closing the gap on Hillary as Bernie is right now.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
12. You tell'em M'Om! and agree on the jeans comment above, lol!
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:52 PM
Nov 2015

He should wear rolled-up shirt sleeves and jeans more often!

askew

(1,464 posts)
13. Good for him. He's right that was shameful.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:56 PM
Nov 2015

He is going to keep doing retail politics in Iowa and chip away at it. Proud to be his supporter.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
17. He'd make a great VP for Bernie
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 01:59 PM
Nov 2015

except he doesn't "balance the ticket".

They have too much in common, superficially: white, male, eastern.

It's good to have a governor, though. And a younger VP for an older President.

zentrum

(9,870 posts)
18. I thought O'Malley
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:04 PM
Nov 2015

….did really well in the debate.

Agree with him about her comment. It reminded me of how BushW used 9/11 to hand wave everything problematic away.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»O'Malley Slams Clinton's ...