Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:22 PM Nov 2015

Gallop: "Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race"

Wow! Clinton's lead is INSURMOUNTABLE! Here is a great article from November 16:

PRINCETON , NJ -- In the national standings of the Democratic presidential candidates seeking their party's nomination next year, New York Sen. Hillary Clinton continues to hold a strong 27-point lead over second-place rival Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, according to a new Gallup Poll. Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards remains further behind in third place.





Of course, this is a Gallop news article from November 16, 2007.

Why do people feel obligated to deny that Clinton was in the same position* in 2007 that she currently occupies?


*When I refer to Clinton being in the "same position" in 2007, I don't mean to imply she is in the identical position. Obviously, Clinton's favorablity polling numbers were MUCH stronger in 2007.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gallop: "Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race" (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 OP
Now you've done it! djean111 Nov 2015 #1
Bernie does not have an organization like Obama did! Hepburn Nov 2015 #9
Now you've done it yes Bernie is no Obama upaloopa Nov 2015 #11
Did they repeal the 22nd Amendment? DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #2
Bernie is not Obama upaloopa Nov 2015 #3
If Bernie is Obama I am the three time heavyweight champion depicted in my avatar. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #5
congrats, mr. ali! restorefreedom Nov 2015 #30
But Hillary is still Hillary jeepers Nov 2015 #7
Clinton 2007 is not Clinton 2015. In Nov. 2007, Clinton had a 52% favorable and 45% unfavorable (+7% Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #22
Obama's running again? zappaman Nov 2015 #4
I would vote for him. He would likely win but it wouldn't be easy. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #6
Oh dear. I think you better open up a newspaper. I'll save you the trouble. Obama isn't running. Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #13
Tell that to the OP. nt Skidmore Nov 2015 #17
The OP seems to understand that he is making a comparative analysis. He doesn't appear to need my Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #18
Oh, I thought maybe the 22nd ammendment had been repealed and this was breaking news... zappaman Nov 2015 #21
Lucky for Clinton there is no one like Barack Obama running against her this time. DCBob Nov 2015 #8
Make believe this is a SAT question DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #10
Very good. DCBob Nov 2015 #12
Bill Clinton is unlike the others: Kennedy was a ground breaker (1st Catholic President), Obama was Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #23
I will stay with my SAT analogy. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #24
So by your standard, FDR would lose? Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #31
The great man rose above his physical challenges and most of us only know about them in retrospect. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #32
Who is drawing bigger audiences -- Clinton or Sanders? How does crowd-size speak to charisma? Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #36
Toughness is her sine qua non...She is never going to win Ms. or Miss Congeniality. DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #37
Toughness? You said the key criteria were "young, virile, vibrant, and charismatic." Clinton fairs Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #39
My seminal post in this thread was to agree with Bob that the Vermont independent is an inadequate DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #41
As I saw it, you set a test that included youth, virility, and charisma. Clinton fails your own test Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #42
An analogy DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #43
There is noone like Bernie, lucky for Clinton, as she is an American citizen, she might find herself Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #15
Part of it is the ability to do math mythology Nov 2015 #14
At this time in 2007, DUers weren't referring to her as "Madam President". oasis Nov 2015 #16
This is getting old for one thing GusBob Nov 2015 #19
Your ignoring some things Robbins Nov 2015 #28
Hillary lost the African American vote 82% -15% DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #29
You made a comparison without a point. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #20
K&R. n/t PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #25
...because she's consistently ABOVE 50% this time? brooklynite Nov 2015 #26
Sanders is not a Barack Obsama Gothmog Nov 2015 #27
SANDERS DOESN'T HAVE OBAMA'S ABS! Juicy_Bellows Nov 2015 #33
Apples with apples. anamnua Nov 2015 #34
Oh jesus Robbins Nov 2015 #38
Sanders lock on the progressive vote is akin to Kennedy's and Obama's and Romney's appeal to their Attorney in Texas Nov 2015 #40
and a Big Rec. riversedge Nov 2015 #35

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
11. Now you've done it yes Bernie is no Obama
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:32 PM
Nov 2015

I remember that rousing speech Bernie made at a prior Dem convention putting him on the national stage. Wait that didn't happen since his name recognition is why he is behind in the polls.
But I remember all the community organizing Bernie did with POC in Chicago which will earn him the loyalty of AA's. Oh dumb me that didn't happen either.
But an independent Senator from a 95% white populated state who has little name recognition unless there are many more debates ranks right up there with President Obama.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. Bernie is not Obama
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:26 PM
Nov 2015

Constantly comparing 2015 to 2007 is showing desparation.
But any port in a storm I guess

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
30. congrats, mr. ali!
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 03:17 PM
Nov 2015

but no, bernie is no obama. he is much more progressive during a time when people are fed up with status quo. so he is actually in a better spot.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
22. Clinton 2007 is not Clinton 2015. In Nov. 2007, Clinton had a 52% favorable and 45% unfavorable (+7%
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:42 PM
Nov 2015

rating) in the polls.

Now, Clinton has a 41% favorable and 52% unfavorable (-11%) rating.


Meanwhile, Sanders has a net positive favorable rating (+4%) that is 15% better than Clinton's net negative (-11%) rating.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
18. The OP seems to understand that he is making a comparative analysis. He doesn't appear to need my
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:38 PM
Nov 2015

help.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
10. Make believe this is a SAT question
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:32 PM
Nov 2015

Make believe this is a SAT question

Which person is unlike the other:

John Kennedy
Bill Clinton
Barack Obama
Bernie Sanders

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
23. Bill Clinton is unlike the others: Kennedy was a ground breaker (1st Catholic President), Obama was
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 02:12 PM
Nov 2015

a ground breaker (1st Black President), and Sanders is a ground breaker (would be the 1st Jewish President).

Bill Clinton is the first President to sign the Defense of Marriage Act? The first President who looked at the welfare policies under Ronald Reagan and decided to make those policies less generous to the poor? The first President to negotiate and sign NAFTA to the detriment of US labor? The first Democrat to govern to the right of Richard Nixon?

Is that what you mean?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
24. I will stay with my SAT analogy.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 02:20 PM
Nov 2015

Which of the four was not young, virile, vibrant, and charismatic:

John Kennedy
Barack Obama
Bill Clinton
Bernie Sanders

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
32. The great man rose above his physical challenges and most of us only know about them in retrospect.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 05:29 PM
Nov 2015

The great man rose above his physical challenges, exuded vim and vigor, and most of us only know about his physical challenges in retrospect.



The indices indicated that Roosevelt and Ford were the highest and lowest rated charismatic presidents, respectively. Cluster analysis revealed several salient clusters including Reagan-Kennedy, Truman-Johnson-Nixon, and Carter-Ford. Key events of the respective presidencies were used to explain the various clusters.

http://www.leader-values.com/article.php?aid=269

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
36. Who is drawing bigger audiences -- Clinton or Sanders? How does crowd-size speak to charisma?
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:20 AM
Nov 2015

I like Clinton -- she's my second choice -- but do you really think charisma is her strongest selling point? Or are you arguing that youth and virility are her biggest selling points?

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
39. Toughness? You said the key criteria were "young, virile, vibrant, and charismatic." Clinton fairs
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:58 AM
Nov 2015

poorly under the criteria that you previously proposed.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
41. My seminal post in this thread was to agree with Bob that the Vermont independent is an inadequate
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:07 AM
Nov 2015

My seminal post in this thread was to agree with Bob that the Vermont independent is an inadequate proxy for Barack Obama.

Charisma is a valuable attribute in a leader but not the only one... Strength, intelligence, persistence, empathy, experience, a holistic view of the world, are also attributes one normally looks for in a leader.


I can't speak for my fellow Clinton supporters but if there was no 22nd Amendment i would be casting my third vote for Barack Obama.



Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
42. As I saw it, you set a test that included youth, virility, and charisma. Clinton fails your own test
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:25 AM
Nov 2015

I like president Obama, and I'd take a third Obama term, but that is not an option.

Since we are going to have to replace Obama, we could either replace him with someone who is more of a pacifist or someone who is more hawkish. I prefer the former (Sanders) and not the later (Clinton).

We could replace Obama with someone who supports more regulation of the financial institutions as compared to Obama's regulatory policy or someone who supports less regulation of the financial institutions as compared to Obama's regulatory policy. I prefer the former (Sanders) and not the later (Clinton).

We could replace Obama with someone who would be less inclined than Obama to put US labor in unfair competition with foreign labor that is cheaper because the foreign companies do not have to comply with worker rights and environmental protections or someone who would be more inclined than Obama to put US labor in unfair competition with foreign labor that is cheaper because the foreign companies do not have to comply with worker rights and environmental protections. I prefer the former (Sanders) and not the later (Clinton).

Since Obama cannot run for a third term, we can either progress past Obama or retreat back from Obama. I prefer the former (Sanders) and not the later (Clinton).


DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
43. An analogy
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:43 AM
Nov 2015
As I saw it, you set a test that included youth, virility, and charisma. Clinton fails your own test
I like president Obama, and I'd take a third Obama term, but that is not an option.



Again, I was citing the reasons for Bob why Senator Sanders is an inadequate proxy for Barack Obama.

A person can be really good at one thing and that one thing can make him special. Your fellow Texan, Shaquille O'Neal, because one of the all time great centers because he figured out how to maneuver his three hundred twenty five pound plus frame a foot way from the basket to dunk the ball...He was far from the quickest or most agile athlete on the court. Another one of your fellow Texans , George Foreman, became one of the greatest heavyweights in boxing history because he had reach and packed a wallop to compensate for the fact he was slow and flat footed.

I predict Americans will be looking for strength, experience, empathy, a holistic view of the world, and intelligence and Americans will see that in Hillary whatever charisma deficit she has, real or imagined...

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
15. There is noone like Bernie, lucky for Clinton, as she is an American citizen, she might find herself
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:34 PM
Nov 2015

living in a better country as a result.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
14. Part of it is the ability to do math
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:34 PM
Nov 2015

In 2007 Clinton was drawing less than 50%. Today she's drawing more than 50%. So in 2007 when the lower drawing candidates dropped out and support coalesced around the last two candidates, Obama could get the support needed to win the delegate count.

This year how does adding the support for Sanders and O'Malley and the undecideds get above Clinton's 55% or 60%?

oasis

(49,376 posts)
16. At this time in 2007, DUers weren't referring to her as "Madam President".
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:35 PM
Nov 2015
Now would be a good time to begin.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
19. This is getting old for one thing
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:38 PM
Nov 2015

The other thing is this: What percentage of African Americans voted for PBO?

How is HRC polling with that demographic here, now, today?

The folks that voted for PBO then are gonna vote for HRC now. Its really simple

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
28. Your ignoring some things
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 03:11 PM
Nov 2015

at this point blacks were mainly supporting Clinton.

I voted for Obama and i sure am not voting for her.

Bernie's numbers are actully higher than Obama's was at this point in 2007.

If edwards wasn't running her overall numbers would have been higher.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
29. Hillary lost the African American vote 82% -15%
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 03:12 PM
Nov 2015

I saw a fascinating piece of research that I am re-creating from memory but if African Americans would have voted like their other Democratic counterparts by income and education Hillary would have won over sixty percent of the primary votes.

That's the headwinds Senator Sanders faces.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
20. You made a comparison without a point.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:39 PM
Nov 2015

You make a comparison and then make a point to why they don't match up. This is getting interesting.

Gothmog

(145,129 posts)
27. Sanders is not a Barack Obsama
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 03:10 PM
Nov 2015

I seriously doubt that Sanders can duplicate the Obama results but time will tell.

anamnua

(1,109 posts)
34. Apples with apples.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 05:55 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Wed Nov 18, 2015, 06:58 PM - Edit history (1)

Remember the golden rule of statistical interpretation:

Compare apples with apples.

African Americans flocked to Obama for the same (understandable) reason that 95% plus of Catholics voted for JFK in 1963 and 95% plus of Mormons voted for Romney in 2012: the prospect of putting one of their own into power for the first time was irresistible. That tied down one third of the Dem vote immediately for Obama.
A point worth repeating: Hill actually won more votes than Obama in the primaries (sort of like Gore/Bush in 2000!). She lost because of the quirks of the system.
Oh, and Hillary's organisation on the ground is far superior to what it was back in 2008.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
38. Oh jesus
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:36 AM
Nov 2015

again your ignoring history

at this point most blacks weren't supporting obama they were supporting clinton.Seeing Obama could win with whites in iowa and the racist tacits of clintons changed it.

clinton supports trying to say more people wanted her than Obama

If her ground game is so great why does DWS and DNC have to rig the game for her.

Why does she have to try to smear bernie as sexist,racist,and wanting to get rid of medicare like she used race card against Obama?

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
40. Sanders lock on the progressive vote is akin to Kennedy's and Obama's and Romney's appeal to their
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 11:05 AM
Nov 2015

constituencies.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Gallop: "Clinton Sus...