2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders is a PURIST and therefore UNELECTABLE
And hey, BernieBros, check this out: Bernie DID NOT VOTE TO SUDDENLY END MILITARY FUNDING!!! Therefore he is IMPURE, loves the F-35, and you can't vote for him.
And nurses have a super PAC, so Bernie loves Wall Street and war!
CHECKMATE comrades!
Regards,
TWM
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)principles rather than principals?
marym625
(17,997 posts)I see what you did there
WillyT
(72,631 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)He does not seem to love Wall Street at all. Goes on and on about it. But I think the f-35 thing is very accurate. Good job! HILLARY 2016!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Genuine Hillary Clinton Supporters like you be bring a big smile to my face!
Regards,
TWM
bravenak
(34,648 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It's in-credible! Fantastic!
Regards,
TWM
bravenak
(34,648 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)let's shine some sunlight on that: http://www.democraticunderground.com/128075924#post5
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)Even when I don't agree with the duplicity it hides behind.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)daybranch
(1,309 posts)having it located on a base in Vermont would bring employment to his state. His positions usually seem very consistent on the need to reduce military spending on weapon systems purchases, so where does he say the F-35 is a desirable weapon system? Contractors use states' desires to increase employment in their states to build support for weapon systems development, a tactic used very well to build support for the B1B bomber. I do not know if Bernie voted to build the F35 aircraft. If not he does not support anything other than employment in his beloved state of Vermont and actually should be commended by people of Vermont and our nation and if he did vote for the program or testified as to its need then he should explain. But as of today I have not seen any facts having been laid out by his critics only un-suppported agendas of the military industrial complex and Hillary supporters. Show me your proof or cut the bull.
merrily
(45,251 posts)angrychair
(12,284 posts)First, it was a said in a mocking manner.
More importantly, Sanders has been honest about the F-35 and its gross cost overruns but it is strongly supported by residents in Burlington, VT, right or wrong, he is honest about it and does not any away.
Just as important, he has never taken a single dime of money from General Dynamics, not one dime.
To be honest, I have never liked defense spending as a jobs program, I think it creates weaknesses in our economy and billions of dollars in waste.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)The Lockheed Martin F-35 is a lemon aircraft and "the epitome of Pentagon waste".
Thinkprogress: Americans Have Spent Enough Money On A Broken Plane To Buy Every Homeless Person A Mansion
To his credit, Sanders acknowledged that the program was wasteful in his defense of it. The contention over the F-35 in his home state of Vermont is that the program is now responsible for jobs in his hometown of Burlington, where he served as mayor before running for Congress. Some front doors of homes in the Burlington area are adorned with green ribbons, signifying support for the F-35. Sanders, like his colleagues in 45 states around the country, doesnt want to risk the wrath of voters angry about job losses related to F-35 manufacturing, assembly, and training if the program were to be cut.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/24583-bernie-sanders-doubles-down-on-f-35-support-days-after-runway-explosion
Lockheed Martin, Inc., gets 82% of its total revenue from taxpayers. If Sanders is serous about going after the "millionaires and billionaires", he can start with Lockheed Martin.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)This kinda corporate welfare needs to end.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)And he cares about funding
soldiers and veterans.
How could anyone trust him
when his loyalty is with
the lowly working class?
Doesn't he understand that's
NOT how an oligarchy works?
daybranch
(1,309 posts)for us working folks, I am very compelled to trust whomever they support. So many times they have brightened my day with their hopeful encouragement, so many times they have removed my anxiety about medical costs through independent actions they took swiftly, so many times they have cried for me when I hurt. I did not know nurses before but I do now and
and if they form a super PAC to support Bernie I guess I would not question their motivation. They get us and care about us. That is why they support Bernie who gets us and supports us too. Go Bernie and thank you nurses where ever you are.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)But it is just a collection of Nurses who love Bernie and want to promote his candidacy ... Small Potatoes and not an actual Super PAC ... $570,000 ... more of just a PAC without the Super ... but it's sure super that they are doing this ...
I love Nurses, and I love Bernie Sanders ...
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)people in our HC system! We have come to appreciate many people at MSK over the past 6 years. Honestly though, we wish we did not recognize their faces and they did not recognize us. There is always a wave or a quick conversation with someone in addition to the core staff, we were just there today.
One day at a time!
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Sounds about right!
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)Social media is slowing killing HRC and her good bounce from performance in the congressional hearing is deflating with each day. Moreover modern polling is crap. The "scientific" meme is bullshit unless the pollsters prove that every call made was made to 50 % cell phones and the same ratio as land line picked up, and the pool included the same same % over and under age 40. But they won't because they can't
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Tarc
(10,601 posts)usually by the same user get piles of upvotes every day; it's like an exercise in GroupThink. Elections aren't popularity contests, kids, and a daily dose of the Triple-S (Sanders' Supprters' Snark) isn't really going to sway undecided liberals to his side.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Who the hell wants to hear this ? ... This is total nonsense ...
No more ...
Tarc
(10,601 posts)Seems that you lot are unable to come to grips with just why Hillary is in the lead, by far.
merrily
(45,251 posts)half million dollar PAC from nurses. 
Among many other things, what a statement about what nurses see in Sanders' goal of Medicare for All versus Billarycare.
Then again, team Hillary never does seem to know when to zip it. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=74854
reformist2
(9,841 posts)strategy. It seems like a surefire way to shoot yourself in the foot to me. :/
merrily
(45,251 posts)It's not how I would approach it, but, then, again, no one is paying me millions to formulate campaign strategy.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)At the same time appearing to be clueless about Bernie's actual support.
merrily
(45,251 posts)War, PACs. It's downright laughable.
Autumn
(48,962 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)And I mean PURE! And I also mean you.know.what.!
And PURE!
--imm
aidbo
(2,328 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Horrifying!
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Bernie Sanders says he would use drones to fight terror as president
....In an interview with NBCs Meet the Press scheduled for broadcast on Sunday, host Chuck Todd asked the independent senator from Vermont if drones or special forces would play a role in his counter-terror plans.
All of that and more, Sanders said.
Asked to clarify, he added: Look, a drone is a weapon. When it works badly, it is terrible and it is counterproductive. When you blow up a facility or a building which kills women and children, you know what? Its terrible.
The Obama administrations use of drones to target terrorist suspects has proved controversial, particularly with the political left. Sanders, a self-professed democratic socialist, has proven popular in such circles in the 2016 campaign so far.
Todd asked Sanders: But youre comfortable with the idea of using drones if you think youve isolated an important terrorist?
Sanders replied: Yes.
Looks like Sanders is inching to the right on some issues....interesting!!
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)!!
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)You don't see you're being played?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)INdemo
(7,024 posts)Then Clinton's have nothing so they have to attack with these baseless BS isues.....
Hillary is Nervous and probably saw some interior polling which showed this was going to be another 2008 all over ago
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)He's bring a spoon to a knife fight.
Upgrading to a spork is degenerate.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And that one note does not resonate with the majority. He's shtick is telling you that your life is shitty because some people are rich. But that just doesn't ring true for lots of people. Especially if their life isn't shitty.
The other issue is that his proposals are pie in the sky without any real plan to make them happen, and no realization of political reality. So even if your life is shitty there is not much about Bernie that is attractive to people that are reality based.
Lastly, he is unelectable because most people realize a president has to know and understand and have viable proposals on a huge range of issues. His one note Charlie routine just does not work.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I also notice that people believe things about him that are just not true. He's not a liberal, he has said so. He's well to the right on guns, he told Chuck Todd he'd use drones, and he wasn't out in front on many social issues, though his fan base likes to pretend that he was.
I also get the impression that some of his supporters approach his candidacy as some kind of quirky "counterculture" effort--something that isn't "of the majority," thus, it's unique and cool.
If the poor old guy ever did get elected, he'd be thrown under the bus in a heartbeat. Why? He'd no longer be a boutique brand--he'd be "Of the majority."
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Apparently not so obvious to lots of folks here. SMH.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)The NRA has Bernie in his pocket they only gave him a D-. The streets are going to flow with blood, because Bernie won't allow manufacturers to be sued over people committing crimes with a lawful product.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)see you break down the Clinton inverse.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Thanks for the chuckles.