2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCan we all agree that using dead civil rights leaders to promote your candidate is kinda sick?
How many "MLK would have supported Bernie Sanders" threads do we need?
reformist2
(9,841 posts)All he did was say that Bernie Sanders was carrying on in the tradition of MLK... what's wrong with that!
Nothing.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)About 10% or so, consistently.
riversedge
(80,802 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)There is no "when". Besides, we're talking about paying for manipulated polls...not paying to get polls done. Significant difference.
Persondem
(2,101 posts)I guess I just did not know that Bernie was risking his life trying to end segregation, Jim Crow and getting AA the vote. How many time has he marched through .... Birmingham, Selma ... or Wall Street (which would at least make some sense)? How many times has he had fire hoses turned on him? How many boycotts has he organized? And here's the bottom line - what has he accomplished? Dr. King had the CRA and VRA which changed the course of American history. MLK had the ear of presidents, had charisma enough to lead a national movement that brought about real change. Sanders, not so much.
Sanders is good guy doing some worthwhile things but to say he is "carrying on in the tradition of MLK" is pure exaggeration. He is doing so only in the most general of terms - attempting to highlight economic injustice - worthwhile, but nowhere near what MLK did.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...in Chicago public schools.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/barrierbreaker/why-was-bernie-sanders-cited-and-fined-for-resisting-arrest/
MLK and Bernie Sanders have both praised Sweden as a place where healthcare is a right.
MLK and Bernie Sanders have both spoken of "democratic socialism." MLK said, "maybe America must move toward a Democratic Socialism."
Following in the tradition of someone doesn't mean accomplishing as much as the other person. But Sanders is following in MLK's tradition: giving speeches against racism and income inequality.
tecelote
(5,156 posts)Plus, why wouldn't we all want to carry on in Martin Luther King's tradition?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)What was he thinking?
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)No, just one DUer.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I assumed there must be some sort of committee that needs to approve this sort of thing.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Good question -- we should. And those in DU's perpetually micro-aggrieved club need to get over it.
Notice how your question was ignored and the subject changed to click polls.
As you said, Martin Luther King had a message we should all carry on.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Well said.
Sid
MineralMan
(151,259 posts)We can't even agree whether we're all Democrats. So, no, I think.
I agree, though, if that helps.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)But, the video is already out there, and Skinner doesn't control Facebook or Twitter.
Gman
(24,780 posts)And would support conservative causes.
There ought to be something like a Godwin's Law for that.
yardwork
(69,360 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)not trying to guess what their late relatives would have thought of (or wanted to do about) contemporary events.
Although the fact that basically the entire Eisenhower family has become Democrats in the last 15 years or so speaks volumes IMHO.
The point is that you have no idea what an IKE or MLK would have thought about the 2016 Presidential race and its candidates.
I would tend to guess that MLK would have similar thoughts to the majority of the African American community.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cha
(319,062 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)... that's kinda sick. IMO.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...will you reply, "That's sick!"?
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)But frankly I can't imagine A Clinton supporter doing that. I've also not seen anyone compare her to Jesus or the Pope.
Cult of personality is not attractive. I don't understand anyone that worships politicians. Or celebrities for that matter.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Irony is not dead!
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Just being mean and nasty for the sake of being mean and nasty. Which is the standard a few have chosen to set here at DU this primary cycle.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...as far as I know.
I was asking a hypothetical question.
jkbRN
(850 posts)Please, explain yourself.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)Cha
(319,062 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)That way people know where you are coming from and what your goals in life are.
And BTW that means ALL the goals of Martin Luther King, not just a politically correct cherry-picked set of ideas that powerful people are comfortable with.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)IT'S A FUCKING DISCUSSION BOARD !!!
I feel better... you ???
fbc
(1,668 posts)It's one thing when Killer Mike references MLK, but when I saw that "MLK would have supported Bernie Sanders" thread I cringed and did not click.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)And pressing that legacy towards an association for political gain, He can wander through the rest of DU and see just what kind of supporters Bernie has. That would be awesome.
I think there are some links That could be included that houses some very special tweets....you know the thread that honors the tweeter.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027367805
Or this that describes the poor unfortunate souls of poc
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251687330
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)This is the kind of idiocy he's seeing on twitter.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)No thanks. If your name has the word "killer" in front of it, you are not likely on my email list.
TM99
(8,352 posts)The AA community has not heard of Killer Mike?
You mean this guy?
http://www.alternet.org/story/155338/killer_mike%2C_venerable_rapper_activist%2C_talks_new_album%2C_drug_war%2C_and_maybe_running_for_office/
Yeah, the AA community has not heard of Killer Mike.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)They'd never heard of him.
I had been made to feel like a fool here on DU because I'd never heard of him. I had to look him up. Apparently he has designs on running for public office.
Other than my own research, he is NOT what so many here are trying to make him out to be. He is not widely known, his opinions mean very little to me...in fact they mean nothing to me. And yet he is quoted not on several threads as if this rapper dude is the final cherry on the Bernie cake.....err not so much.
TM99
(8,352 posts)don't know who he is means literally nothing. What a bubble y'all live in!
Mike has been involved in politics since college almost 20 years ago, and yes, he may run for an office.
You may dismiss him but it is out of your own ignorance not the reality of who he is, what he represents, and who he speaks for.
Number23
(24,544 posts)The crowd trying to act as though he's the biggest thing in hip hop right now are just showing how clueless they are yet again.
He may blow up and get massive one day. But he's not there yet.
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)by "progressives."
polly7
(20,582 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Pollsters generally poll for likely voters
That is, those who have voted in the past and those who are registered on the Democratic ticket.
Youth are pouring into Bernie's campaign and must be giving the Clinton campaign a deja vu headache.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I have nieces and nephews in high school who can't vote yet, but were very interested in our election. They are the future up here - they want real change. I assume they're like young people everywhere.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)in this election, are rarely polled. Those young voters registered as un-affiliated or independent are rarely polled.
The youth vote who turned up to vote for Obama, took the pollsters off guard
And the Hillary campaign.
polly7
(20,582 posts)I know the voting age is not 28, but just a bit of my own experience with young people here who surprised me also with their interest and real knowledge of the issues and leaders in our election. I sure hope your young people do show up to vote - and shock the pollsters.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)has yet to present a racial justice platform. She dismissed activists in Boston. She spoke over them in Atlanta as they were being ushered out.
All of this has not gone unnoticed.
Almost 3 million people have watched Killer Mike's intro to Bernie's rally. 10s of thousands of shares.
Oh, and if you want a window into Hillary "progressives"? Check out Nina Turner's twitter feed after she endorsed Bernie.
People who throw stones...
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)Last edited Wed Nov 25, 2015, 06:09 AM - Edit history (1)
By the people who have harassed black activists on social media, who insisted they were a Koch/Soros Clinton conspiracy and insist people of color are uninformed or suffering from Stockholm syndrome for failing to vote as they are told.
No amount of denial will change what thousands experienced. That will be remembered and written about for decades to come. As the saying goes, when people show you who they are, pay attention.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)and uninformed. Hell in this forum, Killer Mike is portrayed as "sick".
People pay attention.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Cha
(319,062 posts)all documented. They can deny all they want.

stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Including the person to whom you are responding.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)And don't forget the 'All Lives Matter!' "gaffe".
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)sitting down at a table with black women over sweet potato pie and coffee supersedes all that
or so I've been told.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)oasis
(53,689 posts)and I approve this message.
Too funny!!!!
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)we'll see what we can do.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Do you know the character of Huey at all?
Are you a left-wing radical? Because Huey is.
bvf
(6,604 posts)beyond, "Hey, look! An African-American cartoon character!"
It could just as easily have been Uncle Ruckus.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)
kath
(10,565 posts)Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)whenever I hear people do that for not only their candidates, but for other political figures (*cough* Snowden *cough*). Some of the same people who do that generally steer clear from discussing Black issues, but will conveniently use someone such as MLK or Rosa Parks when pushing an unrelated agenda.
Number23
(24,544 posts)The same clique that wanted BLM tossed in jail or in the garbage is now running around quoting MLK ad nauseum and going out of their way to "speak" for black people despite the fact that we wouldn't want any of these people speaking for white people, let alone us.
I just said something very similar to your post in another thread. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=846985
Cha
(319,062 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)that's interesting because I noticed a similar pattern myself. I don't want to say this too loudly, but whether it's her endorsements, speeches, or policy, everything that has to do with HC either gets ignored or badmouthed here. In contrast, BS's speeches, his (vague) ideas, and his few endorsements receive more praise and treated as a much bigger deal. I agree 100%--it does look weird.
Number23
(24,544 posts)claim that MLK would vote for Bernie (or any damn body else) is then told that we are "ignoring his legacy" or "minimizing his contribution." It's so stupid and blatant that it is mind blowing, particularly when you notice that a good number of the people doing the objecting are black or other minorities.
It's crap like this that explains DU's lack of black participants better than anything else.
Cha
(319,062 posts)JustAnotherGen
(38,050 posts)And when you do - you don't stay long enough!
Adding and when they do discuss black issues - they tend to start with -
But MLK said He can't wait to see The Revenant this Christmas.
I'm using the The Revenant for a reason. He's come back to life.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)looking at this car wreck; it's just that I do more lurking than posting these days--in part because of the shoddy work by the jury here, but also because I have a few other forums to fulfill my political appetite. Luckily you guys have the patience to stick around and engage the posters who obviously don't know what on Earth they're talking about.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)so I will put you down for squashing the legacy of MLK.
MadLinguist
(907 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)And we've seen how RW'ers have twisted, distorted and co-op'ed his legacy.
On second thought, quite an apt comparison.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)AOR
(692 posts)kind of like devout Neoliberal Clinton supporters posing as "leftists" running around DU with Bill Foster and the history of the communist party sig lines. If the depths of that deception get any deeper full implosions into a quantum black hole of reaction are very likely.
But, but, but..."the Supreme Court"...and "pragmatic and realistic communist praxis"...and, and, and, my personal portfolio...
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Must be hot down there.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)



BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)towards the "unbelievers." The poll numbers don't lie, sorry for your side.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)The noise is coming from down below, on your end. As it were "BeanMusical."
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)
Number23
(24,544 posts)More and more I see you post something completely innocuous and somebody comes all puffed up trying to start a fight before you cuttingly dismiss them without so much as a drop of sweat. It's like some extra special people here seem to believe that you don't have the right to post anymore.
What is going on? Is it because you are a host of AA?
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Then that makes you EXCEPTIONALLY well suited to participate in this forum. Though working with teens may make you wildly overqualified to deal with the apparent quality of your new and numerous detractors.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)It's true, this isn't very heavy lifting, after awhile I just get bored! Matching wits with testy 17 year olds at 8:30 am everyday keeps me sharp and bouncy.
Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)Just read this...
Toot!
Happy Thanksgiving, Starry!
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)Happy Thankgiving, Bobbie Jo!
Cha
(319,062 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)As many as it takes.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Martin Luther King Jr was a socialist BTW...
so yeah... he would have backed Bernie. sorry that hurts feelings around here.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)electricray
(432 posts)No, identifying parallels between a candidate and one or more of the greatest orators, philosophers, and activists in history is not sick. Looking to history as a guide is what any smart primary voter should do. However, looking to minimize an incredible moment in a candidate's campaign simply because you prefer another candidate is sick.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I would agree with those that find your op absolutely disgusting, however.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)March on Washington in 1963.
They are two men who agreed on politics then and would agree on politics today of MLK were still alive.
Feel the Bern!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)to make it appear that that civil rights leader and your candidate were on the same page, even if they were in the same book, is kinda sick.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Last edited Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:31 AM - Edit history (1)
today.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/killer-mike-says-bernie-sanders-is-like-an-extension-of-drking_5654ac45e4b0879a5b0ca6b3
Yep. Civil rights activist Killer Mike is truly sick.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"An extension of" is a different statement from what Bernie fans are saying about Bernie's relationship to Dr. King. For example, single-payer is an extension of the ACA; but, they are not the same this.
senz
(11,945 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)peacefully, on justice. He raised them out of understandable fear and lifted their sights to a better tomorrow for themselves and their children. He opened their eyes to their own beauty and worth as human beings. He transformed the landscape.
MLK does not go out of fashion.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)I know there are a couple of photos circulating of Sanders at U of Chicago, with some indication that they are actually photos of a Bruce Rappaport, for example the first pic in the collection below, but are there photos of Sanders or Rappaport at the 1963 March on Washington?
"Bernie Sanders, the Early Years": http://www.politico.com/magazine/gallery/2015/07/bernie-sanders-the-early-years/002279-032662.html?ml=po_g#.VlU-AzJurRw
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)And, apparently Rappaport shared the same sweater.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)the Bernie campaign.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)spread false information.
Your pretzel has too many twists in it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)How low will you go?
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)He also replaces MLK Jr. with himself in this title image which strikes me as odd:
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Seriously, you guys are pathetic.
I can just imagine what you were saying about Obama during the birther scandal in 2008.
How do we know he was really born in Hawaii? *wink wink*
Questioning whether Bernie lied about being in Washington for MLK's speech is sick and desperate even by DU standards.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)And you made me spray my coffee. Lol, BERNGHAZI!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Next thing you know they'll be starting rumours about where he was really born.
Why wait for the GOP machine to swift boat Bernie when we can do it right here and now?
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)See what they're doing?
Swift boating.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)They sure like to twist the truth or make up shit.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Better spread the word.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Just like implying that Kerry was lying about his service record and Obama about his birthplace/religion was swift boating.
But you're simply asking questions, just like Karl Rove and his operatives did, amirite?
Fox news and Republicans will be following your lead:
Did Bernie really attend the march, did he really protest and was he really arrested in Chicago? *wink wink*
Nice try.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Happy TG!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You'll be requesting proof of Bernie's arrest warrant next.
Just like Trump wanted a copy of Obama's birth certificate.
Floyd Steinberg
(64 posts)Their photo archive indicates that is Bernie in the photo, not Rappaport.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Killer Mike Says Bernie Sanders Is Like 'An Extension Of Dr. King'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/killer-mike-says-bernie-sanders-is-like-an-extension-of-drking_5654ac45e4b0879a5b0ca6b3
Apparently, that is how you roll.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)ucrdem
(15,720 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)especially on the issues of marriage equality and legalization.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)The way you frame it is sick, as sick as can be.
I think you guys should give it a rest.
A time to stop and rethink - because you aren't making sense.
If civil rights leaders aren't quotable in a civilized debate between advocates of Democratic Party primary opponents, who is allowed to be named, in your world?
Hekate
(100,133 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... there are a lot of "Weekend at Bernie's" jokes that would work here.
But the truth is that attempting to "speak for the dead" in order to prop up (pun intended) a political candidate is as low (and desperate) as it gets.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)He said that MLK was a revolutionary who was part of the War on Poverty and for peace.
Then he said that he doesn't want another Margaret Thatcher.
Then he said that Bernie Sanders has been fighting for our rights for 50 years.
There was an implication that MLK and Bernie Sanders share values, but he didn't say MLK would endorse Bernie Sanders.
NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)... I'm talking about BS supporters here on DU.
Cha
(319,062 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)...and I haven't seen any posts at DU that MLK would endorse Bernie Sanders, though I can't read every post here and so maybe they exist.
I have written that Bernie Sanders and MLK have both presented Sweden as a good model for the US.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)MLK was a Democratic Socialist, not a 'Moderate' whatever the hell that is.
So her supporters are jealous, thus OPs like this one.
Cha
(319,062 posts)Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)Tortmaster
(382 posts)... massacred nine Blacks in a church in Charleston, South Carolina, Senator Sanders told NPR, about gun control, "I think that urban America has got to respect what rural America is about."
I can't picture Martin Luther King, Jr. saying something like that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)His comments come in the wake of the shootings last month in Newtown, Conn. The killing of 20 children in the town has spurred gun-control advocates to seek restriction on the ownership of certain firearms such as military-style assault rifles.
"Part of being able to move this forward is understanding the reality of guns in urban areas are very different from the realities of guns in rural areas. And if you grew up and your dad gave you a hunting rifle when you were ten, and you went out and spent the day with him and your uncles, and that became part of your family's traditions, you can see why you'd be pretty protective of that.
"So it's trying to bridge those gaps that I think is going to be part of the biggest task over the next several months. And that means that advocates of gun control have to do a little more listening than they do sometimes."
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/01/27/170393072/gun-control-advocates-should-listen-more-obama-says
And this is what Bernie said about the Charleston massacre:
Nice try.
Tortmaster
(382 posts)You miss that, you miss a lot.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)In the context of addressing gun control.
What context are you referring to?
Tortmaster
(382 posts)... after the last Charleston victim was laid to rest.
Moreover, everybody knows what's in the heart of President Obama, who has been very tough on guns, and who once said, "So it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns...."
Compare that to Senator Sanders who claimed he was "pro-gun," voted against some form of the Brady Bill 5 times--once shortly after the Luby's Cafeteria massacre--voted to shield gun manufacturers and dealers from liability, voted to allow guns checked onto Amtrak trains and into our National Parks.
Context matters.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And Obama made his remarks the month immediately following Sandy Hook.
I know the "Bernie's a racist gun nut" meme is popular among Hillary supporters but give it a rest.
No one is buying what y'all are selling. If you cared about the gun problem you'd go after the pro-NRA Republicans since Bernie Sanders is firmly in the pro-gun control camp and has been for quite some time.
Obvious poster is obvious.
Tortmaster
(382 posts)... Sanders, but he's still a "state's rights" gun person, and that is way too conservative. Moreover, as noted above, he doesn't have the empathy and the grace to address delicate situations. President Obama, and none of the Republicans, has that.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Who was also a "states rights" person:
For those who are lazy, 2008 Hillary ran to the Right of Obama on gun control. She backed off a national gun registry (which she had previously supported) and ran on local and state control over guns rather than a federal approach. Here are some quotes of Hillary. If we changed New York to Vermont, the Hillary people would use it against Bernie not realizing their own candidate had these positions. These are from the 2008 Philly debate.
Q: Both you and Sen. Obama, in the past, have supported strong gun control measures. But now when I listen to you on the campaign, I hear you emphasizing that you believe in an individuals right to bear arms. Both of you were strong advocates for licensing of guns. Both of you were strong advocates for the registration of guns. Why dont you emphasize that now?
CLINTON: I respect the Second Amendment. I respect the rights of lawful gun owners to own guns, to use their guns, but I also believe that most lawful gun owners whom I have spoken with for many years across our country also want to be sure that we keep those guns out of the wrong hands. And as president, I will work to try to bridge this divide, which I think has been polarizing and, frankly, doesnt reflect the common sense of the American people. We will strike the right balance to protect the constitutional right but to give people the feeling & the reality that they will be protected from guns in the wrong hands.
Q: But do you still favor licensing and registration of handguns?
A: What I favor is what works in NY. We have one set of rules in NYC and a totally different set of rules in the rest of the state. What might work in NYC is certainly not going to work in Montana. So, for the federal government to be having any kind of blanket rules that theyre going to try to impose, I think doesnt make sense.
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Gun_Control.htm
Tortmaster
(382 posts)Millions of people have been introduced to Senator Sanders, and they like him, but not that way. Hey, we can still be friends and all that, but it's me, not him. Take care, and I'll always remember our time together.
He has been in a very bright spotlight and came across as not presidential material, lacking in tact and grace. That doesn't mean he isn't (and can't still be) a great Senator. It just means that people have made up their minds, then moved on, and part of that equation was how the Senator from Vermont has conducted himself on the national stage.
As for the gun issue, it is sad that while there was a supposed horse race in the primary, people made gun control a horse-race issue. Democrats need to begin to regroup and coalesce around limiting handguns and assault weapons, and Senator Sanders has made that harder. Secretary Clinton, on the other hand, told millions of people on live television that one of her biggest enemies is the NRA.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He has repeatedly voted for background checks and assault weapons bans.
Your candidate talks a good game each time she runs for election but her stance changes like the wind. This time around she's claiming the NRA is her enemy and while that sounds fierce she pandered to gun owners in 2008 leading Obama to nickname her 'Annie Oakley'.
If she secures the nomination she'll pander to the God, guns and glory crowd again, it's what she does.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)As for the people making up their minds, last I checked not one damn vote has been cast yet.
As for the gun issue, if you cared about it as a genuine issue instead of just a partisan talking point, you'd be looking for a compromise solution that actually helps save lives, instead of these stupid purity tests. The idea that Clinton calling the NRA her 'enemy' means she's more likely to get action nationally than a guy willing to find a middle ground compromise is just ridiculous. In case you've been asleep for the last 10 years, hyper partisanship on guns has achieved exactly nothing.
Tortmaster
(382 posts)Hyper-partisanship on guns has been monumentally successful. That's how the NRA got so many Senate and House votes against the various Brady Bills, immunized the entire gun industry from civil lawsuit, scared off the CDC from reporting on gun violence, got guns onto Amtrak trains, made sure that guns were allowed in National Parks, and repealed the assault weapons ban.
Senator Sanders voted for all of that (against a form of the Brady Bill 5 times!) except for the repeal of the assault weapons ban.
So, as you can see, hyper-partisanship has been monumentally successful. We need to start doing it. Secretary Clinton is!
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)I'd love all guns to disappear tomorrow, but if you're going to make selling something legal, then allowing people to sue the manufacturers of that product if its then used illegally is just ridiculous. Or should we allow people to sue Ford now if someone deliberately drives over someone in one of their cars?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But ever since the "Sanders and his supporters are racists" smear meme was started, some kilobites had to be used to correct the record. Of course, you could ask team Clinton and her Citizens United obsessed superpacs to stop acting desperately. But I won't be holding my breath until THAT happens.
SunSeeker
(58,274 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Sure it is tedious, but so are empty attacks like this one.
JustAnotherGen
(38,050 posts)aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)And your OP proves it.
BootinUp
(51,314 posts)I propose both are possible explanations.
treestar
(82,383 posts)to claim something on the rights of African Americans.
Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)His first trip to DC was to march with MLK in 1963.
That same year, Bernie Sanders was arrested in Chicago while protesting against segregation in Chicago public schools.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NowSam
(1,252 posts)I seriously got choked up. I think it may have been a game changing moment in this campaign. We shall see. In answer to the question: No. I don't think it is at all sick to suggest that my candidate's views on governing and human rights and service to the people of the world has very very much in common with an immortal figure from history, albeit a dead one. MLK's words live on. His message lives through men like Bernie. So I think it is a mistake to condemn the parallels. Thanks for the provocative conversation.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)attempting to divert attention from what he said in that interview with this garbage is sick. He talks about getting more people involved in elections. He talks about social and economic issues being intertwined. I think this crap does Killer Mike a great disservice. The content of his interview should be the focus.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)I agree with you. The truth spoken now by we the people is becoming more than an embarrassment for those who do not speak the same. I expect this campaign to get very nasty but truth will shine bright.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)....hell no.
Just because YOU can't counter the truth, doesn't mean you get to censor it.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Around the same time, Hillary Clinton discussed Martin Luther King, Jr. and PresidentLyndon Johnson in an interview for Fox News. She stated that, "I would point to the fact that that Dr. King's dream began to be realized when President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when he was able to get through Congress something that President Kennedy was hopeful to do, the President before had not even tried, but it took a president to get it done. That dream became a reality, the power of that dream became a real in people's lives because we had a president who said we are going to do it, and actually got it accomplished."[124] Some African-American leaders took this statement as a denigration of the accomplishments of King and the largerAmerican civil rights movement.[123] Hillary Clinton blamed Obama for the controversy, claiming his campaign had fanned the flames, a charge which Obama dismissed as "ludicrous".[123] Shortly before, and during, a January 15 Democratic debate in Nevada, Clinton and Obama declared a truce on the matter, with both making reconciliatory statements about race, gender, and each other.[125] However, there was concern that Clinton's support among some African Americans may have been damaged,[125] with SUNY Albany's Debra Dickerson stating "The Clintons have to do something dramatic and symbolic to win back the trust of many African-Americans."[125]...
(From wiki)
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)It turns out that the carefully expressed claim is that he "attended" (Facebook) or "participated in" (NPR) the 1963 March on Washington, or "was in the crowd on the Mall" (Sanders.sentate.gov), meaning that he was somewhere out there in the unverifiable distance:
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/martin-luther-king-jr
But suggesting that Sanders says he marched with King is apparently "swift boating" per post 138 of this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251846817#post138
ps Happy Thanksgiving to all!
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Thus, swift boating. Sowing seeds of distrust.
You are not very good at it.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)That WOULD be sick...and rather terrifying...
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)that the "Bernie doesn't care about racism" meme is bullshit and should be put to rest, once and for all.
If your candidate is really all you say she is, you don't need to make false insinuations about the other major candidate to win.
All Bernie was guilty of(and yes, this was a mistake, one he should never have made)was not putting the issue in his first stump speeches or on the initial version of his program on his campaign website.
Autumn
(48,961 posts)The bullshit that Bernie, progressives and all democrats except Hillary are racist and don't care about blacks is just that.Bullshit. A heaping crock of trollish bullshit. How many more of these OMFG I'm offended about people agreeing with MLK and saying he would support politicians who support income equality, civil right and social justice do we need?
Vinca
(53,986 posts)Eleanor Roosevelt every so often. DEAD Eleanor Roosevelt.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Like Superman fleeing kryptonite.
ucrdem
(15,720 posts)
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Sanders supporters embrace it. Do the math.
senz
(11,945 posts)since it so clearly offends you.
enid602
(9,684 posts)The real question is, if Bernie Sanders was still alive . . . .
Cha
(319,062 posts)to a lot of African Americas who don't like them using MLK as their " imaginary Black yes man: as Aaron McGruder the creator of Huey Freeman says..
"You dont get to use Martin Luther King Jr. as your Imaginary Black Yes Man!!!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=28030
Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)
Autumn
(48,961 posts)we would never have heard the end of it.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Autumn
(48,961 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Well, they agree that a black supporter of Bernie shouldn't mention MLK, but that Hillary can use famous black people however she wants.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)where you called out this behavior in the Rosa Parks thread. I guess way too busy high fiving themselves for... something.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I called out both sides for doing it.... I was one of the first DUers to call out the Hillary campaign for using the image of Rosa Parks today.
But apparently they think they got me!