Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:56 AM
upaloopa (11,417 posts)
So the defense of Bernie Sanders' lack of a foreign policy is to make up shit about Hillary
Bernie gives the same speech he's given for 40 years at every venue he goes to.
I don't even need to go to one of his functions to know what he has to say. I've heard it on "brunch with Bernie" for years on Thom Hartman's radio show. I heard it in two debates so far. Probably if we had 100 more debates we would hear it 100 more times. Free tuition $15 per hour Family leave Job creation single payer break up big banks the top 1% have most of the wealth Take the country back form the oligarchs These are all good things What is lacking is the "how do we get there" and a foreign policy Now in defense of the above we hear this: Hillary is a war monger Hillary is in bed with Wall Street Hillary is a republican Hillary is not progressive Hillary is not a Democrat Hillary is Bill Clinton II For six months now I have been waiting for Bernie to tell me how we get there. Maybe Bernie will get the message like he did with BLM (when he added social justice) and add to his stump speech some "how" instead of just "what." My dread is that Bernie is like Bill McKay in the movie "The Candidate" Bill McKay, a novice who has just won an improbable victory, turns dazedly to his campaign manager and asks, "What do we do now?" Bernie is really no leader. He is mostly a rehearsed set of talking points.
|
88 replies, 4832 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
upaloopa | Nov 2015 | OP |
99Forever | Nov 2015 | #1 | |
morningfog | Nov 2015 | #2 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #3 | |
bahrbearian | Nov 2015 | #6 | |
ucrdem | Nov 2015 | #9 | |
MaggieD | Nov 2015 | #13 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #26 | |
Vattel | Nov 2015 | #12 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #4 | |
bahrbearian | Nov 2015 | #7 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #15 | |
morningfog | Nov 2015 | #19 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #23 | |
RichVRichV | Nov 2015 | #60 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #63 | |
RichVRichV | Nov 2015 | #64 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #65 | |
RichVRichV | Nov 2015 | #66 | |
riversedge | Nov 2015 | #29 | |
Crystalite | Nov 2015 | #72 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #73 | |
eridani | Nov 2015 | #44 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #47 | |
eridani | Nov 2015 | #75 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #81 | |
eridani | Nov 2015 | #82 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #83 | |
eridani | Nov 2015 | #84 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #85 | |
eridani | Nov 2015 | #86 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #87 | |
silenttigersong | Nov 2015 | #24 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #34 | |
Warren Stupidity | Nov 2015 | #45 | |
aikoaiko | Nov 2015 | #5 | |
Crystalite | Nov 2015 | #70 | |
Lans | Nov 2015 | #8 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #18 | |
Lans | Nov 2015 | #30 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #32 | |
KittyWampus | Nov 2015 | #10 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #11 | |
4139 | Nov 2015 | #14 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #22 | |
DisgustipatedinCA | Nov 2015 | #16 | |
ibegurpard | Nov 2015 | #17 | |
Broward | Nov 2015 | #20 | |
lovemydog | Nov 2015 | #21 | |
Name removed | Nov 2015 | #25 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #27 | |
Thinkingabout | Nov 2015 | #33 | |
restorefreedom | Nov 2015 | #37 | |
TM99 | Nov 2015 | #28 | |
Alfresco | Nov 2015 | #31 | |
MoonRiver | Nov 2015 | #56 | |
RichVRichV | Nov 2015 | #62 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Nov 2015 | #35 | |
seabeyond | Nov 2015 | #36 | |
ibegurpard | Nov 2015 | #39 | |
seabeyond | Nov 2015 | #42 | |
Warren Stupidity | Nov 2015 | #46 | |
seabeyond | Nov 2015 | #48 | |
Warren Stupidity | Nov 2015 | #50 | |
seabeyond | Nov 2015 | #57 | |
Warren Stupidity | Nov 2015 | #61 | |
Warren DeMontague | Nov 2015 | #38 | |
Hiraeth | Nov 2015 | #40 | |
cherokeeprogressive | Nov 2015 | #41 | |
Bonobo | Nov 2015 | #43 | |
AgingAmerican | Nov 2015 | #49 | |
orpupilofnature57 | Nov 2015 | #51 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #52 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #53 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #54 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #55 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #58 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #59 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #67 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #68 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #69 | |
bravenak | Nov 2015 | #71 | |
Live and Learn | Nov 2015 | #78 | |
bravenak | Nov 2015 | #79 | |
Live and Learn | Nov 2015 | #80 | |
Live and Learn | Nov 2015 | #77 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #74 | |
jfern | Nov 2015 | #76 | |
AgingAmerican | Nov 2015 | #88 |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:59 AM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
1. Somebody...
...call the Whambulence.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 10:01 AM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
2. To be fair, Hillary is a war monger.
Response to morningfog (Reply #2)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 10:10 AM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
3. Let's be fair, Sanders has voted more times for military action than Hillary has, Sanders is a war
monger. Problem is Sanders is not efficient on foreign affairs but yet he has voted for more military actions than Hillary has. Saying Hillary is a war monger has not helped Sanders in the area of foreign affairs, he is still deficient.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #3)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:05 AM
bahrbearian (13,466 posts)
6. He didn't vote for disaster , IWR
or to do Stupid Shit.
|
Response to bahrbearian (Reply #6)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:10 AM
ucrdem (15,502 posts)
9. He voted to fund the Iraq war the same day he voted against the AUMF
Response to ucrdem (Reply #9)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:38 AM
MaggieD (7,393 posts)
13. Don't confuse them with facts
They are totally invested in this fake construct they have built up.
|
Response to ucrdem (Reply #9)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:24 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
26. voting to defund troops in the field is reprehensible
he did NOT vote for military action in iraq
that was someone else |
Response to morningfog (Reply #2)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:33 AM
Vattel (9,289 posts)
12. Why do you lie and smear Hillary by calling her a warmonger?
Granted, she supported the IRW and invading Iraq to force regime change there, she argued forcefully for regime change in Libya, she wanted an even bigger increase in troops in Afghanistan, she now wants no fly zones and American soldiers on the ground in Syria and Iraq, and she refused to admit that the bombing of Gaza was disproportionate. But those actions are just flukes. I mean, everyone has a bad day once in awhile, right?
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 10:13 AM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
4. The lack of foreign affairs ability was very oblivious in the last debate, yes, Hillary is very
experienced in foreign affairs and the only other presidential candidate in which she can compare is Lindsey Graham and the GOP is looking past Graham as their nominee. We need a strong foreign affairs to be president, that person who is able is Hillary Clinton.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #4)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:07 AM
bahrbearian (13,466 posts)
7. More War Drums Please
Response to bahrbearian (Reply #7)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:24 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
15. Your comment does not cover the fact Sanders does not have
Foreign experience.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #15)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:05 PM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
19. I much prefer that than to Hillary's "experience."
I know where HIllary stands on killing innocent people and it disgusts me.
|
Response to morningfog (Reply #19)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:16 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
23. I don't, Sanders has been voting to take military action and he does not
Understand what he votes for or against.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #23)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:56 PM
RichVRichV (885 posts)
60. If Bernie doesn't know what he's voting for or against
why is it he could see through Bush's lies on the AUMF when Hillary couldn't?
|
Response to RichVRichV (Reply #60)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:18 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
63. The same way I can see Bernie's lies when he voted five times against the Brady Bill.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #63)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:25 PM
RichVRichV (885 posts)
64. And here I thought we were talking foreign policy.
Didn't take you long to realize you were going to lose that debate and fall back to guns. I expected you to at least put up a little bit of a fight on the topic at hand.
![]() |
Response to RichVRichV (Reply #64)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:30 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
65. Sanders is terrible on foreign policy, he blew the first question in the last debate, he was
supposed to be talking about foreign policy, was told the first question was going to be about foreign affairs and he danced to finance. Exactly what I thought why is he talking about financial when he is supposed to be on foreign affairs.
I was pointing out Sanders lies when he is giving excuses, why does he think we don't see through his lies? |
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #65)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:34 PM
RichVRichV (885 posts)
66. You do realize those were opening remarks right?
Just like the first debate had opening remarks. There was no question asked there. And opening remarks are open to all subjects.
Go rewatch it. You obviously didn't catch that the first time around. |
Response to morningfog (Reply #19)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:55 PM
riversedge (65,375 posts)
29. Sanders also
kills innocent people in wars when he votes to fund these wars.
|
Response to morningfog (Reply #19)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 10:17 PM
Crystalite (164 posts)
72. Bill Clinton, George Bush, Reagan, Obama, all had less experience than Sanders.
This fact seems to escape Hillary's fan base.
Having served in a cabinet post does not a good president make. And Bernie's experience as an elected official eclipses hers. This is all so silly. Go Bernie! |
Response to Crystalite (Reply #72)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 10:35 PM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
73. The only President elected in the past 40 years who had foreign policy experience
before he started his first term, was George H. W. Bush.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #15)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:31 AM
eridani (51,907 posts)
44. That's a good thing. Better than having the experience of being wrong on foreign policy so often n/
Response to eridani (Reply #44)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 09:46 AM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
47. So say you, Sanders has been making decisions for twenty five years without
Understanding foreign policy, I would have thought twenty five years of being in congress would have helped him, it hasn't.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #47)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 12:38 AM
eridani (51,907 posts)
75. Voting no on the Iraq war shows a pretty comprehensive grasp of foreign policy. Unlike others. n/t
Response to eridani (Reply #75)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 06:04 AM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
81. Yes he grasp on it when he voted the same day to fund the war, more for the defense
Contractors, guess he had a grasp on taking care of the contractors.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #81)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 09:14 PM
eridani (51,907 posts)
82. And you are against taking care of American soldiers after deployment?
If they are in harm's way, they need to be supplied. Sanders did not vote to put them in harm's way--it was Clinton who did that.
|
Response to eridani (Reply #82)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 09:19 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
83. No, she did not make the decision to put them in harm's, that was Bush's decision.
Sanders continues to vote for the F-35 program and the experts say it will lose in a dog fight, ergo putting our military in harms way.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #83)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 10:02 PM
eridani (51,907 posts)
84. And she knew that Bush would invade--assuming that she is as smart as every objector to the war--
--who all knew that. Not only did she vote for it, she led cheerleading for it. You can't really vote against the F-35, as there is no such thing as a bill that is solely about funding it. Funding for it is attached to other funding bills that are necessary for funding general operations.
|
Response to eridani (Reply #84)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 10:51 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
85. Just as I can't say what you are thinking the same applies to others. Bush made the decision.
The F-35 program is a Lockheed Martin project, over budget and overdue.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/24583-bernie-sanders-doubles-down-on-f-35-support-days-after-runway-explosion http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6458446 |
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #85)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:42 PM
eridani (51,907 posts)
86. You can't vote against part of a bill. Maybe Clinton has come out against the F-35?
Probably the best thing to do would be to start over, but then all the sunk costs become worthless.
|
Response to eridani (Reply #86)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:46 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
87. Did you see the cost of the F-35 so far?
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #4)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:19 PM
silenttigersong (957 posts)
24. Ask yourself
were there any candidates for Sec of State more qualified and overlooked ,so Hillary could pad her resume for the 2016 Prez run?Sure she has exp ,sure is well known to foreign dignitaries.It obviously was a Power deal with Obama .I think this is what upsets people with her.Just like Crony Capitalists.
|
Response to silenttigersong (Reply #24)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:28 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
34. This is a question for President Barack Obama, Hillary served at the request of the president.
Actually she could have remained as Senator from NY, she was doing quiet well in that position. Perhaps if Sanders would have been qualified to be SOS maybe President Obama would have ask him but he chose Hillary instead. Sanders has his cronies, like Lockheed Martin and the NRA.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #4)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 09:15 AM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
45. It was indeed oblivious.
"The lack of foreign affairs ability was very oblivious" - sometimes the typos reveal the truth.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 10:41 AM
aikoaiko (33,298 posts)
5. Must correct you on something. Bernie was speaking out for black lives before BLM
He hadn't adopted the language of BLM yet but if you watch this short video the night before Netroots Nation 2015 and the BLMs first disruption of a Bernie Sanders presentation. https://m. But to the point of your OP. Bernie is successfully leading 30% of the Democratic Party to date. |
Response to aikoaiko (Reply #5)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 02:26 PM
Crystalite (164 posts)
70. Bernie is at once ahead of his time and representative of core Democratic values of the past.
One doesn't come across that often.
And it's clear that supporters of the status quo are VERY threatened by him. This entire OP is evidence of that. A post titled "made up shit" which is, itself, made up shit. Right? ![]() |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:10 AM
Lans (66 posts)
8. Bernie's Foreign Policy
Is the only sensible one, if you think that the US needs to act as the World Police and choose which brutal dictator should be in power than obviously you have the wrong priorities.
|
Response to Lans (Reply #8)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:02 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
18. He is saying this without foreign policy experience, this would be a statement made
By someone without knowledge of foreign knowledge, thanks for providing his statement.
|
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #18)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 03:10 PM
Lans (66 posts)
30. I've not provided any statement
I'm telling you the reality of the situation, tell me out of tens of regime changes the US has tried to implement in the last 65 years which have been a resounding success. Starting in Syria in 1949 the overthrowing of dictators or regimes inconvenient to USA regional interests have proved to only breed more chaos and devastation:
Syria Iran Guatemala Iraq Democratic Republic of the Congo Vietnam Chile Afghanistan You can look into all the success with regime changes. All these countries which we propped up different factions sometimes at different times are pretty much standard bearers of democracy. |
Response to Lans (Reply #30)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 06:17 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
32. Did you post #8?
The title was Bernie's foreign policy, thought you had his statement.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:12 AM
KittyWampus (55,894 posts)
10. LOL! They've moved on to something more stupid- Hillary is no longer Bill Clinton II
Now she's Margaret Thatcher.
|
Response to KittyWampus (Reply #10)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 11:17 AM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
11. Wasn't that just the most absurd thing? Are they still doing it?
I kinda figured it would be a 24-hour fad. Maybe it will replace the "it's-2008-all-over-again" meme. (That one continues to amuse me.)
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 12:51 PM
4139 (1,888 posts)
14. Libya, Syria, the reset with Russia, Honduras... Hillary foreign policy experience was awful!
Response to 4139 (Reply #14)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:13 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
22. She has foreign affairs experience, Sanders does not have a foreign affairs policy
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:29 PM
DisgustipatedinCA (12,530 posts)
16. A conservative with a plan trumps a liberal because you say he doesn't have a plan.
Got it.
Oh, but you may want to shore up the OP a little, since you made a claim you're unable to support, namely that people here are making things up about Hillary Clinton in order to defend Sanders. Just saying shit and pretending it's true is the domain of the George W Bush administration. On our side of the fence, we require an actual rationale. You're missing that piece. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 01:44 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
17. No one's making up anything about Hillary
So sorry her own record just doesn't fit with the narrative you're trying to push for her. Although if you just wait a bit she'll probably adopt rhetoric that fits her actual past a bit better. Assuming you actually SUPPORT that record.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:05 PM
Broward (1,976 posts)
20. Why do you support a war monger?
Why support someone in bed with Wall Street?
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:07 PM
lovemydog (11,833 posts)
21. I don't know about all the other folks you're talking about.
As for me, I think Sanders would have a good foreign policy. Vis a vis his appointments. But I think his chances of winning the nomination are very slim. I do hope that if Hillary wins the nomination and presidency, she would make good appointments too. Frankly I don't think there would be much difference in their foreign policy because most of that seems run by most of the same people. Joint Chiefs of Staff. What I'm hoping is that we avoid is another W. Administration of chickenhawks who start wars against the wrong countries. I think President Obama avoided that. I think Hillary or Bernie would avoid that too.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:27 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
27. just to keep things honest
Hillary is a war monger Hillary is in bed with Wall Street Hillary is a republican Hillary is not progressive Hillary is not a Democrat Hillary is Bill Clinton II bernie himself did not say the above. he has called out clinton on her ties to wall street and her support of military action, but he certainly did not use the above terminology. you did not accuse him of doing it, but just wanted to remind everyone |
Response to restorefreedom (Reply #27)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:16 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
33. Honest, I like honest.
Sanders is a war monger
Sanders is saying in bed with Lockheed Martin Sanders is a independent, using the DNC Sanders is a socialist Hillary has been a Democrat, not just in the last few months Sanders is June Sanders II I am calling Sanders out for being war monger, voted for military action more times than Hillary has He hasn't met a defense contract he would not vote and is able to keep the F-35 program going though the experts says it would lose in a dog fight. A war monger who wants to keep wars going in order to fund defense contractors. |
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #33)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:44 PM
restorefreedom (12,655 posts)
37. ok lets take these one by one
war monger...did not vote for iwr and does not like NF zone over syria and has called out many including hillary for too much military intervention
lockheed martin...need to research his ties (being honest here) yes has been indy now dem...caucused with dems for bazillion yrs and is more progressive than some dems socialist....yeah, good its what we need dem/indy addressed above i don't know who june sanders is f35.... dont like it but not gonna withdraw my support for him based on that alone |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 02:39 PM
TM99 (8,352 posts)
28. Sanders on foreign policy.
His experience, his stance, and some of his quotes.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Foreign_Policy.htm http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Bernie_Sanders_Foreign_Policy.htm http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bernie-sanders-determined-heard-foreign-policy/story?id=35295352 The only reason why you see Clinton as being attacked is because she has one stance - neocon military intervention. Her record is replete with examples. Sanders argues quite effectively that had we not gone to war in Iraq, the current crisis would not exist. So his goals will be to avoid such future mistakes - such as Clinton's support for troops on the ground and an expanded war effort in Syria. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 03:45 PM
Alfresco (1,698 posts)
31. He does seem to lack the dexterity needed to be Prez.
![]() |
Response to Alfresco (Reply #31)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:23 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
56. He's completely clueless in this area.
NOT presidential material.
![]() |
Response to MoonRiver (Reply #56)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:01 PM
RichVRichV (885 posts)
62. A clueless person knew Bush was lying us into a war with Iraq.
What does that say about Hillary who fell for it?
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:35 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
35. Hillaryspeak = Bernie has no foreign policy and doesn't get the Black vote
Hillaryspeak is spinning out of control
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:38 PM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
36. I do not even have to argue this one anymore. End of November and Sanders went nowhere in the race.
He has only gone so far and stalled. It is over except for the votes. It is not even a debate anymore. More moving on to the general.
Being the pragmatic gal I am. |
Response to seabeyond (Reply #36)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 08:03 PM
ibegurpard (16,685 posts)
39. So that means we can look forward
To no longer hearing from you?
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #39)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:19 PM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
42. Nope. You will have to get me five hides, again. Sigh..... ah well, that damn freedom of speech.
Response to seabeyond (Reply #42)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 09:20 AM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
46. You get yourself your own hides by being directly rude to people.
It really isn't all that difficult to discuss things here without being rude.
|
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #46)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 11:54 AM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
48. Not really.
Response to seabeyond (Reply #48)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:01 PM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
50. So you think you are perfectly civil and it is all a giant conspiracy to get you timeouts?
Seriously?
|
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #50)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:27 PM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
57. Who is trying to start up something here, and who is enjoying a thread on cameras....?
Response to seabeyond (Reply #57)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:56 PM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
61. um uh, you?
"Nope. You will have to get me five hides, again. Sigh..... ah well, that damn freedom of speech."
I responded to your bringing this subject up right here in this thread. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:56 PM
Warren DeMontague (80,708 posts)
38. Ive noticed that the defense of Hillary's lack of any concrete domestic policy is to make up
Shit about Sanders supporters, so why not?
|
Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #38)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 08:42 PM
Hiraeth (4,805 posts)
40. snicker.
something about sauces and geese goes here, I think.
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 08:59 PM
cherokeeprogressive (24,853 posts)
41. "We came, we saw, he DIED." You can't make up shit like that.
He died, and what was left behind can only be classified as a failed state.
Assad kicked sand all over the red line the President and his Secretary of State drew in the sand. He gassed his own people, and laughed at The President and his Secretary of State. You can't make shit like that up either. Hollywood would have a hard time writing material that reaches that level of ineptitude. |
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #41)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:39 PM
Bonobo (29,257 posts)
43. A peek into her very warped psyche. nt
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 11:55 AM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
49. How much foreign policy experience did Obama have?
How much is necessary? Sanders has common sense, he doesn't have to hire focus groups and do polling to tell him right from wrong.
You are obsessed with his stump speech? Why can't you list the main policy goals of Hillary? Seems you can spit out Sanders from the top of your head, but never hers if she even has any. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:06 PM
orpupilofnature57 (15,472 posts)
51. Like when he was the only member of our Govt to vote against the escalation of war or when
he held a conference on the failure of Greece ?? What foreign policy hasn't he covered ?
|
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:15 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
52. Bernie on ISIS
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:16 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
53. Bernie on Iraq
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:17 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
54. Bernie on Iran
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:18 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
55. Bernie Sanders refreshingly SANE foreign policy
http://www.salon.com/2015/11/25/bernie_sanderss_refreshingly_sane_foreign_policy/
The part about not doing it alone is critical. To begin with, unlike most candidates, Sanders concedes that we’ve being going it alone for decades now, with disastrous results. “Our response must begin with an understanding of past mistakes and missteps in our previous approaches to foreign policy. It begins with the acknowledgement that unilateral military action should be a last resort…and that ill-conceived military decisions, such as the invasion of Iraq, can wreak far-reaching devastation and destabilize entire regions for decades. It begins with the reflection that the failed policy decisions of the past – rushing to war, regime change in Iraq, or toppling Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, or Guatemalan President Arbenz in 1954, Brazilian President Goulart in 1964, Chilean President Allende in 1973. These are the sort of policies that do not work, do not make us safer, and must not be repeated.” It’s astonishing how many candidates on the Right in particular simply refuse to acknowledge that our previous encroachments around the world have done more harm than good (For example, our invasion of Iraq created the vacuum into which ISIS inserted itself). |
Response to peacebird (Reply #55)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:37 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
58. He'll say ANYTHING to get elected. I don't trust him. He'll change in office.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #58)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 12:56 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
59. Nope, he is consistent. Hillary is the weathervane in this election.
Response to peacebird (Reply #59)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:57 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
67. I'll never believe a word he says.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #67)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 02:18 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
68. Your perogative, but he has been consitent. Hillary 'evolves' with the polls, & has reverted right
Now that she thinks she has won the nom.
|
Response to peacebird (Reply #68)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 02:25 PM
NurseJackie (42,862 posts)
69. His anger turns me off. I can't trust someone who has a short fuse.
Finger in the button and all that. He'll never get my vote. I don't want a nuclear war.
|
Response to bravenak (Reply #71)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:32 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
78. Nope, blatantly false.
![]() |
Response to Live and Learn (Reply #78)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:38 AM
bravenak (34,648 posts)
79. He did it when discussing the sanitation workers strike.
Very unfair of him to neglect to mention that they were black sanitation workers trying to get the same pay and treatment as white sanitation workers. Many felt erased from history. That is just one example. The rural/urban/gang talk also.
|
Response to bravenak (Reply #79)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:46 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
80. Pray tell? (and a link would be nice) nt
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #58)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:28 AM
Live and Learn (12,769 posts)
77. Project much? nt
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 10:40 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
74. For the people that are against the lack of domestic policy Hillary Clinton has... this post.
Hillary is not a leader. She is mostly a rehearsed set of talking points.
There. Thought you should look in the mirror for a minute. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 12:41 AM
jfern (5,204 posts)
76. Hillary said 9/11 made her take the Wall Street money
No one made her say that. That was a terrible comment.
As for foreign policy, you are confusing most experienced with any good on the issues. Dick Cheney has more foreign policy experience than Hillary. But Bernie is a lot better on the issues. |
Response to upaloopa (Original post)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 04:18 PM
AgingAmerican (12,958 posts)
88. So you can easily list Sanders policy proposals
But I note you cannot list Clintons. Is this because you DON'T know where she stands on any given day?
|