Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:15 PM Nov 2015

45 to 1

Story tonight on NPR relates that Clinton has a 45 to 1 edge over Sanders in endorsements by elected officials - local, state and federal level. Don't ask me to prove the info is correct; I am assuming NPR would not declare that as a fact if it weren't so.
I would love to see the spin of how this equates to Bernie "will" or "can" win. I probably wouldn't be able to follow the circuitous logic since most of the more rabid folks in that camp are on my Ignore list.
45 to 1 is a staggering figure.

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
45 to 1 (Original Post) SCantiGOP Nov 2015 OP
It ain't over till the fat lady sings. Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #1
The fat lady is now in the wings doing voice exercises. George II Dec 2015 #42
Good one.. riversedge Dec 2015 #57
And she has a lead of more than that ratio of states by 'real people'... onehandle Nov 2015 #2
The Sanders Brigade philosophy is that political endorsements aren't important... brooklynite Nov 2015 #10
Most endorsements are little more than short-term publicity stunts as people forget them soon after. LonePirate Nov 2015 #19
Superdelegates are convention votes. okasha Dec 2015 #21
They matter to the candidate but not to the typical voter. LonePirate Dec 2015 #22
They matter to anyone. who has a firm preference okasha Dec 2015 #25
When I canvass I remind people which local politician has endorsed Hillary. Reminders are good riversedge Dec 2015 #58
Or Ben and Jerry. He's got the corporatist ice cream lobby sewed up. George II Dec 2015 #28
Or Cornel West. randome Dec 2015 #44
There's also Killer Mike. nt msanthrope Dec 2015 #63
I feel stupid Control-Z Dec 2015 #66
Some musician that generated a lot of threads here. nt msanthrope Dec 2015 #67
Thanks. Control-Z Dec 2015 #68
That means that the men in smokey back rooms have selected her. It's the opposite of democracy. nt Romulox Nov 2015 #3
In fact it cannot even be called an election. jwirr Nov 2015 #5
Several hundred WOMEN have endorsed her too. George II Dec 2015 #31
52 of the Representatives and 13 of the Senators who have endorsed ("selected") her are WOMEN. George II Dec 2015 #55
She just picked up the Gov of NH and Vermont..endorsements Historic NY Nov 2015 #4
yay! :-) NurseJackie Nov 2015 #18
She's had the Vermont Governor endorsement for several months, as well as......... George II Dec 2015 #30
NPR.....LOL.... jkbRN Nov 2015 #6
The only people I've ever seen who "LOL" at NPR have been republicans. Hmmmm. George II Dec 2015 #32
Same here. Isn't that odd? MoonRiver Dec 2015 #35
Very Curious. Could it be? Alfresco Dec 2015 #41
In other news, the establishment supports the establishment. nt Lucky Luciano Nov 2015 #7
+1 Hepburn Dec 2015 #50
Assuming that the endorsers each have one vote like every other American tularetom Nov 2015 #8
many of them have considerably more than one vote dsc Nov 2015 #9
Actually, most of the, are much more important brooklynite Nov 2015 #11
And that's just the ticked off Bernie supporters. CajunBlazer Dec 2015 #29
Clinton had the same amount of endorsements at the same time at 2007 sleepyvoter Nov 2015 #12
"Clinton had the same amount of endorsements at the same time at 2007" NCTraveler Dec 2015 #36
List of Hillary Clinton presidential campaign endorsements, 2008 Hepburn Dec 2015 #51
Doesn't back what the poster said. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #53
LOL! Of course not...it doesn't support your allegation! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #56
I made no allegation. Literally. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #59
Are you positive on that? Sheepshank Dec 2015 #46
Yeah...Inertia and name rercognition and political and intellectual laziness.... Armstead Nov 2015 #13
"she's not going to find such easy sledding in the General." postatomic Nov 2015 #17
Which GOP potential candidate isn't a dickwad? okasha Dec 2015 #23
I should have amended to total unelectable dickwad Armstead Dec 2015 #24
I think it's going to be Jeb. okasha Dec 2015 #33
They are all unelectable dickwads. Every single one of them. randome Dec 2015 #47
I agree, but alas, many don't Armstead Dec 2015 #48
IMO, we lose the GE if HRC gets the nomination. n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #52
I'm guessing this means 'still in office' postatomic Nov 2015 #14
No snark, however Half-Century Man Dec 2015 #79
Yes, it's from the 2016 Cycle postatomic Dec 2015 #80
9 out of 10 dentists prefer Crest toothpaste. Crystalite Nov 2015 #15
So the odds are on the "WE CAN'T" candidate. No thanks. nt Live and Learn Nov 2015 #16
I don't give a shit who endorses her ibegurpard Dec 2015 #20
Sanders is currently ahead in the polls for ONE state. Guess which one that is? George II Dec 2015 #26
...also won by Paul Tsongas and Howard Dean... brooklynite Dec 2015 #27
LOL NurseJackie Dec 2015 #34
Lots of work for his fifty state landslide. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #37
Well, I guess if he won all 50 states he'd be assailed as a "corporatist" in the pocket of.... George II Dec 2015 #39
Completely unscientific demwing Dec 2015 #38
Here is a complete and comprehensive list of endorsements of all kinds... George II Dec 2015 #40
Hillary is Dominating Alfresco Dec 2015 #49
I heard that very same NPR item yesterday Sheepshank Dec 2015 #43
See post #40 right above yours - a complete list of major office-holder endorsements for all 3. George II Dec 2015 #45
Clinton is setting a record in endorsements according to Nate Silver Gothmog Dec 2015 #54
Collect the whole set. frylock Dec 2015 #61
When you are campaigning for the nomination of the Democratic Party endorsements are important Gothmog Dec 2015 #65
How many of the 30% of voters registered as democrats encompass the base of the party? frylock Dec 2015 #71
This is why Trajan Dec 2015 #60
Something that independents, unaffilated, and millennials don't give a shit about. frylock Dec 2015 #62
Except that these superdelegates are the ones that get out there and campaign with her Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #64
Ask five millennials if they care more about their students loans.. frylock Dec 2015 #70
My candidate is also lacking in endorsements. qwlauren35 Dec 2015 #69
The corrupt MSM want you to believe SmittynMo Dec 2015 #78
LOve ya, SCantigop! Cha Dec 2015 #72
Why, thank you, Sir or Madam SCantiGOP Dec 2015 #73
Madam.. you're welcome. Cha Dec 2015 #74
K&R That is one hell of a mountain to climb Number23 Dec 2015 #75
It's amazing to me how many SmittynMo Dec 2015 #76
So the estabishment status quo candidate is endorsed by the status quo establishment CBGLuthier Dec 2015 #77
I'm not the Chosen One olddots Dec 2015 #81

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. And she has a lead of more than that ratio of states by 'real people'...
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:20 PM
Nov 2015

...as the 'Not Hillary' Party calls them.

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
10. The Sanders Brigade philosophy is that political endorsements aren't important...
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:57 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Tue Dec 1, 2015, 12:52 AM - Edit history (1)

...except for Nina Turner.

LonePirate

(13,417 posts)
19. Most endorsements are little more than short-term publicity stunts as people forget them soon after.
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:59 PM
Nov 2015

Few endorsements actually change minds or votes. People generally (but not always) care more about what their neighbor or co-worker thinks than what some politician is favoring.

riversedge

(70,192 posts)
58. When I canvass I remind people which local politician has endorsed Hillary. Reminders are good
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:41 PM
Dec 2015

things.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
44. Or Cornel West.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:30 PM
Dec 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
66. I feel stupid
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 04:25 PM
Dec 2015

but who the hell is Killer Mike? I've seen the name a few times but have no clue. And I don't care enough, I guess, to Google it. Lol

George II

(67,782 posts)
30. She's had the Vermont Governor endorsement for several months, as well as.........
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:03 AM
Dec 2015

....the endorsement of the Mayor of Burlington, Bernie's home town.

Now THAT is a kick in the face!

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
8. Assuming that the endorsers each have one vote like every other American
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:32 PM
Nov 2015

those endorsements don't mean jack shit.

But see, the problem for Clinton is not so much whether or not she has the nomination sewn up. She may have already gamed the process sufficiently to ensure that she will be the candidate.

But her problems have just begun once she is nominated. About that time she can expect a mountain of shit to come out regarding influence peddling from the State Department, shady dealing inside the Clinton foundation, and the continuing fallout from emailgate. Not to mention the Clinton scandals from the good old days.

She has as good a chance of being under indictment by the time of the election as she does of actually being elected POTUS.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
9. many of them have considerably more than one vote
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:55 PM
Nov 2015

I don't know the exact number of voters a delegate is supposed to represent but it is way more than 1 and many of those endorsers are delegates.

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
11. Actually, most of the, are much more important
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:58 PM
Nov 2015

Federal office holders and Governor's all serve as Convention Delegates.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)
29. And that's just the ticked off Bernie supporters.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:02 AM
Dec 2015
After that Republican attacks will be a breeze.

Seriously now, all of that has the sound of wishful thinking. Already to date she has been the most carefully vetted candidate in recent history.

And I can see it now: Hillary vs. Mr. Text Book Narcissistic Complex, or Hillary against Mr. I Really Did Try to Stab My Best Friend, or Hillary vs. Mr. I Shut down the Government Twice. The press will have a field day with those guys.
 

sleepyvoter

(42 posts)
12. Clinton had the same amount of endorsements at the same time at 2007
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:02 PM
Nov 2015

Once the real numbers come through, then it will be painfully obvious that Clinton is not the choice of Democrats.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
46. Are you positive on that?
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:42 PM
Dec 2015

There are other links that tell us, this time around she learned her lesson about not playing to delegates and realized the importance of endrosements. So you will need to back up your assertions.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
13. Yeah...Inertia and name rercognition and political and intellectual laziness....
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:02 PM
Nov 2015

She's probably got the Dem nom locked up.

But unless the GOP nominates a real dickwad, she's not going to find such easy sledding in the General.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
17. "she's not going to find such easy sledding in the General."
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:16 PM
Nov 2015

I couldn't agree more, which is why she has been looking past the nomination and toward the General.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
24. I should have amended to total unelectable dickwad
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 12:19 AM
Dec 2015

They're all dick wads in the collective opionion of Democrats,liberals,progressives. But they do have good luck in convincing nonpartisan types that they' are not dickwads. I was referring to absolutely beyond the pale ones, not the typically offensive ones.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
33. I think it's going to be Jeb.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:06 AM
Dec 2015

And I think Hillary will beat him handily. Most of the crazies have no traction, and the Republican "elders" are just as scared of Trump and Carson as the rest of us.

And Jeb is a dickwad.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
47. They are all unelectable dickwads. Every single one of them.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:49 PM
Dec 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
14. I'm guessing this means 'still in office'
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:07 PM
Nov 2015

In terms of actual people it's more like 85 to 1.

Hillary Clinton has just passed previous nominees before Iowa in terms of clinching the nomination.



All the details here:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
79. No snark, however
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 06:27 AM
Dec 2015

I see only one line documenting her endorsements. I assume it is from the current cycle.
Is there a line indicating her endorsements from her last run?
A comparison between the two runs for nomination would be helpful.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
80. Yes, it's from the 2016 Cycle
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 01:13 PM
Dec 2015

The comparisons are all the candidates that were nominated, so it doesn't show her endorsements in 2008.... since she wasn't the nominee. It also doesn't show Obama or Bill Clinton in their re-election nominations. Hope that is helpful.


 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
37. Lots of work for his fifty state landslide.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 12:30 PM
Dec 2015

Or maybe they were saying he was going to lose all fifty. I can't keep it straight anymore.

George II

(67,782 posts)
39. Well, I guess if he won all 50 states he'd be assailed as a "corporatist" in the pocket of....
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:11 PM
Dec 2015

...the oligarchy and "Wall Shhhtreet".

So maybe his strategy is indeed to lose all 50 states?

George II

(67,782 posts)
40. Here is a complete and comprehensive list of endorsements of all kinds...
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:17 PM
Dec 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endorsements_for_the_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016

This list is very well maintained and updated almost as endorsements are announced.

If we were to zero in on only Governors, Senators, and Representatives (the office-holders with whom a President has to have the cooperation), Clinton actually has a margin of 194 to 2:

Martin O'Malley - 0 Governors, 0 Senators, 1 Representative
Bernard Sanders - 0 Governors, 0 Senators, 2 Representatives
Hillary Clinton - 13 Governors, 38 Senators, 143 Representatives
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
43. I heard that very same NPR item yesterday
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 01:26 PM
Dec 2015

I was looking for the back up info, realizing that there will be those calling for it.

Since I can't find the clip of the news item, but I will give you my support, K&R and confirmation that I'd heard the same thing.

Gothmog

(145,130 posts)
54. Clinton is setting a record in endorsements according to Nate Silver
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:30 PM
Dec 2015

According to Nate's scoring system, the relative values of endorsement are set forth below http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/

Hillary Clinton 452
Bernie Sanders 2
Martin O'Malley 1

This is a modern record according to Nate

Gothmog

(145,130 posts)
65. When you are campaigning for the nomination of the Democratic Party endorsements are important
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 04:13 PM
Dec 2015

Endorsements are important in the primary process and play a role on how many voters in the true base of the party will be basing their decisions. The number and percentage of endorsements of Hillary Clinton is truly impressive and shows wide support inside the base of the party (i.e., the people who volunteer and work each year on party efforts). Elected officials who got elected due to the efforts of the base of the party are important area of support in the primary process.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
60. This is why
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:49 PM
Dec 2015

Because tens of millions of voters, including new voters, will swamp that rickety little boat with all those 'super delegates' ... like a tsunami ...

Now that we've gotten that out of the way ... Good bye ...

frylock

(34,825 posts)
62. Something that independents, unaffilated, and millennials don't give a shit about.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 02:52 PM
Dec 2015

I'm sure a majority of the 30-something percent of registered democrats might care.

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
64. Except that these superdelegates are the ones that get out there and campaign with her
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 04:04 PM
Dec 2015

And raise awareness, get out the vote and all that other stuff that millennials don't give a shit about either, right?

frylock

(34,825 posts)
70. Ask five millennials if they care more about their students loans..
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 05:12 PM
Dec 2015

or that superdelegates are backing the establishment candidate. Ask them which one of those will effect their vote.

qwlauren35

(6,147 posts)
69. My candidate is also lacking in endorsements.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 04:43 PM
Dec 2015

But there's still a lot of data that says she can win. What the campaign says all the time - endorsers are not voters. We're after voters.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
78. The corrupt MSM want you to believe
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 06:20 AM
Dec 2015

she's killing it.

If you continually talk about the lies and total bullshit, eventually everyone will think it's true. That seems to be the concept.

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
76. It's amazing to me how many
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 05:47 AM
Dec 2015

people in this thread are totally in their own little bubble, and will vote against their best interests.

These people say screw healthcare, education, and income inequality, just to mention a few. And to not realize and admit that Clinton is part of the 1% is ludicrous.

If you think Hillary is going to fix these issues, dream on. She's totally bought and paid for. How can people not see this?

I don't care what the polls say. I don't care what the delegate support indicates. I don't care if some union heads say they support the wrong person. What matters are the votes, and I feel that the votes this upcoming election will set a record for participation.

So what DO I care for? I DO care that my candidate is not bought by anyone, and has a huge record of trustworthiness. No one can even come close to Bernie in his stances for equality and rebuilding our democracy and the middle class. Doesn't that mean anything anymore? It does to me, big time.

But most of all, I DO care about my children, and grandchildren, and their future. One would think that if this were important to themselves, voting Bernie would be your only choice.

I clearly remember what it meant to have a true democracy in this country. That was at least 40 years ago. Life was good in general, jobs were plentiful, and people actually had a family life with a 40 hour work week. Most corporate jobs came with pensions and 0 out of pocket insurance. Not any more. Look around you. Are you pleased with what you see and what you make? Do you like working more hours for less? Do you still want the same ole politics as usual?

It's plain as day what needs to be done. Wake up and smell the coffee, while you can still get it.




CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
77. So the estabishment status quo candidate is endorsed by the status quo establishment
Wed Dec 2, 2015, 05:53 AM
Dec 2015

The herd moves of its own accord with its own protection foremost in its motives.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»45 to 1