2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNEW robust landline-cellphone Quinnipiac poll -Clinton 60% (+7) Sanders 30% (-5)
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2307
This RDD telephone survey was conducted from November 23 30, 2015 throughout the
nation.
Responses are reported for 1,453 registered voters with a margin of sampling error of +/-
2.6 percentage points. The survey includes 672 Republican or Republican leaning voters
with a margin of sampling error of +/- 3.8 percentage points and 573 Democratic or
Democratic leaning voters with a margin of sampling error of +/- 4.1 percentage points.
Margins of sampling error for additional subgroups are listed in tables below.
Surveys are conducted in English or Spanish dependent on respondent preference with live
interviewers calling land lines and cell phones.
All data was collected and tabulated by the Quinnipiac University Poll
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)livetohike
(22,156 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)brooklynite
(94,679 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)Alfresco
(1,698 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)I'm not all that spiteful of a person though.
But you may want to refrain from open taunting. That's not a great way to get people to join your cause.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)Good Day.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Big time. Republicans are about to be met head on by a unified Democratic Party. We really have a great opportunity to build off the success of the Obama administration.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Laser102
(816 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)The Democrats and Republicans have already basically made it to the Super Bowl, now it's all about who to start.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The Clintons have been delivering for the Democrats for over forty years. The other gentleman walked on the team last April.
anti partisan
(429 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)That is why both HRC and RNC, and their sponsors Goldman Sachs, want people to hear as little as possible about Bernie.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)So that explains him losing 2-1 among the people who know him best (Democratic primary voters) , okay
anti partisan
(429 posts)Where he happens to have the highest approval rating of any Senator in the country.
#1/100
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He has been caucussing with Dems 40 yrs ...Democrats know who he is....
anti partisan
(429 posts)And you very well may get a blank stare and look of utter confusion.
Most of those people support Hillary, and there is a lot of fertile ground there.
Knowing who he is.. not quite. But of course there is time. Time that HRC wish didn't exist.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Vermont...
Walk away
(9,494 posts)He can't eve get another Senator to mention his name unless it's a republican trying to make Democrats look bad!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Oh, the state that has the population of a congressional district and has the same demographics as a NHL game?
anti partisan
(429 posts)And they like what they see
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It is my experience that those who point a finger at someone often have three fingers pointing back at themselves.
anti partisan
(429 posts)It is clear that you are talking about white people, who are just as an integral part to the Democratic Party as everyone else, as we fight the common fight for progress.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Yes, Vermont is a homogeneous state... That's an empirical observation and not a normative one, no less empirical and no more normative than to say California, New York, Florida, and Texas, et cetera are heterogeneous states...
A successful leader must reach all demographics in a nation as heterogeneous as our nation.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)His poll numbers would show that ....and they don't
anti partisan
(429 posts)News, news, read all about it!
http://morningconsult.com/polls/new-survey-finds-that-bernie-sanders-is-most-popular-senator-in-america/
I know you are one of Hillary's top Internet supporters so I won't waste too many breaths here.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)They know who he is?
anti partisan
(429 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Sanders appeal was always to a limited demographic and that hasn't changed. Unless you want to claim that minorities and women aren't aware of Sanders.
anti partisan
(429 posts)And yes minorities do not know much about Sanders, as shown in crosstabs of national polls.
His record will speak for itself. It already has to many people, and will to many more.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Maybe a month ago he said "I am a Democrat now"...
moobu2
(4,822 posts)If anyone actually thought Bernie had a chance to be the D. nominee, the GOP would go after him and so would the media. Bernie's poll numbers would reflect that new attention.
anti partisan
(429 posts)They specifically want to avoid giving him attention. Gee, I wonder why...
moobu2
(4,822 posts)anti partisan
(429 posts)But there he is with constant 30+% in the polls, in contention to win the first two states, and pushing HRC into adopting more progressive positions.
How's that for irrelevancy?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Is losing by seventeen points in IA in contention to win the state?
anti partisan
(429 posts)Mainly, having the ground game and impassioned supporters that will not only change minds but also turn out for the caucuses for a historic victory.
He will also get tons of votes from those who don't even show up in the polls (those who either didn't vote last time or vote for the most honest candidates and voted Ron Paul last time).
People generally don't care all that much about politics this early, but just you wait...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That in and of itself is a victory.
anti partisan
(429 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)Unless Bernie Sanders can find some kind of smear that sticks...he's done. Everybody knows it besides Bernie bubble people.
anti partisan
(429 posts)Hillary and her surrogates sadly can't say the same
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)They are ignoring him in the faint hope he will be the nominee because they know he will be easy to beat...
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Not only does Bernie have a greater margin of victory over the GOPers, but he is viewed as the most honest of all candidates (you'd never know it by the attackers on this site) and a whopping 41% of those polled indicated that they could change their mind. So hold off on the celebrations cause this show ain't over folks.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Bookmark this post.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I would put the Vermont independent's chances somewhere below Dan Campbell hoisting the Vince Lombardi trophy next February 7th.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)
Post removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I will be gloating a year from now when she's #45... I would literally bet my life on it, so far no takers.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I bet not!!!
So its a BS poll!!!!!!
Or something like that.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)[img][/img]
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I think you have those binoculars on backwards....
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Again, time to retire the cell phone excuse
still_one
(92,322 posts)republicans verses Democrats
Walk away
(9,494 posts)every other poll that has come out in the past few weeks. Just goes to show you...no matter how you slice it, Hillary has twice as much support as Sanders!!!!
still_one
(92,322 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Online polls! Bernie is winning in 50 states!
Seriously though, I love it when I wake up in the morning and Hillary is still winning. By a mile.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)askew
(1,464 posts)It shows how unelectable she is in the general.
Hillary Clinton is viewed unfavorably by women to the tune of 41% to 54%
"Hillary Clinton cares about the needs and problems of people like you?"
46% yes
51% no.
Obama beat Romney on this in 2012 by 60+ pts.
Hillary is a flawed, damaged candidate and if we go into the general with her, we will lose.
okasha
(11,573 posts)care so much about women.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And after decades this somehow still surprises people...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)You couldn't be more wrong...I would literally bet my life on it.
A wager...
If Hillary loses the G E I will eat dirt and put it on youtube under "Man Loses Bet" as long as my wagering partner promises to do the same if she wins...
Of course nobody will take my wager because nobody has my strength of conviction.
Duval
(4,280 posts)I hope to see you here after Bernie wins.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I'm not complaining, this one is fun and encouraging too.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)Trump .. +6 ...... +8
Cruz ..... +5 ...... +10
Rubio .... +1 ...... +1
Carson .. +3 ...... +6
Sanders continues to show better as a candidate in the general election because
Sanders Beats All Top Republicans In Latest Poll
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sanders-beats-republican-candidates-poll_565ee12ce4b079b2818c95fc
"Fifty-nine percent of voters also say Sanders is honest and trustworthy -- placing him well above former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, his chief rival for the Democratic nomination, and above all top Republican candidates tested in the poll."
14 Percent of Democrats Will Not Support Hillary Clinton. Only Bernie Sanders Prevents Low Voter Turnout
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/14-of-democrats-will-not-support-hillary-clinton-only-bernie-sanders-prevents-low-voter-turnout_b_8696238.htm
ln addition to the 14% of Democrats who won't support Clinton, 27% would "support her with some reservations" and 11% would "only back her because she is the nominee."
Based on the CBS News findings, around 52% of Democrats will either stay home or reluctantly drive to the polls. Not the recipe to beat a Republican, who if Clinton is the nominee, will have millions of new conservatives/independents doing everything possible in order to ensure Hillary Clinton doesn't get elected.
....
Also, look closer within polls stating Clinton leads Sanders and you'll find that voters don't admire Clinton. The same NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll in October showing Clinton with a commanding 31 point lead over Bernie Sanders also finds that many Democrats view Clinton in an unfavorable manner. In this poll, 26 percent of respondents gave Hillary Clinton a 1 out of 5 (the lowest rating, titled "Very Poor Rating" and 11 percent gave her a 2 out of 5 pertaining to "Having the right temperament."
Sorry, but if around 37 percent of respondents (in a poll that's supposed to be favorable) don't feel Clinton has the "right temperament," low voter turnout is a logical consequence if Clinton becomes the nominee.
As for "Being compassionate enough to understand average people," the October NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that 30 percent of voters gave Hillary Clinton the worst rating, or a 1 out of 5.
Interestingly, when voters in this poll respond to "Having high personal standards that set the proper moral tone for the country," 37 percent of respondents give Hillary Clinton a "Very Poor Rating" of 1 out of 5.
I wouldn't be jumping up and down with glee at those results. Hillary has a real problem looming in the general election. More and more, Bernie is looking like the better horse for the general election. Winning the primary is pretty hollow if the candidate who wins cannot wind up in the White House.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)completely crushing Bernie Sanders in the Primaries.
Twist, spin and type as many words as you can. It doesn't change anything.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It is silly to compare a candidate's favorable ratings who has been in the fray for forty years and one who has been in the fray for eight months but you know that. If you don't, you should.
The Vermont independent wilted under a two minute attack from Governor O'Malley on his gun position:
I can't even begin to fathom how he would wither under a relentless Go(PU) attack.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)Favorability:
Sanders +13
Rubio +9
Carson +7
Cruz 0
Clinton -7%
Trump -22
American voters say
59 28 percent, +31 that Sanders is honest and trustworthy
53 34 percent, +19 that Carson is honest and trustworthy
49 33 percent, +16 that Rubio is honest and trustworthy
43 39 percent, +4 that Cruz is honest and trustworthy
59 35 percent, -24 that Trump is not honest and trustworthy.
60 36 percent, -24 that Clinton is not honest and trustworthy.
I can't think of any candidate for president that won with favorability and trustworthy numbers as bad as Hillary's
39% of Republicans and 64% of Independents trust Bernie vs 7% Republicans and 26% Independents trusting Clinton.
That's not good for Hillary in the general election.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)This is a sterile debate...How sterile do I think it is? This sterile:
A wager...
If Hillary loses the G E I will eat dirt and put it on youtube under "Man Loses Bet" as long as my wagering partner promises to do the same if she wins...
Of course nobody will take my wager because nobody has my strength of conviction.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)It has nothing to do with the strength of your "conviction" - though many might argue some other word is more appropriate.
On a state by state basis for electroral votes, right now, Hillary is currently handily behind Rubio for example. He's cleaning her clock right now. With her bad favorability and trustworthy numbers, her only practical hope against him is that he blows up somehow. With his credit card problems in the open, that doesn't look so likely. With her bad favorability and trustworthy numbers, enthusiasm for her is down and she is not going to get help from independents or Republicans. And therefore, has a very difficult task to come back against Rubio. We knew she had this ceiling when she ran against Obama except it's gotten worse.
The reason so many do not trust Hillary is because she's been lying to the American public longer so everybody knows about her chronic problem with not telling the truth. So this much you got right: "because she's been in the fray for forty years" ... roughly 2/3rds of Americans know from experience with her that she's a chronic liar.
We saw more of it yesterday with her disgusting doubling down on the 9/11 BS to explain her Wall Street donations that flowed to her and her husband long before 9/11 and paid off with things like her support for the bankruptcy bill (going against Elizabeth Warren).
If she wins, I'll support her to win the White House because all of our work over the last ten years could get undone with a Republican president. But I don't like her chances. Hillary has a serious problem as a general election candidate. Bernie is no sure thing either but I like Bernie's chances better because he is an honest man not owned by Wall Street who polls better among independents and Republicans.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I don't blame you from demurring from my wager and insolently so at that.
There is a reason Hillary Clinton is an 8/11 favorite at the betting markets while the great (sic) Marco Rubio is a 4/1 underdog:
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner
Oh, Bernie Sanders is a 14-1 underdog. That's worse odds than Donald Trump:
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2016/winner
The notion that a independent senator from a small, rural, and homogenous state that is the size of a congressional district is some political superstar is beyond preposterous.
This doesn't take a Nate Silver or Drew Linzer to game out. Hillary Clinton dispatches of the Vermont independent, probably some time in February than she summarily dispatches of whatever clown the Go(PU) offers up as a sacrificial lamb next November.
I would literally bet my life on it.
Jarqui
(10,128 posts)Some polls had him behind about 30 pts.
Hillary was the heavy favorite for the coronation.
What happened? Did America sober up or wake up?
As for the betting markets, that's Wall Street money laying a bunch of those bets while financing Hillary's campaign. In fact, it's been reported campaigns put their thumb on those with some bets. With similar odds and similar Wall Street money, they lost real bad in 2008, didn't they.
Even if Hillary wins the primary, unless Trump runs as an independent, she won't be favored or favored for long. Koch money in ads is going to hammer her with all the material they have on her. From the convention until November, they can run new ads every week featuring a different big Clinton fib (to leverage bad vibes on her near record high untrustworthiness in the polls) and a different big flip-flop (to leverage bad vibes on her near record low favorability in the polls) and nasty inferences about Benghazi, emails, Whitewater, Travelgate, Monica, Vince Foster, brain damage/confused, Wall Street/Clinton Foundation money, etc. I think it's going to make the swiftboating of John Kerry look trivial in comparison.
Brace yourself. It's gonna get real nasty.
If Bernie were to win the primary, they don't have a nasty dirty laundry list for him like they do Hillary and Republicans and Independents trust Bernie much more and his favorability is much better than Hillary's with them. Medicare for all might be an easier sell than Obamacare - certainly not likely to be as offensive to Independents and Republicans. I think Bernie's a better candidate for the general election.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)What you are missing is when the GOPU fires on Team Clinton they will fire back but with ten times as much force and venom...When Team Clinton gets through with their GO(PU) opponent he will look like like a cross between Bull Connor and Sheriff Joe Arpaio...Politics is a blood sport and the Clinton's have mastered it. In fact the Clinton loves when the opponents go negative because that allows them to go negative...
What does Ken Starr, Newt Gingrich, and Bob Livingston have in common? All G(PU) heads on the Clinton's wall!!!
Gothmog
(145,479 posts)Thanks for posting
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)She will be the democratic party nominee! I can't wait!
61 days to the 2016 Iowa Presidential Caucuses!!!