Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:25 PM Dec 2015

Are we seriously going to get a thread when some unknown endorses Sanders? We could fill the entire

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by yardwork (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

Last edited Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:39 PM - Edit history (1)

front page with people (let alone unions) who have endorsed Clinton

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are we seriously going to get a thread when some unknown endorses Sanders? We could fill the entire (Original Post) hill2016 Dec 2015 OP
We got a thread each time someone endorsed Hillary and no one complained. Begrudge much? merrily Dec 2015 #1
Geez we UglyGreed Dec 2015 #2
How many on her (eye roll) box of household products? merrily Dec 2015 #16
I've lost count UglyGreed Dec 2015 #40
Oh god, I had forgotten about that nonsense. arcane1 Dec 2015 #52
Nah, we got at least 4 threads each time someone endorsed Clinton. (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #8
You're so right. I misspoke. I promise to be more careful next time. merrily Dec 2015 #10
Followed by polls of other polls... Segami Dec 2015 #14
You're right still_one Dec 2015 #53
Appreciate it, still_one merrily Dec 2015 #55
I was just thinking how nice it was Kentonio Dec 2015 #3
Only if you promise to comment on each one snooper2 Dec 2015 #4
I'm interested in the next obscure rapper that endorses him. It will turn the minority tide. nt LexVegas Dec 2015 #5
I was told to delete my list of Clinton endorsements.... NCTraveler Dec 2015 #6
Well, we probably weren't before. HerbChestnut Dec 2015 #7
6-8 threads per endorsement of Sanders seems right, since the fix is obviously in for someone else. merrily Dec 2015 #12
HA! Yes, obviously it's fixed. That it! What else could it be? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #20
Of course not. The handwriting hasn't been on that wall for years at all. merrily Dec 2015 #24
I know! Exactly. (You forgot to mention landlines and cellphones. That's a biggie.) NurseJackie Dec 2015 #30
Cellphones and landlines have nothing to do with the fix having been in for years. merrily Dec 2015 #31
But Bernie is such a strong candidate, but not for the cellphone-thing, the polls would NurseJackie Dec 2015 #38
Again, try to track. It really shouldn't be as hard as you're making it seem. merrily Dec 2015 #39
I think you understand better than you think I think you think I do. ;-) NurseJackie Dec 2015 #43
Anyone with a brain whose eyes and ears and mind were open knew. merrily Dec 2015 #44
But I do have one other question. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #45
specious sophistry and logical fallacies merrily Dec 2015 #46
Well, that's a good working title for your explanation. But where's the rest? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #48
Says it all. merrily Dec 2015 #49
As I expected. A big bucket of nothin' ... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #50
Awww, don't be so hard on yourself! merrily Dec 2015 #56
Try to track! NurseJackie Dec 2015 #59
"the fix is in" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #32
I don't vote based on endorsements or polls. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #9
I vote on hair. Once Chafee dropped out, I switched to Sanders. merrily Dec 2015 #11
I can boast that I have hair very much like Sanders. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #13
Thanks to Sanders' opening my eyes, I realized I am at least a Democratic Socialist. merrily Dec 2015 #15
I might very well vote for you for being a Socialist and forgive you your hair. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #17
Not I! I'm the Sherman candidate: If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve. merrily Dec 2015 #21
Awww, shucks. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #28
Purist! merrily Dec 2015 #33
H> is perfectly coiffed. Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #18
Call Sanders old and mock his hair all you want, but mentioning Hillary's age or hair is sexist. merrily Dec 2015 #19
If sanders paid hundreds for his hairdo I'd give him no pass. Ed Suspicious Dec 2015 #23
No one gave Bubba or Edwards a pass for their haircuts, but Hillary is different. merrily Dec 2015 #26
HAHAHAHA.....Aaaah,.. Segami Dec 2015 #22
Thread Win !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #27
I'd like to thank the Academy. merrily Dec 2015 #29
well Ive read right HERE on the DU that ENDORSEMENTS mean nothing. particuarly entertainers. nt msongs Dec 2015 #25
Whoever said that was probably right. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #34
If replying as that post deserves were worth a hide, you'd no doubt get at least 20 replies. merrily Dec 2015 #36
Black endorsements matter Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #35
Unrec. How is this not meta? aidbo Dec 2015 #37
It is, but the Hosts don't do their job. morningfog Dec 2015 #58
... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #41
I post every time I see HRC gets a new endorsement. It is part of what GDP is for Godhumor Dec 2015 #42
I'm not sure I can handle all this niceness from you Armstead Dec 2015 #54
What a dumb, stupid, pointless OP. giftedgirl77 Dec 2015 #47
seriously. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #51
Whiney meta post. morningfog Dec 2015 #57
By unknown you seem to mean artists, particularly minority artists. Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #60

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. We got a thread each time someone endorsed Hillary and no one complained. Begrudge much?
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:28 PM
Dec 2015

Small

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
2. Geez we
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:30 PM
Dec 2015

had a Hillary xmas shopping thread

merrily

(45,251 posts)
16. How many on her (eye roll) box of household products?
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:00 PM
Dec 2015

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
40. I've lost count
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:37 PM
Dec 2015

so many threads so little time

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
52. Oh god, I had forgotten about that nonsense.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:26 PM
Dec 2015

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
8. Nah, we got at least 4 threads each time someone endorsed Clinton. (nt)
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:40 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
10. You're so right. I misspoke. I promise to be more careful next time.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:53 PM
Dec 2015
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
14. Followed by polls of other polls...
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:58 PM
Dec 2015

still_one

(92,174 posts)
53. You're right
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:27 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
55. Appreciate it, still_one
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:47 PM
Dec 2015
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
3. I was just thinking how nice it was
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:31 PM
Dec 2015

That the Hillary thread about being in NH with Dean was just filled with happy Hillary supporters enjoying the photos and no sniping going on in there. Then I see this thread..

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
4. Only if you promise to comment on each one
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:35 PM
Dec 2015

LexVegas

(6,059 posts)
5. I'm interested in the next obscure rapper that endorses him. It will turn the minority tide. nt
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:38 PM
Dec 2015
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
6. I was told to delete my list of Clinton endorsements....
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:39 PM
Dec 2015

As it was so long people claimed it was crashing their phones. lol.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
7. Well, we probably weren't before.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:40 PM
Dec 2015

But we sure as hell are going to now!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
12. 6-8 threads per endorsement of Sanders seems right, since the fix is obviously in for someone else.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:57 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
20. HA! Yes, obviously it's fixed. That it! What else could it be?
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:11 PM
Dec 2015


merrily

(45,251 posts)
24. Of course not. The handwriting hasn't been on that wall for years at all.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:16 PM
Dec 2015

No totally obvious signs. No pressure on Democrats to endorse. No fixing of the debate school. No media cooperation. Nothing! It's just been one uphill battle after another.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
30. I know! Exactly. (You forgot to mention landlines and cellphones. That's a biggie.)
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:23 PM
Dec 2015

I've never seen a candidate with such rotten luck! Man, he just can't catch a break for trying. It's totally unfair!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
31. Cellphones and landlines have nothing to do with the fix having been in for years.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:26 PM
Dec 2015

Try to track.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
38. But Bernie is such a strong candidate, but not for the cellphone-thing, the polls would
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:33 PM
Dec 2015

... reflect how popular he really is. (It couldn't be any more obvious that this is just one element of the "fix". Probably orchestrated by that powerhouse, DWS. She controls everything! It's like she's some Bond villainess.)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
39. Again, try to track. It really shouldn't be as hard as you're making it seem.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:36 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
43. I think you understand better than you think I think you think I do. ;-)
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:47 PM
Dec 2015

And I, for one, am completely relieved to learn about this "fix" thing. And on top of that, to find out that the fix has been in place for YEARS.

I mean, seriously, WHO KNEW? How could I not have known this before now? I wish I'd known sooner.

All this time I've been worrying over nothing! And it's not because I lacked any confidence in DWS. I mean, she really IS a powerhouse. It just never occurred to me that it could actually be done!

I think I'm more amazed than anything. You've got to hand it to her! Well done, Debbie! Well done!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
44. Anyone with a brain whose eyes and ears and mind were open knew.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:50 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
45. But I do have one other question.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:58 PM
Dec 2015

Why would Bernie and his fans keep going? If it's fixed then there's no reason to try. If there's a reason to try, then it's not really fixed.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
46. specious sophistry and logical fallacies
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:09 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
48. Well, that's a good working title for your explanation. But where's the rest?
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:13 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
49. Says it all.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:14 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
50. As I expected. A big bucket of nothin' ...
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:16 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
56. Awww, don't be so hard on yourself!
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:48 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
59. Try to track!
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 05:03 PM
Dec 2015
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
32. "the fix is in"
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:26 PM
Dec 2015


It can't possibly be because most Democrats just like someone else more...
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
9. I don't vote based on endorsements or polls.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:52 PM
Dec 2015

Or, ethnicity, or gender, or age, or shoe size.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. I vote on hair. Once Chafee dropped out, I switched to Sanders.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:55 PM
Dec 2015

All the rest have boring hair. Well, exempt Trump, but his is not interesting, just repulsive.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
13. I can boast that I have hair very much like Sanders.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:57 PM
Dec 2015

About the same on the head. But, I also have some on my chin.

And, I'm also a (Gasp!!) Socialist.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
15. Thanks to Sanders' opening my eyes, I realized I am at least a Democratic Socialist.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 02:59 PM
Dec 2015

My hair is not like Sanders, but it's never been easy to get along with, either.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
17. I might very well vote for you for being a Socialist and forgive you your hair.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:02 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
21. Not I! I'm the Sherman candidate: If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:12 PM
Dec 2015
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
28. Awww, shucks.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:21 PM
Dec 2015

merrily

(45,251 posts)
33. Purist!
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:26 PM
Dec 2015

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
18. H> is perfectly coiffed.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:06 PM
Dec 2015

The interest on the cost of her haircut on a credit card could buy me numerous cuts at the barber shop.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. Call Sanders old and mock his hair all you want, but mentioning Hillary's age or hair is sexist.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:10 PM
Dec 2015

Or so we were told over and over long before Hillary even announced.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
23. If sanders paid hundreds for his hairdo I'd give him no pass.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:15 PM
Dec 2015

I just think H> dresses like the spectators in the hunger games. When Bernie dons a hot pink suit, he's going to get an earful from me for his lack of professionalism and his disregard for the seriousness of the position he seeks.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. No one gave Bubba or Edwards a pass for their haircuts, but Hillary is different.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:17 PM
Dec 2015
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
22. HAHAHAHA.....Aaaah,..
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:13 PM
Dec 2015
..........
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
27. Thread Win !!!
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:18 PM
Dec 2015







merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. I'd like to thank the Academy.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:21 PM
Dec 2015

msongs

(67,395 posts)
25. well Ive read right HERE on the DU that ENDORSEMENTS mean nothing. particuarly entertainers. nt
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:17 PM
Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
34. Whoever said that was probably right.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:27 PM
Dec 2015

With regard to the celeb endorsement influencing undecided voters, that is. But it's still a great deal of fun for the people who ALREADY support the candidate. (But, I guess the level of fun depends on how well-known the celeb actually is. And that could be a generational thing too.)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. If replying as that post deserves were worth a hide, you'd no doubt get at least 20 replies.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:29 PM
Dec 2015

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
35. Black endorsements matter
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:28 PM
Dec 2015

Of course, Clinton prefers the endorsements of party insiders and non-humans (like unions which endorse a candidate notwithstanding widespread dissent from its actual human members).

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
37. Unrec. How is this not meta?
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:31 PM
Dec 2015
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
58. It is, but the Hosts don't do their job.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:55 PM
Dec 2015

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
42. I post every time I see HRC gets a new endorsement. It is part of what GDP is for
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 03:45 PM
Dec 2015

They should post when Bernie gets good news, the same as we do.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
54. I'm not sure I can handle all this niceness from you
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:31 PM
Dec 2015

The universe seems out of whack.

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
47. What a dumb, stupid, pointless OP.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:12 PM
Dec 2015

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
51. seriously.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:22 PM
Dec 2015
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
57. Whiney meta post.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:54 PM
Dec 2015
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
60. By unknown you seem to mean artists, particularly minority artists.
Fri Dec 11, 2015, 05:12 PM
Dec 2015

Because all the elected officials for Hillary certainly get threads here and they should she's got lots of them and that's one of her strengths. But the thing is when you do post every last endorsement breathlessly you should expect the other side to do the same.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Are we seriously going to...