2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumCNBC Millionaire Survey: WHO do the Millionaires WANT for President? Surprise!
Among all millionaire voters surveyed Democrats, Republicans and independents Hillary Clinton is still the overall favorite. Clinton was the top candidate among 34 percent of total respondents, followed by Rubio with 13 percent. Trump and Carson tied for third, with 9 percent.
All millionaires regardless of party:

Republican millionaires:

Democratic millionaires:

Millionaires who identify as Independents:

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/10/marco-rubio-the-top-gop-choice-among-rich-cnbc-survey.html
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)There are a lot more of us with < million than >= million.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)He has the lowest support of the millionaires.
Nah...
Thread WIN!!
Boom!!!!

DFW
(60,189 posts)We see about the purported preferences of millionaires, but what about the millionaiahs? Not to mentions the billionaiahs?
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Please educate me...
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)regarding where we are at in our nation's history.
No educating required. It's a worldview.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)Once he figured out that conventional remedies wouldn't cure the Great Depression and went all socialist-y, the millionaires jumped ship pretty darn quick.
Do you think Hillary would be as ready to abandon her current allies and change course when she discovers her love of Wall Street and neoliberal policies aren't working?
DFW
(60,189 posts)When she saw her campaign wasn't going to get her nominated in 2008, she got on board with Obama's (very successful) candidacy. Once she saw it was how history was gonna go, she never looked back.
If inaugurated, I suspect she'd invite Mitch McTurtle (if he's still Majority Leader) to a quick ultimatum: "none of this 'one-term' shit. I'm ready to play ball if you wanna do that, and I'll play war if you wanna do that."
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)She kept running past when she had a chance because 'Well you know Robert F. Kennedy got assassinated so....'. Give me a break.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)men, women, liberals, moderates, non-whites and voters over age 45 want.
Interesting.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)41% of millionaires want a Democrat to be the next president.
JohnnyRingo
(20,872 posts)Gates, Rooney, Mahar, DeBartolo, and Buffet just to name a few good democrats off the top of my head. Three of those open their homes to the Obamas when they're in their town.
Having a million bucks doesn't automatically make someone a Koch brother, and not everyone gains their fortune through evil means and greed.
I've heard that one can make a poll say anything they want, but you're playing this one like Jeff Dunham.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)JohnnyRingo
(20,872 posts)Money changes some for the worse, but it's not a given. Certainly a sense of philanthropy and good will survives wealth for most.
One only has to look at most of Hollywood's greatest and the musicians who selflessly donate both time and money to help those less fortunate. Zuckerburg, Gates, and Buffet's race back to zero and Clinton's Global Initiative are the very spirit of good will.
Being wealthy does not make one greedy or evil. Those are traits that likely existed before the windfall.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)the desire to keep more then you can use or need?
JohnnyRingo
(20,872 posts)If we didn't have disposable income we wouldn't have cable TV and the internet. Places like Amazon and Dillards would shutter, but none of us consider ourselves greedy. Most of the 99% live our lives more frivolously than Mother Theresa who truly gave away everything she didn't need.
I know there are many below the poverty line, and I have family members who do, but the argument that wealth alone means one is selfish doesn't hold water. The Waltons and the Kochs may be the poster children of the rich & famous, but they have counterparts who are generous and giving.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Hillary promises to continue the policies of the last three and half decades which benefit only the rich. Why shouldn't they wnat her?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts).. besides that Clintons are multi-millionaires themselves. .. oh, and Goldman Sachs ... and
did I mention Walmart, General Electric Co., Exxon Mobil Corp., Microsoft Corp. or Boeing Co.?
Millionaires For Hillary! <--Evil bumper sticker
LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)Hepburn
(21,054 posts)I would guess that a Clinton sign at a tRump rally might not get much positive attention.
LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)as to the income level at those rallies. Nor does it give any representative percentages. Nor does it support your contrary assertion of "Not hardly"
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Clinton is in it for the 1 %. Not for me. She never was.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)He is the only one millionaires don't seem to feel comfortable with.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, thanks for playing.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)They're just grateful to her for representing them on 9/11!!!!
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)It says everything!
Bernie MUST BE the nominee or this country goes full throttle OLIGARCHY. The government has been bought and paid for already. We have to stop this. Bernie is our only hope. HRH, is part of the problem. That's a fact.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Hepburn
(21,054 posts)...the wealthy favor Hillary? Shocked, I am totally shocked!
Just in case -------->