2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Has A HABIT Of Always Being Right
111 New Hampshire Ave.
Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801
Posted Dec. 11, 2015 at 2:01 AM
To the Editor:
Why not elect the idea guy behind Hillarys campaign? Throughout her candidacy, Hillary has taken her time sharing her positions with us. When she finally takes a position its a watered down version of a position Bernie has come out with months, years, even decades earlier. She clearly recognizes that Bernies message is reaching us and that its resonating.
Faced with a choice between adapting or sinking like a rock, she adapts. Not an easy decision when your top donors are the very same banks and investment companies Bernies platform will inevitably challenge. Is she misleading her donors or misleading us?
Forget about that question for a minute but dont forget it.
Hillarys listening to him now. She should have listened to him in 2003 when he told the nation what he feared would happen if we went to war in Iraq. Instead she voted for war. Everything Bernie predicted happened. To her credit, she says the vote was a mistake. Oops.
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan should have listened to him back in 1992 when he stood on the congressional floor and predicted the financial collapse we would experience if we continued in the direction Greenspan was taking us. The collapse happened and during a congressional hearing in 2008, Greenspan had to admit he was using a financial model that was flawed. Hed been using it, he said, for the past forty years.
They should have listened to him decades ago. We should listen to him now. Try it on, it fits.
This February, lets vote for the guy who sees it before it happens instead of reacting to it after its too late. Lets vote for the unelectable guy who hasnt lost an election for 25 years.
Greg Tuveson
Dover
http://www.seacoastonline.com/article/20151211/NEWS/151219831/101050/OPINION
treestar
(82,383 posts)No one is perfect.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)You think anyone else noticed you didn't refute it with even one instance?
So what issue do you see where Bernie has been wrong?
Perhaps we might discuss it.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Discuss.
zalinda
(5,621 posts)<snip>
After some back and forth, a version of the bill resurfaced that reinstated the five day waiting period. In November 1993, Sanders voted against that version but for an amendment imposing an instant background check instead (seen by some as pointless, as the technology for instant checks didnt exist at the time).
He also voted against an amendment that would have ended state waiting periods, and for an amendment giving those denied a gun the right to know why.
<snip>
According to Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver, Sanders reason for opposing the Brady bill was two-fold. First, he believed implementing a national waiting period was federal overreach. And second, he was doing his job.
"He wasn't opposed to states having (waiting periods) if they wanted to. The Republicans wanted to repeal waiting periods in states that had them, and Bernie voted that down," Weaver said. "He said he would be against waiting periods, and he kept his word to the people of Vermont."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jul/10/generation-forward-pac/did-bernie-sanders-vote-against-background-checks-/
Z
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Yes or no?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)The complexity of bills and amendments and the habit congress has of attaching riders to things that completely change the overall picture makes yes/no unrepresentative of a lot of votes. Not to mention that sometimes 'vote for this, or something worse will pass' is a very real thing that members have to deal with regularly.
If you want to know why someone voted the way they did, you have to get much deeper than 'yes or no'. Unless you're just trying to score cheap points.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Exactly. But that takes effort, and is not as likely to score points.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)There were good parts of the bill and bad parts.
After weighing those factors Bernie made a choice.
After hearing his thoughts behind it, I agree with his choice.
I don't consider it a mistake.
Going along with a criticism based on a pure yes/no I consider a much bigger mistake.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)you say discuss then say don't discuss, just answer yes or no. Which is it that you really want?
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
artislife
(9,497 posts)h is the most electible candidate
except for the voters who were always against the war
except for the voters who believe glass steagal should be put back in place
except for the voters who think citizen united should be abolished now and not some future election
except for the voters who think climate change is the number one issue facing this country
kind of like that.
We should all be aware of our use of language.
Good point, Cal_democrat.
treestar
(82,383 posts)that nobody is perfect.
All it takes it one instance, so it won't last long.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Perhaps a little discussion about an issue rather than a quip and and a quit.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)1.3 Trillion dollars cost of f-35 program supported by Sanders (now at least 70% over budget)
8.6 Billion dollars cut from Food Stamps with his vote
95,000.00 - dollars accepted in donations from machinist aerospace workers PAC while providing ongoing support for the f-35
10,000.00 - dollars accepted by Sanders from Clintons PAC in 2006 (So he was ok taking Wall St money then)
5 Votes against the Brady Bill
1 Vote to allow guns in National Parks (thats all it took)
1 Immigration Bill killed by his hand (2007)
I might mention, as the author of the letter, that when submitting to the paper it was published in, one doesn't write their own headings. The paper's editors write their own. Omitting "always" would have been more respectful of the spirit of the letter. Another paper published it under the heading "It's Time to Start Listening to Bernie."
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)He doesn't need to triangulate, poll test, etc. He knows what is right, speaks honestly, and sticks to his principles.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I think Bernie is one of those very rare politicians who goes with his moral compass on issues. He's never been weighed down by popular opinion or what's safe to say.
It doesn't matter to me if at times he's been wrong. It only matters that he's honest with himself and us.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)He is a human being first.
Then a public servant.
Then, a politician-- as a chosen profession to serve other human beings.
senz
(11,945 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)spot on
Akamai
(1,779 posts)Psychologist Daniel Kahneman proved that we have these two systems at work within us.
"Fast-thinking" is a quick, gut response that tends to bypass our sober logical thinking process. Most of our decisions are made this way. For example, in driving, we respond very quickly to traffic conditions and we would not be able to state out loud in real time how we make correctly the huge number of decisions we make. Indeed in driving we are likely to be focused on our own thoughts, maybe mostly listening to "Brunch With Bernie" on the Thom Hartmann Radio Show, giving full attention to driving at certain particularly thorny commuting conundrums.
"Slow-thinking" involves logical reasoning, may well involve getting more outside data, trying to avoid logical mistakes, etc.
These two systems of thinking work in us pretty seamlessly.
I certainly trust Bernie in both his Fast-thinking and Slow-thinking responses.
Also, his pattern recognition skills are superb -- for example, in saying "No" loudly and repeatedly to the Iraq War, to banksters crashing the economy, to the incredible wealth inequality we have in this country, to the horrors of global warming, etc., etc.
Bernie has no need for a polling group to dictate his policies, has no interest in personal power.
What Bernie Sanders does have is a burning commitment to solving problems and helping people. And he has a very lengthy track record of being absolutely correct on important matters very, very much earlier than anyone else.
senz
(11,945 posts)Thanks for this!
And welcome to DU!
Akamai
(1,779 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)He is indeed the Real Deal.
Pretty much the opposite of Hillary.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)I'll take proven judgement
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I'd like someone from the Hillary camp to answer that one.
It's either she's lying to the donors, to us, to both or to neither.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)RandySF
(59,235 posts)Even when he voted to prevent the CDC from studying gun violence?
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Couldn't agree more!
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
madokie
(51,076 posts)"Don't underestimate me."