2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBrand New Iowa Poll - Sanders beats Cruz, but Cruz beats Clinton; Sanders beats Carson, but Clinton
is tied with Carson; Sanders does 5% better than Clinton head-to-head against Rubio, and also does better head-to-head against Fiorina and Trump.
Link.
Vinca
(50,273 posts)I think he has a better chance in the general than Hillary.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)bernie is the electable one not clinton especilly if another republican manages to beat trump.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)the one who would attract cross-over voters.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Response to reformist2 (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Uh, right, as if the lunatic who is Cruz is going to beat Clinton in the general election. This doesn't mean a single fucking thing right now.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)...and you should be. Hillary is a loser. Every day is it gets clearer that if we Dems nominate her, Cruz, Rubio, Trump or one of the other sociopaths running on the GOP side WILL get the WH.
It means a lot that she has less than -0- cross over appeal and that with all of her alleged support she comes in second to a maniac like Ted Crud.
Congrats on backing a loser. If she is nominated and the GOP takes the WH, what are you going to say then? That only lunatics voted for Cruz? Or many it was insanity to back someone like HRC who is very disliked.
JMHO
Response to Attorney in Texas (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Not.
I was just about to ask for tonight's Lotto numbers....
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)in Iowa. That's the only contest that matters. Neither Clinton nor Sanders are running against Cruz or Carson or any other republican in Iowa. Grasping at straws...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)the only candidate who could beat a Republican nominee, and that's been proven to be illusory.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)so far. Soon after the GOP media guns turned on him, Sanders' drop in the polls would be meteoric. They have LOTS of ammo (starting with "big government, tax and spend socialist" complete with sound bites.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Cause a Hillary primary victory is the be all and end all in 2016.
Talk about a pyrrhic victory.
comradebillyboy
(10,147 posts)The relevant match up is Clinton vs Sanders
merrily
(45,251 posts)Hillary and the rest of the field in November of 2007 precisely because I thought he'd have a better chance in the general than Hillary or the other candidates. That should be a huge factor in a primary choice. For a Democratic voter, there's little point in your candidate winning the primary, only to lose the general.
George II
(67,782 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)like week old spinach. He has had a complete pass because they would love to see him beat Clinton. Clinton scares them shitless because of things like the Benghazi hearings; she either makes them look foolish or rises above their diddly-squat games.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Not knowing the the difference between fact and one's own opinions and perceptions is a serious thing.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)Argue, argue, argue, ... make a snarky point ... get the last word in ... insert worthless emoticon.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)several Hillary supporters told me so.
You must remember, back when it was assumed she would beat any of the Republicans.
Remember back before they actually asked people who they would prefer in the general election and found out it wasn't Hillary.
Back when it used to be important to select the candidate that would do the best in the general election. Funny now it's not so important to Hillary supporters anymore.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)No fucking wonder DWS/DNC is scared shitless enough to bugger the debates, and that
corporatist M$M is doing their damnedest to completely ignore him.
Just imagine if this was actually a fair & level playing field, and say hello to President Bernie Sanders.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I haven't a doubt in my mind.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...."Clinton beats Sanders"
Tote Life
(72 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Matthew28
(1,798 posts)Well, I'll probably pass out and have a heartattack.
merrily
(45,251 posts)At all other times, they warrant trumpeting all day, every day.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)He's around 30 in the likely dem voters polls without any help whatsoever. Just imagine the wave he could ride through the country with support of the party and a fair shake in the media.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I think it is simply unrealistic to expect the party insiders to show equal preference to someone who has been a Democrat for all of 5 minutes, especially since he is running against someone who is a very central figure in the Democratic Party. I have no doubt that they will support him if he wins the primaries, and they don't seem to be undermining him in any significant way, but they cannot possibly feel the same loyalty to him than they do to Hillary. After all, he does not have a history of membership of, and loyalty to, the Democratic Party.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)and the headliners haven't been chosen..... in 45 days we will know one thing the Iowa poll will be a brand new and shiny thing.
rladdi
(581 posts)all the candidates. Just watch his Senate speeches in 2013 and 2015 on the Senate Floor. IN 2015 he rejects everything he said in 2013 even though he submitted bills for immigration. This was one of his focus subjects in 2013.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Republicans, yet MSNBC hosts (and others) perseverate over how Hillary does in these match ups without mentioning Sanders.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Isn't this the same outfit that had Hillary beating Bernie?
I wonder whether the Hillary supporters have looked into this one as closely? Or do they automatically dismiss it?
I will reiterate that whatever the results of any of these polls I still contend that they completely over-sample land lines over cell phones. Therefore, even if this poll seems to suggest that Democrats maybe should consider supporting Bernie as the more pragmatic choice, I will still question it's accuracy.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)MFM008
(19,814 posts)still dont think it will be Sanders, hes still meh to me.