2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow about Debbie W. Schultz's scheduling Democratic Primary debates on weekends, so
that Sanders will get as little public exposure as possible? Fox News and the Main Stream
Media are already doing the same thing. DWS is showing her efforts in doing everything
possible to help Hillary beat Sanders. The actions of the Chairperson of the DNC are
supposed to be impartial and fair towards all Democratic candidates for the presidency.
Is she being impartial and neutral?
Do Debbie W. Schultz's actions above also merit an investigation? And can we demand one?
think
(11,641 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)brooklynite
(94,482 posts)think
(11,641 posts)brooklynite
(94,482 posts)But it doesn't really matter because "nobody's paying attention yet" according to the Sanders folks.
think
(11,641 posts)Great planning by DWS!
Cal33
(7,018 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)brooklynite
(94,482 posts)He's going to fight the Republican Congress for his policies with Marquis of Queensbury rules, is he?
Cal33
(7,018 posts)running as a presidential candidate - in spite of all the inaccurate Fox News and
MSM polling reports saying that he is the underdog - he keeps right on fighting,
and is the only candidate whose number of donors has reached beyond the
2 million mark. He is winning slowly but steadily, in spite of all the forces that
are against him. He hasn't lost his cool. He is in there to win.
razorman
(1,644 posts)trying to secure a position in the next Clinton administration.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... and the Senate. Yet she still has her job. Anyone wonder why?
Cal33
(7,018 posts)even earlier. She might be voted out of office come November 8, 2016.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)BLAME DWS!!!!
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Those schedules were set back in June or so. They easily could have set up more and they easily could have not used the "exclusive rule" that the republicans have used for decades. Both the O'Malley and the Sanders campaign spoke out against the DNC on this matter at the time.
DWS was adamant in keeping it as it was.
So yeah... we are blaming DWS on this one.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Just who the fuck do you think you're fooling?
brooklynite
(94,482 posts)...as an excuse for why they're not doing better?
Cal33
(7,018 posts)the only one who has ever had 2,000,000+ grassroots donors for his campaign so far, and
the numbers are growing. There is a thread nearby saying that because of this recent
action on the part of DWS, the number of donors for Sanders' campaign will now
QUADRUPLE!!! I hope he is right.
Her tricks very much resemble those which have been used for the longest time by our
friends, the Republicans.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And she is pulling ever more cunning stunts to show it.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)...as corrupt as a dirty politician can be.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)was at that time, except that she was a Democrat and needed a donation! I now only make
donations directly to those of my choice. DNC doesn't get a cent from me.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I was fortunate enough to learn that lesson years ago. Now, my support, my donations, and my vote must be earned by anyone that wants them. Political organizations and politicians burned that bridge by forgetting what they promise in their campaigns and forget as soon as they take office.
Never again.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)or 3 decades. We need new blood to come out of the deadbeat doldrums!!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)fredamae
(4,458 posts)for Bernie!