2016 Postmortem

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts) Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:39 PM Dec 2015

I have put a sh*tload of people on ignore this morning . . .

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Spazito (a host of the 2016 Postmortem forum).

I usually don't mind most of the back and forth between Bernie, MOM and HRC supports on DU, but this shit today has pushed me over the edge.

I just donated to Actblue for Bernie a couple days ago, but I'm so sick of this DWS shit that I donated again.

Every time DWS and the DNC try to fuck Bernie's campaign, I will donate to him again!

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have put a sh*tload of people on ignore this morning . . . (Original Post) fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 OP

How is it DWS's fault that multiple Bernie Sanders staffers moobu2 Dec 2015 #1

Whoops! You're now on ignore! (Probably.) NurseJackie Dec 2015 #2

So are you (most likely) moobu2 Dec 2015 #5

See? There's one now. 99Forever Dec 2015 #6

they were told the problem exists and ignored it Kalidurga Dec 2015 #29

Your question deserves no answer floriduck Dec 2015 #39

Dito lisa, im with you. litlbilly Dec 2015 #3

+1 fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #15

Sent another 50 to Hillary. Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #4

Wall St and the MIC thank you. 99Forever Dec 2015 #7

Ha ha! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #24

Corporate America and the 1% thank you! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #11

LOL! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #25

This is what she'll spend it on... Ino Dec 2015 #21

+1 fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #26

$5,850 per hour Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #27

Good job. She'll need it to by the disks to store all of Sanders' data. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #31

Me too! $100 to Bernie dana_b Dec 2015 #8

+1 - I called the DNC too! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #16

I donated, and put more on ignore also. I reckon I'm over 200 now. nt Zorra Dec 2015 #9

+1 fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #18

+1 Matariki Dec 2015 #10

She's not called DINO Deb for nothing! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #19

How exciting! OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #12

I don't have anyone on ignore. Happy Friday. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #13

All that means, you know, is that you won't see anything MineralMan Dec 2015 #14

Lock this thread. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #17

You wish Matariki Dec 2015 #20

Why is an op about ignore feature in GDP? JaneyVee Dec 2015 #22

True. NurseJackie Dec 2015 #23

Why, because you're all looking like fools? nm floriduck Dec 2015 #40

Disruptive meta-discussion workinclasszero Dec 2015 #28

I'm not putting any of them on ignore. I'm putting them in their place. phleshdef Dec 2015 #30

Totally agree on your assessment of DWS! - eom fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #35

+1 Matariki Dec 2015 #38

I don't put people on ignore UglyGreed Dec 2015 #32

I will take them off in a few days . . . fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #33

Many people do have UglyGreed Dec 2015 #37

My ignore list Faux pas Dec 2015 #34

+1 fleur-de-lisa Dec 2015 #36

But..but...it's a Scandal!, a Catastrophe!! What will people think?!! Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2015 #41

Locking... Spazito Dec 2015 #42

moobu2

(4,822 posts)

1. How is it DWS's fault that multiple Bernie Sanders staffers

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:42 PM

Dec 2015

violated the rules and searched and saved Hillary Clintons proprietary information?

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

2. Whoops! You're now on ignore! (Probably.)

Reply to moobu2 (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:43 PM

Dec 2015

And now, so am I. (Probably.)

moobu2

(4,822 posts)

5. So are you (most likely)

Reply to NurseJackie (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:47 PM

Dec 2015

what is a person to do?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)

6. See? There's one now.

Reply to moobu2 (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:48 PM

Dec 2015

Bubye.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)

29. they were told the problem exists and ignored it

Reply to moobu2 (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:16 PM

Dec 2015

Thankfully no one died as a result of their inaction.

floriduck

(2,262 posts)

39. Your question deserves no answer

Reply to moobu2 (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:28 PM

Dec 2015

because it is based on lies. Hillary's 2008 IT vendor already said NO data was copied. Now I want an audit of the whole database to see how much Hill is behind this. This could get really ugly for the DNC, DWS and HRC. . . . . .

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

3. Dito lisa, im with you.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:44 PM

Dec 2015

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

15. +1

Reply to litlbilly (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:57 PM

Dec 2015

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)

4. Sent another 50 to Hillary.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:46 PM

Dec 2015

99Forever

(14,524 posts)

7. Wall St and the MIC thank you.

Reply to Dawson Leery (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:50 PM

Dec 2015

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

24. Ha ha!

Reply to 99Forever (Reply #7)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:13 PM

Dec 2015

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)

11. Corporate America and the 1% thank you! n/t

Reply to Dawson Leery (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:55 PM

Dec 2015

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

25. LOL!

Reply to Hepburn (Reply #11)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:13 PM

Dec 2015

Ino

(3,366 posts)

21. This is what she'll spend it on...

Reply to Dawson Leery (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:07 PM

Dec 2015

LAP OF LUXURY: This photo from Executive Fliteways shows the interior of the exact jet that Clinton's campaign rented for the day at a rate that the company advertises as $5,850 per hour

You just bought her about 2 seconds of luxury travel. Good for you!

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

26. +1

Reply to Ino (Reply #21)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:14 PM

Dec 2015

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)

27. $5,850 per hour

Reply to Ino (Reply #21)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:15 PM

Dec 2015

How quaint................LOL

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)

31. Good job. She'll need it to by the disks to store all of Sanders' data. nt

Reply to Dawson Leery (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:18 PM

Dec 2015

dana_b

(11,546 posts)

8. Me too! $100 to Bernie

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:51 PM

Dec 2015

and a not-so-nice e-mail and phone call to the DNC.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

16. +1 - I called the DNC too!

Reply to dana_b (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:58 PM

Dec 2015

Zorra

(27,670 posts)

9. I donated, and put more on ignore also. I reckon I'm over 200 now. nt

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:52 PM

Dec 2015

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

18. +1

Reply to Zorra (Reply #9)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:58 PM

Dec 2015

Matariki

(18,775 posts)

10. +1

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:54 PM

Dec 2015

Yep. Donating too. Donated earlier in the week, doing it again today.

I want to see DWS's head on a metaphorical pike right now. Useless lying liar that she is. She belongs in the Republican party.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

19. She's not called DINO Deb for nothing!

Reply to Matariki (Reply #10)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:59 PM

Dec 2015

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)

12. How exciting!

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:56 PM

Dec 2015

Do you get a prize?

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

13. I don't have anyone on ignore. Happy Friday.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:56 PM

Dec 2015

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)

14. All that means, you know, is that you won't see anything

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:57 PM

Dec 2015

those people post. If you think that bothers them, you're wrong. You're welcome to ignore. You're the only one who loses information. Nobody else is affected at all.

That's why I never use Ignore.

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

17. Lock this thread.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 02:58 PM

Dec 2015

Matariki

(18,775 posts)

20. You wish

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #17)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:02 PM

Dec 2015

The truth about DWS *will* come out. She's a goner.

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

22. Why is an op about ignore feature in GDP?

Reply to Matariki (Reply #20)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:08 PM

Dec 2015

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

23. True.

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #22)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:09 PM

Dec 2015

floriduck

(2,262 posts)

40. Why, because you're all looking like fools? nm

Reply to JaneyVee (Reply #17)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:30 PM

Dec 2015

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)

28. Disruptive meta-discussion

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:16 PM

Dec 2015

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)

30. I'm not putting any of them on ignore. I'm putting them in their place.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:16 PM

Dec 2015

I have no problem with Hillary. I'm voting for Bernie because he is closer to my on the issues. This has nothing to do with either candidate. It has to do with bad software development and DWS being incompetent when it comes to managing the DNC in general.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

35. Totally agree on your assessment of DWS! - eom

Reply to phleshdef (Reply #30)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:23 PM

Dec 2015

Matariki

(18,775 posts)

38. +1

Reply to phleshdef (Reply #30)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:26 PM

Dec 2015

What you said.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)

32. I don't put people on ignore

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:19 PM

Dec 2015

but I understand why you feel you must..... This will backfire and help Bernie in the end.....

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)

33. I will take them off in a few days . . .

Reply to UglyGreed (Reply #32)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 03:23 PM

Dec 2015

once I think I can read their posts without vomiting. I am so angry by all of this. I don't trust DWS any further than I can throw her. I have faith in Bernie's integrity over DINO Deb's any day!