Screenshot of VAN actions taken by Bernie staff in data breach

[JaneyVee]

[RandySF]

1. Created folder "Ranged Targets" and saved list "Persuasion 80-100" into it?

THAT doesn't look good.

[Depaysement]

2. Curious way to breach a data security system

Leave easily traceable evidence of your actions, creating user names tagged "Bernie." Not exactly surreptitious activity. What's up with that?

Something is rotten and it ain't in Denmark.

[JaneyVee]

10. Usernames were for their own domain

And this is company data, they may not even have known actions were being logged.

[Depaysement]

11. How do you know that? Nt

[JaneyVee]

13. They were able to access from their own domain.

[Depaysement]

15. It says "created" not accessed

And you have no evidence to support your claim that they accessed from their own domain and those were their domain user names.

[Jarqui]

3. That doesn't look sinister to me at all

1. He's looking at "Not Hillary" list
2. He's looking at priority 0-1 and then priority 9-10 in TX - he's missing a bunch in between - you'd get it all if you were trying to steal the data or you'd be interested in only the higher or lower priorities
3. Again, he goes into NH and just gets Persuasion 80-100 range - why not the other ranges if you were stealing data?
4. He logs into HI and creates two new "_Bernie" logins not "_Hillary" or "_OMalley" - hardly trying to keep eyes away from the Sanders campaign
5. He goes back into NH and gets a couple of ranges of Turnouts and one range Support - again, incomplete sets and middle of the road - not convincing that this is the best data for them to get
6. Logs into OH and gets full VF access .. and does nothing with it
7. Much of the time, he's generating lists - which are usually just item identifiers - not the whole data.

This is not a guy downloading gobs of data or getting a contiguous chunk of user data. I don't know the application but he looks like he's doing as he said - bouncing around seeing what was open/available to him by sampling ranges of various fields and generating lists - not full data dumps or reports.

[PowerToThePeople]

4. REC

Good post.

[JaneyVee]

7. Tried to log back in and search: denied access.

Forgot that part?

[winter is coming]

9. ^^ This. n/t

[Depaysement]

12. +1

My point but in much more and better detail. Well done.

[joshcryer]

19. He's differentiating by making separate lists.

And it's not clear that the "_bernie" designation is manually created, it could be the system assigning their username "csanchez" to group "_bernie."

[Jarqui]

25. And maybe they're not supposed to be able to do that

- add logins - maybe that's supposed to be handled by the vendor to some extent.

Separate lists for 20% of the data? Leaving a big hole in 80% of the data? That has really limited usage -particularly in that much of it was middle of the road - not top or bottom ranges.

And much of that data doesn't even seem to distinguish who it belongs to - it probably includes Hillary but they have no separation between the campaigns.

If these things like "Primary Priority""Turnout""Support" are fields the Clinton campaign created and entered, you'd probably need to understand the rules of how they derived the range for them to have much meaning. where is that?

They have the above logs or logs like them for the above and other users. They have a darn good idea what the Sanders campaign did. This talk about an audit and wanting a declaratino from Sanders when they already have this smells like a colossal pile of BS.

I hope the judge kicks the crap out of DWS and the DNC. This is a big hunk of nonsense that should never have been made public. Clearly, it was done for the sole purpose of trying to hurt the Sanders campaign - not because anything sinister like stealing or a significant data loss had occurred.

This is a 2008 deja vu and yes, it's on her because even though a candidate should not, Hillary obviously effectively controls the DNC or they're very much biased and on her side in this contest. The DNC should not be so biased or in the camp of one of the candidates. It's a disgrace.

[Hiraeth]

23. Thank you.

[Hell Hath No Fury]

5. Uh, I think that actually --

looks like it supports the Sander's IT guy's story.

Who the heck creates a "user" with BERNIE'S OWN NAME in it if they're trying to do skulduggery??? Seriously, that just doesn't make sense.

Hate to break it to you but my mind has been put at ease with that screenshot.

[JaneyVee]

8. That's them logging into their own domain

They were able to breach from their side. And they may have not been aware their actions were logged. This is from company.

[Hell Hath No Fury]

16. An IT guy that --

just assumes his actions aren't being logged? Seriously?

[JaneyVee]

21. An IT guy who is obviously incompetent.

[roguevalley]

26. you mean like the hillary donater that runs the company. That kind of incompetent

who 'leaves' a firewall down after being told about it two months ago? Him?

[Go Vols]

28. Yep,that kind of incompetent

[OilemFirchen]

22. Ah.

So he knows he's being logged, searches and downloads proprietary data.

Seriously?

[Luminous Animal]

18. Hahaha! An IT person who would be aware that their actions would be logged.

Hell, I'm an end user and I know that.

[joshcryer]

20. Yeah, I think it's assigning the username to the group "_bernie."

[seabeyond]

6. Cheaters... Nt.

[joshcryer]

14. "Not Hilary"

Tells you the intelligence of these dipshits.

Fire them all.

Stop fucking making excuses.

[workinclasszero]

17. Evidence

Right here.

[MeNMyVolt]

24. Is this real? Is there a link?

[PowerToThePeople]

27. Not sure why, but I can not see it.

My dns server blackholes many known malicious web domains, it is very likely this photo is hosted somewhere that people may not wish to expose their computer systems to.

edit - I was able to get to the image (possibly a browser flaw). Looks like an excel spreadsheet that someone created. I can make something just like that in a matter of minutes with whatever information, true or false, I wish to put into it.