Shame on you, ABC! Hillary was late coming back to the debate
because the only available ladies’ room was a lot further from the stage.And ABC knew it. But they couldn’t wait even a minute for Hillary to return from her long trek to the ladies’ after the break.
Instead, ABC decided to focus its camera on her empty podium and announce that they were going forward without her – as if her presence didn’t matter. As if it didn’t matter if she heard the question and response being given by another candidate. As if it was her fault.
And shame on everyone here who instantly judged Hillary, claiming she was “looking for attention,” that she was pulling a “stunt,” showing “distain for the debate process,” engaged in “debate theater,” or “making a grand entry.”
Ladies, she could have been any one of us.(Except that most of us have never stood on a national stage for more than two hours, trying to drink enough water to keep our throats hydrated, while having to worry about how long it would take us to get to the bathroom.)
Old buildings all over the country were built during an era when architects included fewer restrooms for women than men, because women weren’t expected to be using them much. Women were supposed to be at home taking care of children, not at the ABC studio or in the Senate.
It was only in the 80’s when researchers with stopwatches conducted studies proving that women need more restrooms than men – because on the average they need twice as much time as men to use the facilities. (A woman using a bathroom stall has many more actions to take than a man using a urinal. Plus women are more likely to wash their hands -- and to use soap.)
But old building codes weren’t designed for the modern era and so it is still harder for women to deal with basic bathroom needs than it is for men. Hillary, of course, would be used to this. The Senate is notorious for its lack of ladies rooms, with women often having to attend to their physical needs on a different floor from their office.
Bathrooms are a feminist issue, because the lack of adequate bathrooms can prevent women from engaging as equal partners in the public sphere. This was proven once again on Saturday.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/20/finally-an-explanation-for-hillary-clintons-long-bathroom-break/
Not a lot of wiggle room.
With the men’s room significantly closer to the debate stage, Mrs. Clinton’s male opponents, Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley, made it back quicker and, well, it takes women longer, as Mrs. Clinton pointed out after returning slightly late from a commercial break during the first Democratic debate in Las Vegas.
But on Saturday, the ABC News hosts, tied to the schedule of live TV, proceeded with their questioning about the economy with an empty podium awaiting Mrs. Clinton. “Sorry,” she deadpanned when she finally took her place.
Aides said they had been concerned during the walk through before the debate that the ladies room was such a schlep. The campaign’s vice chairwoman, Huma Abedin, had timed the distance to and from the podium and expressed concerns to organizers, but the gymnasium setting meant there were no closer options. She relayed to Mrs. Clinton that she would have to be speedy, said several aides involved in debate planning.
http://time.com/3653871/womens-bathroom-lines-sexist-potty-parity/
The Everyday Sexism of Women Waiting in Public Toilet Lines
If you’re a woman, chances are you’ve a) spent time fidgeting in a long line waiting to use a public toilet, b) delayed a bodily function because you don’t want to or haven’t the time to waste standing in line to use a public toilet, c) considered sneaking into a men’s room—illegal in some places, or d) cursed loudly because of all of the above.
Faced with a long restroom line that spiraled up and around a circular stairwell at a recent museum visit, I opted not to wait. Why do we put up with this? This isn’t a minor pet peeve, but a serious question. Despite years of “potty parity” laws, women are still forced to stand in lines at malls, schools, stadiums, concerts, fair grounds, theme parks, and other crowded public spaces. This is frustrating, uncomfortable, and, in some circumstances, humiliating. It’s also a form of discrimination, as it disproportionately affects women.
= new reply since forum marked as read
He only hoped onto the Democratic Party wagon because his independent butt could never have gotten elected without jumping onto their coat tails (and it still won't).
A lifetime independent, and outsider heckling the real players in government, and he thinks he can just hop onto the party in the 9th inning and is suddenly entitled to all the perks that the lifetime government LEADERS get??
I may be a "bot", but what exactly does that make you? I'd tell you, but I'm not in the mood to give you a hide for free. 
Yes, he has won elections. He's been the Senator of Vermont since the early 90's, and before than in the house, and if I recall right state legislature before that. All that time, and of all the laws that he has either sponsored or cosponsored only three.. that's right THREE have made it to law, and not a single one of them of any real consequence.
Your man should have been up in the balcony section with the hecklers from the Muppets.
In one sense you are correct, and he is the perfect candidate: A lifetime politician, with no real accomplishment, who took the safe stance on virtually everything because he never had to be a real part of anything larger. It's so easy to stand on your principles when you don't really plan on accomplishing anything at all... other than great sounding speeches.
Sorry, at least during the primary, I'm sticking with the REAL lifelong Democrat.. the one who has actually been in the party and didn't join it at the 11th hr. to ride the coat tails after a failed career of accomplishing shit.
Oh, and if Sanders does take the Primary. I will absolutely support him. The potential SCOTUS nominations alone is too important to be petty post primary season.
compare a candidate who hopped onboard months ago (only to ride the coattails of the party he's scorned for decades) to one who did it almost half a century ago.
Yep.. that's a comparison to bring to the table.
I'm sure there's plenty of facilities around for the female cheerleaders. 
Like they couldn't have spent 30 seconds letting Steph and his crew bloviate? 
