2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFrom Daily Kos: BREAKING SCANDAL: Democratic Presidential candidate has Democratic Party connections
BREAKING: Weve come to realize, especially now via the ethical and moral investigating that the Bernie Sanders campaigns data team (and subsequent unbiased sources), that the following MAY BE TRUE:
1. Hillary Clinton MAY have been supported by Democratic politicians in the past, and that many of them may STILL favor her in the nomination process
2. As a long-time establishment Democratic politician, its POSSIBLE that regular Democratic donors and lobbysists DONATED AND WORKED FOR HER IN THE PAST
3. That members of the DNC POSSIBLY KNEW AND LIKED Hillary Clinton before the 2016 race began, and still do
4. That MANY Democrats, politicians and voters alike, have SOME LOYALTY to the Democratic Party and may look upon someone who has been a longtime leader and member as preferable to someone who has not been.
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/22/1462762/-BREAKING-SCANDAL-Democratic-Presidential-candidate-has-Democratic-Party-conections
Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)Bernie since September 2015.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I have respected them for their contributions, but now I think the centrist think tanks got too firm a hold on all of us.
tecelote
(5,156 posts)Let us Democrats elect who is in key positions within the Democratic National Committee.
It would be the democratic thing to do.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)So I would say for at least 50 years.
Not sure if he supported Goldwater, who was one of the most conservative politicians at the time, before that.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Jarqui
(10,909 posts)At college, she was President of the Young Republicans and interned with Republicans in Washington.
By around '69 or '70 she made the transition to the Dems.
Bernie was working on social causes before he was out of high school and went into fighting for civil rights causes (like against segregation) in his early college years.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Here is the original diary there:
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/22/1462664/-DNC-Data-Breach-Reveals-a-Lot-More-Than-Hillary-s-and-Maybe-Bernie-s-Campaign-Data
Here is the article that diary links to, conveniently left out of the diary you posted.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/bernie-sanders-dnc-data-breach-217016
Sanders data controversy spotlights powerful gatekeeper
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Are you sure there was a gatekeeper? Seems they just hired one.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)doing so, I would be joining the Hillary Campaign. I cannot support a 1%er or Democratic Party conservative, against Bernie Sanders, unless that candidate wins the primary. Glad to see others realize that the Daily Kos is apparently supporting Clinton in the Primary.
stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)
comradebillyboy
(10,955 posts)It's like they are politicians or something.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)The National Chairperson shall serve full time and shall receive such compensation as
may be determined by agreement between the Chairperson and the Democratic National Committee. In
the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee,
particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the
Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and
campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the
Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party
Presidential nominating process.
http://berksdems.org/sites/default/files/dnc_bylaws.pdf
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" - my new favorite Upton Sinclair quote.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)It don't matter to them...those are just words, nothing to be taken seriously.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)The entire system is rigged and corrupt and the American people know it.
George II
(67,782 posts).....should be drummed out of the Democratic Party immediately. How dare they!
(I better add this
panader0
(25,816 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)How cute.
.(in the UK) a member or supporter of the Conservative Party
George II
(67,782 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Five generations here laddie.
P.S. Don't forget to vote--oh wait --you Canadians can't vote in the US elections--so sorry.
R B Garr
(17,984 posts)Scandalous!!!!!
LOL.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)A Democrat who knows other Democrats and is liked by other Democrats?
You've unearthed a subtrefuge so diabolically atrocious it makes my nipples tingle with fear! Could this phenomenon be the work of the Illuminati?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)for their shit having been stolen was so intricately woven!
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)He's treated Democrats as if they were the enemy. THAT is a problem.
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)That's funny!
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Who knew?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Situational ethics are unethical. Why can't some Clinton supporters grasp that simple truth?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Maybe they are just short sighted.
Maybe they honestly believe that sometimes the end justifies the means.
I don't understand it, but assuming that they themselves are unethical is something I can't do.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Good one. The proposed solution are funny, too.
Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)that does little to distract from the many legitimate reasons why someone might think that impartiality is non-existent with DWS and therefore the org.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)then why so few debates and on weekend nights too?