Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sonofspy777

(360 posts)
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 05:06 PM Dec 2015

When Secretary Clinton says...

Sanders: Now, when Secretary Clinton says, "I'm not going raise taxes on the middle class," let me tell you what she is saying. She is disagreeing with FDR on Social Security, LBJ on Medicare and with the vast majority of progressive Democrats in the House and the Senate, who today are fighting to end the disgrace of the United States being the only major country on Earth that doesn't provide paid family and medical leave.

What the legislation is is $1.61 a week. Now, you can say that's a tax on the middle class. It will provide three months paid family and medical leave for the working families of this country. I think, Secretary Clinton, $1.61 a week is a pretty good invest. (sic)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/19/3rd-democratic-debate-transcript-annotated-who-said-what-and-what-it-meant/

26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Secretary Clinton says... (Original Post) sonofspy777 Dec 2015 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #1
K & R AzDar Dec 2015 #2
Don't worry, she doesn't mean it. Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #3
K N R Faux pas Dec 2015 #4
Wasn't it just a month or two ago... mindwalker_i Dec 2015 #5
I think it's a pretty good investment as well, NorthCarolina Dec 2015 #6
Bernie's Right gordyfl Dec 2015 #7
K & R ! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #8
I'm with Bernie on this one. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #9
But Mrs Clinton doesn't want to pay for medical leave for trumps family Doctor_J Dec 2015 #10
Kicked and recommended to the Max! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #11
If I wanted to adopt Trickle Down I would be a Republican. AlbertCat Dec 2015 #15
This is shocking, really. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #16
Yes it is. daleanime Dec 2015 #12
I am on a fixed income and I will gladly pay the fucking $1.61 a week. CharlotteVale Dec 2015 #13
me too dana_b Dec 2015 #22
K&R! Duval Dec 2015 #14
i am a huge bernie supporter but i really do not support this bill at this time questionseverything Dec 2015 #17
How would raising the Social Security cap hurt working families? HoneychildMooseMoss Dec 2015 #19
i would rather we set the working family definition higher questionseverything Dec 2015 #21
Half a million a year is definitely not "working family" HoneychildMooseMoss Dec 2015 #23
i would make the cut off high so those folks would side with the 99.99% questionseverything Dec 2015 #25
What party does Clinton claim to be in? 99Forever Dec 2015 #18
Well she is a moderate and a progressive. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #20
She Is Thinking About Just How Much That Will Co$T Her In Corp CA$H If She CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #24
She is operating under the delusion ... earthside Dec 2015 #26

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
5. Wasn't it just a month or two ago...
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 05:39 PM
Dec 2015

that Hillary briefly tacked left, and a bunch of us were all, "yeah, bullshit," while her synchophants hailed her as a great progressive?

Yeah, bullshit!

Even with a good job, I pay hundreds a month for healthcare, so $1.61, hell, I'll happily go up to $2 or $5, would be great. The tax-cut land in Republican territory, and Hillary is deep in it.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
6. I think it's a pretty good investment as well,
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 05:59 PM
Dec 2015

along with Bernies planned investments in education and medical access for ALL of our people. Like Cornel West said: "Bernie; he touches our humanity". For me, nothing could be more true than that.

gordyfl

(598 posts)
7. Bernie's Right
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 06:04 PM
Dec 2015

Hillary's wrong.

Paid family and medical leave should be a right. A dollar sixty-one is more than reasonable.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
9. I'm with Bernie on this one.
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 06:08 PM
Dec 2015

Hillary doesn't have to worry about money to pay for her kids and grandkids education or their healthcare or for family leave for her loved ones.

The rest of us -- or most of the rest of us do.

Social Security is the best investment I ever made -- bar none. Best investment.

Raise the cap on the Social Security tax and insure that it will always be there for everyone.

You may think you are wealthy today, but you do not know what will happen to you. A fall. A gunshot. An accident. An illness.

And you may never work again and, if you are lucky enough to have savings, you will live on them until they are gone, and then you will rely on some sort of government assistance.

Social Security is a Godsend.

Thank you Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

And Medicare is the only feasible way to cover the high costs of healthcare for the elderly. Private insurance could not do it. Too costly.

Thank you, Lyndon B. Johnson.

And thank you Bernie Sanders for the proposals you have to continue the tradition begun by LBJ and FDR for us to pool our resources to help cover the costs of the inevitable events in our life -- for education and for the birth of a child.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
10. But Mrs Clinton doesn't want to pay for medical leave for trumps family
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 06:42 PM
Dec 2015

And since she makes only $250,000 per speech, the $1.61 will require sacrifice on her part.

Also most of her supporters despise the liberalism of FDR and lbj.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
11. Kicked and recommended to the Max!
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 07:24 PM
Dec 2015

If I wanted to adopt Trickle Down I would be a Republican. Fuck Grover Norquist.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
15. If I wanted to adopt Trickle Down I would be a Republican.
Tue Dec 22, 2015, 08:14 PM
Dec 2015

Exactly.

Trickle Down and Preemptive Strikes.

No thanks "no-raise-taxes-boots-on-the-ground" Hillary!

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
22. me too
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 07:46 PM
Dec 2015

If I can get healthcare from the government, others should be able too (and I mean better than the Affordable Care Act).

questionseverything

(11,840 posts)
17. i am a huge bernie supporter but i really do not support this bill at this time
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 03:48 PM
Dec 2015

i want the 1% to be taxed first to accomplish what the 99% needs........if we ever accomplish something in that direction and then need to increase middle class taxes, ok but

i want to start by raising taxes on the 1%.period

i also do not agree with raising the ss cap which would hurt working families and drive higher pay outs down the road

i want a ,skip and tax plan, meaning leave the cap where it is and add a tax on multimillionaires that feeds into ss but is not used in the payment to that individual when they retire

/////////////////////////

19. How would raising the Social Security cap hurt working families?
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 05:26 PM
Dec 2015

How many working people earn more than $118,500 a year?

questionseverything

(11,840 posts)
21. i would rather we set the working family definition higher
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 07:30 PM
Dec 2015

maybe at like half a million a year (for a couple) so they would identify with the 99% which they are a part of, wether they know it or not

but let me ask you, why raise taxes on that 118,500 family while letting the guy making 5 mill a year completely off the hook?

why not have the koch brothers that are making billions a year pay first?

23. Half a million a year is definitely not "working family"
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 09:55 PM
Dec 2015

In most states, that puts you in the top 1%.

Once again, how many working people (plumbers, nurses, firemen, mechanics, etc.) are making anywhere near even the current cap?

questionseverything

(11,840 posts)
25. i would make the cut off high so those folks would side with the 99.99%
Thu Dec 24, 2015, 02:13 PM
Dec 2015

a couple making a half mill a year are not the problem, it is the koch brother types making 30 billion plus a year that are the trouble and have the resources to help the 99.99% without it changing their lives in any real way

why tax the bottom before taxing he top?

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
24. She Is Thinking About Just How Much That Will Co$T Her In Corp CA$H If She
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 10:21 PM
Dec 2015

Advocated for that by FOLLOWING Bernie's Policy...

earthside

(6,960 posts)
26. She is operating under the delusion ...
Thu Dec 24, 2015, 02:28 PM
Dec 2015

... that if she says it right, she will get votes from the right in the general election (if she by chance gets the nomination).

I heard a Repuglican on a talk radio show the other day say that he didn't want to ever vote for Trump, nevertheless he would crawl over broken glass to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House.

So, she wants to keep her banker/corporate sponsors and Clinton Foundation contributors happy, but also thinks she can get s few Repuglicans to vote for her ... and the base of the Democratic Party are just whiny peons who will vote for her because they have no choice.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When Secretary Clinton sa...