2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen Secretary Clinton says...
Sanders: Now, when Secretary Clinton says, "I'm not going raise taxes on the middle class," let me tell you what she is saying. She is disagreeing with FDR on Social Security, LBJ on Medicare and with the vast majority of progressive Democrats in the House and the Senate, who today are fighting to end the disgrace of the United States being the only major country on Earth that doesn't provide paid family and medical leave.
What the legislation is is $1.61 a week. Now, you can say that's a tax on the middle class. It will provide three months paid family and medical leave for the working families of this country. I think, Secretary Clinton, $1.61 a week is a pretty good invest. (sic)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/12/19/3rd-democratic-debate-transcript-annotated-who-said-what-and-what-it-meant/
Uncle Joe
(65,136 posts)Thanks for the thread, sonofspy.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Unless of course, that in itself is a reason to worry.
Faux pas
(16,357 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)that Hillary briefly tacked left, and a bunch of us were all, "yeah, bullshit," while her synchophants hailed her as a great progressive?
Yeah, bullshit!
Even with a good job, I pay hundreds a month for healthcare, so $1.61, hell, I'll happily go up to $2 or $5, would be great. The tax-cut land in Republican territory, and Hillary is deep in it.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)along with Bernies planned investments in education and medical access for ALL of our people. Like Cornel West said: "Bernie; he touches our humanity". For me, nothing could be more true than that.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Hillary's wrong.
Paid family and medical leave should be a right. A dollar sixty-one is more than reasonable.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hillary doesn't have to worry about money to pay for her kids and grandkids education or their healthcare or for family leave for her loved ones.
The rest of us -- or most of the rest of us do.
Social Security is the best investment I ever made -- bar none. Best investment.
Raise the cap on the Social Security tax and insure that it will always be there for everyone.
You may think you are wealthy today, but you do not know what will happen to you. A fall. A gunshot. An accident. An illness.
And you may never work again and, if you are lucky enough to have savings, you will live on them until they are gone, and then you will rely on some sort of government assistance.
Social Security is a Godsend.
Thank you Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
And Medicare is the only feasible way to cover the high costs of healthcare for the elderly. Private insurance could not do it. Too costly.
Thank you, Lyndon B. Johnson.
And thank you Bernie Sanders for the proposals you have to continue the tradition begun by LBJ and FDR for us to pool our resources to help cover the costs of the inevitable events in our life -- for education and for the birth of a child.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)And since she makes only $250,000 per speech, the $1.61 will require sacrifice on her part.
Also most of her supporters despise the liberalism of FDR and lbj.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)If I wanted to adopt Trickle Down I would be a Republican. Fuck Grover Norquist.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Exactly.
Trickle Down and Preemptive Strikes.
No thanks "no-raise-taxes-boots-on-the-ground" Hillary!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)She isn't even hiding it now.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)dana_b
(11,546 posts)If I can get healthcare from the government, others should be able too (and I mean better than the Affordable Care Act).
Duval
(4,280 posts)questionseverything
(11,840 posts)i want the 1% to be taxed first to accomplish what the 99% needs........if we ever accomplish something in that direction and then need to increase middle class taxes, ok but
i want to start by raising taxes on the 1%.period
i also do not agree with raising the ss cap which would hurt working families and drive higher pay outs down the road
i want a ,skip and tax plan, meaning leave the cap where it is and add a tax on multimillionaires that feeds into ss but is not used in the payment to that individual when they retire
/////////////////////////
HoneychildMooseMoss
(251 posts)How many working people earn more than $118,500 a year?
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)maybe at like half a million a year (for a couple) so they would identify with the 99% which they are a part of, wether they know it or not
but let me ask you, why raise taxes on that 118,500 family while letting the guy making 5 mill a year completely off the hook?
why not have the koch brothers that are making billions a year pay first?
HoneychildMooseMoss
(251 posts)In most states, that puts you in the top 1%.
Once again, how many working people (plumbers, nurses, firemen, mechanics, etc.) are making anywhere near even the current cap?
questionseverything
(11,840 posts)a couple making a half mill a year are not the problem, it is the koch brother types making 30 billion plus a year that are the trouble and have the resources to help the 99.99% without it changing their lives in any real way
why tax the bottom before taxing he top?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Why is she going Grover Norquist?
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)She's whatever the wind blows.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Advocated for that by FOLLOWING Bernie's Policy...
earthside
(6,960 posts)... that if she says it right, she will get votes from the right in the general election (if she by chance gets the nomination).
I heard a Repuglican on a talk radio show the other day say that he didn't want to ever vote for Trump, nevertheless he would crawl over broken glass to keep Hillary Clinton out of the White House.
So, she wants to keep her banker/corporate sponsors and Clinton Foundation contributors happy, but also thinks she can get s few Repuglicans to vote for her ... and the base of the Democratic Party are just whiny peons who will vote for her because they have no choice.