2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHahahahahahahahahaha....
"Hillary Clinton has used the debates to do what shes done the whole campaign: demonstrate that she is the best candidate to take on the Republicans and to address the key issues facing American families, from rising incomes to national security," Adam said. "Given her three decisive victories, we hope as many viewers as possible are watching the debates to get a real view of where she stands and how shell fight for them."
More: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2015/12/22/sanders-wants-clinton-join-him-standing-up-dnc/77740204/
polichick
(37,626 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)No. They don't.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Those results are shown in poll after poll. Debates helped her. No doubt about that.
With the recent and very strange attacks from Sanders supporters, the Sanders campaign itself changing tactics over the last two weeks and now standing against everything instead of for things; I'm more confident now that it's getting really close to party time for Clinton.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)^snip^
Hillary Clinton, leave our grandmothers out of it
Updated 8:48 AM ET, Wed December 23, 2015
On Tuesday morning, Hillary Clinton's campaign released a post on her campaign site with the headline "Seven ways Hillary Clinton is just like your abuela." "Abuela" is the Spanish word for "grandmother," so presumably this list was designed to appeal to potential Latino voters.
On the list were items such as, "She reads to you before bedtime" and "she had one word for Donald Trump ... 'Basta!' Enough!"
With all respect, Clinton's latest effort to connect with Latinos is beyond lame. Her campaign's list is an example of "Hispandering" at its worst. It is condescending to Latinos and has generated deserved pushback on social media.
Amazing, no doubt about it.
Just Freaking Amazing!!!!!
Duval
(4,280 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)Round and round she goes, where she stops everyone knows.
Dustlawyer
(10,539 posts)General election! Why doesn't she join in the call for more debates in Prime Time?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)pandr32
(14,272 posts)It is unsanctioned debates that are getting reined in. This whole idea that HC doesn't want debates is nonsense. Debating is one of her strengths. Don't forget how she kept her cool and train of thought together for eleven hours against Republican bullies during the latest Benghazi inquisition.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)pandr32
(14,272 posts)Why is it you are twisting this?
The first premise you are making (falsely) is that six sanctioned debates are somehow fewer than they would be if not for something nefarious. Then you come up with your conclusion based on the first false premise that HC doesn't want any more debates, becoming part of the problem that doesn't really exist. The fact is she did not call for more (she could), though she has said she would participate if more were scheduled, be they sanctioned or unsanctioned.
Here is a fact. HC does better than the other two candidates in the debates. While both BS and MOM did better in the last one than the first two, they still didn't change anything. Why, then, would the DNC go through the additional cost and trouble of scheduling any more than the six? There are still three more sanctioned debates to go.
Unsanctioned debates can be scheduled. Why not press your candidate into setting some up? Let him pay for them.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)My first premise is that if hillary wants more debates, it should be easy to cite.
Thanks for trying to speak for me, but it turns out I'm very capable of speaking for myself. In fact, it would seem I have a whole life-time worth of experience doing it versus your couple-of-sentence attempt just now.
Being willing to participate in more debates is not the same as wanting more.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... Good one!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)I have been able to see some online but geeze they might as well not have them at all for all the exposure they don't get.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)etc etc etc...
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)In fact, her handlers who are MOST familiar here have covered the debate schedule as best they could so that there's virtually no chance of hearing Bernie Sander's WIN those debates.
If there weren't such a ridiculous claim, it MIGHT be funny, but honest to Goddess, WillyT, it's fucking insane and nonsense.
Her party girlfriend, DWS has done the level best job to control the debate schedule in FEAR of the obvious winner and best suited Social Democrat.
It HURTS these people to claim anything else, but whoever is following history, including well documented 2008 presidential run DU history, knows that it's going to take an extreme amount of manipulation (hey, the got it, based on the everyone in the 1% who are in positions to control the message) to "get HRC in".
They think it's going to be that simple, and THIS is the JOKE!!!
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)of I'll be even more pissed.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Unacceptable already!
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)I hope that after this primary is over the Clinton's will fade away like a cloudy sunset, never to return to a national spotlight.
marble falls
(71,926 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)mgmaggiemg
(869 posts)did you see the victory dance on the national stage? you're buying the beer on election night
HRC 2016, Cheers, Maggie
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)is that you don't have to just make shit up -- like that
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Ilsa
(64,368 posts)I didn't realize incomes were rising. Is that some form of subliminal messaging for billionaire voters?
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)gordyfl
(598 posts)Not allowing the candidates to debate in any non-sanctioned debates (such as set up by unions), Howard Dean says "It's not Right."
Response to WillyT (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)It is transparent and pathetic to most that realize it's all an act and not real. We are being set up by the 1%. The handlers of the actors in the ring will take our money, clean water, send us to war, point out distracting crap for us to get worked up over to avoid for us to see the scam.
Spin about limited, crappy timed debates is still circus talk. It is getting really tiring and not entertaining getting played.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Sanders supporters think that debates are helping Bernie
name not needed
(11,665 posts)