2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPost removed
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)so get use to Madam President
You don't even represent 30% of the Democratic Party
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Just an opinion, but alert on me if you must!
Nitram
(22,949 posts)"Shoot if you must this old gray head , but spare your country's flag."
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Without a large part of the millennials as well
as the independents? Without 10-14% of the
democrats?
Good luck with that!
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)dragonlady
(3,577 posts)He said because of Hillary's position on the TPP, he would write in Bernie Sanders rather than vote for her. And I'm sure he's not the only one.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)how we have to reclaim what we've lost and stabilize things.....instead of Nadering a Dem in 2016..
Good work, screw you when the Supreme Court goes Republican!! Will know who to blame....
Put on the critical thinking hat and ponder a bit....or do these people insist on keeping the dunce caps on??
Jerk
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)That's huge news, you should post it in LBN.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)BTW - I'm a Sanders supporter but I'm not stupid enough to refuse to vote for Clinton when the result could be a fascist republican regime. And puhleeeze, don't recite the imbecilic "no difference" canard.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,875 posts)You do realize that "just today I heard from a young man....." doesn't mean squat when there are going to be millions of votes and an electoral college to determine who is the next President?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)bernie will be elected the 45th president. oh, but i already posted this here. hiccup.
SCantiGOP
(13,875 posts)ends up being decided by one vote I will praise your wisdom and foresight.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)nor what i implied. but, you know this already. bernie sanders will be your 45th president.
JohnnyRingo
(18,686 posts)When the election rolls around it's absurd to imagine that every current Bernie supporter will stay home or vote for someone else. You may feel that you're leading a huge rally right now, but in six months you may find yourself wallowing in self pity and relative solitude when the movement evaporates.
Personally, I'll be proud to vote for Sanders if he manages to pull it off, but it doesn't appear likely. While I guess that means I have no ideals but perhaps I'm a loyal democrat. Shame on those who vow to help elect a republican just to spite a Clinton.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I think there is a group of poster on DU that "won't" voter for her, but mainly because they aren't really democrats. Sure they claim to be, but it's pretty obvious that some here have a different agenda than putting a democrat back in the WH. That being said, I do think the "real" Bernie supporters will vote for Hillary because they know that any republican running is going to be far, far worse at leading this country forward, and protecting the things we have gained since president Obama took office.
I know my candidate is a long shot, and I also know that whoever wins, I will vote for them in the GE. Those who keep pushing the idea, in one way or another, to not vote for Hillary, to not vote at all, or to write in Bernie's name if she is the nominee, are not really matters and should find another board that feels the same way as they do about NOT helping elect democrats.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)HRC Dems and Bernie Dems. This isn't about "our" party anymore. Those days are over. This is a movement .. of People-ordinary people from all walks of life and political affiliations. In fact party affiliation is nearly gone from the conversation at least In my experience and in my opinion.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)they fumble it away. The only reason any Dem presidential candidate would lose is if Dems voted by write-in for someone else, stayed home or decided by vote to let the GOP fuck the country up even more. Then maybe the DLC/DNC might get their heads out of their asses.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)and Senate...and "we" yelled for change...and all "we" heard was crickets. I'm questioning the very motives of the DNC right now. Presidents don't have a hellava lot of authority domestically speaking, can't spend/allocate money, can't write laws...EO's are temporary .... Appointees are important - unless the Minority in the senate Filibusters everything ad nauseam, with a Dem maj leader Refusing to reform the rules....Geebus..really the GOP has Been in control during Obama's 7 years using every stinking dirty trick in the book--with seemingly little resistance From dems. I'm not too sure these guys can Find the asses from which they must withdraw their heads at this juncture.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Sanders will get more Democratic votes in the general than HRC. But the DNC/Oligarchy don't care. They'd much rather run Clinton and lose than support Sen Sanders who would try to temper their greed. And it's really all about greed.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)"Sanders will get more Democratic votes in the general than HTC"
They should get the same amount, but they won't. It is Bernouts who are just begging to sit out an election (like 2010 and 2014) because the candidate isn't pure enough.
They are the ones saying "if I don't get my unicorn, I'm taking my rainbow and going home!"
Bernouts need to learn a phrase:
Don't let the "perfect" become the enemy of the good.
I put perfect in quotes because Sanders is far from it, but their are a lot people who are following his pied piper routine.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)vote to continue the corruption of the establishment. I am not admitting anything, I am stating a fact. Sanders will garner more Democratic votes than Clinton. Whether you like it or not, it's a fact that you need to consider. Do you really want the best candidate to face the Republicons or do you go along with Goldman-Sachs and the Oligarchy and don't care if Democrats win as long as they don't get a Progressive. Seems you would rather have Bush than Sanders.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)I will vote for Bernard in the general.
I will not vote for him in the primary.
But millions of moderates will not support his far left positions. Regardless of what his supporters say, republicans are not going to vote for him. Minorities are not going to turn out for him. These are all things backed by polling.
So, maybe, if your pretense is correct, that so many of the Democratic base is roiling with anger and hatred for money, capitalism, and the "establishment" he will get more votes (a pretense I reject as a complete and utter phallacy) from the Democratice base. That makes up 30% of the electorate. The other 70% is up for grabs and Sanders doesn't have the ability to sway them.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Please proceed.................
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)majority of voters are unaffiliated and they do not like Hillary. I don't even have to mention how her number one enemy the Republicans feel about her do I? Bernie, as the polls are already showing, with the support of a majority of the unaffiliated and along with a majority of Democrats and even a minority of Republicans will easily win and have large coattails. Hillary can not win with just a majority of Democrats, she can't win even if every Democrat votes for her. But who cares, we will just blame it on the liberals again.
If Hillary wins the primaries and then loses the general I see the Democratic party shrinking to be even smaller than the Republican party. The exodus will be massive.
Logical
(22,457 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)we are living with now. All I hear is people cannot stand this country anymore.
Now be honest and realize who did this?
Bush and Clinton.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... looked down upon the common folks, and found them unworthy.
demwing
(16,916 posts)To send another donation to Bernie.
Thanks!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Goldman-Sachs and the wealth of the 1%. Elect someone that is beholden to the oligarchy and watch what happens to the "common folks". So far your wealthy oligarchy have given us 50,000,000 Americans living in poverty. Let them win the Presidency and watch the poverty rate grow as the corporate profits.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)just ask billary how she refers to herself. yea, "common folk", broke when they left the white house.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Beacool
(30,254 posts)They are sore losers who can't seem to see beyond their noses. They are so selfish that they don't care if a Republican gets elected. It's either their candidate or nothing, the country be damned.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)randr
(12,418 posts)She will get my Democratic vote.
If she beats Bernie.
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)Any Dem is head and shoulders above the republicans.
Nitram
(22,949 posts)If Clinton wins the primary, you won't vote for her. Thanks for letting us know. Now, could you leave us in peace?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm telling you I think it would clearly be in the best interest of the people of the U.S. and the world. Where is the challenge.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)brooklynite
(94,942 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)I do not have the need to be insulting with names, to opposing supporters.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)We are fighting the established corruption of big money running our government. We are fighting to end the continuation of the wealth redistribution from the 99% to your 1%. Fighting the imprisonment of our population, especially minorities. I know you think these all take a backseat to increasing the wealth of Goldman-Sachs and the other supporters of HRC. Some act as if they never heard of quid pro quo. If you let the oligarchy run our government, we will lose all the social gains we've fought so hard for.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)brooklynite
(94,942 posts)...and you'll call out Sanders for endorsing Clinton if she wins?
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Stomach turning.
randys1
(16,286 posts)see that these people are working AGAINST the Democratic candidate.
I have seen it for a year now or a little less, however long it has been.
I know who is doing what and why, it is why I have my twitter account
https://twitter.com/DidTheyLetUVote
And if you speak OUT as I do in FAVOR of the Democratic Party, you are silenced...
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)I don't have a Twitter account (I don't even text), but I now have your's saved to my favorites.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Can we start a go fund me page for you, so you can fight the good fight?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Will their heads explode before or after they end their tantrums?
emulatorloo
(44,268 posts)Sorry Berni_Mccoy, sounds like you are the one drawing false equivalences.
Vote however you want. It is your right, and no one can tell you what to do.
Personally I am not going to enable the Republican apocalypse.
randys1
(16,286 posts)speak up more often
Do you know what Bernie will do if he isn't the nominee?
He will pray on his god damn KNEES that Hillary wins, because as Wall Street as she is, he KNOWS what will happen if she doesnt and as he is a very decent man who doesn't want to see hell on earth
I am a Bernie supporter also but I am seeing SO much harm being done by Bernie supporters that I have decided I will vote for whoever Nate Silver tells me has the better chance of winning.
Beacool
(30,254 posts)The total lack of respect of some of Sanders' supporters for Hillary is pathetic, but inconsequential.
Do with your vote whatever you want to do with it. I frankly don't give a fig.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Beacool
(30,254 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,184 posts)hides and bans for behaving that way to certain others.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)comradebillyboy
(10,184 posts)party that does not support him. Give me what I want or I'll go home and pout.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...used in this thread?
riversedge
(70,441 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)straight-ticket Democratic ballot because I won't support the Republican nominee for president or for any of the down-ballot races.
randys1
(16,286 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)vote for the Democratic candidate for president?
Beacool
(30,254 posts)They act like spoiled children who will throw a tantrum if they don't get their way.
randys1
(16,286 posts)so blinded by their own interests they cant see what is right in front of them, and which ones are here visa vi Karl Rove.
Maven
(10,533 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)c588415
(285 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)How very liberal of you.
Squinch
(51,083 posts)pnwmom
(109,024 posts)Hillary people understand that she DOES support raising the minimum wage, to the highest level that research supports. (The research conducted by the liberal economist at Princeton who first demonstrated that raising the minimum wage does not reduce jobs; whose research is cited by Bernie; except there is NO DATA for a raise as high as what Bernie is proposing.)
And Hillary supporters know that Hillary was lied to before the IWR vote, and that Ted Kennedy said he understood the votes of Democrats who voted yes, because they didn't haveaccess to the same classified documents that he did, as a member of the Armed Services Committee.
And Hillary people know that she opposes the Keystone Pipeline.
And on and on and on. She is nothing like the Rethugs on the other side, and Hillary supporters can see that clearly.
And yet the vast majority would be willing to vote for Bernie Sanders in the general because it's that important. Even if it sticks in our craw to vote for someone with his record on gun issues and his habit of making it appear that all issues are simple, black and white, with a one-size-fits-all solution.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)So you are saying that Hillary supporters think she was duped into voting for the IWR because she wasn't given the right documents. My question is: As a sitting senator, would it not be her JOB to do the due diligence to ask questions before voting on a resolution that authorized a president to go to war?
I would rather hear that she made a mistake in voting for the IWR than the bullshit excuse that she was duped.
NanceGreggs
(27,821 posts)It's always been a given that Democrats will vote for the Dem nominee in a general election. They do so either as a vote for a candidate they believe in, or a vote against the Republican alternative.
Apparently - on DU, at least - keeping a Democrat in the WH is no longer a "given", because some people think that it is somehow "principled" to not vote for the (D) if it's not their candidate of choice.
There is nothing principled about any Democrat contributing to even the remotest chance of a Republican being elected POTUS. There is nothing principled about putting one's individual desires above the needs of the citizenry as a whole.
If you believe that an HRC administration would act in exactly the same way as a Republican administration, perhaps you are simply too politically naive to know the difference.
No one here, or on any other political site, is "challenging" anyone to do anything. You want to vote for the (R), g'head. You want to write-in your candidate if he's not on the ballot, g'head. You want to sit out the election and pout, g'head.
The fact is that those of you who will do so amounts to a handful of people, in the great scheme of things. So no big whup.
And BTW, if you've looked at the polls, you must be aware that most of the population does not see Bernie in any "great political light" when it comes to who they want as the Democratic nominee, and the eventual president.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Hillary supported the Patriot Act and wants to get access to American's personal information.
Didn't we have enough of that spying on Americans during the Bush years?
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)and simply show their support for them.
The one that slays me the most is the way they cavalierly dismiss her opposition to single-payer, like that doesn't at the least represent 4-8 years of time wasted on achievement of that goal without her advocacy as POTUS.
If I was a HIlllarian, I'd say all that unnecessary human misery and deaths that occur as a result to our fellow citizens, is on her shoulders.
treestar
(82,383 posts)No she is not the same as the Republican freak that will win.
Most of your assertions are overgeneralization or exaggerations of Hillary's position.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)...It's the fault of the candidate.
I recall the hollering, screaming, wailing and gnashing of the teeth when President Obama snatched Hillary Clinton's so called inevitability straight from her stronghold.
If Hillary Clinton loses, it won't be my fault, nor will it be the fault of any Democrat that holds their nose and votes for her in the GE if she is our nominee.
Ultimately, the only person responsible for losing an election is the person who lost.
Will I suck up and vote for her if she is our nominee? Yes, of course I will - but it will be with reluctance and little enthusiasm.
Spirochete
(5,264 posts)if Bernie ever takes the lead in the polls. The loyalty oath demands will come to a screeching halt, I'll wager.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)on Game of Thrones?
I've been away for a while so I'm not up on this cycles slang.
On that note Bernie is my first and Clinton is who will get my vote if she is the Nominee.
SCantiGOP
(13,875 posts)I can't stomach even a brief viewing of Freerepublic anymore, but they used to delight in calling her "Hitlery Klintoon." I was amazed that they thought that was somehow clever and inventive.
Is "Hillarian" supposed to be something in that same vein?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/foreign-governments-gave-millions-to-foundation-while-clinton-was-at-state-dept/2015/02/25/31937c1e-bc3f-11e4-8668-4e7ba8439ca6_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/02/18/foreign-donations-to-hillary-clintons-foundation-raise-major-ethical-questions/
Chan790
(20,176 posts)laundry that is covered in Republicanism. Ewwwww!
I'm voting for Democratic values.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Will you vote for her, or the republican running against since he pretty much as NO democratic values at all. Of course maybe you know something I don't. Which republican running has better democratic values than Hillary would?
Chan790
(20,176 posts)before she runs America into the ground and there is a refugee flood.
Spain, I think. I speak the language and it's an EU Schengen Area country.
I'm also in favor of making lists of her supporters and denying them refugee status as political undesirables. They will have made this mess by backing Clinton, let them stew in it.
Mustellus
(328 posts).... and enjoy a Trump presidency.
Iggo
(47,591 posts)Funnier than sad.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)they don't need my vote, they say...so I shall not give them my vote.
If Hillary wants my vote, she'll tell her supporters to STFU and then she can set about earning my vote by repudiating the DLC and Bill's economic legacy and policies. The only Hillary I'll ever vote for is one that has a come to Jesus moment and realizes Bernie is 100% right on economic issues and she's been wrong all along.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)how many people will vote against their best interest, and the future of their children and grandchildren.
I will NEVER understand it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Democratic ideas passed or Republican ideas are passed. Fight the fight and if you are rewarded with a republican along with a republican congress then you can say great, we beat Hillary.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the Democratic candidate whoever it may be, is not a Democrat. period!!
hay rick
(7,662 posts)I am working to get Bernie nominated. If that fails I will put my volunteer effort into other campaigns- but I will definitely vote for Hillary. While I clearly prefer Bernie, I view the good/evil gap between Bernie and Hillary as trivial compared to the good/evil gap between Hillary and any possible Republican nominee. Folks who can't handle less than perfect candidates need to put a whole lot of time/effort/money into supporting their preferred candidate in the primary. The only perfect candidate for office is the person you see in the mirror every morning and his/her name isn't on the ballot.
WIProgressive88
(314 posts)I live in Wisconsin so I've seen up close and personal what government by Tea Baggers looks like, and it's not pretty. I certainly disagree with Sec. Clinton on a number of things, but even at her worst, she's a gazillion times better than any of the assclowns that the other side is running.
bigtree
(86,015 posts)...he'll endorse her if she wins.
I'll bet you he'd do that without any hint of a 'challenge' to his political sensibilities. You're in a league all to yourself (yourselves).