Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Times article on the infighting within Sanders campaign (Original Post) hill2016 Dec 2015 OP
Waiting for the obligatory "The Times is part of the MSM/in the tank for Clinton" post brooklynite Dec 2015 #1
This is the best you can throw at him? tecelote Dec 2015 #3
I entirely agree... brooklynite Dec 2015 #5
The Polls Are ALL BS and Cannot By Definition Be Random Given The Structural Change in Means of CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #39
Malarky.... reACTIONary Dec 2015 #48
Let's review the ignorance... brooklynite Dec 2015 #52
no stolen elections in our history reddread Dec 2015 #96
None that I'm aware of brooklynite Dec 2015 #101
three dollar bill reddread Dec 2015 #105
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #100
No one called this a scandal RandySF Dec 2015 #26
There is a faction in Bernie's floriduck Dec 2015 #8
I don't doubt that one bit. A lot of people want to go for her jugular. Not just a small Hiraeth Dec 2015 #30
Damn right a little friction is healthy.. Used to be a major trait of the Dem party.... raindaddy Dec 2015 #47
And a tendency to be afraid of not conforming Voice for Peace Dec 2015 #88
And instead you get what, you've never seen politics before? Let's do a quick review! Bluenorthwest Dec 2015 #10
Interesting how the Clinton fans used to disparage the Corp-Media and now have switched rhett o rick Dec 2015 #15
Well, the Times did pimp the self-same war she sold out the Iraqi KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #44
I know you didn't mean this but this post reads like a throwaway line to me Depaysement Dec 2015 #50
I knew after 30 minutes of research and reading that Bush's claims of KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #55
You were faster than I was. pangaia Dec 2015 #60
She "whored" herself out? Nonhlanhla Dec 2015 #54
Hillbots clearly have problems with the metaphoric use KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #58
I am as strong a Bernie supporter as you will find, but I agree. pangaia Dec 2015 #61
oh, all right. Does 'sold out' pass muster? - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #63
Sure. pangaia Dec 2015 #64
Done. Thanks for the nudge. - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #66
Wow, You did change it. pangaia Dec 2015 #69
So I'm shrill? Nonhlanhla Dec 2015 #75
It is along the same lines that Bernie uses and then claims it was not mysoginistic. Sheepshank Dec 2015 #86
Why no quotes? n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #2
LOL - I wouldn't be surprised if BOTH campaigns nc4bo Dec 2015 #4
This. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #16
yep SNAFU all over the place. Hiraeth Dec 2015 #31
From the link: Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #6
And why won't hill2016 Dec 2015 #7
Just my opinion but why risk DNC repurcussions and debate without her? Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #9
And that hill2016 Dec 2015 #18
I agree with that. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #22
There is "no upside" to Sanders debating O'Malley. And what is the upside for Hillary pnwmom Dec 2015 #73
Because then the DNC may ban him from debating Hillary. Luminous Animal Dec 2015 #21
MOM Need sto Man Up and Drop Out! For AMERICA! CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #40
Why waste time and energy on a debate that does not include the frontrunner? passiveporcupine Dec 2015 #45
Isn't Uponthegears Dec 2015 #51
Why should he debate O'Malley alone? O'Malley is irrelevant. Autumn Dec 2015 #76
Why do you care? frylock Dec 2015 #78
Sounds like a point that someone is trying to astroturf. Baitball Blogger Dec 2015 #11
+1. n/t winter is coming Dec 2015 #12
It's a poorly run campaign. Amateurish and belligerent. sufrommich Dec 2015 #13
Really? Sen Sanders went from relitive unknown to millions of supporters in a relatively rhett o rick Dec 2015 #17
"So-called Democrats" run the Party. So-called socialists should be happy oasis Dec 2015 #32
You'll miss us next year. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #35
Honestly now, what percentage of (non DU) Bernie supporters oasis Dec 2015 #38
Won't be Trump Uponthegears Dec 2015 #59
Hillary will get her share of the dyed-in-the-wool ultra lefties. oasis Dec 2015 #80
Five words Uponthegears Dec 2015 #90
are they running again? reddread Dec 2015 #97
Cute Uponthegears Dec 2015 #102
four ugly words reddread Dec 2015 #103
What you mean is that Conservative Democrats run the leadership of the Party and rhett o rick Dec 2015 #36
Opinions vary on who or what is a "real Democrat". oasis Dec 2015 #37
She turned her back on the Democratic Party in 2002 and chose to side with the Republicons. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #84
Millions of Democrats believe she's Democrat enough for them. oasis Dec 2015 #87
Millions love Trump also and that's who we will get if she wins the nomination. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #91
Millions voted for her in 2008 with full knowledge of her oasis Dec 2015 #94
Hey you're welcome for the fucking votes. frylock Dec 2015 #79
Oh my, you mean that everyone in a campaign doesn't agree? Heaven forfend. libdem4life Dec 2015 #14
Sometimes the best defense really isn't an offense. ucrdem Dec 2015 #19
That is so cute. Bill was concern trolling. Luminous Animal Dec 2015 #49
My stars ... Bill is worried that Bernie is a typical politician Deny and Shred Dec 2015 #62
That's rich, isn't it? Ned_Devine Dec 2015 #72
Thanks for posting. There is no doubt in my mind who the NYTimes supports. But why rhett o rick Dec 2015 #20
The writer couldn't come up with enough examples Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #23
NY Times is a desperate newspaper Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2015 #34
Propagandizing is hard work! n/t Oilwellian Dec 2015 #95
And the poster couldn't quote a single word from the article. arcane1 Dec 2015 #46
Tad Devine probably isn't helping. MBS Dec 2015 #24
or Dukakis rbrnmw Dec 2015 #29
OK, that is the ultimate example of incompetence. MBS Dec 2015 #89
Weaver enid602 Dec 2015 #25
What fucking infighting? hootinholler Dec 2015 #27
Everything is rosie and unicorns in other campaigns Omaha Steve Dec 2015 #42
Really interesting after the massive amount of hair pulling from sanders supporters FloridaBlues Dec 2015 #28
a bunch of unquoted nonsense stupidicus Dec 2015 #33
a former politco writer and rupert murdoch puppet: hopemountain Dec 2015 #41
Is this the reason Clinton is astro-turfing? Clearly a “tell of a losing campaign" dorkzilla Dec 2015 #43
If his campaign thinks "debates aren't his strength," then why the conspiracy theory here... Hekate Dec 2015 #53
The last paragraph in this article is telling of the effectiveness of Weaver combined with the facts Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #56
Sure sounds like Weaver is running the incompetent campaign here. Wait a second....! JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #83
The entire article is a crock. pangaia Dec 2015 #57
+Infinity! - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2015 #68
k/r Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #65
"Bill Clinton has privately told friends he was astonished" ish of the hammer Dec 2015 #67
Wow. Just wow. concreteblue Dec 2015 #70
LOL, Hillary fans are classy. nt Logical Dec 2015 #71
Jim Weaver is a loose canon.. Cha Dec 2015 #74
more like a tight fugue reddread Dec 2015 #98
The feel of the article doesn't add up Jarqui Dec 2015 #77
Strange attribution in that article. Eric J in MN Dec 2015 #81
This post augered in... cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #82
All you have to do is watch Weaver on TV to see R B Garr Dec 2015 #85
So you are gloating over this? Nedsdag Dec 2015 #92
Jeff Weaver, from Victory Comics... thesquanderer Dec 2015 #93
that is awesome reddread Dec 2015 #99
In case anyone missed the reference form the linked Times article... thesquanderer Dec 2015 #106
KICK! Cha Dec 2015 #104
This type of infighting is never a good sign Gothmog Dec 2015 #107

tecelote

(5,129 posts)
3. This is the best you can throw at him?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:23 PM
Dec 2015

Hillary is a veteran when it comes to scandals.

This is just trash. It won't dissuade anyone from voting for the person who has consistently fought for their best interests.

brooklynite

(96,806 posts)
5. I entirely agree...
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:27 PM
Dec 2015

...unfortunately, that amounts to about 30%; you're still going to need to find a way to lift Sanders' ceiling.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
39. The Polls Are ALL BS and Cannot By Definition Be Random Given The Structural Change in Means of
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:11 PM
Dec 2015

Telephone communications... Who uses what type, who will answer the phone as well as the demographics associated with these variables. No coefficient fudge facor can correct for these disparities that ensure that these polls are for all practical purposes irrelevant.

The Polls Are MEANINGLESS from a prediction standpoint. However, what the polls do seek to accomplish is to set expectations so that when the "FIX" with the Electronic Voting Machines comes in... The contrived result will already have been "predicted."

reACTIONary

(5,866 posts)
48. Malarky....
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:43 PM
Dec 2015

..... just because people have more than one way of communicating doesn't mean you can't gather a representative random sample.

brooklynite

(96,806 posts)
52. Let's review the ignorance...
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:45 PM
Dec 2015

Iowa is an open Caucus; there are no voting machines, electronic or otherwise. There are also n ballot, paper or otherwise.

The conspiracy theorists(And I use that term decidedly-I've spoken to candidates and Party officials, and nobody believes we lose elections because of rigged voting machines) tell us we lost the 2004 Presidential election because of voting machine riggin; am I to understand that you believe the Republicans have handed control of the voting machines to the DNC?

Response to brooklynite (Reply #5)

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
8. There is a faction in Bernie's
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:30 PM
Dec 2015

Campaign that wants him to go for Hill's throat, down in the mud. But Bernie won't ever do that. Friction is healthy. It shows independent thinking rather than robotics.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
30. I don't doubt that one bit. A lot of people want to go for her jugular. Not just a small
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:44 PM
Dec 2015

amount of his campaign staff. I can't imagine any campaign not having disagreements on strategy/agenda.

raindaddy

(1,370 posts)
47. Damn right a little friction is healthy.. Used to be a major trait of the Dem party....
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:43 PM
Dec 2015

and thing got worked out.

That was before the tendency to be rigid and calculating became the norm...

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. And instead you get what, you've never seen politics before? Let's do a quick review!
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:34 PM
Dec 2015

Then:
The Front-Runner’s Fall
Hillary Clinton’s campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memos—published here for the first time—reveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-front-runner-s-fall/306944/

Now:
The Hillary 2016 campaign infighting begins even before the Hillary 2016 campaign begins
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/11/14/what-the-mook-mafia-e-mails-really-tell-us-about-hillary-clintons-presidential-bid/


It's not that the media is in any tank it's that it is a broken record repeating the same material year after year with minor adjustments to suit the day. Today it's Bernie, and that's fun for you. But when the material is cyclical, everybody's next.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
15. Interesting how the Clinton fans used to disparage the Corp-Media and now have switched
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:47 PM
Dec 2015

to embracing it because the Corp-Media along with all things corp back HRC the billionaires choice.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
44. Well, the Times did pimp the self-same war she sold out the Iraqi
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:35 PM
Dec 2015

people for.

What's a million innocent Iraqi lives when Hillary's presidential ambitions are on the line?

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
50. I know you didn't mean this but this post reads like a throwaway line to me
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:45 PM
Dec 2015

Except it's true. She didn't support or oppose the war on policy grounds. She supported the war because she didn't think she could be elected President without supporting it. Purely a political calculation.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
55. I knew after 30 minutes of research and reading that Bush's claims of
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:52 PM
Dec 2015

WMD and ties to AQ were total bullshit. While none of us can peer into the innermost recesses of her heart, we can say definitively that she should have known better.

Her AUMF vote disqualifies her from any elective office.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
54. She "whored" herself out?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:52 PM
Dec 2015

Really? That's the language you want to you use?

Then please don't complain next time when someone suggests that some Bernie supporters are sexist.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
58. Hillbots clearly have problems with the metaphoric use
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:54 PM
Dec 2015

of language. But persist in your shrill dudgeon.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
69. Wow, You did change it.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:09 PM
Dec 2015

That was... I don't know.. 'nice?'

I also figure, why stick a stick in a hornets nest, something like that.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
75. So I'm shrill?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:37 PM
Dec 2015

Thanks for changing the wording I originally complained about - although you did it only after a other poster agreed with me. I don't appreciate the suggestion that I am shrill. That is terminology often used against women when they complain about sexism.

Once again, don't complain when someone says that some Bernie supporters are sexist.

And no, no problem with metaphoric language. Just with metaphors rooted in the denigration of women.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
86. It is along the same lines that Bernie uses and then claims it was not mysoginistic.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 01:18 AM
Dec 2015

Should be called out...glad you spoke up.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
4. LOL - I wouldn't be surprised if BOTH campaigns
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:26 PM
Dec 2015

Weren't running around like their hair was on fire at this stage of the game.

It's primary season, situation normal, all fucked up.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
16. This.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:48 PM
Dec 2015

Primaries are really close and they are all go. The last two weeks have been the only big dust ups since Seattle. Amazingly polite primary to this point. Getting a little discheveled now.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
6. From the link:
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:27 PM
Dec 2015

“I asked Senator Sanders” to do more, said Mr. O’Malley. “Senator Sanders didn’t want to do more debates either. He kind of liked where it is.”

Aides to Mr. Sanders said they couldn’t speak to Mr. O’Malley’s assertion, although Mr. Briggs said the team would “welcome more debates” that included Mrs. Clinton as well.

EDIT - emphasis is mine.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
9. Just my opinion but why risk DNC repurcussions and debate without her?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:33 PM
Dec 2015

Sanders doesn't really need to debate against O'Malley at this time, there would be no upside to it.



 

hill2016

(1,772 posts)
18. And that
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:51 PM
Dec 2015

Is the exact reason why Clinton won't call for more debates

She doesn't really need to debate against Sanders at this point, there would be no upside to it (for her).

pnwmom

(109,231 posts)
73. There is "no upside" to Sanders debating O'Malley. And what is the upside for Hillary
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:24 PM
Dec 2015

to go beyond the 6 debates?

Actually, I'd be happy to see her debate more times, because it's free good publicity. But she doesn't need them at this point.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
45. Why waste time and energy on a debate that does not include the frontrunner?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:42 PM
Dec 2015

You really are trying too hard to get some Bernie supporter a hide.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
17. Really? Sen Sanders went from relitive unknown to millions of supporters in a relatively
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:51 PM
Dec 2015

short time. Over 2 million individuals have donated and thousands come out when he speaks. He is scaring the hell out of the Oligarchy that has unlimited resources to Swiftboat him. Sadly some so-called Democrats are choosing to side with the Oligarchy in lieu of the 99%. I guess they worship wealth.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
32. "So-called Democrats" run the Party. So-called socialists should be happy
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:47 PM
Dec 2015

to get a free ticket to ride.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
38. Honestly now, what percentage of (non DU) Bernie supporters
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:11 PM
Dec 2015

would stay home on Election Day to allow a Trump presidency?

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
59. Won't be Trump
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:56 PM
Dec 2015

But, yes, folks like me who saw the demand for ideological purity hand Florida to GWB will vote, and possibly work, for Hillary. HOWEVER, there are millions of new voters who have been moved to action who will stay home on election day if Hillary's machine keeps personally attacking a man they admire instead of talking issues. I am not sure I am the only kind of Democrat voter Hillary needs, particularly if the GOP gets its act together and puts its own transformational candidate on the ticket.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
80. Hillary will get her share of the dyed-in-the-wool ultra lefties.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:11 AM
Dec 2015

They're not so much under the spell of Bernie that they would reject half a loaf.

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
102. Cute
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 11:19 PM
Dec 2015

But Hillary is ten times less popular among progressives than Al Gore was on the worst day of his life and his supporters were a hundred times less arrogant. He still spurred a rebellion on the left and that rebellion put one of the worst and most destructive presidents in the history of this nation in the White House. Old folks like me will vote for Hillary, but there are millions of new voters who are more loyal to Bernie and liberal values than the voters who abandoned Gore for Nader lo these many years ago. Hillary may well get the nomination but her supporters' bs could end up putting Satan himself in the White House.

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
103. four ugly words
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 12:08 AM
Dec 2015

Joe Biden Clarence Thomas. Without which there would never have been a GWB 911 or IWR

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
36. What you mean is that Conservative Democrats run the leadership of the Party and
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:56 PM
Dec 2015

real Democrats recognize the need for social programs. Sen Sanders is more of a Democrat than HRC will ever be.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
37. Opinions vary on who or what is a "real Democrat".
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:08 PM
Dec 2015

I'll agree that here the DU realm, the tendency is more to the left. But that's not what is going to take to win the GE. That's why the Party chooses Hillary to be the standard bearer.

I like Bernie, but his Democratic Party credentials don't measure up to Hillary's, so can stop making that claim.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
84. She turned her back on the Democratic Party in 2002 and chose to side with the Republicons.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 01:13 AM
Dec 2015

She chose to either believe Bush or went along knowing he was wrong, either way she proved she is not a Democrat.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
87. Millions of Democrats believe she's Democrat enough for them.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 01:35 AM
Dec 2015

That's what will count in the year 2016. Her overall accomplishments far outweigh her past missteps.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
91. Millions love Trump also and that's who we will get if she wins the nomination.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:34 PM
Dec 2015

No accomplishments can outweigh the betrayal that lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children.

Do you think that she believed Bush that Iraq had WMD? or She knew they didn't but liked the idea of "spreading democracy" (I think that is what imperialism is called now) in the Middle East, or she knew she was voting to give Bush authority to invade but thought he would use good judgement? Doesn't matter to a lot of Democrats that we need to win the presidency.

oasis

(50,628 posts)
94. Millions voted for her in 2008 with full knowledge of her
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 02:36 PM
Dec 2015

IWR decision. Since 2008, Hillary's become an international icon as Secretary of State and garnered numerous Woman of the Year honors.

In 2016, even more women and people of color will refuse to dwell in the past and join ranks to send her to the highest office. Why? Because there are more important issues facing them.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
14. Oh my, you mean that everyone in a campaign doesn't agree? Heaven forfend.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:43 PM
Dec 2015

Shocked, I tell you. And this is all they have? An over-zealous PR guy that everyone is not in love with? That's why he has the job, so silly.

And yes, investigate the DNC...that's what this is about...fending off their idiocy and the little scandals that are buried deep within the tight little group with DWS and HRH.

I'm on Team Sanders and Weaver.

ucrdem

(15,700 posts)
19. Sometimes the best defense really isn't an offense.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:51 PM
Dec 2015

But I suppose we'll know how it played in Dubuque in a few weeks.

Bill Clinton has privately told friends he was astonished by the Sanders’ team’s handling of the data breach, and that it risked depicting the Vermont senator as a typical politician and not the political outsider he is seen to be.

Deny and Shred

(1,061 posts)
62. My stars ... Bill is worried that Bernie is a typical politician
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:59 PM
Dec 2015

Allow me to clutch my pearls and faint onto my couch.

I shall rest assured that the Clintons are so very far above typical politicians.

I'm sure every single Hillary staffer was on board with the Obama dog whistling in 2008.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
20. Thanks for posting. There is no doubt in my mind who the NYTimes supports. But why
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:52 PM
Dec 2015

Democrats would support the wealthy 1%, other than pure wealth worship.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
23. The writer couldn't come up with enough examples
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:55 PM
Dec 2015

...of Sanders campaign in-fighting to fill the article.

So she mixed in criticism of the Sanders campaign from the Clinton campaign and O'Malley campaign to have enough words for the article.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
46. And the poster couldn't quote a single word from the article.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:42 PM
Dec 2015

Almost as if it was never meant to be read, but spread as a false narrative instead.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
24. Tad Devine probably isn't helping.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 08:55 PM
Dec 2015

He sure wasn't an asset to either the Gore or Kerry presidential campaigns.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
89. OK, that is the ultimate example of incompetence.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 05:20 AM
Dec 2015

I hadn't known that he'd been involved in the Dukakis campaign, too.

enid602

(8,816 posts)
25. Weaver
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:09 PM
Dec 2015

Well, at least Bern's campaign manager can look forward to resuming his promising carreer in the booming comic book store industry. Looks as if both he and Bern have a real flair for picking winners.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
27. What fucking infighting?
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:30 PM
Dec 2015


Zero evidence in your article. Your behavior in the way you present this article is, shall we say, suboptimal?

Omaha Steve

(101,397 posts)
42. Everything is rosie and unicorns in other campaigns
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:24 PM
Dec 2015

4 pages: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902451.html?sub=AR

After a dramatic failure at the helm of Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign, and five months after Clinton sacked her via e-mail, she moved back to the comfort of her home town to work for Barack Obama.


Chicago native Patti Solis Doyle will be chief of staff to whoever becomes Barack Obama's running mate. (By Charles Rex Arbogast -- Associated Press)

FloridaBlues

(4,277 posts)
28. Really interesting after the massive amount of hair pulling from sanders supporters
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:36 PM
Dec 2015

Let's face facts he's not the best at debates so having less for him is a goog thing

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
33. a bunch of unquoted nonsense
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 09:52 PM
Dec 2015

for the gullible, and a bad commentary on the state of modern "liberal" journalism

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
43. Is this the reason Clinton is astro-turfing? Clearly a “tell of a losing campaign"
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:26 PM
Dec 2015

Why don’t we let VOTERS decide who is losing?

If HRC & Co were soooooooo confident, why are they doing shit like this???

THE POPULAR AND influential Blue Hampshire blog on progressive New Hampshire politics recently busted a group of campaign staffers for registering anonymously on site and boosting pro-Hillary Clinton diaries on the group blog.Sockpuppet



http://www.wired.com/2007/12/clinton-staff-a/


Hekate

(92,596 posts)
53. If his campaign thinks "debates aren't his strength," then why the conspiracy theory here...
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:46 PM
Dec 2015

...about the paucity of Democratic debates? I thought it was all an evil plot hatched over cocktails by HRC and DWS in the Turd-Way Secret Hideout?

Things that make you go hmmmm.

Oh, and the NYT is in no sense a "liberal" newspaper.

Uncle Joe

(59,231 posts)
56. The last paragraph in this article is telling of the effectiveness of Weaver combined with the facts
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:52 PM
Dec 2015

surrounding the Schultz DNC's handling of this incident and track record of obvious favoritism to Hillary.


I also liked this paragraph.



“Jeff is a Marine,” said Michael Briggs, the spokesman for Mr. Sanders, when asked about Mr. Weaver’s tone. “You wouldn’t want to be in a foxhole with anybody else.” Mr. Weaver declined to be interviewed.

(snip)

For now, the Clinton team is still surprised to find itself playing defense over the data breach. Days after the breach, a bemused Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta, told NBC’s “Meet the Press” about Mr. Sanders, “I think he’s got a problem in his campaign with the culture of that campaign and I think that was shown in this incident. And I think that we are the victims of this, not the Sanders campaign.”



Thanks for the thread, hill.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
57. The entire article is a crock.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 10:54 PM
Dec 2015

Some guy(s) creating something imaginary about the Sanders campaign, a bunch of paragraphs with no substance whatsoever.

next...

ish of the hammer

(444 posts)
67. "Bill Clinton has privately told friends he was astonished"
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:09 PM
Dec 2015

I'm astonished that B. Clinton is thinks anybody believes him. The Clintons would love to paint Sanders as a common politician using dirty tricks, but it's more the Clinton's style and it's not working!

concreteblue

(626 posts)
70. Wow. Just wow.
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:16 PM
Dec 2015

I wont alert on this, although it is right up against the line as far as i can tell. Your headline is not the headline of the article and bears little resemblence to the content. The article itself struggles woth trying to make this a bigger deal than it is.the desperation is dripping off every Shrillary post these days.

Cha

(300,933 posts)
74. Jim Weaver is a loose canon..
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:30 PM
Dec 2015
The blowback outside the campaign was fierce. But there was also blowback within the Sanders campaign as well, as some aides said the language crossed a line. Mr. Sanders said on MSNBC that the comment “was inappropriate,” although it is not clear whether he suggested that Mr. Weaver apologize.

However, others in the campaign did. The Sanders campaign’s New Hampshire state director, Julia Barnes, asked Mr. Weaver to apologize for the comments, and voiced her displeasure to him in clear terms. He never did, telling unhappy staffers on a conference call after the report aired that their team needed to be mindful that the Clinton campaign was about to unleash attacks on Mr. Sanders, according to three people with direct knowledge of the episode.


 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
98. more like a tight fugue
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 10:14 PM
Dec 2015

Sounds great but funereal. Poor Hillary has to rely on the support of her worst critics from 2008. What a world what a world!

Jarqui

(10,185 posts)
77. The feel of the article doesn't add up
Tue Dec 29, 2015, 11:56 PM
Dec 2015

It spins one thing:

These people described Mr. Sanders’ team as decidedly less emphatic in private discussions about having more primary debates than they have been in public, realizing that debates are not his strength.


No quote from "these people" to back that assertion up.

Then :
Mr. Briggs denied that claim. .... Mr. Briggs said the team would “welcome more debates” that included Mrs. Clinton as well.


O'Malley whined but ignored the consequences of debating without Hilary = no more debates with Hillary.

Of course the Sanders campaign would like more debates with Hillary as most second place candidates would. It's a chance to get their message out and a chance for Hillary to make a mistake. The rest is pure nonsense in comparison.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
81. Strange attribution in that article.
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 12:22 AM
Dec 2015

A source is described as "people briefed on the flap about the number of debates."

Are those DNC staffers? Clinton staffers? O'Malley staffers?

Sometimes journalists need to conceal names, but this level of concealment makes the article garbage.

R B Garr

(17,231 posts)
85. All you have to do is watch Weaver on TV to see
Wed Dec 30, 2015, 01:14 AM
Dec 2015

that this article accurately describes what we could see with our own eyes. The guy is really hostile, to put it mildly.

Reading through some of the outraged comments here, it's obvious that they didn't watch him on TV. He's very unprofessional. I can't even imagine having to tiptoe around him.

thesquanderer

(12,162 posts)
106. In case anyone missed the reference form the linked Times article...
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 10:18 AM
Dec 2015
Mr. Weaver, who worked for Mr. Sanders in Congress for years and has the candidate’s trust, took a break from a store in Virginia, Victory Comics, to return to the candidate’s fold (his cell phone voicemail still identifies him as with the comic-book store.)
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NY Times article on the i...