2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNY Times article on the infighting within Sanders campaign
Generally a tell of a losing campaign.
Even the campaign thinks debates "aren't his strength" and isn't that keen on more debates
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/29/top-bernie-sanders-aide-rankles-those-in-and-out-of-campaign/
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
brooklynite
(96,806 posts)tecelote
(5,129 posts)Hillary is a veteran when it comes to scandals.
This is just trash. It won't dissuade anyone from voting for the person who has consistently fought for their best interests.
brooklynite
(96,806 posts)...unfortunately, that amounts to about 30%; you're still going to need to find a way to lift Sanders' ceiling.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)Telephone communications... Who uses what type, who will answer the phone as well as the demographics associated with these variables. No coefficient fudge facor can correct for these disparities that ensure that these polls are for all practical purposes irrelevant.
The Polls Are MEANINGLESS from a prediction standpoint. However, what the polls do seek to accomplish is to set expectations so that when the "FIX" with the Electronic Voting Machines comes in... The contrived result will already have been "predicted."
reACTIONary
(5,866 posts)..... just because people have more than one way of communicating doesn't mean you can't gather a representative random sample.
brooklynite
(96,806 posts)Iowa is an open Caucus; there are no voting machines, electronic or otherwise. There are also n ballot, paper or otherwise.
The conspiracy theorists(And I use that term decidedly-I've spoken to candidates and Party officials, and nobody believes we lose elections because of rigged voting machines) tell us we lost the 2004 Presidential election because of voting machine riggin; am I to understand that you believe the Republicans have handed control of the voting machines to the DNC?
reddread
(6,896 posts)I wish those conspiracy theorists would just cut it out.
brooklynite
(96,806 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)Response to brooklynite (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandySF
(63,205 posts)Just a great big sign that reads "Amatuer Hour" at Club Bernie.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Campaign that wants him to go for Hill's throat, down in the mud. But Bernie won't ever do that. Friction is healthy. It shows independent thinking rather than robotics.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)amount of his campaign staff. I can't imagine any campaign not having disagreements on strategy/agenda.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)and thing got worked out.
That was before the tendency to be rigid and calculating became the norm...
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)to the will of the Powerful
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Then:
The Front-Runners Fall
Hillary Clintons campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memospublished here for the first timereveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-front-runner-s-fall/306944/
Now:
The Hillary 2016 campaign infighting begins even before the Hillary 2016 campaign begins
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/11/14/what-the-mook-mafia-e-mails-really-tell-us-about-hillary-clintons-presidential-bid/
It's not that the media is in any tank it's that it is a broken record repeating the same material year after year with minor adjustments to suit the day. Today it's Bernie, and that's fun for you. But when the material is cyclical, everybody's next.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to embracing it because the Corp-Media along with all things corp back HRC the billionaires choice.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)people for.
What's a million innocent Iraqi lives when Hillary's presidential ambitions are on the line?
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Except it's true. She didn't support or oppose the war on policy grounds. She supported the war because she didn't think she could be elected President without supporting it. Purely a political calculation.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)WMD and ties to AQ were total bullshit. While none of us can peer into the innermost recesses of her heart, we can say definitively that she should have known better.
Her AUMF vote disqualifies her from any elective office.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I took me 32 minutes!!
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Really? That's the language you want to you use?
Then please don't complain next time when someone suggests that some Bernie supporters are sexist.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)of language. But persist in your shrill dudgeon.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Not well-phrased.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts):> )
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)That was... I don't know.. 'nice?'
I also figure, why stick a stick in a hornets nest, something like that.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)Thanks for changing the wording I originally complained about - although you did it only after a other poster agreed with me. I don't appreciate the suggestion that I am shrill. That is terminology often used against women when they complain about sexism.
Once again, don't complain when someone says that some Bernie supporters are sexist.
And no, no problem with metaphoric language. Just with metaphors rooted in the denigration of women.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Should be called out...glad you spoke up.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Weren't running around like their hair was on fire at this stage of the game.
It's primary season, situation normal, all fucked up.
Primaries are really close and they are all go. The last two weeks have been the only big dust ups since Seattle. Amazingly polite primary to this point. Getting a little discheveled now.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)I asked Senator Sanders to do more, said Mr. OMalley. Senator Sanders didnt want to do more debates either. He kind of liked where it is.
Aides to Mr. Sanders said they couldnt speak to Mr. OMalleys assertion, although Mr. Briggs said the team would welcome more debates that included Mrs. Clinton as well.
EDIT - emphasis is mine.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)He debate with MOM alone?
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Sanders doesn't really need to debate against O'Malley at this time, there would be no upside to it.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)Is the exact reason why Clinton won't call for more debates
She doesn't really need to debate against Sanders at this point, there would be no upside to it (for her).
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Thank you for your honesty.
pnwmom
(109,231 posts)to go beyond the 6 debates?
Actually, I'd be happy to see her debate more times, because it's free good publicity. But she doesn't need them at this point.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You really are trying too hard to get some Bernie supporter a hide.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)the better question, "Why wouldn't MOM demand Hillary be present?"
Autumn
(45,540 posts)![](/emoticons/rofl.gif)
frylock
(34,825 posts)Baitball Blogger
(47,283 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)short time. Over 2 million individuals have donated and thousands come out when he speaks. He is scaring the hell out of the Oligarchy that has unlimited resources to Swiftboat him. Sadly some so-called Democrats are choosing to side with the Oligarchy in lieu of the 99%. I guess they worship wealth.
oasis
(50,628 posts)to get a free ticket to ride.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)oasis
(50,628 posts)would stay home on Election Day to allow a Trump presidency?
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)But, yes, folks like me who saw the demand for ideological purity hand Florida to GWB will vote, and possibly work, for Hillary. HOWEVER, there are millions of new voters who have been moved to action who will stay home on election day if Hillary's machine keeps personally attacking a man they admire instead of talking issues. I am not sure I am the only kind of Democrat voter Hillary needs, particularly if the GOP gets its act together and puts its own transformational candidate on the ticket.
oasis
(50,628 posts)They're not so much under the spell of Bernie that they would reject half a loaf.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)Ralph Nader George Walker Bush
reddread
(6,896 posts)Shit maybe I should watch the news.
Uponthegears
(1,499 posts)But Hillary is ten times less popular among progressives than Al Gore was on the worst day of his life and his supporters were a hundred times less arrogant. He still spurred a rebellion on the left and that rebellion put one of the worst and most destructive presidents in the history of this nation in the White House. Old folks like me will vote for Hillary, but there are millions of new voters who are more loyal to Bernie and liberal values than the voters who abandoned Gore for Nader lo these many years ago. Hillary may well get the nomination but her supporters' bs could end up putting Satan himself in the White House.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Joe Biden Clarence Thomas. Without which there would never have been a GWB 911 or IWR
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)real Democrats recognize the need for social programs. Sen Sanders is more of a Democrat than HRC will ever be.
oasis
(50,628 posts)I'll agree that here the DU realm, the tendency is more to the left. But that's not what is going to take to win the GE. That's why the Party chooses Hillary to be the standard bearer.
I like Bernie, but his Democratic Party credentials don't measure up to Hillary's, so can stop making that claim.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)She chose to either believe Bush or went along knowing he was wrong, either way she proved she is not a Democrat.
oasis
(50,628 posts)That's what will count in the year 2016. Her overall accomplishments far outweigh her past missteps.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)No accomplishments can outweigh the betrayal that lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children.
Do you think that she believed Bush that Iraq had WMD? or She knew they didn't but liked the idea of "spreading democracy" (I think that is what imperialism is called now) in the Middle East, or she knew she was voting to give Bush authority to invade but thought he would use good judgement? Doesn't matter to a lot of Democrats that we need to win the presidency.
oasis
(50,628 posts)IWR decision. Since 2008, Hillary's become an international icon as Secretary of State and garnered numerous Woman of the Year honors.
In 2016, even more women and people of color will refuse to dwell in the past and join ranks to send her to the highest office. Why? Because there are more important issues facing them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)No more free tickets.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Shocked, I tell you. And this is all they have? An over-zealous PR guy that everyone is not in love with? That's why he has the job, so silly.
And yes, investigate the DNC...that's what this is about...fending off their idiocy and the little scandals that are buried deep within the tight little group with DWS and HRH.
I'm on Team Sanders and Weaver.
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)But I suppose we'll know how it played in Dubuque in a few weeks.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)Allow me to clutch my pearls and faint onto my couch.
I shall rest assured that the Clintons are so very far above typical politicians.
I'm sure every single Hillary staffer was on board with the Obama dog whistling in 2008.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Democrats would support the wealthy 1%, other than pure wealth worship.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...of Sanders campaign in-fighting to fill the article.
So she mixed in criticism of the Sanders campaign from the Clinton campaign and O'Malley campaign to have enough words for the article.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)It can't find much to say
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Almost as if it was never meant to be read, but spread as a false narrative instead.
MBS
(9,688 posts)He sure wasn't an asset to either the Gore or Kerry presidential campaigns.
Devine is the one who put him in the tank ad
MBS
(9,688 posts)I hadn't known that he'd been involved in the Dukakis campaign, too.
enid602
(8,816 posts)Well, at least Bern's campaign manager can look forward to resuming his promising carreer in the booming comic book store industry. Looks as if both he and Bern have a real flair for picking winners.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)![](/emoticons/shrug.gif)
Zero evidence in your article. Your behavior in the way you present this article is, shall we say, suboptimal?
Omaha Steve
(101,397 posts)4 pages: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902451.html?sub=AR
![](http://forum.blu-ray.com/images/smilies/imported/cloudnine.gif)
After a dramatic failure at the helm of Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign, and five months after Clinton sacked her via e-mail, she moved back to the comfort of her home town to work for Barack Obama.
![](http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/07/29/PH2008072902513.jpg)
Chicago native Patti Solis Doyle will be chief of staff to whoever becomes Barack Obama's running mate. (By Charles Rex Arbogast -- Associated Press)
FloridaBlues
(4,277 posts)Let's face facts he's not the best at debates so having less for him is a goog thing
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)for the gullible, and a bad commentary on the state of modern "liberal" journalism
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)maggie haberman.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Why dont we let VOTERS decide who is losing?
If HRC & Co were soooooooo confident, why are they doing shit like this???
THE POPULAR AND influential Blue Hampshire blog on progressive New Hampshire politics recently busted a group of campaign staffers for registering anonymously on site and boosting pro-Hillary Clinton diaries on the group blog.Sockpuppet
http://www.wired.com/2007/12/clinton-staff-a/
Hekate
(92,596 posts)...about the paucity of Democratic debates? I thought it was all an evil plot hatched over cocktails by HRC and DWS in the Turd-Way Secret Hideout?
Things that make you go hmmmm.
Oh, and the NYT is in no sense a "liberal" newspaper.
Uncle Joe
(59,231 posts)surrounding the Schultz DNC's handling of this incident and track record of obvious favoritism to Hillary.
I also liked this paragraph.
Jeff is a Marine, said Michael Briggs, the spokesman for Mr. Sanders, when asked about Mr. Weavers tone. You wouldnt want to be in a foxhole with anybody else. Mr. Weaver declined to be interviewed.
(snip)
For now, the Clinton team is still surprised to find itself playing defense over the data breach. Days after the breach, a bemused Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta, told NBCs Meet the Press about Mr. Sanders, I think hes got a problem in his campaign with the culture of that campaign and I think that was shown in this incident. And I think that we are the victims of this, not the Sanders campaign.
Thanks for the thread, hill.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Some guy(s) creating something imaginary about the Sanders campaign, a bunch of paragraphs with no substance whatsoever.
next...
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,358 posts)ish of the hammer
(444 posts)I'm astonished that B. Clinton is thinks anybody believes him. The Clintons would love to paint Sanders as a common politician using dirty tricks, but it's more the Clinton's style and it's not working!
concreteblue
(626 posts)I wont alert on this, although it is right up against the line as far as i can tell. Your headline is not the headline of the article and bears little resemblence to the content. The article itself struggles woth trying to make this a bigger deal than it is.the desperation is dripping off every Shrillary post these days.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Cha
(300,933 posts)However, others in the campaign did. The Sanders campaigns New Hampshire state director, Julia Barnes, asked Mr. Weaver to apologize for the comments, and voiced her displeasure to him in clear terms. He never did, telling unhappy staffers on a conference call after the report aired that their team needed to be mindful that the Clinton campaign was about to unleash attacks on Mr. Sanders, according to three people with direct knowledge of the episode.
reddread
(6,896 posts)Sounds great but funereal. Poor Hillary has to rely on the support of her worst critics from 2008. What a world what a world!
Jarqui
(10,185 posts)It spins one thing:
These people described Mr. Sanders team as decidedly less emphatic in private discussions about having more primary debates than they have been in public, realizing that debates are not his strength.
No quote from "these people" to back that assertion up.
Then :
Mr. Briggs denied that claim. .... Mr. Briggs said the team would welcome more debates that included Mrs. Clinton as well.
O'Malley whined but ignored the consequences of debating without Hilary = no more debates with Hillary.
Of course the Sanders campaign would like more debates with Hillary as most second place candidates would. It's a chance to get their message out and a chance for Hillary to make a mistake. The rest is pure nonsense in comparison.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)A source is described as "people briefed on the flap about the number of debates."
Are those DNC staffers? Clinton staffers? O'Malley staffers?
Sometimes journalists need to conceal names, but this level of concealment makes the article garbage.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)R B Garr
(17,231 posts)that this article accurately describes what we could see with our own eyes. The guy is really hostile, to put it mildly.
Reading through some of the outraged comments here, it's obvious that they didn't watch him on TV. He's very unprofessional. I can't even imagine having to tiptoe around him.
Nedsdag
(2,437 posts)There's nothing worse than a sore winner.
How sad.
thesquanderer
(12,162 posts)...he's comic book guy!
reddread
(6,896 posts)But the comic book guy runs a shop in fresno called wonderland.