2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton: Aliens may have visited us already
Can't make this one up.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/264650-clinton-aliens-may-have-visited-us-already
"I think we may have been [visited already]. We don't know for sure," the Democratic presidential front-runner told The Conway Daily Sun during a campaign stop in New Hampshire last week.
Her comment came after being asked about her husband Bill Clinton's comments during an appearance on late-night show "Jimmy Kimmel Live" in 2014, when he suggested that extraterrestrial life could exist.
"I just hope it's not like 'Independence Day,'" said Clinton, referring to the film where aliens attack earth.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)riversedge
(70,204 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)If this were anyone else they'd be ripped apart for it and painted as a tinfoil hat wearing loony. I remember watching one of the Democratic debates in 2008 and the very first question the moderator asked Dennis Kucinich was about his "UFO encounter". He was practically laughed off the stage and not asked another question for the better part of a half an hour.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I hope she gets asked about it during the next debate. First question.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)in just this ultra-deep photograph taken of a quiet region of the night sky. There may be as many as a trillion galaxies (not planets!) in the universe.
I don't think she was just having fun. At least briefly planning, or becoming updated on existing plans for, potential responses to alien contact, and considering the forms that might take, is something all presidential administrations should have on their to-do lists.
Stephen Hawking feels overall we may be very fortunate that we apparently have not been contacted, but that hasn't kept him from supporting efforts to identify extraterrestrial civilizations.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Seeing as space science needs to be a priority for the 21st century, I hope Hillary's "understanding" of the size and scope of the cosmos is better than her apparent grasp of encryption.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)This seems like an awfully weird thing to say so close to the start of the primary.
global1
(25,242 posts)because no politician can be that honest. (tongue in cheek)
AJH032
(1,124 posts)The great mysteries of our existence are beyond human comprehension.
Anansi1171
(793 posts)...are now and forever will be completely alone in all the universe. Now THAT is a human sentiment if ever there was one. Right up there with the Earth being the center of the universe.
Never mind the Drake Equation.
3catwoman3
(23,975 posts)...Men In Black movie, it seemed very possible -
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Anansi1171
(793 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I can't find the energy to be at all concerned about what Hillary may have said on the Jimmy Kimmel show about extraterrestrials.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Kucinich took just for his UFO comment, I can easily imagine what the right wing would do with this.
Kucinich gave off the air of someone who might actually think this was a top priority.
I sorta wish Clinton had suggested that it was a good thing the anti-government militants didn't know the truth about area 51 though. It would be entertaining to see them swarming the area in search of a clue.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Kucinich was mayor of Cleveland when I lived there, and did some good things (saving Muni Light, among others).
I think the air you speak of was more of a consequence of the media's portrait of him, not to mention that he pissed off the right institutions during his tenure there, and while in Congress. Big banks deeply loathed him, which was a big point in his favor. (This was when the era of bank consolidation was only a gleam in Wall Street's eye.)
I phone-banked for him in his congressional run, and was a proud Dad when my daughter interned for him.
As to the Area 51/militants thing (thanks for not calling them "militia" btw), that would have been funny as hell.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)He's a nice person and a good one, but he made a poor impression on me within minutes of meeting him. But this thread isn't about him and it's not my intention to trash him or change your opinion. I'll just say he didn't inspire confidence in me.
bvf
(6,604 posts)My larger point was that the media clearly can destroy anyone it has a problem with.
And consider the media.
Response to HerbChestnut (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Response to HerbChestnut (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)She said they may have.
OP fail.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I just copied the title of the article and used it as my OP title.
demwing
(16,916 posts)What is your point?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)whatthehey
(3,660 posts)After all, panspermia is a reasonable enough although unverified, like all the others, theory of the origin of life.
Just moved the question somewhere else though.
zazen
(2,978 posts)on the subject. It was from 2010, by Leslie Kean (Podesta wrote the Forward). It's a very reasoned, rational book.
I must say, I was really surprised (as an automatic dismisser of these claims until now) that there are lots of very credible witnesses from the Air Force and NASA (not to mention other country's agencies) to something going on. Most of reported cases have obvious natural explanations, but apparently some remaining small percent does raise questions. Whether that's a huge black ops (black budget, as in 8 trillion?) thing where trillions go missing from DOD to work on stealth technology and it's covered up with a huge disinformation campaign . . well, that's entirely possible too. (And angering, since it means there's some non-fuel based energy source in which billions are being invested that would greatly help our planet and economy).
What struck me the most and for the first time when reading Kean's book was how, if as an agency you were charged with absolutely silencing all serious research and conversation about an issue, then you'd make any mention of it an immediate career killer that subjects the person raising the subject to endless ridicule and isolation. If there had been something in the late 40s that someone wanted to cover up, and/or that moved into the private sector, the level of ridicule aimed at a lot of very credible people would be exactly what you'd do to hush them up.
Doesn't mean aliens have visited or not, but if we are truly skeptical (truly scientific), we should keep an open mind. Medieval people would have thought our world was 'magic' and utterly inconceivable. It's entirely possible there's mind-blowing information out there that we find inconceivable that may be plausible.
I hope if Clinton is elected she will follow-through on this. Apparently, past presidents haven't had as much luck. There's an anecdote about Carter trying and being visibly upset after learning something . . . who knows.
vi5
(13,305 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Probably took one look at our planet and got out of dodge.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And that about it.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)It can be followed up by voicing your opinion on the likelihood of that happening, but Hillary admitting there is something she doesn't know is very encouraging to me.
postatomic
(1,771 posts)And promised to investigate the possibility of extraterrestrial life if elected, which he did. Problem was that NASA said there was no scientific basis for investigating it. End of story.
If you get past the wild claims from the bayou, there are definitely some unusual things that have gone on in this world.