2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumElizabeth Warren PRAISES Bernie Sanders' Wall Street Speech
Though she has not yet endorsed a presidential candidate, Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday offered some strong praise for Bernie Sanders. "I'm glad @BernieSanders is out there fighting to hold big banks accountable, make our economy safer, & stop the GOP from rigging the system," she tweeted as part of a series supporting the presidential candidate's proposal, which he announced in a speech the previous day. She invoked her own proposed legislation as an example.
Elizabeth Warren ✔@elizabethforma
11 big banks are still so risky that if any one started to fail, they'd need a gov bailout or risk taking down the economy again.
10:09 AM - 6 Jan 2016
Elizabeth Warren ✔@elizabethforma
But the 2016 Republicans claim they'll repeal all the new financial regulations hoping to be chosen as Wall Street's favorite candidate.
10:09 AM - 6 Jan 2016
Elizabeth Warren ✔@elizabethforma
I'm glad @BernieSanders is out there fighting to hold big banks accountable, make our economy safer, & stop the GOP from rigging the system.
10:10 AM - 6 Jan 2016
Elizabeth Warren ✔@elizabethforma
We need to level the playing field and end too big to fail.
10:10 AM - 6 Jan 2016
In his address, Sanders promised that, as president, he would seek to prosecute Wall Street executives and to tax speculators, as well as to implement what he called a "21st century Glass-Steagall Act" that would restore the boundaries between commercial and investment banking.
For her part, Hillary Clinton has rejected the notion that a Glass-Steagall replacement is a viable solution for preventing future financial calamity, pointing to the fact that the act would not have limited the "reckless behavior" on the part of large "non-traditional" institutions like Lehman Brothers and AIG.
cont'
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-wall-street-217401
thereismore
(13,326 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)the next wave of posts coming...
Mike__M
(1,052 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)questionseverything
(11,836 posts)here is a link to the full text of bernie's speech warren is referring to
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251975996
boobooday
(7,869 posts)And we should give credit to Occupy Wall Street, because they really primed and escalated the discussion about the shenanigans of these giant financial institutions.
I love to see the "unsold" members of the Democratic Party taking a stand!
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and for reinstating Glass Steagall. Both are hallmarks of Bernie's plan that were featured in his speech yesterday.
Clearly, Warren and Bernie are on the same page. Warren is on record saying that the big banks should be broken up.
Hillary does not want to reinstate Glass Steagall or break the behemoth banks, some of which are Hillary's biggest campaign contributors.
DONOR TOTAL
Citigroup Inc---- $824,402
Goldman Sachs---- $760,740
DLA Piper ---- $700,530
JPMorgan Chase---- $696,456
Morgan Stanley---- $636,564
EMILY's List---- $609,684
Time Warner---- $501,831
Skadden, Arps et a---l $469,290
University of CA---- $417,327
Sullivan & Cromwell---- $369,150
Akin, Gump et al---- $364,478
Lehman Brothers---- $362,853
21st Century Fox---- $340,936
Cablevision Systems---- $336,613
Kirkland & Ellis---- $329,141
Natnl Amusements---- $328,312
Squire Patton Boggs $328,306
Greenberg Traurig $327,890
Corning Inc $322,450
Credit Suisse Group $318,120
Credit: Center for Responsive Politics
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Evolving, real fast.
red dog 1
(33,062 posts)Response to Segami (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)From your link:
Whether its attacking the C.F.P.B., undermining new rules to rein in unscrupulous retirement advisers, or rolling back any part of the hard-fought progress weve made on financial reform, she and I agree, Warren wrote.
Warren was the lone holdout among women Democratic senators who publicly endorsed Clinton as a Washington fund-raiser last week. Warren has not said when or if she will endorse anyone.
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #20)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DhhD
(4,695 posts)She knows the difference between Citizen United Insiders and being a representative of the people who vote for you. She and Sanders still remain very responsibility to the people; of the people, by the people and for the people.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)https://www.facebook.com/ElizabethWarren/posts/10153459037888687
Segami
(14,923 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,639 posts)NT
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Yes, I know she is touting her plan as being tougher, etcetera, but as of yet I have not heard WHY she beleives Glass-Steagall should NOT be restored along with her other proposals? Stiglitz beleives Glass-Steagall should be restored, Warren beleives it. What is her real aversion to restoring it?
What damage does she feel restoring Glass-Steagall will cause?
Because simply saying her approach is tougher isn't enough, wouldn't adding Glass-Steagall to her plan make it "even tougher" right?
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)sonofspy777
(360 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)But nobody has provided any justification for not reinstating it at all.
Some dishonestly claim that Sanders believes reinstating GS would "solve all our problems" but even those people know they are lying.
Reinstatement has bipartisan support in Congress. Sanders could get it done, but since Clinton is against it, she couldn't get it done. Remember that when some idiot says "Only Clinton can get things done with this Congress".
Ino
(3,366 posts)For her to advocate restoring Glass-Steagall would be to admit her co-presidency made a huge mistake.
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/economic-intelligence/2012/08/27/repeal-of-glass-steagall-caused-the-financial-crisis
That would present another front open for criticism.
Bill Clinton's biggest mistake, IMO.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)red dog 1
(33,062 posts)I support LGBT rights; but Clinton's repeal of Glass-Steagall had far more serious repercussions to our country & our economy than either "Don't Ask Don't Tell" of "Defense Of Marriage Act"
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)civil rights were imperiled / trampled by Clinton through DADT and DOMA. Did the repercussions of the repeal do the same?
Bottom line: Clinton did a lot of harm and a lot of damage. The fact we are having a serious debate over which was his worst decision, is enough to demonstrate the flaws of his presidency.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)That counts as an endorsement for president, doesn't it?
At the time, plenty at DU seem to think it did,
and paraded around DU under that banner for several embarrassing weeks.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Hillary thinks we need legislation the stop the risky gambling from being risky. She is wrong. Wall Street gambling has always been risky. 1928 and 2008 are examples of it.
And Glass-Steagall never addressed that problem. It addressed the issue of who's money would be used to gamble in the Wall Street. It made depositing in commercial banks less risky than depositing in investment banks of today.
Hillary very clearly shows us that she is not worried about our little deposits but instead is looking out for the big investment banks that use our money to make money for the rich.
She also seems to miss the point that if the big banks continue to exist it will be the little guy (taxpayer) who will get to bail them out at the same time that little taxpayer will be losing his/her shirt without any hope of bailout or protection from FDIC.
I do not know if Hillary is willfully blind to this or if she is just so out of touch that she truly misses it.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I'm glad that ALL the Dem candidates for president @HillaryClinton, @BernieSanders & @MartinOMalley are fighting for Wall St reform.
11:41am - 6 Jan 16
It looks like she is trying hard to not play favorites. I think we should all try to respect that. When she is ready to endorse, she will.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)red dog 1
(33,062 posts)red dog 1
(33,062 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Warren chooses her words carefully and well.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)So, here we have 2x of the 100 Senators in congress saying these great things.
1. Where's the bills?
![]()
2. If there's been bills that have gone through congress, did President Obama use his Veto on them?? If not, exactly what is St. Bernard going to do to get the bills through congress? Hell, if as a SENATOR he couldn't get a bill off and running to do this, what magic power will he have as president to change that?
As usual.. all talk.. no meat.. promises being made that are either lies or proof of just how clueless Bernie is.
If lies are all everyone wants I promise eternal life for everyone! I will bring us world peace! I will end to disease, suffering and hunger! With me as President, there will be a brand new Tesla car in every garage!
My name is Amimnoch and I approve this 'hilarious' message.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)say nice things about other Democrats as well..
Politician, not purist, people!
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)The concept of truth and justice instead of the graft and lies they are accustomed to leaves them grasping at straws.
Historic NY
(40,037 posts)playing two sides of street can get one burned.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren delivered influential support Monday for Hillary Clinton's proposal to expand regulation of the banking and financial services industries.
Warren said she welcomes Clintons warning that Republicans are trying to use the current government spending bill to weaken regulations. The liberal Massachusetts Democrat has declined to endorse anyone in the Democratic presidential primary so far.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/12/07/elizabeth-warren-praises-hillary-clintons-wall-street-plan/
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)that it was just Bernie to begin with,then she "got a call" and then included Martin and Hillary.