HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Oh boy! Juanita Broaddri...

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:10 PM

 

Oh boy! Juanita Broaddrick is back! Says the rape "never goes away"

She says Hillary tried to silence her.


Broaddrick allegation that Bill Clinton raped her emerged at the time of congressional impeachment proceedings over his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Broaddrick has also said that Hillary Clinton approached her some time after the alleged assault and attempted to thank her for her support in what Broaddrick took as appreciation for her silence about the attack.

Through his lawyers, Clinton has repeatedly denied the allegations.

Broaddrick’s tweet comes a month before the Iowa caucus, and days after Bill has gone on the 2016 trail to stump for his wife’s presidential campaign. Hillary Clinton was loudly heckled at a Sunday campaign event about


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/juanita-broaddrick-twitter-bill-clinton

Many liberal feminists including Maureen Dowd and Gloria Alred supported women like Jones and Broaddrick and will again.

Maybe people who are concerned about Bernie's socialism should switch to O'Malley because it is obvious the Clinton impeachment machine is coming back. Paula Jones made a recent appearance on CNN.

68 replies, 6403 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 68 replies Author Time Post
Reply Oh boy! Juanita Broaddrick is back! Says the rape "never goes away" (Original post)
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 OP
MelungeonWoman Jan 2016 #1
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #5
riversedge Jan 2016 #11
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #15
riversedge Jan 2016 #16
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #19
StrongBad Jan 2016 #34
EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #14
brush Jan 2016 #38
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #39
arely staircase Jan 2016 #68
NCTraveler Jan 2016 #2
JoePhilly Jan 2016 #3
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #4
NCTraveler Jan 2016 #7
riversedge Jan 2016 #13
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #17
jmowreader Jan 2016 #66
MineralMan Jan 2016 #6
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #10
baldguy Jan 2016 #63
bluestateguy Jan 2016 #8
comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #44
Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #9
99Forever Jan 2016 #20
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #21
emulatorloo Jan 2016 #52
emulatorloo Jan 2016 #53
NurseJackie Jan 2016 #12
Alfresco Jan 2016 #18
brooklynite Jan 2016 #22
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #23
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #24
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #27
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #32
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #33
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #35
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #36
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #37
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #40
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #41
comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #45
MoonRiver Jan 2016 #47
leftofcool Jan 2016 #42
azmom Jan 2016 #26
beaglelover Jan 2016 #25
2naSalit Jan 2016 #28
Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #29
betterdemsonly Jan 2016 #30
leftofcool Jan 2016 #43
Robbins Jan 2016 #31
comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #46
Robbins Jan 2016 #50
comradebillyboy Jan 2016 #51
Robbins Jan 2016 #54
Tarc Jan 2016 #48
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #58
ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #61
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #62
ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #64
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #65
Post removed Jan 2016 #49
Historic NY Jan 2016 #55
ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #56
okasha Jan 2016 #59
ronnykmarshall Jan 2016 #60
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #57
arely staircase Jan 2016 #67

Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:13 PM

1. Didn't this trash get a hide yesterday?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MelungeonWoman (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:18 PM

5. It doesn't come from a right wing source.

 

so unfortunately you can't censor it.

I would add, the centrist dems, like TPM were not supportive of Clintons during the scandals, so the beat down you give us liberals is unfair.

The truth is the Clintons have demonized the only people who stood by them, and they lost friends.

You hate moveon, but moveon were formed specifically to defend the Clintons. They are called moveon because they wanted to moveon from impeachment to deal with issues the public cares about. The Clintons made enemies of moveon by consistently siding with their haters. Joe Lieberman voted to impeach Bill. The Observer were Clinton defenders too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:33 PM

11. Does not matter. It is smearing a good Democrat and should not be on DU

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #11)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:36 PM

15. It is doing no such thing

 

it is just reporting on the fact that his accusers are back. You can believe them or not believe them. Should we have censored the existence of the Benghazi hearings?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #15)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:37 PM

16. you sould like a faux news host with that comment

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #16)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:40 PM

19. That is your opinion.

 

you imagine lots of things.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #11)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:40 PM

34. Stop contributing to rape culture by dismissing this woman.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:35 PM

14. Best of luck

I tried posting this yesterday but the censors got their way - even though there was basically a rational and reasonable discussion about the potential implications being had.

But you know - some people feel threatened if anything from outside their echo chamber slip through.

I still think it's worth discussing - the political implications, what Trump might try and do, how Hillary might respond, will Bill have to limit his campaign exposure, etc. - but be prepared to be attacked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:17 PM

38. Wonder who dug her up and how much they paid her?

I'm a Bernie supporter and I'm saying take this down.

This site is to help get dems elected not to try smearing Hillary by smearing her husband.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brush (Reply #38)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:35 PM

39. The site that published it is a dem site too

 

You aren't helping Clinton or her people by censoring the news. Clinton people need to know what they are in for. Just because it is democratic site, doesn't mean we shouldn't report on what the other side is doing. Why do we always post the latest statement by Trump?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 04:54 AM

68. Lieberman didn't vote to convict Clinton.

he gave a shitty speech about being disappointed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:13 PM

2. Let the impeachment trial begin on day one.

 

Right wing extremists are the only ones who haven't figured out how much these attacks help Hillary. Her popularity will go through the roof while theirs sinks even further. Huge win in political capital to push our agenda through. Bring it on nutty ass right wingers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:15 PM

3. + 1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:17 PM

4. There are limits though. The Clintons didn't accomplish much because of this

 

Why not avoid it altogether with candidates that don't have baggage? Why not just nominate someone who can focus on something besides scandal hearings?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #4)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:22 PM

7. huh?

 

"The Clintons didn't accomplish much because of this"



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #4)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:34 PM

13. Stop posting it and or agreeing with these smears.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #13)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:38 PM

17. I never agreed to the smears. I just posted a news item.

 

This news was posted on another democratic blog. A blog that is otherwise philosophically sympathetic to Clinton centrism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 03:56 AM

66. The politician that doesn't have any baggage doesn't exist

Give the GOP scandalmongers a week and they'll have enough baggage on any Democratic candidate, they may as well get "Samsonite" tattooed on their forehead.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:21 PM

6. Why post this garbage here?

If you even try a little, you can find all sorts of right-wing arguments against the Clintons. There are millions of search results on any of them you can name. Give it a break, please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MineralMan (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:29 PM

10. Talking Points Memo is a Third Way/Centrist blog

 

They aren't censoring it. Though it is a reminder that during the impeachment hearing, the DLC/New Democrats supported impeachment. Yeah, the Clinton's own wing of the party supported impeachment while liberals like Moveon, Observer writers like Conason and Tomasky rallied around them. Joe Lieberman was awful. Then the Clintons backed Joe Lieberman all the way in the march to the Iraq War. Moveon realized they supported people who weren't going to return the favor, and all is history. That is why they support Bernie now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MineralMan (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 10:58 PM

63. Because the Berniestas need a meanns to use the VRWC's resources to attack Clinton.

 

Countdown to Vince Foster in 3.... 2.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:23 PM

8. Maybe she can start carrying a mattress around to make a statement

Ken Starr even found her to be lacking in credibility.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bluestateguy (Reply #8)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:57 PM

44. If Ken Starr couldn't make anything out of her

multiple conflicting statements I don't think Bernie's partisans will have much success smearing Bill 20 years later with these old discredited allegations. Maybe they would do better with the Vince Foster rumors.Starr investigated that as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:23 PM

9. Calling Maureen Dowd a feminist is science-fiction.

Last edited Thu Jan 7, 2016, 08:45 PM - Edit history (1)

As in, alternate reality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #9)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:40 PM

20. Under the bus Maureen.

You always hated The Big Dog.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 99Forever (Reply #20)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:43 PM

21. Don't you have to ask yourself why the NYTimes promotes Hillary but also

 

maintains so many who believed Bill's accusers? What kind of setup do they have in mind?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #21)


Response to 99Forever (Reply #20)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:47 PM

53. Two words: "earth tones"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:33 PM

12. Try this ...


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:39 PM

18. You can tell who the worried ones are by the increase in trump-styled attacks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 03:53 PM

22. If I were you, I wouldn't vote for Bill Clinton again

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #22)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:00 PM

23. Did Hillary divorce Bill. Is Bill not campaigning for her? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #23)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:05 PM

24. And?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #24)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:14 PM

27. If these scandals are brought back into focus she can't distance herself

 

She is married to the accused.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #27)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:38 PM

32. Every time Repubs have tried to tie her to Bill's activities she goes up in the polls.

That will happen again. Count on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #32)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:40 PM

33. That was back when Bill was President

 

We can choose a different candidate now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #33)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:41 PM

35. It's going to be Hillary,

Count on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #35)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:45 PM

36. I am choosing Bernie

 

for a number of reasons. This one included. Your not psychic, and your judgement on electability is not infallible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #36)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:10 PM

37. Just going by the data.

And no this isn't 2008 all over again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #37)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:39 PM

40. No this isn't 2008 all over again

 

it is worse because she has doubled down on neocon foreign policy positions, and doubled down on her corporatism, by bailing out wallstreet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #40)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:42 PM

41. Wow I didn't realize Hillary was president all these years!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MoonRiver (Reply #41)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 06:04 PM

45. Didn't you know that George W Bush was Hillary's puppet all

those years, and she just let Dick Cheney take the rap for being the puppet master? She is also responsible for every action by Barack Obama that lefties don't like as well. She probably was involved in the Tea Pot Dome scandal to boot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to comradebillyboy (Reply #45)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 06:18 PM

47. Drat! I'm just so unobservant! Wonder how much else I missed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #27)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:43 PM

42. Oh FFS!

Let me break this to you gently. Bill Clinton has an approval rating of over 65%. No one and I mean no one except Republicans care about this type of trash. But you keep trying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #23)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:08 PM

26. He sure is. It's pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brooklynite (Reply #22)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:07 PM

25. Exactly! And the fact that Hillary did NOT divorce Bill is a good sign of her character IMO. She

takes her marriage vows very seriously and I like that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:18 PM

28. Wonder if

her savings account got fatter recently.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:22 PM

29. I totally support critiquing Secretary Clinton's position on issues

There is no need for this kind of poison that was largely a creation of hate radio and the Star Commission.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Douglas Carpenter (Reply #29)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:28 PM

30. Republicans still run in elections

 

and they feel they get traction. That does affect her electabilty. Not my fault. Many of the mostly liberal wing of the party that supported her can't be counted on to support the Clintons this time because of the bridges they burnt, during the Iraq era and since then with their neocon foreign policy and prowallstreet views. The centrists wing went along with the republicans on impeachment. That is just a fact.

She is inheriting Obama's campaign team and most were too young at the time to remember this stuff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Reply #30)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 05:44 PM

43. Horse shit!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 04:34 PM

31. well

I am sure paula Jones was part of right wing attack job.

I am unsure of truth of Juanita broaddrick's rape story but it should be addressed.it was kind of dismissed after impeachment.

broaddrick claimed hillary Clinton worked on trying to silence her.that is valid issue.

I am not going to go back to defending him as i once did.

and rape is very serious issue.if they have someone that can disprove her claims go ahead and present it.

if you want to move past clinton issues vote for bernie or even O'Malley.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robbins (Reply #31)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 06:11 PM

46. It got vast attention during the impeachment

fiasco. There was nothing but wall to wall coverage of this shit by Ken Starr. It's sad to see Bernie's partisans resurrecting the discredited smears of the right from the 90s. Bill Clinton's sex life was the main topic of cable news for about four years, but I suppose you were hiding under a rock during that era.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to comradebillyboy (Reply #46)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:40 PM

50. jesus christ

trump brought it up first and now she is talking.

after clinton wasn't removed it went away except for interview she gave which i didn't watch.

You clinton supporters will do anything to smear bernie and his supporters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Robbins (Reply #50)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:43 PM

51. And you Bernie supporters are pushing Trump's smears

You Bernie supporters smear yourselves by re-posting this discredited slime while pretending concern.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to comradebillyboy (Reply #51)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 07:55 PM

54. In case your forgetting

there are photos of clintons all smiles with trump.so they are all similar.

she said she was raped and spoke out again.rape is serious charge.and shouldn't be sweep under rug.

I am not going to defend bill clinton anymore.i did that too much in 1990's and he screwed over all the dems who supported him for his wall street cronies.

i find it rich clinton and her supporters attacking us when you tried to smear bernie and his supporters as sexiest,anti-women,and racist and she talked like a republican to attack bernie's ehalth care plan and attack him like republican on taxes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 06:48 PM

48. TPM?

What next, Jerome Corsi and Glenn Beck for sources?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #48)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 09:31 PM

58. TPM is right wing?

Yeah, sort of like how Debbie Wasserman Schultz's commitment to incarcerating medical marijuana patients is "progressive"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #58)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 10:40 PM

61. Fuck that shit ...

DU .... I mean BU is a cesspool of right wing smears attacking Hillary that the "fair" jury lets stand.

This place sucks ass

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ronnykmarshall (Reply #61)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 10:56 PM

62. I think that people are kidding themselves if they didnt realize this sort of crap would resurface.

I agree it's crap, but ... that doesnt mean it isnt going to come up.

(i mean, fuck, the stuff that was said here about Bernie sanders over some essay he wrote in an alterna-weekly in 1973... "Well, he should know it's going to be a legitimate issue, herp derp"


It shouldnt have any bearing on HRC or her campaign, but she's a super intelligent person so she should think far enough ahead to realize that when she puts out a sound bite that "women should be believed", given the history of the anti-BC smear jobs in the 90s it will be turned and used against her. i mean, come on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #62)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:14 PM

64. Of course this shit is going to come up

But what kills me is that on DU, we have Bernie supporters spewing this shit. I don't give a flying rats ass about Bernie's essay nor do I give a fuck about Hillary being a Goldwater girl in 1964. BUT, there has been this festering stank from DU members spewing this right wing shit from the 90's over and over.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ronnykmarshall (Reply #64)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:58 AM

65. Well the only relevant aspect of the conversation, to my mind, is the part i mentioned.

beyond that I feel no need to keep kicking the thread.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 08:43 PM

55. Salon has a wonderful story about her and the allegations from 1999.

pretty interesting,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 09:23 PM

56. Wow digging up this lying sack of shit?

How Fox News of you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ronnykmarshall (Reply #56)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 09:39 PM

59. This is a sorry miss-by-a-mile

attempt to neutralize the Planned Parenthood endorsement.

Clumsy, to say the least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to okasha (Reply #59)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 10:36 PM

60. and the same shit is coming from the Trump people.

And DU ..... I mean BU allows this bullshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Thu Jan 7, 2016, 09:29 PM

57. Predictable, sadly. This has no bearing on Hillary or her campaign, of course.

The only thing I would say- and I hestiate to mention it, but it seems patently obvious- is that given the history with this sort of shit, HRC would probably be better off finding different ways of raising the issue of sexual assault than through sound bites like "women should be believed".

There are other ways to say the same thing that dont leave such an obvious door open for this crap. She should be thinking one or two moves ahead, if she is really the skilled politician her supporters claim.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betterdemsonly (Original post)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 04:51 AM

67. Yeah. All that shit worked so well for them last time

they lost two house speakers in about as many days and Clinton's popularity rose as quickly as the GOP's plummetted. They actually lost congressional seats during the mid term of the opposing party's second term, almost unheard of - that level of fail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread