Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:21 PM Jan 2016

So the Media thinks Bernie and Hillary are neck and neck in Iowa and New Hampshire now huh?

Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Here's an open letter to the media.

Dear Media,

You had a close race when Bernie entered the race months ago.

You had an edge of your seat fight, in the beginning, just when you kept ignoring it and waiting for Biden to jump in.

Neck and neck? We're already past that. We've BEEN past that.

Bernie's been in the lead for months. Twisting your polls and ignoring that doesn't make it fact.

So while we're happy you're finally admitting to yourself that you have to take Bernie seriously, we can't really pat you on the back for being so slow to catch up.

So, you can act surprised when Bernie takes Iowa and New Hampshire, and I'm sure a lot of other people who trusted you as their only source will be surprised as well.

But yeah. Try to keep up. We know what you're doing.

Sincerely,
The People.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the Media thinks Bernie and Hillary are neck and neck in Iowa and New Hampshire now huh? (Original Post) retrowire Jan 2016 OP
So frustrating. Liberal Jesus Freak Jan 2016 #1
I think a lot of people are going to be surprised over the next few months. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #2
Very well could be, and do you know what is the most important part of it all? randys1 Jan 2016 #3
i think i have an idea what you are talking about restorefreedom Jan 2016 #9
The grave dancing will be minimal on the part of Bernie supporters Android3.14 Jan 2016 #18
And maybe DU can become a liberal site again as stated in the About section. A Simple Game Jan 2016 #23
I have a hunch Old Codger Jan 2016 #32
TRUTH. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #4
And That, I will enjoy seeing!! Duval Jan 2016 #26
Bernie WILL SmittynMo Jan 2016 #5
Yep Robbins Jan 2016 #6
Ironically, in Iowa and New Hampshire, having a reasonable gun policy will be Fawke Em Jan 2016 #11
The clinton playbook Robbins Jan 2016 #14
Now she is all about gun control. A Simple Game Jan 2016 #29
Me too! in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #7
It is exciting!! nt artislife Jan 2016 #13
While that would be great.... vi5 Jan 2016 #16
What will be equally ugly will be her supporters. SheilaT Jan 2016 #31
Oh I remember them... RoccoR5955 Jan 2016 #34
As I recall, they proudly wore that SheilaT Jan 2016 #35
I'm fine at this point with them lowering expectations just as much as they want to Fumesucker Jan 2016 #8
Good letter. But, FWIW, the phrase is "neck AND neck". kath Jan 2016 #10
Thanks. It was driving me a bit crazy. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #27
Oh, I thought it was like turducken... ybbor Jan 2016 #30
Excellent OP! Punkingal Jan 2016 #12
What is the saying about revenge artislife Jan 2016 #15
And I think you're correct.. mountain grammy Jan 2016 #17
Right on! Moral Compass Jan 2016 #19
It amazes me that people here are so convinced that the polls are being skewed. mythology Jan 2016 #20
Weird. Polls are exactly what is showing the race tightening Android3.14 Jan 2016 #24
Missology Plucketeer Jan 2016 #28
Well we already know the polls that only count people who voted in a previous primary are skewed. Kentonio Jan 2016 #36
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #21
It's always "neck and neck". Helen Borg Jan 2016 #22
K&R! We know exactly what they're doing! Duval Jan 2016 #25
What a difference a week makes, eh? Oilwellian Jan 2016 #33

randys1

(16,286 posts)
3. Very well could be, and do you know what is the most important part of it all?
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jan 2016

How the WINNERS handle it.

I could explain what this means, but right now it will be lost on many here.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
9. i think i have an idea what you are talking about
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jan 2016

but when you are ready to elaborate, i would be interested to hear it

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
18. The grave dancing will be minimal on the part of Bernie supporters
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:04 PM
Jan 2016

They have shown extraordinary reserve in the face of a well-funded, malicious, unethical, misleading and vindictive assault from the Clinton camp, and I expect the Sanders camp will continue to behave that way. Further, if Hillary wins, I'd wager at least a third of her supporters on DU disappear as the funds dry up. If Bernie loses, I suspect the number of long-term AFK (away from keyboard) users is a much smaller figure.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
23. And maybe DU can become a liberal site again as stated in the About section.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:11 PM
Jan 2016

There are just way too many conservatives here to feel comfortable.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
32. I have a hunch
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 05:28 PM
Jan 2016

That the largest percentage of us will not be assholes about it, have to wait and see how the losers handle it though

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
4. TRUTH.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jan 2016

Long ago abandoned by our corrupt corporate owned MSM.

99% > 1% and that reality is about to smack them upside the head!

PEACE ✌
LOVE ❤
BERNIE

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)
5. Bernie WILL
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016

take IA and NH. Immediately afterwards, the shit will hit the fan.

I look forward to this immensely.

That is all.....

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
6. Yep
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jan 2016

it's going to get ugly very soon.it's why clinton is back trying to declare bernie gunnut.

after he wins iowa and NH he has a shot at nevada.that's going to get ugly after clinton losses In Iowa and NH.

while clinton probally takes SC it may be a lot closer than some thought.

I look forward to seeing it all.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
11. Ironically, in Iowa and New Hampshire, having a reasonable gun policy will be
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jan 2016

seen as a plus - not as "gun-nuttery."

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
14. The clinton playbook
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jan 2016

is to portray bernie as gunlover and to take votes out of context to say he is lover of guns.Of course it doesn't match the record
of man who has a d- rating from NRA and who NRA has said to members in vermont in past don't vote for bernie sanders.

I feel bernie not wanting people who legaly sell guns not to be sued when people who buy them go crazy or commit crimes makes
him sound reasonable.

The attacks would work better if she hadn't run as pro-gun candiate in 2008 attacking obama when video leaked of him saying some
upset with how things are cling to guns and relgion.of course now she is all about gun control

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
29. Now she is all about gun control.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jan 2016

That is unless she get to the general election in which case she will be less about gun control and thumb her nose at the control advocates foolish enough to believe anything she says.

She just can't grasp the idea that there is no reason to court the Republican voters, they will never vote for her.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
16. While that would be great....
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

I really don't want to see how ugly this race gets once Clinton sees another nomination potentially slipping through her fingers. Her camps handling of Obama's initial surge in 2008 is what made me turn the corner from just being "not a big fan" of hers to realizing just how dangerous she is to the Democratic party and it's future.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
34. Oh I remember them...
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

They never went away, they just resurfaced this election cycle. But don't ever call them PUMAs, they will have a fit from here to eternity!

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
35. As I recall, they proudly wore that
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jan 2016

name back in '08. Sincerely did not give a shit that continuing to run when it was clear Barack was going to get the nomination, not caring at all if they continued to divide the party to the point that it would not win in '08. Hillary supporters.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
8. I'm fine at this point with them lowering expectations just as much as they want to
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jan 2016

Bless their shriveled little hearts.

ybbor

(1,555 posts)
30. Oh, I thought it was like turducken...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jan 2016

You know a neck shoved inside another neck. I mean, come on, that's REALLY close!

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
12. Excellent OP!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:52 PM
Jan 2016

I almost wish they hadn't woken up lately. I could relish them looking like fools in Iowa when he wins.

mountain grammy

(26,648 posts)
17. And I think you're correct..
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jan 2016

But,hell, don't tell everyone. The surprise will be wonderful... Kind of like when Eugene McCarthy almost won New Hampshire in 68. Surprise! We really were against the war and many of us are still here.

Moral Compass

(1,525 posts)
19. Right on!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:08 PM
Jan 2016

I've had the sense that nothing is as it seems for months now. The narrative Hillary was to be the heir apparent was set up years ago. First we had a black President. And then we would have our first woman President. It was to be this seamless transition as we marched into a progressive paradise.

But, but....

Some of us have been rudely paying attention to Ms. Clinton's actual policy positions and when offered the alternative of a real progressive found that option much more appealing.

I eagerly await the primaries. I think the nation is going to be shocked at the divergence from the pre-ordained narrative the MSM has been pushing.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
20. It amazes me that people here are so convinced that the polls are being skewed.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jan 2016

Stating that Sanders is ahead without any sort of facts to back it up other than some alleged confederacy of dunces against him, isn't actually supporting your deeply held belief.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
24. Weird. Polls are exactly what is showing the race tightening
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jan 2016

Polls, as our friends in Canada learned, are also oddly useless in this modern age.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
28. Missology
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jan 2016

will be a book Clinton writes after Missing the mark in the primaries. Don't feel bad for her tho. The book will help keep her in the 1% lifestyle she's accustomed to.

Edit to add: Twelve bucks should be the price of her book. Fifteen - or more - would be too much.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
36. Well we already know the polls that only count people who voted in a previous primary are skewed.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 02:23 PM
Jan 2016

As they immediately ignore anyone under the age of 26.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So the Media thinks Berni...