Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI hope that O'Malley will be in the next debate
Yes, his numbers are below the "threshold" - whatever it is. But in contrast to the clowns car, we have only three candidates so why not let all three of them debate?
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I hope that O'Malley will be in the next debate (Original Post)
question everything
Jan 2016
OP
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)1. Absolutely!
There is no reason he shouldn't be there. Lessig should have been included in earlier debates.
I don't like how the debates are being run on both sides.
Funtatlaguy
(11,872 posts)2. Gotta disagree.
I respectfully disagree.
I really like MOM.
However, I think there should be a debate threshold for debate inclusion.
Especially this close to Iowa.
FSogol
(47,543 posts)4. Ham and Cheese!
FSogol
(47,543 posts)3. He will be. His level of support exceeds the threshold set by the party.
unlike the GOP, the media doesn't have a say in who appears.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)5. More fair to go by IQ, which would
handily ensure all three of our candidates a place on the debate stage.
And it would extinguish the Republican debates altogether.
