Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 09:30 PM Jul 2013

New Snowden leak upstages U.S. move to declassify documents (XKeyscore program = warrantless)

Last edited Thu Aug 1, 2013, 06:01 AM - Edit history (1)

http://news.yahoo.com/u-declassify-documents-spy-programs-surveillance-court-033021541.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New revelations from former security contractor Edward Snowden that U.S. intelligence agencies have access to a vast online tracking tool came to light on Wednesday, as lawmakers put the secret surveillance programs under greater scrutiny.

The Guardian, citing documents from Snowden, published National Security Agency training materials for the XKeyscore program, which the British newspaper described as the NSA's widest-reaching system that covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet."

Intelligence analysts can conduct surveillance through XKeyscore by filling in an on-screen form giving only a "broad justification" for the search and no review by a court or NSA staff, the newspaper said.

(More at the link. Note "no review by a court" = warrantless.)
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Snowden leak upstages U.S. move to declassify documents (XKeyscore program = warrantless) (Original Post) Fire Walk With Me Jul 2013 OP
They would probably argue this is not a "search" BlueStreak Jul 2013 #1
We are still (theoretically) protected against arbitrary searches in public spaces Demeter Aug 2013 #2
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
1. They would probably argue this is not a "search"
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jul 2013

They would argue you are in a public space and there is nothing wrong with them noting what you are doing in that public space.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
2. We are still (theoretically) protected against arbitrary searches in public spaces
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 12:04 AM
Aug 2013

There isn't any way this stuff they do is Constitutional. Just because some kangaroo court says it's okay doesn't make it so.

There's something about the Consent of the Governed....and we do not consent! We weren't even asked.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»New Snowden leak upstages...