Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

eridani

(51,907 posts) Mon Dec 10, 2012, 09:48 AM Dec 2012

A bit of navelgazing FYI

Total number of posts since DU3 started until 12/10/12

LGBT 22,803
History of Feminism 13,828
Feminists 9,429
Men's Group 5,872
Women's Rights & Issues 2,101
Feminisism and Diversity 720
LGBT Civil Rights and Activism 691
Women's World 56

IMO the last two are superfluous.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A bit of navelgazing FYI (Original Post) eridani Dec 2012 OP

That's kinda interesting ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #1

Keep in mind some of these groups are newer than others, so their cumulative counts reflect that... hlthe2b Dec 2012 #2

I've never seen the Woman's World forum until just now. sufrommich Dec 2012 #3

ismnotwasm

(41,984 posts)

1. That's kinda interesting

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Mon Dec 10, 2012, 03:20 PM

Dec 2012

I didn't know 'woman's world' was still around. Didn't look I guess

hlthe2b

(102,282 posts)

2. Keep in mind some of these groups are newer than others, so their cumulative counts reflect that...

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:36 PM

Dec 2012

For instance, I'm fairly certain that LGBT was formed on DU3 from inception, while we (HOF) have only been in existence since March 28, 2012...

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)

3. I've never seen the Woman's World forum until just now.

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Mon Dec 10, 2012, 04:54 PM

Dec 2012

It looks like they meant it to be a sort of Women's Room where the topic didn't necessarily have to be about feminist issues. It sounds like it could have been a good idea.

Reply to this discussion