What I Learned From Gay Sex: Misogyny and Homophobia

[redqueen]

...

Eventually surpassing the typical "what did I do wrong?" stage of self-hatred, I asked myself, "What does it mean that Peter called me faggy for expressing pleasure?" And so I learned that people like Peter are part of a larger problem: pervasive misogyny.

Typically we say that "fag," "sissy," "nancy," "nelly" and "fairy" are homophobic words, and although they certainly are used to perpetuate homophobia, they are not homophobic in and of themselves; the usage of any of these words as slurs usually targets people with male-sexed bodies who do not act sufficiently masculine. They prize masculinity by demonizing femininity. This is probably rooted in some outdated, essentialist reading of gender where women are biologically the weaker, pathetic sex, but we know today that in addition to being totally offensive, gender essentialism is more or less bullshit, because women can vote and work and beat men into submission, and men can cook and clean and stay at home with the kids. But although it was relatively easy to deconstruct the misogyny in Peter's abuse, getting to the root of why a man, while lying naked with another man and kissing him, would call that man's expression of pleasure too gay is a more complicated subject. I would suggest that Peter calling me faggy is part of a larger queer cultural heritage.

Queer people live in a constant narrative of struggle; today we struggle for legally recognized marriage, and in 2003 we struggled for the right to have consensual sex, but 60 years ago queer role models fought for the right to exist in public or private. To gain those rights, they used an effective strategy called assimilation, which dictated that queer people look and act as much as possible like straight people. The Mattachine Society and the Daughters of Bilitis both did it intentionally in the '50s, and it was probably the most aggressive option to say "we are normal, just like you" at a time when police were encouraged to raid gay bars, arrest patrons and publish their names and faces in the newspaper the following day. However, "just like you" literally bleached queer people of color from the movement and rendered trans people invisible, because "just like you" referred to white men in power and their wives who had the sway to validate any queer identity legally. Assimilation was successful in that discrimination against LGBT people is now illegal in many forms, but it also created an "acceptable gay man," and he was white and masculine and certainly did not say "darling." It also created and validated a favorite excuse for anti-gay bigotry, "I'm fine with gay people as long as they don't flaunt it," because suddenly there were gay people who were not "normal." "Normal" gay men today ape that heterosexual excuse for bigotry by blaming "abnormal" gays for the the maltreatment of gays as a whole.

Peter is a "normal" gay man, so when my behavior started to drift outside "normal," he reprimanded me much in the same way that police officers, gym teachers or parents might have done in the '50s (and today, to be fair). And although the '50s were over 60 years ago, that attitude remains pervasive: Look at any on gay dating website or smartphone app and you'll see our twisted heritage as "preferences" based on a hierarchy of who can pass as a successful straight man: "Looking for masc, musc, no femmes, white only." Though the irony that none of us is straight does not escape me, I'd like to focus more on how regressive this is; we are literally contributing to our own oppression by upholding this bizarre heritage of misogyny created in the '50s.

...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/simon-moritz/what-i-learned-from-gay-sex-misogyny-and-homophobia_b_3092418.html

Good to see this being called out more often lately.

[hedgehog]

1. It reminds me of the racism that exists among some people of color -

lighter skin and straighter hair is preferred.

[redqueen]

2. Oh yeah, colorism. That's what I've seen it called.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12558900

Also http://madamenoire.com/198705/lost-in-time-eric-benet-says-criticism-of-redbone-song-is-its-own-form-of-racism/

[msongs]

3. political correctness run amok ?

we all have people to whom we are attracted or not attracted. however it is in our own best interests not to denigrate those to whom we are not attracted, a simple "not interested, thanks" is sufficient response. Each of us has an interest in telling our partners what we like or do not like, as our partners have an interest in telling us the same. That is the only way to find a compatible partner. Suffering in silence is not really a good option. Know what you like and go for it rather than making a mistake and wishing it wasn't so.

[redqueen]

4. Wow.

This is actually about a lot more meaningful things than which characteristics one prefers in a boinking partner.

As for "political correctness run amok" ... I'll just say I wish I was surprised to see that phrase used on DU in response to an article about not using homophobic / misogynist insults. I know you were focused like a laser on his critiquing of superficial sexual preferences but that is obviously not the point, so your decision to focus on it alone... well...

[ismnotwasm]

5. I don't understand: explain please

The author was explaining his opinion of a type of toxic rejection, not rejection itself.



Of course we all have preferences, that goes without saying.