History of Feminism
Related: About this forum"Yes means maybe, and maybe means no"
I love the way this woman spells it all out. I have to quote her again.
http://radtransfem.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/under-duress-agency-power-and-consent-part-two-yes/
Radical (and some other) feminists identify a ubiquitous pressure against womens consent which is part of and partially created by rape culture. In an interview discussing her book, Are Women Human?: And Other International Dialogues, Catharine MacKinnon described it as follows:
The (sexist) assumption is that women can be unequal to men economically, socially, culturally, politically, and in religion, but the moment they have sexual interactions, they are free and equal. Thats the assumption and I think it ought to be thought about, and in particular what consent then means My view is that when there is force or substantially coercive circumstances between the parties, individual consent is beside the point.
Radical feminists argue that the concept of a straightforward yes is unique to those groups who dont experience pressure on their consent. A yes under pressure cant be unequivocally understood as yes because it may mean maybe or indeed no. The act of a man taking a womans yes as a yes is an act which directly denies conditions of sex inequality between men and women under patriarchy.
Properly, the radical feminist understanding of consent cant be summed-up as an x means y statement. When under duress, theres no such thing as a simple yes or no; the very idea of a statement meaning one of those things becomes questionable when an answer may have as much (or more) to do with the power factors at play than with what a person really wants to communicate.
...
Someday many more people will catch up with her, and we won't have to struggle to be heard on issues of consent. We seem to be a long, long way away from that at the moment, though.
BainsBane
(57,772 posts)men have to be insistent to make sure we submit. That's what "prominent feminists" from the last century insist. So it must be true.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)Seriously, how does scum like that sleep at night?

ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)You know in Stephan Kings book "It" he actually implies an analogy between his monster and references to sex and sexual acts as 'it'?
I don't know whether he meant it like that or not, but I ponder that sometimes when I think of sexist inequities;
'It'--an impersonal act that somehow men can rationalize into a right.
There are other words of separation from the personal and intimate of course, 'some' being one. "Hit" another and so on.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)that scene always freaked me out.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)In the book, he describes that sex as an exchange of power, with no shame or coercion, ignoring the basic and embedded gender inequity, probably because the ARE kids. It's a clumsy scene, however well-intentioned; the last sexual power she feels is her first, pre-pubescent hetero, multi-partner experience as Bev goes on to marry an incredibly abusive asshole.
King is not a feminist author by a long shot but he has some interesting insights.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)their "way with women". They sleep too well at night, imo.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)I'm sure a few do. Hopefully not only after they have a daughter themselves whose feelings they're pretty much forced to consider.
BainsBane
(57,772 posts)better criminal prosecution is the answer.
redqueen
(115,186 posts)At least this law has probably been changed by now.
http://jezebel.com/5973087/california-court-declares-that-its-not-rape-if-the-sleeping-women-isnt-married
As we have seen, though, girls can be gang raped and have the case thrown out by the police... so we have a long, long, long way to go before enforcement comes anywhere near being much help at all.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)We can dream, can't we?
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)But of course some will twist this into "All sex is rape!" or equivalent nonsense...