History of Feminism
Related: About this forumMore creepy technology: "Female" Airport Avatars
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has installed in Newark Liberty, JFK, and LaGuardia airports an interactive avatar projected onto a plexiglass silhouette of a woman's body. Lost and disoriented travelers can ask her for help with things like getting to the correct gate, security checkpoint rules, and duty-free shopping.
And all of this is fine and dandyand I'm not saying this is necessarily a bad thingbut why is she so goddamn flirtatious?
Even without her come hither facial expressions, the dialog alone is absurd:
"I'm so versatile, I could be used for just about anything."
Really? ANYthing?
More at link: Flirtateous NYC Airport Avatar
From the Yahoo article "New York City airports install new, expensive holograms to help you find your way":
More at link: NYC airports install...
There's video at the links, too.
Ugh.
Just what I want to do when I am stranded/lost at JFK... try to make a stupid sexygirl computer understand my questions. (As if I am not already pissed off enough just being in JFK.)
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that is to the point of sex. here, visualizing me letting your do whatever you want....
no one thought this might be a bad idea, that women may not enjoy looking at this thing. or do they simply not care
and the answer would be. men no longer care because there are enough women to shrug their shoulders and say.... so what.
didnt get to the second article yet. do i really want to read it? lol
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)sexual harassment and assault.
the land of open and free sexuality..... for the men. a nation greater in patriarchy than the u.s. probably ever was.
no fuckin wonder.
i hope every woman complains.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Is this all we are? Or is this all they want us to be? Or is this what we want to be?
Ya know the older I get, this may sound silly, but I'm glad that I am slowly becoming invisible.
Anybody understand what I'm trying to say?
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)I was telling my BF how I made a conscious decision years back to make myself as visually neutral and invisible as possible because I was so sick of it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)my sexuality is ALL about me. thank you. i find it works much better and i get much more out of it, that way.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)rheotorical i think you would call it.
answered anyway.
maybe i am off.
drinking afternoon coffee to make brain work again. what did she mean..... i will re read
boston bean
(36,220 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)little star? she wouldnt know how.
i was going to hit reply, but then decided, not with me anyway. she is a tough woman. remembering some of her posts.
but, me....? nevah.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)you should see me giving the eye. fuck it. but, i am really not seeing it getting any less. thinking more. at the blatant audacity.
Warpy
(111,222 posts)It's restful, if nothing else.
I think this flirtatious female is going to be turning off a hell of a lot of women. I don't think any of us are going to be particularly amused by the flirtatiousness and we all know she's going to be a glorified phone tree without press "O" for a real live person.
It's like the Apple invention, Suri, who didn't know where any women's health services were but could point you to any Viagra dispensing pharmacy in the world. Geeks who come up with this stuff seem to think all women are invisible, under house arrest, living in purdah.
Nay
(12,051 posts)men always having to give me the lookover. I got so effin' sick of it. I feel like I finally crawled out from under a load of sewage.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i really thought i was just "enlightened" or something, one with my authentic self, . but noooooo, lol. sounding like as we get older (and it hit me oh, late 20's, but 30's was enough!) more women see and and recognize it for what it is. when we talk on GD too many women come in and say it is a compliment. then it gets confusing, but to hear the women in here speak out, it tells me something else.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)attractive, that attractiveness was a burden.
For me, yeah, I may not have been beautiful but I could hold my own with the best of them. When I was young that felt kinda nice. But it didn't take long to fine out there would always be another more buxomly, more shapely, prettier hair, nicer clothes, etc. What the hell was I into some kind of friggin contest?
It was a horrible way to live, so I stopped giving a shit. I started caring more about who I was in my heart, mind and actions. Hell it took a while to learn this new way of thinking of myself and becoming more of that than the old shallow pretty shell life I had led. But I've come a long way baby!
And at age 65 now I am so grateful to finally be out of every aspect of the beauty competition just so men could like my looks. I still look and dress ok but I do that more so as not to embarrass my poor kids and grand kids, lol. Cause personally, I no longer give a shit for myself.
My husband liked me fine and I still get an occasional look-ie from others. It's nice I guess, but it matters not a wit in reality for me.
The more invisible I become, as each year passes, the more I like my life style and me. Life's sure funny, it ain't so bad getting older in some ways!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)I wonder how many of us have read Reviving Ophelia. Or seen Miss Representation. Both of these works, and many others I'm sure, document the harm done to girls as they enter adolescence in a society which tells them that their appearance belongs to the public. That it is their most important characteristic. We see the harm done to these girls and too many of us see it as inevitable, but it is within our power to change it. First, we have to make people aware.
It is bittersweet to me to see these stories of the rediscovery of the genuine self... the loss of that burden of being a member of The Sex Class, that is shared by so many.
It should not be this way. We deserve to live our entire lives as ourselves, for ourselves.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)to the public." This is the most harmful, demeaning, ugly thing foisted upon girls before they even can know what's being done to them.
Remember the asshole men who took it upon themselves to tell you, a complete stranger on the street, to "smile"? As if your face was only around to decorate his fucking space? All just to be "friendly," of course. He didn't MEAN anything by it! Why are you so sensitive??
Arrgh, don't get me started. I could spew for hours.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)I think I'll do that OP from home later on. It needs to be said.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)that's not really human interaction.
This product likely has a different target market than airports.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)People want more human interaction... so their brilliant answer is a computerized human?
Fail.
Human simulator is not human.
Ugh.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and then say... really, must this shit be EVERYWHERE, just give me the info i want. shhheeesh. he has no patience for this stuff.
MerryBlooms
(11,761 posts)Too ridiculous for words.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)boston bean
(36,220 posts)they could have paid half that to hire human beings.
WOW, what a novel idea. Hiring living breathing human beings.
Not creepy holograms, that can do anything you want... YUCK.
I can see myself now, saying Repeat, What, Help, Customer Service, Customer Service. You know like on those stupid vm answering option thingies where you can never reach a live person.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)boston bean
(36,220 posts)"that is not a valid option" and the call is disconnected.
Talk about pissing me off when that happens!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)boston bean
(36,220 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,761 posts)Exactly.
I get the feeling we're being encouraged to become more anti social by the year.
boston bean
(36,220 posts)I won't use them out of principle.
If I do, I feel I am costing someone a job.
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)Broderick
(4,578 posts)Just saying. Sigh though on the whole thing.
Broderick
(4,578 posts)"advertise your products"
"promote your business"
Just another advertising gimmick and ploy. Why the port authority paid to let someone advertise their product is beyond me. Seems the company should be paying to advertise.
Sex sells I guess. Likely some "man" thought it wise to pay 180K in taxpayer monies to have these "things" there.