Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:24 AM
BlancheSplanchnik (19,952 posts)
check this post, please. comment #5
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025987691#post11
I'll wait to alert. Unless someone else alerts first. But he deserves some more schooling.
|
13 replies, 2907 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
BlancheSplanchnik | Dec 2014 | OP |
Cooley Hurd | Dec 2014 | #1 | |
Tuesday Afternoon | Dec 2014 | #3 | |
Cooley Hurd | Dec 2014 | #7 | |
Tuesday Afternoon | Dec 2014 | #9 | |
hlthe2b | Dec 2014 | #4 | |
Feral Child | Dec 2014 | #5 | |
Cooley Hurd | Dec 2014 | #8 | |
Feral Child | Dec 2014 | #11 | |
juxtaposed | Dec 2014 | #2 | |
hlthe2b | Dec 2014 | #6 | |
F4lconF16 | Dec 2014 | #10 | |
seabeyond | Dec 2014 | #12 | |
BlancheSplanchnik | Dec 2014 | #13 |
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Original post)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:26 AM
Cooley Hurd (26,877 posts)
1. Alerted...
That was effed up and it needs to be pulled.
|
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:32 AM
Tuesday Afternoon (56,912 posts)
3. please post results when you get them,thanks.
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #3)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:16 AM
Cooley Hurd (26,877 posts)
7. Here it is (6-1 to hide):
On Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:25 AM you sent an alert on the following post: Look closely. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5987776 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. YOUR COMMENTS self explanatory JURY RESULTS A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Dec 21, 2014, 07:35 AM, and voted 6-1 to HIDE IT. Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Mixed feelings on this one...the poster probably thought they were being funny or clever when in fact they looked stupid...But not willing to hide for being stupid. Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Jeebus Christ....did you take a wrong turn at DI and end up here? Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Over the top and around the bend. The stuff banning is woven from. MIRT? Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: "What sensible human being would want to rape"???? I presume the person who wrote this thinks rapists pick their targets based on some sexual attraction; and are "sensible"? Seriously? I guess that explains rape as a weapon of war, as a weapon of torture as reported in the torture report, prison rape? What kind of person even thinks something like that? Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: Rape is not a matter of sensibility. this is a really horrid post. Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: "Want to rape"? As if someone wanting to rape a woman is bestowing some sort of honor? Thank you. |
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #7)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:23 AM
Tuesday Afternoon (56,912 posts)
9. thank you.
#1 yes, STUPID should be hidden because DU is not a STUPID message board. Raise the level of discussion, please. Stupid, short-sighted, greedy people is a lot of the reason why this country/nation/world is in the shape it is in. Do us all a favor and hide STUPID.
|
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:32 AM
hlthe2b (83,392 posts)
4. As did I...
Hopefully, lots did
|
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:33 AM
Feral Child (2,086 posts)
5. I must have tied you because mine was
accepted, too. Usually they'll reject 2nd Alerts with the comment that someone else already filed.
I detest Coulter for her politics, but I wouldn't think about commenting on her looks or sex-appeal. That's puerile as well as sexist. EDIT: apparently there was a long line of alerts. Offensive to many people. EDIT2: just got the notice, already alerted. |
Response to Feral Child (Reply #5)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:17 AM
Cooley Hurd (26,877 posts)
8. It was a very shitty post...
Glad it was hidden!
![]() |
Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #8)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:53 AM
Feral Child (2,086 posts)
11. Indeed. n/t
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Original post)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:31 AM
juxtaposed (2,778 posts)
2. ditto
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Original post)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 09:39 AM
hlthe2b (83,392 posts)
6. A 6-1 hide, but no actual jury comments as my alert was a dupe
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Original post)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:46 AM
F4lconF16 (3,747 posts)
10. Some hides need to contribute towards eventual banning, imo.
Bigoted posts like that need to be on a two or three strike basis. One comment puts you on probation for a long period of time, two/three in that period gets you banned after a review from MIRT. There should be little tolerance of bigotry. I understand saying something stupid once in a while, so not all hides should be used for this, but bigotry is not something that should go off the record easily. It contributes to a lot of nastiness on this site.
|
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Original post)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 12:40 PM
seabeyond (110,159 posts)
12. a poster that is anti choice, uses the old, she is not fuckable enough to be raped.
yea
|
Response to seabeyond (Reply #12)
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 04:18 PM
BlancheSplanchnik (19,952 posts)
13. I had a look at his profile too.
Smart, accomplished guy.....
Yet, he's functioning at this level? ![]() |