Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:00 AM Jun 2016

Attacking Elizabeth Warren? Political Reporters Will Grant You Anonymity


http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/37598-attacking-elizabeth-warren-political-reporters-will-grant-you-anonymity

The fast rise of Sen. Elizabeth Warren within the Democratic Party has coincided with another phenomenon: the continual use by elite-media journalists of anonymous sources in articles that either criticize Warren directly or warn other politicians about the dangers of embracing her, her political style and the policies she advocates.

That journalistic trend manifested itself most recently on Monday, in a piece by Ben White in Politico that quoted fully five anonymous sources — including “one top Democratic donor,” “one moderate Washington Democrat” and “one prominent hedge fund manager” — to the effect that Hillary Clinton would be making a major misstep by selecting Warren as her running mate. Warren is an expert in bankruptcy and predatory lending and a leading critic of the financial industry.

Is the “top Democratic donor” Politico quoted a self-interested executive at Citigroup or Goldman Sachs fearful that Warren would influence policy decisions? We’ll never know. Journalists in this way let powerful individuals take potshots without any fear of accountability and without the reader being able to discern what conflicts of interest might be involved.

And when it comes to Warren in particular, pretty much any “administration official” or “political strategist” interested in advancing a narrative gets the anonymous treatment. The Intercept in short order compiled a list of 15 other articles and political newsletters over the last few years of the anonymously sourced, anti-Warren genre. Not surprisingly, given its institutional affinity for establishment sources and contempt for political idealism, Politico was the worst single offender, its reporter Ben White in particular:
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attacking Elizabeth Warren? Political Reporters Will Grant You Anonymity (Original Post) eridani Jun 2016 OP
We must bust up the oligarchies. The media/propaganda machine needs a major overhaul. Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #1
So Warren stood up for Hillary but where is the reciprocity elaristotle Jul 2016 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2016 #3

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
1. We must bust up the oligarchies. The media/propaganda machine needs a major overhaul.
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 08:58 AM
Jun 2016

It is one of the biggest threats to our Democracy right behind legal campaign bribes (contributions)! We have allowed so much consolidation that many industries have monopolies such as cable TV in certain areas, health care, and insurance to name a few.

elaristotle

(26 posts)
2. So Warren stood up for Hillary but where is the reciprocity
Wed Jul 6, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jul 2016

Corporate special interests are trying to push Hillary away from Warren, but Elizabeth is the best voice against Trump. Hillary better wise up.

Response to eridani (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Elizabeth Warren»Attacking Elizabeth Warre...