Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
Thu Dec 1, 2016, 12:05 PM Dec 2016

John Goodman was terrifyingly perfect in 10 Cloverfield Lane...

He deserves an Oscar nomination.

The actor played a very human monster in one of the year’s best supporting performances.

From Vox, by Todd VanDerWerff


If you haven't seen 10 Cloverfield Lane - I didn't because reviewers kept saying it was nothing like the original 'found-footage' Godzilla-like monster movie Cloverfield - I was shocked at how good a movie this is after showing up on premium cable, and how there are still wonderful surprises at the end!


John Goodman as 'Godzilla.'



*spoiled at* http://www.vox.com/culture/2016/12/1/13773792/john-goodman-oscar-10-cloverfield-lane

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Goodman was terrifyingly perfect in 10 Cloverfield Lane... (Original Post) yallerdawg Dec 2016 OP
Goodman pressbox69 Dec 2016 #1
Yes he was! yallerdawg Dec 2016 #2
Loooooovved 10 Cloverfield Lane. Goodman & M.E. Winstead were both perfect in their roles. SuprstitionAintthWay Oct 2018 #3
He was good in Red State too TexasBushwhacker Oct 2018 #4
3. Loooooovved 10 Cloverfield Lane. Goodman & M.E. Winstead were both perfect in their roles.
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 11:38 PM
Oct 2018

I love movies that make me want to go back and immediately re-watch them, to see exactly what so-and-so said when, and figure out, did they really structure this movie as intricately and well as it seems? Which, the makers of this one did. After marveling at and admiring (or hating, your choice... I marvelled and admired) the late-story plot developments, unexpected questions resulted which I wanted to find good answers to. Questions mostly about Goodman's character... particularly what was he thinking at points x and y and z? What specifically was going on with him throughout... and even before the story we saw started?

This was a hard movie to afterwards convince other people to see, because to tell them much about what they're in for, ...well, you can't really, without spoiling it for them.

I'd seen Room around that time, too. Both are great, but this slightly kindred girl-in-a-very-tough-spot film is so much more enjoyable.

Btw, in the bluray special features there's a quick glimpse of a schematic of the bunker, with even the year noted for when Goodman's character made each addition to it. This was helpful in my minor obsession to figure out his history as specifically as I could.

But don't let all this post-viewing puzzling out of story details put you off it, you can enjoy it greatly without all the revisiting of it that I did.

But I do love a smart movie that engages and also challenges me.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,116 posts)
4. He was good in Red State too
Wed Oct 10, 2018, 09:22 PM
Oct 2018

And in Damages. It doesn't really surprise me though. I think comedy is a lot harder than drama when it comes to acting.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Movies»John Goodman was terrifyi...