Paul Krugman Un-ironically Anoints Himself Arbiter of “Seriousness”:Only Clinton Supporters Eligible
For years, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman has repeatedly complained about the DC orthodoxy-enforcing tactic of labelling only those who subscribe to Washington pieties as Very Serious People, or VSPs. Its a term Krugman borrowed (with credit) from the liberal blogger Atrios, who first coined it to illustrate how Iraq War opponents were instantly marginalized in establishment discourse and only war advocates are deemed to be Serious. Krugman mockingly uses it so often that The New York Times created a special tag for the term. The primary purpose of the VSP tactic is to malign anyone who dissents from DC establishment pieties as non-Serious or un-Serious, thus demeaning them as someone who can (and should) be ignored as residing on the fringe, unworthy of engagement or a real platform regardless of the merits of their position.
Yesterday, one of the purest and most noxious examples of this tactic was invoked by Paul Krugman. The long-time Clinton defender announced that all Serious policy experts lean Hillary; he even used the term serious unironically to advance his claim:
Meanwhile, the Sanders skepticism of the wonks continues: Paul Starr lays out the case. As far as I can tell, every serious progressive policy expert on either health care or financial reform who has weighed in on the primary seems to lean Hillary.
Lets repeat that:
every serious progressive policy expert on either health care or financial reform who has weighed in on the primary seems to lean Hillary.
The economist Dean Baker previously cited as a financial reform and economic policy expert by Krugman but who now most assuredly does not lean Hillary quickly reacted to his formal exclusion by Krugman from the Club of Seriousness:
Paul Krugman Revokes Credentials of Those Who Dont Support Clinton . . .
Oh well, so much for those of us backing or leaning towards Sanders. I guess we just have to turn to that old Washington saying, better right than expert. In other words, its better to rely on people who have a track record of being right than the people who have the best credentials.
more
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/28/paul-krugman-unironically-anoints-himself-arbiter-of-seriousness-only-clinton-supporters-eligible/