Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DetroitSocialist83

(169 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:41 AM Apr 2016

So can we all remember to support Senator Merkley

In his next election or for higher office? I feel like his endorsement of Bernie and progressive agenda has not gotten enough attention. I feel like he is guy we all need to take a good look at for the future.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So can we all remember to support Senator Merkley (Original Post) DetroitSocialist83 Apr 2016 OP
You bet Old Codger Apr 2016 #1
We need to take a *good* look: Donkees Apr 2016 #2
In that interview he did say that he stands with Bernie, will do all he can to help Bernie win. jillan Apr 2016 #4
Do you know Jeff? Pastiche423 May 2016 #6
He's my senator too, and I like him. potone May 2016 #8
LNG Pastiche423 May 2016 #9
Ow... malokvale77 May 2016 #7
I wrote an email to thank him. Biaviians Apr 2016 #3
Every State [Contest] CobaltBlue Apr 2016 #5

Donkees

(31,504 posts)
2. We need to take a *good* look:
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:39 AM
Apr 2016
Bernie Sanders' lone supporter in the Senate said Thursday that the Vermont senator should end his presidential campaign if he's losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.

In an interview with CNN, Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley argued that the party should be united heading into the July convention. And that if Sanders has no viable path to the nomination after the final round of primaries in June, he should concede to Clinton at that point. He said that Sanders should follow the model employed by Clinton in 2008, who dropped out in June of that year and pledged her support to Barack Obama.


Rep. Raul Grijalva, the liberal Arizona Democrat who backs Sanders, said in an interview Thursday, "I want him to go to the convention. ... I think he needs a prominent place at the convention to talk."
Similarly, Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, another Sanders backer, said "there is a lot to be gained" by taking the fight to the convention by giving the self-proclaimed Democratic socialist a chance to influence the party's agenda.
"I think the party is going to unify in any case," Ellison said.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
4. In that interview he did say that he stands with Bernie, will do all he can to help Bernie win.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:12 AM
Apr 2016

He's still in it until the primaries are over.

He stops short of the convention tho, unlike Grijalva.

Pastiche423

(15,406 posts)
6. Do you know Jeff?
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:10 PM
May 2016

He's been my senator for the last six years and has been a great disappointment. Do not trust him to be consistent.

Why would he endorse Bernie, then turn around and say only until after the primaries?

He lied to me and others that were in attendance about a regional issue. He caught my wrath then and I doubt he will ever be back in good graces again.

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
5. Every State [Contest]
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:33 AM
Apr 2016

I think Bernie Sanders wants to—and should—play out the map.

Not counting American Samoa, Democrats Abroad, Guam, et al., between the 50 states plus District of Columbia he will probably carry between 18 and 22…while Hillary Clinton ends up carrying between 28 and 32.

It is the fine details—the entrance and exit polls—that are compelling. They both carried in ways like Republicans and Democrats in a general election. For example, in close states she carried counties like a Democrat while he carried like a Republican. But, when it comes to the four voting-age groups—17–/18–29; 30–44; 45–64; 65+—she carried the two oldest age groups (which was the case, nationally, with 2012 losing Republican Mitt Romney) while he carried like a Democrat (2012 re-elected Democrat Barack Obama) with the two youngest age groups.

The thing is…a lot of this turned out to be numbers crunching. When she eked out wins in states by bare margins, it was because the combined size of the vote from the two oldest age groups was greater—essentially 3-to-2. But, it also has had to do with specifics—opened vs. closed.

I am not the least bit concerned about the primaries. I look over to the Republicans—and Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are such a turnoff even in their own party (like with white women) that people are able to tell they are losers.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»So can we all remember to...