Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:23 PM May 2016

It’s Happening: Democratic Party Officials to Vote on Eliminating Superdelegates

Maine Democrats are taking the first step towards eliminating the massively unpopular superdelegates at this weekend’s state convention with a move that could result in an all-out brawl between the Clinton and Sanders presidential campaigns, according to Bangor Daily News.

Portland state Representative Diane Russell has introduced an amendment that would require superdelegates to be distributed in proportion to the state’s caucus results. As of now, superdelegates are permitted to go against the will of their voters and allot their points to whomever they please.

This proposal comes in the wake of public outcry after Sanders received nearly double the votes of Hillary Clinton in the state’s caucus (64%-35%), but only 1 of the 5 available superdelegates. Clinton has secured three of the other Maine superdelegate endorsements, with one still remaining undeclared.

“If you’re representing the state of Maine as a superdelegate, you should be going the way of the voters,” said National Committeeman Troy Jackson, the only Maine superdelegate to vote for Sanders. “The voters of the Democratic Party told us very much who they wanted.”

Rep. Russell agrees. “We have a system of government where you have one person, one vote, by and large,” she said. “The primary system is not when that happens. And I think that we need to start moving toward a system that’s more fair, that’s more democratic, and more reflective of the popular vote.”


While this amendment will include a “strong suggestion” that this year’s superdelegates vote in accordance with the caucus results, it won’t become binding until 2020.

Russell hasn’t officially said that she supports an immediate change “because it could put Maine out of compliance with rules set by the Democratic National Committee.”

However, the passage of this amendment could be enough to spark a floor fight between supporters of Sanders and Clinton in a contested national convention. Ironically, Clinton’s maligned superdelegate support may soon prove to become her greatest political vulnerability.

The vote on Russell’s amendment will occur this weekend.

http://usuncut.com/news/maine-dem-superdelegates/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It’s Happening: Democratic Party Officials to Vote on Eliminating Superdelegates (Original Post) Playinghardball May 2016 OP
Yep. I edited my Sea Changes in U.S. Politics post today to include that. merrily May 2016 #1
Hi Gorgeous Playinghardball May 2016 #3
Hi. LOL! How do you know I'm gorgeous? merrily May 2016 #4
I have my sources... Playinghardball May 2016 #5
There was probably a good reason they never mentioned that I was 22, though merrily May 2016 #6
I might have misunderstood them... Playinghardball May 2016 #9
You sure they didn't say 34 and you heard 22? It could happen. merrily May 2016 #10
Maybe... Playinghardball May 2016 #11
Super delegates no longer needed to suppress grassroots activists. HooptieWagon May 2016 #2
"Grass roots activists" is code for liberal. merrily May 2016 #7
It's a start Bob41213 May 2016 #8
Logged in just to Rec. and OH SNAP this. TalkingDog May 2016 #12
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
3. Hi Gorgeous
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:35 PM
May 2016

How have you been?

I've managed to get three of my posts hidden by the sycophants...

How about you?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. Hi. LOL! How do you know I'm gorgeous?
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:47 PM
May 2016

You're right of course. I'm a drop dead gorgeous 22 year old.

I just wasn't sure how you knew.



No hides lately. I've had two hides here. Once because I omitted a sarcasm emote, thinking that including one would insult the intelligence of DUers and one when I told someone to fuck off because I thought it worth a hide--and I am one of his biggest fans now.

Then again, my ignore list is pretty big.

 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
5. I have my sources...
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

Yet, they didn't mention anything about you being only 22....gotta give them a talkin' to...

There are a few that I'd like to tell to fuck off..they remind me of rabid 'Old Yeller'.....LOL

merrily

(45,251 posts)
6. There was probably a good reason they never mentioned that I was 22, though
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:03 PM
May 2016

I can't imagine what it might be.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
10. You sure they didn't say 34 and you heard 22? It could happen.
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:57 PM
May 2016

Not likely, but anything's possible, or so "they" say.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
7. "Grass roots activists" is code for liberal.
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

Supposedly, McGovern was the impetus for super delegates, but the institution of super delegates did not get enough votes until Reagan. All the memes since 1972 have had to do with demonizing liberals.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»It’s Happening: Democrati...