Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumIn case we don't win the primary, be prepared:
*Note that I have been saying this for months, so they have been warned.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Bernie's criticisms give Trump more ammunition. Bernie is dragging things out, preventing Hillary from focusing her attention on Trump. Bernie is dividing the party. Bernie is the devil. And so on, ad infinitum.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)They've already been making that case in advance.
merrily
(45,251 posts)they need to wake the fuck up.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)I cannot think of any group of people whose opinion means less to me.
My mind is made up. I will be voting for the Democrat. Bernie Sanders.
Funny, when I first saw that New Democrat Coalition website, I thought it looked and read almost exactly like Americans for Prosperity. Looks like the Kochs are funding both.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)understand a lot of big things. Meaning, I will stay with him as long as he is in the party. I will be part of his coalition. If he ever decides to leave, I will cross that bridge when it gets here. I suspect it won't, now, but could be underestimating the forces at work here.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)HRC is openly inviting Bushco into the tent with us. We're supposed to be ok with that.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)It is!
That's precisely what it is.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)This primary has opened a lot of eyes. Hopefully these people won't close them soon thereafter.
djean111
(14,255 posts)I see too much in-your-face STFU and give us money and vote for the letter "D" stuff down here in Florida. And last year, before they prettied it up for the primaries, that New Democrat Coalition website was quite the eye-opener. It read so much like Americans for Prosperity, it was almost like a parody. And the membership list - senators, Representatives, governors, mayors - DINOs all. And there is a separate group for Senators in Congress, I think. "My" Senator, Bill Nelson, was on the NDC membership list, and now he is gone from the website, but still belongs. Patrick Murphy, DWS, Gwen Graham - all belong, and all vote with the GOP a lot. This is also where I got the inkling that Pelosi does arrange voting - if someone wants to vote with the GOP, but is up for election, Pelosi can determine whether there are enough votes to pass something, so someone can safely vote against it, for example. Like, for instance, Fast Track.
The Third Way has taken over; if Hillary is ever president, she will start right in on their safety-net slashing to-do list. Which, really, will be the Democratic Party's bucket list.
Hillary Clinton!!!
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)"We've got to focus on Trump!" Nevermind the supreme lack of logic, Trump is Hillary's strawman.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)By trying to elect the canadite with the best chance to win.
Actually scratch that, we are focusing on elelecting the best canadite we have seen in a long time, regardless of who else is running.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)You know that. And best candidate in a long time? That depends very much on your definition of, "best."
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Sanders is the best hope, otherwise we're just trying to turn the heat down a little, instead of taking the kettle off the stove.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Tempers are running high and it can be hard at times. Especially when they've been working hard to turn us against each other.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)But Hillary still sucks
deepestblue
(349 posts)Wherever he goes, we will go.
The democratic party has become completely corporatist over the last 40 years.
In Bernie We Trust.
President Sanders.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)for things that go wrong.
If Clinton loses there will certainly be narratives created to avoid blaming her campaign for her campaign's failure to get out votes favorable to her.
There's also no chance that if she wins the narrative will include how Sanders supporters were loyal dems who rushed over to lift her vote total.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...it's what they always do.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)The people who voted for other third party candidates? Invisible. The Dems who crossed over to vote for W? Irrelevant. It was Nader that cost us the White House.
And no, I wasn't a Naderite. Never even crossed my mind to vote for him. I just despise the hypocrisy.
djean111
(14,255 posts)I realized it does not matter who they blame. It matters who they shoved at us as a candidate.
It never occurred to them that if some people are given a choice between two shit sandwiches, they will just leave the table and get something else entirely different. That never occurred to them. Hubris. What they have accomplished, IMO, is if Hillary is the Dem candidate, we lose and if Hillary wins the GE, we lose. The only important thing to them is that Hillary must win, and fuck what happens to people afterwards.
And, again, I don't see why I should care who they blame. They are not relevant to anything, at this point.
TBF
(32,047 posts)for their complicity. This time will be a little harder because should Hillary steal the nomination that means the superdelegates ignored all the polls that show he is the better candidate to run against Trump. They are on their own on this one.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)They would have blamed the primary opponent no matter who that opponent turned out to be.
What will never happen: blaming themselves for nominating a candidate with the highest unfavorability in 10 election cycles.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Just like Gore's loss was his own doing.
I mean, technically they are right that not enough voters voted for him, but the reason is because he could not get them too. Clinton will be the same way.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)if 1,000,000 turn up at the DWS-DNC convention to demand Bernie continue as an Independent if the convention denies Bernie the nomination. Imagine...
Bernie said, "I will do everything I can to ensure a republicon does not win the White House"
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)The simple retort is that Bernie is the stronger candidate against Trump and that the Democratic establishment should not have put their collective thumb on the scales for such a flawed candidate as Hillary Clinton.
It won't be our fault, no matter what they say,
dana_b
(11,546 posts)for nominating yet another pro war, anti environment, pro big bank/WS loving corporate/oligarch.
We have the BEST candidate in my lifetime - the most progressive/honest and pro people candidate since FDR - and they want to throw him away. It will be THEIR FAULT entirely if Trump wins the Presidency.
jillan
(39,451 posts)doubt she can carry the party. She has a 56% unfavorable rating already!
senz
(11,945 posts)on the worst candidate out there. Her huge unfavorable ratings, her high untrustworthiness, her inability to get a clean win when she had everything stacked in her favor from the get-go. Bad candidate. Can't take a principled stand on anything.
As well as her bull-headed supporters who turn away rather than look at what she is.